-ocr page 1-
-ocr page 2-
GUNPOWDER FOR INDIA.
MESSRS. JOHN HALL amp; SON,
rAVERSHAM AND LONDON,
Beg to direct the attention of Officers and Gentlemen resident in the East to the SPORTING GUNPOWDERS of their Manufacture, which have for many years enjoyed the highest reputation.
THE RIFLE GUNPOWDER,
THE GLASS GUNPOWDER,
THE BRILLIANT GLASS GUNPOWDER,
Packed In Patent Japanned Flasks.
These Powders will be found to possess the utmost Strength, Cleanness, and Quickness of Ignition.
Messrs. HALL beg to announce that in consequence of the many fradulent imitations now current in India, of the above well-known brands, they have adopted as a new design for a Trade-Mark Label, a Tiger's Head, surrounded by their Name and Address, which will for the future be attaojied to every Package of Sporting Powder sent to the East.
Periodical supplies are forwarded to the three Presidencies, and to Kurrachee for the North West Provinces; also to China, Singapore, Ceylon, and the Mauritius.
GUNPOWDER OFFICE,
70, Cannon Street.
-ocr page 3-
JHURSTON'S
Prize Medal, London, 1851. Honble. Mention, London, 1862.
Prize Medal, Sydney, 1879, quot; Pirst Award.quot;
gILLIARD
Established 1814.
By Appointment.
^ABLES.
16, CATHERINE STREET, STMB,
LONDON, W.O.
Dougalls Shootings Agency
FOE THE LETTING OF
Deerforests, Moors, amp; Partridge ShootiDgs.
Communications aa to Shootings to be addressed to
J. D. DOUGALL, Jim.,
8, BENNETT STREET (St. James's Street), LONDON,
AND
J. C. DOUGALL, 23, Gordon Street, Glasgow.
The firm of J. D. DOUGALL amp; SONS, Gun Manüpao-tubees, has Eeraoved to those commodious premises, 8, Bennett Street (St. James's Street), lately occupied by the Eaoing Club.
-ocr page 4-
f
B1BLI0THEEK UNIVERSITEIT UTRECHT
mill
2911 204 6
-ocr page 5-
%m***mj!m~'m-k^__„-:._
laquo; f
r
I
r
-ocr page 6-
-ocr page 7-
ww^
zzzmtmsmes
G1I0USE DISEASE:
ITS CAUSES AND REMEDIES.
c
c
^7
By
D. G. F. MACDONALD, C.E., LL.D., J.P., F.R.G.S.
AUTHOR OF
'WHAT THF. FARMERS MAT DO WITH THE LAND,'* quot;ESTATE MASAfiEMF.NT,'
quot; HINTS ON FARMING,quot; quot;CATTLE, SHEKP, AND CEER,quot;
quot;THE HIGHLAND CROFTERS,quot; ETC., ETC.
WITH ILLUSTRATIONS.
Scfonlr emtttm.
LONDON:
W. H. ALLEN amp; CO., 13 WATEELOO PLACE, PALL MALL, S.W.
PUBLISHERS TO THE INDIA OFFICE.
1883.
{ATI rights reserved.)
k
-ocr page 8-
#9632;#9632;#9632;#9632;I
LONDON: PRINTED BY W. H. ALLEN AMD CO., 13 WATERLOO PLACK, S.W.
-ocr page 9-
JL-m^Ji.^
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER 1.
National love of Sport.—Grouse Eauges.—Prospects of Sport. —Grouse Shooting.—Shooting in Winter.—Great Else in Shooting Eents.—Extraordinary clemaud for Moors.—Inte­resting Statistics.—Marvellous Selling-Value of Highland Estates.—Cost of Grouse to the Sportsman.—Eeuts of Moors.—Dishonourable Practices in letting Shootings.—#9632; Sport in the Olden Time.—Battue Shooting.—Views of Professor Blackie.—Wonderful Migration to the Highlands. —Sport the instinctive Exercise of a noble Attribute of Man.—The Shooting Lodge.....1
CHAPTER II.
The Eed Grouse.—Its Food.—Condition of Moors.— Evil Eesults of Old Heather.—One cause of Grouse Disease.— Evidence on Heather-Burning given before the Select Committee of the House of Commons.—Extraordinary Prejudices of Gamekeepers.—Mr. Houstouu on Heather-Burning in Caithness and Eoss.—Mismanaged Moors.— Drainage of Moorlands.—Grouse improved by new Strains of Blood.—Evils of In-and-in Breeding.—Transfer of Grouse from Place to Place.—Experience of the Prince of Wales. — Exchanging Eggs of Grouse. — Destruction of Grouse.— A growing Evil.—Fencing Moors. — Best Kind of Fence. — Effects of Cold and Wet Seasons on Grouse.........21
-ocr page 10-
IVnbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; CONTENTS.
CHAPTER III.
Another cause of Grouse Disease.—Destruction of Birds and Boasts of Prey.— Gamekeepers' Notions.—Hawks and Grouse.—Balance of Nature.—quot; The Field quot; on this Sub­ject.—Highland Keepers and Cockney Sportsmen.—Golden Eagle—Sea Eagle—Buzzard—Hen-Harrier—Peregrine— Sparrow-Hawk — Goshawk — Merlin #9632;— Kestrel — Fox.— What Mr. Frank Buckland saw. — Polecat—Marten — gtoat — Weasel — Eat.—Economy of Nature.—Evidence given before the Select Committee respecting Birds of Prey.—The Divine Organisation of Nature . . .41
CHAPTER IV.
The different Species of Grouse—Capercailzie—Black-Game— Ptarmigan—Red Grouse.—Habits and Disposition of Bed Grouse.—Many Naturalists in Error.—North American Grouse.—Variety of Colour in the Plumage of Grouse.— Scotch Grouse larger than the English.—Grouse as an Article of Food.—Opinion of the famous Chef Alexis Soyer. —The Highland Moors.—Sport last Season.—Our Predic­tions verified.—Eeturns from the Moors taken from quot; The Fieldquot; and from quot; Land and Water.quot;—Proof of good Sport.—Glut of Grouse in Leadenhall Market.—quot; Away to the Grouso,quot; from quot; Pimchquot;.....91
CHAPTER Y.
Grouse Disease—Eival Theories.—- Opinions of Sportsmen, Naturalists, and Scientists.—Views of Dr. Spencer Cobbold. Critical Eemarks by Mr. William Colquhoun.—The Cob-bold Theory disputed by Dr. Eobert Farquharson. —
.
-ocr page 11-
I^i
I.,!, ! i.!_PJ!lu.-Mi
CONTENTS.
'
Opinions by Mr. J. A. Howie Brown.—Letter from Mr. Colqulioun to Dr. Macdonald.—Opinions of the Earl of Morton—General Macdonald—Major J. Murray Kennedy Colonel J. S. Stirling—Dr. W. G. Dickson—Mr. T. Wat­son Greig—Mr. W. Houstoun—Mr. W. J. M'Haffie — Professor Young—Eev. Canon Tristram—Mr. Andrew Wilson—Mr. John Keast Lordnbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;.... 112
CHAPTER VI.
Dr. Macdonald's Views on the Grouse Disease in 1856.— Opinion of the North American Indians.—Paper in quot; Land and Water.quot;—Letter from Dr. Macdonald in the quot; Times.quot; Scientific Eesearch and the Practical Study of Nature.— Eeflections on the Lives of Wild Animals.—The Denizens of the Forest.—Lovers of Nature.—Deer Forests.—Dis­placement of Man for Deer.—Deer-Stalking.—Chieftain of the Corrie.—Delight even in Disappointment.—The Charms of Scotland.—The Queen and the Highlands . . 151
APPENDIX.
I
Heather-Burning on the Sutherland Estate Wild Birds' Protection Acts, 1880 and 1881 Close Time for Wild Birds Schedule of Protected Birds Close Time for Game Birds Technical Terms used by Sportsmen Form of Sportsman's Journal
PAGE
172 175 179
180 181 181 182
M
-ocr page 12-
im
VI
CONTENTS.
List of Dr; D. G. F. Macdonald's Works, with Opinions of the Press :—
quot; Cattle, Sheep, and Deer quot;
quot; Hints on Farming quot;
quot; Estate Management quot; .
quot; British Columbia and Vancouver's Island quot;
quot; quot;What the Farmers may do with the Landquot;
quot; Napoleon III., Empress Eugenie, Prince Im
perial, and the Franco-German War quot; quot; The Highland Crofters of Scotland quot; .
i iii iii
v vii
via xi
ILLUSTRATIONS.
Frontispiece
. To
face
Title.
Eed Grouse
sraquo;
p. 21
Capercailzie
••
91
Black Grouse
?j
1)5
Ptarmigan .
sraquo;
117
Grey Hen .
182
-ocr page 13-
UM
Mi
PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION.
Bokn and bred in the Highlands,—a sportsman from my youth,—with an intimate knowledge ot' grouse moors, and having necessarily associated freely with sportsmen, ornithologists, and keepers, my acquaintance with the subject of grouse disease and its causes inspires me with a lively hope that my observations may prove of service by indicating the means of remedying an evil which has long vexed the minds of owners of Highland estates, sportsmen, and others.
It is gratifying to me to find that owners and renters of moors, with whose interests and senti­ments I have been so long identified, have received this book with such favour that a Second Edition is called for.
D. G. F. M.
Lymington House,
Brighton, 1883.
gt; .
-ocr page 14-
-ocr page 15-
wsssmm*.'*
iÄ.-'L—Jl -^ .
GROUSE DISEASE.
CHAPTER I.
(A
Let others love the city,
And gaiuly show at sunny noon Give me the lonely valley,
The dewy eve and rising moon, Fair beaming and streaming
Her silver light the boughs among.
The national love of sport has made Highland shootings such an important element in the value of estates, that it is surprising moors are so generally neglected. Since grouse disease depreciates this class of property, we will dehne its cause or causes and remedies. We do not agree with those who hold that the malady is a mystery beyond solution; but, on the contrary, that moors are in many cases sacrificed by carelessness, indifference, and the unwise policy of destroying all birds and beasts of prey alike, and not burning the old heather periodically.
We are convinced that were landowners to apply the same careful attention to moors as they do to
-ocr page 16-
2nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; GROUSE DISEASE.
farms, very little would be heard of grouse disease.
The marvel is that it is not more prevalent considering
how many of the grouse ranges are mismanaged by
allowing the growth of unwholesome food for the
birds and upsetting the organization of nature, instead
of being guided by her unerring laws. The penalty
of such folly is, as a matter of course, grouse disease.
Come forth into the light of things, Let Nature be your Teacher.
We took a great deal of trouble to get trustworthy information as to the prospects of the moors for 1882, and we published the result in the Press in July. Since then the tidings as to the crop of grouse have fully confirmed our predictions ; and the gloomy fore­bodings of some discontented persons have been proved to have been greatly exaggerated. Spread over so large an area of the British Islands as the red grouse is, the reports naturally vary considerably. The accounts received by us, together with the consign­ments of birds to the South, and the Press reports, testify that on the high grounds sport has been fairly o'ood, whilst on the low-lying moors grouse were not only plentiful but in excellent condition, with few ex­ceptions,—all, in short, that the most cynical gunner could have desired. On some of the very high lands the birds were not altogether free from disease, which was more prevalent in Ayrshire, Perthshire, Inverness-shire, and Caithness. On the English and Welsh moors sport has been much above the average, and
-ocr page 17-
mm*
GROUSE SHOOTING.
far better than in 1881. A few birds were found dead, which the sportsmen attributed to indigestion.
There is hardly any kind of rural sport of which the characteristics are so picturesque as those of grouse shooting. It is at the golden time of the year, when everything in nature is so beautiful, that we seek out the heath-frequenting broods ; when the dear old straths and glens, the sweet heather air, and the birch and hazel, the ferns and ash saplings, the wild lakes and streams and foaming falls, the hills and mountains, are at their best. Truly quot; Caledonia stern and wildquot; is the Bl Dorado—the happy chosen land of the grouse shooter.
Hie away, hie away, Over bank and over brae. Where the copsewood is the greenest. Where the fountains glisten sbeenest. Where the lady fcru grows strongest. Where the morning dew lies longest. Where the blackcock sweetest sips it, Where the fairy latest trips it; Hie to haunts right seldom seen. Lovely, lonesome, cool, and green. Over bank and over brae.
Hie away ! Hie away !
Even in the depth of winter shooting has its attrac­tions. The world of nature is more open to us. Especially lovely are the lakes and meres when frost has bound the land in its iron chain, when the hills and vales are clad in snow, and the wild fowl peal forth sweet music to the whistling winds as they
1 *
-ocr page 18-
WINTER SHOOTING.
tread and break the frozen rotting reeds glittering in the clear sunlight. Verily there is a charm in winter shooting that the true sportsman feels as he pursues his quarry through the snow, under a dark blue sky or a bright moonlight night, as he sees coot, teal, and widgeon on the crystal lake, and hears over­head the call-notes of wild-fowl as they fly from mere to mere. For pleasant memories of sport give us the hills and glens and lakes and meres of bonnie Scotland, whether in summer, autumn or winter—they are ever full of interest to the sportsman and naturalist.
At times, too, the shooter falls in with whole bat­talions of wild swans, although we admit that his chances of bagging
That lovely tiling, Oaring with rosy feet its silver boat,
ai'e few and far between. They are seldom to be met with except in severe winter; but as their flight is very low they are not difficult of approach. In all animated nature there is hardly a more brilliant sight than a flight of swans, their spotless robes glistening in the clear arolden lisdit of the winter's sun. We can never forget the thrill of delight when we shot for the first time one of these magnificent creatures in the Cromarty Frith. It was a fine specimen, of nineteen pounds weight, with splendid plumage. Although we considered this as an epoch in our life we have often almost repented the destruction of so lovely a bird. The eager demand for grouse-moors, and the enor-
-ocr page 19-
BENTS OF GROUSE MOOES.
mous rents now given, are evidence of the rapid growth of the world's wealth, and that the interest taken in the feathered denizens of the hills is not uaesme. There are many examples of the marvellous increase of rents within the last forty or fifty years, as the following statement condensed from the quot; Quarterly Eeview quot; shows. In the counties of Perth, Inverness, and Ross, Highland properties have doubled in value within the last forty-five years. The shootings of Glen Urquhart were in 1836 let for one hundred pounds; they now produce a rental of about two thousand pounds. The Glen Morison moors were rented for one hundred pounds in 1835; they now bring in nearly three thousand pounds a year. The shootings attached to the Brchless Castle, as well as those of Fasnakyle, may be taken as fair examples of the rise of shooting-rents. These have increased at least twenty times in value in the course of as many years. One of the first shootings let was Monalia or Coignafeani, on which moors the river Findorn has its source. They are the property of the Mackintosh, and were first let to a Mr, Windsor at a rent of thirty pounds, with five pounds given back as a luckpenny. Some twenty years ago these shootings were let at rents varying from three hundred pounds to five hundred pounds. The Aberarder moors were on lease forty years ago at seventy pounds; the rent has been for years back, on an average, four hundred pounds. Stratherrick, for years let at an exceedingly
-ocr page 20-
6nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;GREAT GROUSE DISTRICTS.
small rental, now brings in annually about six thou­sand six hundred pounds, besides what is retained by the proprietors for their own sport. These facts may be taken as a sample of the effects resulting from the growing taste for Highland life and Highland sports. A glance at the lists of shooting quarters to be let will give some idea of the scale of prices demanded. We find Upper Killin (seventeen thousand acres) advertised at five hundred and fifty pounds; Glen-quoich, one thousand seven hundred pounds; the Macdonald estates in Skye, an aggregate.of one thou­sand two hundred and fifty pounds; Auchonachie and Cabaan, seven hundred pounds; Kinlochluichart, two thousand pounds; Kinlochewe, one thousand two hundred pounds; Upper Strathmore, and other ranges belonging to the same proprietor, one thousand and forty-seven pounds. In one list alone we count more than two hundred names of northern shooting quarters actually in occupation. It is to be remembered that these consist only of such as have come under the immediate notice of one aijent alone.
The Duke of Sutherland's extensive shootings and forests are so well known for their excellent sporting qualities that, at the time avc write, none remain to be let. The other great grouse districts in rotation after Stratherrick, south of Inverness, are Strath Nairn, Strathdearn, and Strathspey; all of which are noted for sport, and bring rents equal to any in Scot­land. In fact, shootings and deer-forests make up a
-ocr page 21-
DEMAND FOR HIGHLAND SHOOTINGS.
very considerable portion of the rent-rolls of High­land properties. They bring the highest rentals, and when put in the market they fetch large prices. And, whatever may be said to the contrary, we believe we are fully justified in considering that northern estates represent the capital which they bring at the hammer in public competition.
Fifty years ago, the very names of the greater part of these places were unheard of beyond their own immediate neighbourhood, and the game made no return whatever to the proprietor of the land. Since then rents have gone on steadily increasinff. The late Mr. Snowie, of Inverness, who was so well known in connection with Highland shootings, now repre­sented by his sons, had been in the habit for years of publishing an advertisement-sheet of places to be let. His first list was printed in 1836. It contained only eight advertisements; but the demand for moors has increased so steadily that for nearly twenty years he had printed three, sometimes four, lists each year, and circulated as many as one thousand five hundred copies annually. We are informed that the demand for shootings in the north is so great that there are hardly any now in the market, although higher and higher rents are given year after year; also, that the moors and forests are now taken so much on lease that there will be fewer to be let by the season here­after. In short, that it will soon be difficult to laquo;et any at all by the season.
-ocr page 22-
8nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;STATISTICS OF GROUSE SHOOTINGS.
We gather the following information from Mr. H. C. Fraser's interesting and useful little work on quot; The Land Statistics of the Shires of Inverness, Ross, and Cromarty.quot; The lairds of Inverness, it appears, hold three shootings in their own hands, worth seven hundred and ten pounds; and nine deei'-forests, three thousand and eighty pounds—together, three thou­sand seven hundred and ninety pounds; while the most part is divided among one hundred and fifty-two tenants, viz. one hundred and thirty-two shootings, twenty-five thousand eight hundred and ninety-five pounds; and twenty deer-forests, eleven thousand five hundred and twenty-three pounds—together, thirty-seven thousand four hundred and eighty-eight pounds: total value, forty-one thousand two hundred and seventy-eight pounds. Adding part of fishings let for the purpose, the quot; sporting rents quot; in the shire of Inverness may be estimated at forty-four thousand five hundred pounds. At the same time, twenty-two shootings unlet, at the average value of those let (one hundred and ninety-seven pounds), may be set down at four thousand three hundred and thirty-four pounds, and one deer-forest at eight hundred pounds; in round numbers, fifty thousand pounds as the annual value of shootings and allied properties in the county.
According to a return presented to the House of Commons, the fixed and floating capital engaged in the cotton trade is put down at eighty-eight million
i
-ocr page 23-
gt;
CAPITAL INVESTED IN SHOOTINGS.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;9
pounds; in the iron trade at twenty-five million three hundred thousand pounds; and in the woollen trade at twenty-two million pounds. What then is the amount of fixed and floating capital employed in the shootings and deer-forests in the Highlands? The fixed capital in the deer-forests and shootings is represented by the value of the estates. We have not correct data to fix the value of all deer-forests and shootings in the Highlands, hut we have the annual valuation of quot; sporting rents quot; in two counties, Inver­ness and Ross — Inverness-shire (as above), fifty thousand pounds ; Ross-shire, thirty-three thousand pounds ; at twenty -five years' purchase, this is ecpial to two million and seventy-five thousand pounds. We may estimate the floating capital—that is, the expen­diture of the sportsmen in wages, taxes, appliances, amp;c.—at about one-half of the rent, at five years' purchase, equal to two hundred and seven thousand five hundred pounds, making about two million two hundred and eighty thousand pounds in these two counties alone. Takina: the remaining Hisrhland counties, Caithness, Sutherland, Argyle, Perth, and Dumbarton, with the mountainous parts of Aberdeen, Banff, and Moray, and other districts, it will be a fair estimate to consider the annual value of the deer-forests, shootings, and fishings, let for sporting purposes in the Highlands, equivalent to the profits of twelve million four hundred thousand pounds of invested capital. Although this may seem a large
-ocr page 24-
10
SPOETING RENTS.
amount, we do not consider it at all above the mark.
We have already given examples of the great rise in this species of property which fifty or sixty years ago was regarded of little value in a monetary point of view. The shootings, deer-forests, and fishings in Ross-shire now amount to thirty-three thousand six hundred and ninety-one pounds annually. The sums placed opposite each of these descriptions of property and their total value must not, however, be regarded as absolutely correct. In several instances, shootings and deer-forests are valued together, while those unlet are not returned; hut the sum of the three may be held as the beneficiary value derived by proprietors from the/era? naturcB on their estates. It must also be noticed that the fishings include river and sea-fishings rented for commercial purposes; so that a certain deduction must be made to arrive at what may be called the sporting rents, Avhich may be estimated at thirty - three thousand pounds per annum. The proprietors retain in their own posses­sion—shootings, tour hundred and thirty-five pounds; fishings, one thousand and forty-two pounds; deer-forests, three thousand six hundred and thirty-seven pounds—total, five thousand one hundred and four­teen pounds; while the main part is divided among one hundred and thirty-nine tenants, viz. eighty-seven shootings at fifteen thousand and twenty-nine pounds ; thirty-two fishings at three thousand and twenty-eight
-ocr page 25-
VALUE OF HIGHLAND ESTATES. 11
pounds; twenty deer-forests at ten thousand five hundred and twenty pounds; total, twenty-eight thou­sand five hundred and seventy-seven pounds. There are also six shootings unlet, which, at the average value of those let, amount to one thousand and forty-eight pounds. Thus then A\re have a total annual value in shootings, deer-forests, and fishings of about eighty thousand pounds, in round numbers, for Inver­ness-shire and Ross-shire alone. Mr. Winans, of Brighton, pays the largest rent—about seventeen thousand pounds per annum — and occupies more than two hundred and twenty thousand acres.
Captain Horatio Ross, the veteran sportsman of world-wide fame, stated, in the evidence he gave before the Select Committee appointed to consider the Game Laws, in reference to the increase in the selling value of Highland estates:—quot; There is the estate of Applecross, which I had a great deal to do with, for I may say that I bought it for the Duke of Leeds in 1854. I do not mean that I was the agent, for I am no lawyer; but it was by my advice and through my negotiation that it was purchased. He gave one hun­dred and thirty-five thousand pounds for that estate. There were no forests on it then, but he made the two forests of Applecross and Coulin. He died, and it Avas sold in 1860 for two hundred and thirteen thousand pounds. Now comes this most striking circumstance: one lot was purchased by Lord Hill for seventy-six thousand pounds; he laid out about
-ocr page 26-
12
SELLING VALUE OP HIGHLAND PKOPEETT.
from twelve thousand to fourteen thousand pounds on a house and some buildings, and that lot for which he gave seventy-six thousand pounds has since been sold in different lots for one hundred and ninety-one thou­sand pounds. In 1872 a third part of the estate (the whole estate having originally cost one hundred and thirty-five thousand pounds) has been sold for fifty-six thousand pounds more than was paid for the whole in 1854, and that is entirely owing to the deer-forests. I may also say that the rents on Lord Hill's part, when he bought it, were about one thousand and fifty pounds, the grazing and shootings and all; but when it was sold the other day, the one portion called Aughnashellach, the grazing rent according to the valuation roll (it being in the hands of the proprietor, the shooting rent was not put down, the proprietors only paying for the assessment upon the grazing rent), was eight hundred and thirty-five pounds. And the grazing rent of a small forest called Coulin, which adjoins it, was three hundred and forty-five pounds, that is, one thousand one hundred and eighty pounds; this rent of one thousand one hundred and eighty pounds, exclusive of the deer-forests—for this was what the grazing was leased at—sold last year for one hundred and forty thousand pounds. There was another small estate called Monar, which was bought in 1838 for sixteen thousand pounds, and it was con­verted into a deer-forest, and about two-thirds of it was sold about ten years ago for forty thousand
-ocr page 27-
ESTIMATED VALUE OF SHOOTIXGS.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 13
pounds. The estate of Harris was bought in 1831 for sixty thousand pounds, and one-half was converted into deer-forest, and that half was sold last year for one hundred and fifty-five thousand pounds. These are some of the details of the effects of deer-forests upon the selling price of the land.quot;
In this, as in all marketable commodities, the prices are regulated by the law of demand and supply. As long as there exists a class of men doomed for three-fourths of the year to sedentary occupations, but with wealth enough to enable them to enjoy the mountain air and the bracing exercise of the chase, even though many of them should be but indifferent sportsmen, so long will the pi'ice of Highland property increase and the rentals of shootings rise. At the rate of twenty-five pounds a head is now paid for deer-forests and at least a guinea a brace for grouse moors. Some sportsmen pay much higher. We find that Mr. Hall, Old Bond Street, London, has estimated the value of shootings let in Scotland last year as follows:—Aber-decnshire, thirty-thousand pounds; Argyle, twenty-five thousand pounds; Banff, six thousand five hundred pounds; Caithness, ten thousand pounds; Dumbarton, five thousand pounds; Elgin, eleven thousand pounds; Forfar, twenty thousand pounds; Inverness, one hundred thousand pounds; Kincar­dine, three thousand five hundred pounds; Nairn, #9632; one thousand five hundred pounds; Perth, eighty thousand pounds; Boss and Cromarty, sixty thou-
-ocr page 28-
14 D1SCEEDITABLE PRACTICE IN LETTING SHOOTINGS.
sand pounds ; Sutherland, twenty thousand pounds. He believes that the most valuable moors are those of Perthshire, yielding over one hundred brace of grouse to the thousand acres, and that two thousand brace is about the maximum bag in this county in one season. Aberdeenshire has, however, given the quot; biggest bao1,quot; seven thousand brace having been shot on a moor in the great o-rouse season of 1872. Inverness, Koss, Sutherland, and Caithness yielded splendid bags in many instances last season; several sportsmen having run up bags of two thousand brace and upwards.
Here we may refer to a practice which is likely to lessen the demand for shootings. We allude to the attractive advertisements which agents are in the habit of inserting in the newspapers when they have shootings to let. This is all very well when the game is abundant; but when game is scarce, it is discreditable to the proprietors, whom it reduces to the rank of huckstering shopkeepers. There are some landowners, though we are happy to say few, who delight in catching dupes, not only by alluring and specious advertisements, but by employing quot; game-coj^ers quot; to do their work of deception. In the progressive age in which we live,—but we fear progressive rather in astuteness than in morality,— circumspection in all matters in which investments are to be made seems to be imperatively required. It would be amusing, were it not really fradulent,
-ocr page 29-
i
SPORTING IN THE OLDEN TIME.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;15
to observe that comparatively grouseless moors ai'e offered to sportsmen on the condition that the number of grouse to be killed will be limited. This is an old and stale device. The number is usually put at several hundred brace more than are to be found on the ground. The object, of coarse, is to induce a belief in the minds of sportsmen that there must be, at least, as many as the number named as the limit. We have known moors where one thousand brace was the limit, where barely four hundred were on the ground. What conduct can be more reprehensible ? Factors who lend themselves to this delusion, not only bring disgrace upon themselves but upon the owners of the land. Moreover, such conduct is cal­culated to depreciate rather than enhance the value of sporting grounds. There are few things more annoying to gentlemen than to start from their shooting-boxes, to roam over wild mountains and glens in quest of grouse and to return home wearied and disappointed.
How different the sporting in the olden time, when the neighbouring lairds were wont to meet on the moors to enjoy each other's society for the season, and to decide bets of rumps and dozens, to be dis­cussed when days got short, and nights got long! There was nothing heard of grouse disease then, and sportsmen could always count on a good head of game on the hill. In our native county, Eoss-shire, pro­prietors and their friends occupied shootings, and
-ocr page 30-
16nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; GROUSE SHOOTING IN PEEFEOTION.
particularly those of Keanloch Ewe, Achnashean, Strathvaich, Leadgoun, Inchbea, Achnacluach, and Fascrinach, dispensing hospitality extensively in their bothies of a but and a ben, with the addition of a sweet-scented hay barn, that knew neither lock nor key! In the latter place, under the black rafters, which have long since gone to ashes, the varied produce of Ben Derg and Ben Cailich, and of the black linn of the romantic Broom, was annually enjoyed by large parties, who luxuriated amidst the sweet intercourse of friendship unrestrained ; and in autumn Loch Broom is truly beautiful. For a time there was a lull in deer-stalkinff, but orouse shootiner in perfection prevailed ; and it is now nearly sixty years since a very interesting bet was decided in Strathvaich, betwixt the late Sir Francis Mackenzie of Gairloch, and Mr. George Mackenzie of Allan-grange, two crack shots of uncommon pluck ; and though they only took the hill after a very late break­fast, the former killed sixty-nine, and the latter seventy-three brace of birds, showing the abundance of game in these days. The loss of the bet was a gain to a party of at least a dozen, who met at the good old town of Dingwall to celebrate the event. Such meetings, so unselfish in character, when friend vied with friend in pTOmoting manly sport and social virtue, are not now, alas ! the order of the day. To many Highland patriarchs, the very thought of having out-lived the chivalrous convivial men
,
-ocr page 31-
BATTUE SHOOTING.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 17
of those days, who so generously met to perpe­tuate friendship, makes life quot;a moral desert and a blank.quot;
The sporting element in the rising generation is, we are sorry to observe, at a rather low ebb. Professor Blackie sarcastically said of our Highland sports, that—
London brewers shoot the grouse, And lordlinamp;s shoot the deer.
quot;We fear there is some truth in the satire, for by far too many of the shooters of the present day would cut but a sorry figure if they were not led up to the game. It is indeed a sad thing to see the old English and Scottish love for the sport degenerating into the spiritless diversion of battue shooting.
Murder most foul, as in the best it is ; But this most foul, strange, and unnatural.
It is like walking into a poultry-yard and shooting tame birds in cold blood. It is quite a misnomer to call such wholesale slaughter of game quot;sport.quot; To our mind battues are the most insipid pastime imagin­able, indulged in for the vulgar ambition of topping the list of killed in the Grazctte of Fashion. Genuine sportsmen have it in their power to discourage, by their social influence, such shameful butchery, and we trust they will exercise it against one of fashion's false freaks. To blaze away at flocks of game, with a couple of loaders at one's side, is altogether
-ocr page 32-
18
THE TKUE SPORTSMAN.
unsportsmanlike, and should be more and more condemned by the lovers of true sport.
If Nature bids To kill or eat,— the life-destroying steel He edges with compassion. He, the friend And guardian, not the tyrant of whate'er Inhales the vital breeze, ne'er issues forth Breathing dismay and slaughter in the paths Where happy creatures sport.
Lockhart, in his quot; Life of Sir Walter Scott,quot; talks of a lad fresh from college, who had no other idea in his head than his gun and his pointer. But Lockhart was no sportsman. Sir Walter certainly was, and no one knew better than he did that the man who had no other idea in his head than about his gun or his pointer, was quite as unfit to be a sportsman, in the proper sense of the term, as a man of letters. What Disraeli says in quot;Lothairquot; of the Aryan race is not inapplicable to the thorough sportsman. He may be no bookworm ; it may be neither his custom nor wish quot;painfully to pore upon a book ; quot; but the want of great knowledge of books does not necessarily imply ignorance. Southey finely expresses that sentiment:—
One impulse from a vernal wood Will teach you more of man— Of moral evil and of good—
Than all the sages can. How sweet the love which Nature brings !
Man's meddling intellect Perverts the beauteous forms of things : We murder to dissect.
'
-ocr page 33-
'
ENGLISHMEN AND HIGHLAND SPORT.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;19
Well; the sportsman may not be a worshipper of nature, but he must be an ardent lover of nature. Shelley has the following beautiful lines:—
Away, away, from men and towns To the wild woods and the downs ; To the silent wilderness— Where the soul need not suppress Its rapture, lest it should not find An echo in another's mind.
Grouse-shooting1 and deer-stalking have become a passion with Englishmen who can afford the sport —a passion which vents itself very pleasingly into the coffers of Highland lairds. To them, it is indeed the Golden Age. They have no difficulty in inducing their many friends to cross the border to share in the sport and pleasures of the land of the mountain and the flood ; because Englishmen, like themselves, delight to scramble over the rugged mountain-top, and tread the flowery heathered hills and glens in search of game. They, too, delight in seeing the beauties of nature in reality, knowing that art, glorious as it is— the most beautiful and perfect pictui'e—can but faintly imitate nature. They also feel that there are few periods in the life of sportsmen more exhilarating than when they find themselves, in the freshness of the morning, on the dewy moors with dogs, guns, and gillies, ready for shooting grouse and blackcock on whirring wing.
Migration to the Highlands and the moors is more
2 *
r
-ocr page 34-
20nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; ENGLISHMEN AND HIGHLAND SPORT.
fashionable than ever, and there seems little pro­bability at present that the attraction will soon pall. The wealthy class who delight in the hills and valleys, streams, lakes, and purple heather appear year by year to augment the number. We deem grouse-shooting and deer-stalking the instinctive exercise of one of the valuable and noble attributes of man. They call into action sagacity, activity, caution ; besides patience and perseverance, endurance and strategy. Moreover, such sport is not only a healthy and in­vigorating recreation, but it affords favourable oppor­tunities for inviting friends to enjoy unceremonious hospitalities at quot; The Lodge.quot; Some of our plea-santest memories are of the convivialities at shooting-boxes, with their unostentatious liberality—
Come then where the heather bell,
Child of the highland dell, Breathes its coy fragrance o'er moorland and lea ;
Gaily the fountain sheen
Leaps from the mountain green : Come to our highland home, blithesome and free !
-ocr page 35-
-ocr page 36-
K O
a
,
-ocr page 37-
quot;^^^#9632;^-- -,-L*--— #9632; J:—,
21
CHAPTER II.
f
The red grouse is scattering
Dews from his golden wing, Gemmed with the radiance that heralds the day :
Peace in our highland vales,
Health in our mountain gales ; Who would not hie to the moorlands away ?
The red grouse, or Lagopus scoticus, is the most beautiful and most popular game-bird, and is more sought after than any of the other varieties. He certainly well deserves all the care we can bestow upon him, while his presence on our hills affords healthful and legitimate sport. Even matters of State are often hurried through, or postponed to another season, that the votaries of the trigger may enjoy for a time their favourite sport. As the 12th of August approaches Members of Parliament begin to think that grouse-shooting is paramount to all legislative questions, and betake themselves to moors to invigorate themselves after long, wearisome nights spent in debate. The comparative abundance or
-ocr page 38-
22nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; MANAGEMENT OF MOOR-LANDS.
scarcity of the heath-frequenting birds is a matter of concern, not alone to sportsmen, but to the landowner who calculates on getting a guinea a brace for all the grouse his moors will produce, and thirty pounds per stag for forest lands.
Grouse are found only on moors, as they feed almost entirely on heather and wild grass seeds, the tender tops of the heath being their chief food. Hence the necessity of moor-lands being properly managed by keeping the evergreen shrub in sound condition. It is penny wise and pound foolish not to keep moors in as sound a state as possible, espe­cially where the rearing ranges are high above the level of the sea. The principal means of effecting this is to judiciously drain the wet land and burn the old heather. Periodical heath-burning is abso­lutely essential to the well-being of grouse. Yet many gamekeepers are prejudiced against it. We are persuaded that the diminution of grouse by dis­ease is in a great measure attributable to neglecting to burn the old heath. Grouse never hatch in long-heather if they can avoid it, nor do they lie in it. Nests are rarely found in heather of more than a foot in length. When made close to rank heath, the young birds eat the decayed fibres and die of in­digestion. They are liable, also, to disease from the damp, unhealthy position when they leave the nest.
Heather of a moderate growth affords better shelter
-ocr page 39-
•W^PW^iquot;™^^- --gt;.-—---quot;—gt;
'
HEATHER-BURNING.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 23
to young broods than when old and high ; because the old is invariably bare and thin, except at the top, and the young birds are thus more exposed to cold and damp. The happiest condition in which a nest can be found is in erowinff heather of about a foot in length, and in the immediate proximity of short young heather. When the heath is rank the young birds are caged in—are unable to rove about for food, and are often found dead in their nests.
Sportsmen are apt to be misled by the fact that, when out shooting, they usually find grouse in thick cover. This is easily accounted for. Birds always run into the best shelter on the first alarm given by the distant shot. They have an instinctive dread of the gun. To secure the most favourable condition of heath for grouse it must be burnt by rotation, a certain portion everj^ year, so as to have at all times heather of good sound quality and of the stages of growth best suited for food and cover. The extent to be fired each year should, of course, be regulated by the nature and quality of the land, as regards its capability of yielding the shrub, as there is a sur­prising difference in the growth of the crop in various soils.
If the heath grows rapidly it requires to be burnt more frequently to prevent its getting rank. Where it grows slowly burning should be less frequent. Opinions differ as to the proportion that should be burnt each successive year. We think that from a
-ocr page 40-
24nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;OLD BANK HEATHER.
sixth to a tenth of the whole extent is best. In numerous cases the proportion can hardly be less than a tenth without running the risk of allowing the heather to grow so long as to be injurious to the grouse. Burning is the cheapest mode of keeping a fresh supply of young heath. But where there is danger of the fire extending beyond certain defined limits, the best way is to cut or mow patches here and there on the most sheltered and sunny slopes, where the broods can feed and lie in comfort and warmth, as damp and cold never fail to produce diarrhoea, cramp, and disease.
One of the causes, then, of grouse disease is neglecting to sufficiently burn or mow extensive patches of the old rank heather in the best feeding-grounds, so as to ensure an adequate supply of tender heath-shoots for food, and cover for protection in winter and the breeding season. Old rank heather and decayed fibres lack the nutrition requisite for the healthy condition of the grouse, and are not duly assimilated in the system of the bird ; disease of the liver results, of which they speedily die. We have often conversed with the aborigines of North America, who are excellent ornithologists, as to the cause of the disease, and they quite agree Avith our views. quot;When there is not a sufficiency of young heather for the grouse to feed upon they Avill take to other food that does not agree with them. This, of course, is a fertile source of disease.
I
-ocr page 41-
mimmamms^^Kam
HEATHEß-BÜENING BENEFICIAL TO GROUSE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;25
In the evidence given before the Select Committee appointed in 1873 to consider the Game Laws of the United Kingdom, we find that several gentlemen of position and experience have expressed their views on heather-burning. Mr. David Mundell, an exten­sive sheep farmer in Inverness-shire and Ross-shire, replies to the question—Can you give any instances where heather •burning has been beneficial to game ?
quot; Yes, plenty; the strongest instance that I can give is this: when grouse were very scarce in the Highlands, when I was young, my father burnt the heather, after coming into the county, on the hill of Knockdamph in Rhidorroch Forest, in Ross-shire.
quot; If heather be burnt, is it a fact that all the sheep in the neighbourhood rush to the burnt heather ?—Before burning his hill you would see but an old bird, or a very few, just one here and there, and most of them old cocks ; but the next year after the burning there were hundreds and hundreds of them that came from all the neighbour­hood round into that ground. We had a neighbour, a farmer, whose sheep came on to the ground, and he said he did not like his neighbour who burnt the heather, because it took away all his neighbour's sheep.
quot; So that it is a fact that not only the grouse, but all the sheep, near heather-burnt ground, rushed to it ?—Yes ; if once two or three sheep find it they bring others ; they all rush to it.
-ocr page 42-
^quot;^^^
V
26nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;EVIDENCE BEFOEE THE SELECT
quot; Are you prohibited from burning on your present farm ?—No; I am prohibited to one-seventh part, which is quite sufficient.
quot; Can you speak personally that the grouse have increased since you took your own farm ?—Yes, they have increased greatly since I took the farm. There is a very good stock of grouse.
quot; Do yon attribute that to the heather-burning ?— Quite so.
quot; Do grouse breed among long, rough heather ?— Never. I have been amongst the hills all my life, and I have never seen a bird's nest amongst the rough heather. They build in a little tuft of heather at the side, or even among the bent. No man ever saw them build in the rough heather.quot;
Mr. Thomas Purves, of Caithness and Sutherland-shire, interrogated:—
quot; What have you to say about the burning of the moors, that we hear a great deal about ?—It was principally the everlasting contention and the ever­lasting trouble about burning the moors which made me first apply to my proprietor for the shooting. Gamekeepers are generally averse to the burning of moors, and I am sorry to say their employers are too often guided by them. I may mention that thenbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; •'•
season before I took the shootings I saw a letter with the local factor from the sporting tenant stating, as a complaint, that it was of no use he and his friends coming up to shoot over my ground that
-ocr page 43-
mm
V
COMMITTEE ON HEATHER-BUKNING.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 27
season, because I and my servants had so over-burned the ground. That season there were nearly double the birds shot on that ground that were ever shot before.
quot; Did you ever know a keeper that knew anything about it, that does not wish the heather burnt when it got to a certain growth ?—T know a great many who know very little about it.
quot; Is it not in the interest of the shooting tenant that the heather should be burnt periodically, but burnt in patches ?— Yes; and it is the interest of the sheep tenant as well.
quot; If the heather is burnt in patches it suits both the shooting tenant and the sheep fanner ?—Yes.
quot; But the shepherds who are careless will burn a whole hill-side, will they not, and leave it bare ?—I should explain that we are now by Act of Parliament compelled to burn all our heather by the 26th of April, but we only get leave to the 12th of April without the consent of the proprietor, and we are very often hampered in getting it done. It is per­fectly well known to every practical man that, in the wet floes, as we call them, the flat ground cannot be burnt in one year out of ten by the 12tli of April ; 1 have often known the last day or two of the burning to be the only two clays in the whole year when we could burn. Our shepherds are always a very limited number compared to the extent of ground to be burnt; those men go out to burn with no intention of doing
-ocr page 44-
^^m^m^^^
28nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; EVIDEKCE BEFORE THE SELECT COMMITTEE.
any harm, but they must do a certain amount of work at a certain time, and they light the fires here, there, and everywhere ; one cannot control those fires; there is no power; they have to do it upon a very dry day, and instead of the sportsman giving us the assistance which he should do by his keepers, I have generally found that the keepers take no interest in the matter, but they complain against us after it is done.
quot; Is it not the case that, if a keeper knows his business, he will favour the burning of heather, pro­vided that it is burnt in patches ?—Certainly.
quot; And will give assistance in doing it ?—He ought to do it.
quot; You yourself practically, since you have had the shooting in your own hands, have had no difficulty, I presume, in burning the heather ?—I have suffered far more loss from the burning of heather than the sportsmen have; in fact, I burn extensively, and the birds have been doubled on that land since I have had the shooting. My ground being low, at the end of the season they come down in very great numbers from the higher ground to my ground.
quot; And the birds are very fond of feeding on the young shoots of heather after it is burnt, are they not ? —They eat nothing else.
quot; And if it is burnt properly, it is exactly what is in the interest of the sportsmen ?—Perfectly so.
quot; Has the quantity of game on your farm been seriously diminished since you took the shooting your-
-ocr page 45-
^^.JILJBÜ.-----L-. i'J,-*------------1
MR. HOUSTOUN ON HBATHBR-ßüRNING.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;29
self?—No; we get more birds than tliey got before, owing to the ground being properly burnt.quot;
Yet many gamekeepers object to burning the moors, even in small patches. Their repugnance must be ascribed to old prejudices and old opinions. They are sticklers for old routine, regarding any new light as an innovation of pretentious theorists, although they cannot but know that when grouse are flushed they almost invariably make for the nearest patch of young heather, the fresh tops of which con­stitute their food. Unlike ground game, they subsist upon shoots and seeds of indigenous plants, which must be young and in abundance to ensure the good condition of the birds.
Mr. W. Houstoun, of Kintradwell, Sutherlandshire, states, in his excellent brochure on quot; Heather Burn­ing,'' that quot;it is sometimes easier to find a complaint than suggest a remedy; but there are two axioms which we think must be admitted to commence with; the one is, ' That you might as well let arable land to a man, and bind him down not to crop it, as let hill grazings to a sheep farmer and prevent his burning heather ;' and the other is, ' You might as well let a shooting to a man, with a proviso that he was not to use a gun, as ask him to pay rent for ground upon which all cover and long heather had been burnt.' Nevertheless, the interests of the sporting and farming tenants are more identified than the feelings which so often exist might lead one to suppose, as there cannot
-ocr page 46-
^i^^quot;^^—
30nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;SHOOTINGS AXD GRAZINGS.
lie a doubt that a regular rotation of burning in stripes and patches is absolutely necessary for the healthy maintenance of sheep, deer, and grouse.
quot; If, then, it be admitted that judicious heather-burning is for the welfare of both parties concerned, it will at once appear plainly that the only effectual mode is for them to co-operate and each contribute a quota of expense to enable the thing to be syste­matically carried out. What are the respective pro­portions to be contributed by landlords or tenants towards this end is not our province to decide; but we may remark that, whereas of old shooting rents were very low when compared with those paid by farmers —and the latter, with perhaps a little reason if not much philosophy, considered that the sympathy and protection of the landlord should lean towards the person paying the higher rent, and whose whole capital, upon which his living depended, was invested —it now happens that shootings have risen so much in value that in very many cases they come up to or exceed the sums paid for grazings. Here, then, we have, in one particular at least, and that a very important one, the two tenants upon an equality, and having a like claim upon the even-handed justice of the proprietor. How this is to be dispensed to the satisfaction of either party, under the fast and loose system of burning generally in vogue, we leave for wiser heads to unravel; but from a long experience of its unpleasant working, during which we have not
-ocr page 47-
MODB-BÜBNINQ IN CAITHNESS AND ROSS.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 31
unfrequently stood in the place of the responsible culprit for a servant's misdeeds in over-burning, we have at the end of the day come most firmly to the conclusion that nothing short of a regular assessment upon landlord, sportsman, and farmer, to such an extent as will enable a staff of men to be put on to each hill district during the burning season, can ever prove an effectual remedy. Armed with brooms, and under proper superintendence, the duty of these extra hands would be to cui-tail and fmide the burning into strips—a certain portion being done annually.
quot; Writing from an intermediate county, it may not be invidious to mention what we believe to approach the proper system of moor-burning in Caithness and Eoss—and both, by the way, on ducal estates. In the former case the ground is burnt in rotation with the regularity of a dice-board, and is quite charming to look upon; and no less charming is it to hear that, in the latter county, a concord exists between sports­man and farmer, which the judicious factor accounts for under his short but most comprehensible rule, that ' The farmer lights the fire and the sportsman puts it out.' quot;
Looking at the many instances of mismanaged moors, we might, indeed, suppose the idea that heather possesses a mysterious indistinctive vitality prevails amongst landowners and sportsmen. It is true that the heaths, the natural herbage of this description of land, require for their growth but little
-ocr page 48-
32nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; ADVANTAGES OF BURNING WILD PLANTS.
from the hand of man. Being the food of all herbi­vorous animals in a state of nature, these plants are endowed with sufficient means of preserving the fer­tility of the soil on which they grow, but have no natural provision to meet the increased demands upon them consequent on the grazing of sheep and cattle. Heather and other wild plants possess the power of obtaining much of the nitrogen they require from atmospheric sources; at the same time they are greatly benefited by periodical burning, which supplies the roots with vegetable elements of nutrition. We have the high authority of Sir Humphrey Davy for stating that the alkalies produced from the combustion of plants tend very powerfully to promote the growth of new herbage; and that the burning of such plants as heath, furze, tough grasses, rushes, and moss, is the cheapest and best means of reducing such substances to a state of minute carbonaceous particles, at once capable of supplying food to the roots of new plants. It is an error to suppose that burning the heather covering of the land so consumes the soil and the roots that succeeding crops fail to attain perfection. The reverse is the case, Another good result is the destruction of grubs and insects.
It is well known that when we get to the watershed of Scotland, where the water begins to flow to the Atlantic on the one side, and to the German Ocean on the other, as we advance to the Atlantic the grouse shooting deteriorates. This is owing to the great
-ocr page 49-
raquo;
DRAINAGE OP GROUSE LAND.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;33
quantity of rain that falls over the western division of the country, which drowns the young birds. More­over, the hills on the west coast produce more grass than heather, so that there is a scarcity of food for grouse. The valleys and glens, too, are subject to fogs. But there are some modifying circumstances. If there be much rain, there is also much sunshine. And if the spring be wet the winter is mild, and the first signs of vegetation appear earlier than on the eastern side of the country.
Xow that grouse land is so limited and over­crowded it is capable of being greatly improved, where marshy, by drainage. When water collects in pools upon the moor, and when it is spongy from superabundant moisture, evaporation goes on rendering the air unhealthy and the soil cold. Some of the ailments of grouse disappear before the influence of drainage, which often produces as great an effect upon the atmosphere as on the soil. It clears the soil from the growth of many noxious substances which wet breeds in it. For every tissue of vegetable life is formed of innumerable vessels from the soil. Just as drainage is the corner stone of farming—the
CDnbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; O
foundation of agricultural improvement—so it is with moors, which deteriorate by superfluous moisture. The temperature of hill pasture is raised by drainage. During sudden falls of temperature, and during pro­tracted cold periods, as when the surface is under snow, the cold finds its way sooner and more com-
3
-ocr page 50-
34nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; DRAINAGE OP MOOR LANDS.
pletely through undrained than through drained land. When the temperature of the air is higher than that of the land, the moor receives more benefit from the higher temperature than undrained land, since it is more easily permeated by the air.
Many moors incapable of conversion into arable land might be much improved for sheep and grouse at little expense by drainage. When the health of this valuable stock is taken into account such meliora­tion soon repays the outlay. We know an instance in which wild heath land was increased fourfold by drainage alone. Black leg and red water are some of the fatal diseases which arise from animals grazing on peaty, swampy pastures. Surely then we may con­clude that feeding grouse in similar circumstances is one of the causes of the disease which periodically attacks them. Excess of moisture impoverishes the heath and makes it unhealthy for birds to feed upon. Surface drains should be cut with a gentle slope so as not to endanger the young grouse.
We are aware that hill-drainage has fallen into dis­repute with some shooters because they have been disappointed in the results. Why ? Because they acted upon the absurd theory that all lands can be drained alike regardless of their various qualities. Because they disregarded quot;the laws that govern the natural drainage of a country, and laid out a system utterly opposed to nature, instead of being guided by her laws. In drainage operations the great point is
.k
-ocr page 51-
m^^^m
GROUSE IMPROVED BY CEOSSING.
35
that they be well planned and efficiently executed. Nothing can be more penny wise and pound foolish than, after the opinion of an experienced engineer has been obtained, to entrust the work to ordinary labourers, by whom, ten to one, it will be bungled.
The stock of grouse might be much improved by new strains of blood. The Duke of Hamilton's ex­periments in this way proved very successful. His Grace had several brace transferred from the moors of Lancashire to the Island of Arran, which resulted in a wonderful improvement in the breed. quot;We are aware that the greatest good has been effected in various birds by crossing. Just as seeds flourish best if changed every few years, so birds and animals must be crossed now and then to maintain their vigour and full development. This is a simple law of nature which ought not to be neglected, especially in over-preserved, over-stocked moors. If not attended to animals and birds will assuredly degenerate. Size is i'educed and symptoms of delicacy of constitution become manifest, the same as in the human race, who, by intermarrying, when too closely related, weaken their physical vigour. When breeding cattle and sheep we invariably found that breeding in-and-in from stock having bad qualities resulted in ruin to our herds and flocks.
We know by long experience that with farm poultry, the introduction of new blood enhances the weight and value of the birds. The game-cock
3 *
1
-ocr page 52-
¥#9632;
86
quot; STONEHENGB ON IN-AND-IN BEBEDING.
among
domestic fowls is like the short-horn bull
among cattle, the fleet greyhound of the chase, the
blood-horse of the race-course,
and the high-bred Mr. J. H. Walsh
Spanish pointer of the kennel (quot; Stonehenge quot;), Editor of the quot; Field,quot; gives the following illustration of the evils of in-and-in breed-ino- in his admirable work on quot; British Rural Sports quot; : —quot; Great injury has often been done by breeding in-and-in for many generations of pointers. A sportsman beo-ins life by obtaining a brace which do their work to perfection, and he is the admiration and envy of all his sporting friends as long as they last, which may be perhaps five or six years. From these he breeds others, which also maintain his fame; and he expects to be able to continue this plan with the same blood for fifty, or, in some cases, sixty years. He is so wedded to it that he fears any admixture, and for two or three litters he does not require it; but at last he finds that though his puppies are easily broken to stand and back, they are small, delicate, and easily knocked up, and are mere playthings in the field. This I have known occur in several kennels of pointers, in one of which the blood had never been crossed for seventy years ; and though the boast of the owner, that they required no breaking, was founded in truth, yet they did no more than back other clogs, for they rarely found game after the first hour's work, being by that time wholly knocked up.quot;
There is no difficulty in transferring grouse from
p
-ocr page 53-
'
EXPERIMENT BY THE PRINCE OP WALES.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 37
one moor to another, as they are easily netted. The keeper has but to take correct bearings of the spot where the birds have settled and drop his net over the spot. In this way the Prince of Wales has had several brace of grouse transported from Aberdeen-shire to His Royal Highness's Sandringham estate in Norfolk. The birds reached their destination safe and sound and fought the battle of life bravely through the winter. We traversed Wolferton moor, but found the surroundings unfavourable for such birds, being nearly all either cultivated land or scrubby marsh. We expressed our views at the time that the moor is much too limited for the long flights natural to grouse, and not wild nor hilly enough for them to take to kindly and flourish. The heath itself looks all that can be desired as a habitat for grouse, but so small in extent that they wandered away and wei^e shot and trapped, much to the disgrace of the small freeholders, seeing that his Royal Highness had gone to so much trouble in making a most interesting experiment. The trial, however, was useful as proving that grouse can be removed from one place to another without regard to distance.
An easy way of improving grouse, by introducing new strains of blood, is by exchanging their eggs. W hen we had the shootings of Ferrintosh we adopted this means on the Mulbuy moor with complete suc­cess. We took the eggs from one nest and transported them to another a distance of twenty miles. Incuba-
-ocr page 54-
-
38
EXCHANGING GROUSE EGGS.
r
tion was not in the least prejudiced, and several fine strong broods were the result. Eggs selected for substitution should, of course, be removed as soon as possible, and they should be chosen of a large size, avoiding those of equal thickness at the ends, which usually contain a double yolk and become useless. Grrouse, like most wild birds, are very capricious as regards sitting, so that care must be taken not to scare them when effecting the change. A common hen ol moderate size will hatch grouse very well; but the bantam is the best hatcher and rears them in better feather. Heath-game reared in this way take well to the moors, are free from disease, and do not differ in any respect from wild-bred birds. As grouse floor their nests with a few blades of grass in cavities, at the base of heather tufts, and lay their eggs on the top, there is no difficulty whatever in getting their eggs for transfer from one Highland district to another. In olden times, when grouse had wide ranges of moor­land, the breeding went on all right; but now it is different, through the advance of agricultural reclama­tion.
A great and growing evil in the management of moors is the erection of miles upon miles of wire-fences, especially when made entirely of iron. Grouse in their flight do not always see them, and are killed in great numbers. A gentleman writing from Rox­burghshire in the quot; Field quot; of last September, states that he has known as many as seven cut to pieces out
-ocr page 55-
*
FENOIXG Ot GROUSE MOOKS.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;39
of a flock of eleven. Old birds come to know them, but young ones run against them and are killed. In some districts as much as thirty to forty per cent, of the grouse that are hatched are thus destroyed. It is suggested that on all wire-fences with wooden stakes the proprietor should place a bar of paling along the top ; and on those made entirely of iron, pieces of tin be attached to the top wire. On most hill-land a boundary-fence of some sort is indispen­sable to prevent the intrusion of sheep and cattle into deer-forests and neighbouring farms.
There are great varieties of fences: stone-dykes, turf-dykes, sheep-hurdles, post-and-raUs, wooden palings, and wire-fences. The best fence against sheep and cattle, and the most suitable on grouse-moors, is the old-fashioned stone-dyke from three to four feet high, with a cope of a foot to sixteen inches; and at intervals of six or seven feet one cope-stone of about two feet high, having a niche in which a strong-rail is placed. This kind of inclosure is the cheapest in the end, and grouse never fly against it.
As we have said, grouse feed, almost exclusively, upon the top shoots of heather, and it is best for them when young and tender. When the heath is in this favourable condition the birds are in general healthy; but when the heather is old, and affected by severe frost, or a wet season, the contrary is the case; they become weakly and diseased. We think there cannot be any doubt that there is an inseparable connection
-ocr page 56-
-to
GBOUSE IN WET SEASONS.
between healthy heather and healthy grouse. A
Scotch forester states that all along the sea-coast,
where the heather does not suffer by frost, there is no
grouse disease ; while inland, ten miles or so, beyond
where the sea exercises its influence, there the grouse
disease begins. The dissection of grouse that have
died of disease has proved that their crops contained
frost-bitten heather. We can also connect the disease
with wet seasons. The heath, like other vegetable
products does not quite ripen, particularly the small
tops on which grouse chiefly feed. The tape-worm,
so common in diseased birds, is equally the result of a
wet open season as of frosted heather. Of course,
bad hatching seasons, such as cold wet weather, have
unfavourable results, but these are unfortunately
beyond human control. We can, however, mitigate
the evil effects by drainage, and burning the heather
periodically, so as to give sound, healthy feed. We
find that excessively cold or wet seasons are succeeded
by great mortality among birds, and that grouse
suffer more in wet than in dry seasons however cold.
This was strikingly demonstrated in the wet season of
1872-73.
The tears of heaven shed o'er much Doth infinite mischief.
-ocr page 57-
#9632;
41
CHAPTER III.
. v
He prayetli best who loveth best
All creatures great and small; For the great God, wlio loveth us,
He made and loves them all.
Another cause of grouse disease is over-trapping of birds and beasts of prey, which interferes with the balance of nature. Birds of prey especially contribute to the soundness of breed by destroying the weak and sickly grouse, such as become debilitated from bad feeding, want of good water, wet, and cold. There is thus left, though a smaller, yet a stronger, hardier, and healthier stock. Surely it is not without reason that nation after nation are making laws for the pro­tection of wild birds. There must be a growing feeling of the necessity. Just as we believe that in farming birds are absolutely required to destroy weeds, grubs, and insects, so we believe birds of prey to be necessary for ensuring a well-stocked moor of healthy grouse. There can be no doubt that were the quot; Balance of
-ocr page 58-
^#9632;#9632;quot;
42
BIEDS OF PEET.
Nature quot; left to herself all would be right. The Rev.
F. 0. Morris, the Rev. Mr. Tristram, Mr. R. Gray, all
well-known naturalists, and others, are most anxious
to protect birds of prey, believing that they should
hold their place in the divine organization of nature,
and that no bird on earth would be a nuisance if man
had not interfered with them. Lord Lilford, who is
a sportsman of the first rank, believes in this balance
in nature, for his lordship said: quot; My view is, if we
allowed the hawks to increase, and take their share
of the small birds, we should get about the right
balance.quot;
But cawing rooks, and kites that swim sublime In still repeated circles, screaming loud ; The jay, the pie, and even the boding owl That hails the rising moon, have charms for me.
Whilst we think that birds of prey should be allowed to increase, we think that grouse should have im­proved conditions of existence.
Keepers, as a rule, look upon everything as vermin, except what they find in the game list, and kill off accordingly, with a quot; zeal not according to know­ledge.quot; This certainly is one of the causes of the grouse disease, and is an erroneous and ignorant practice. No doubt birds of the hawk tribe sometimes kill grouse of full vital energy; but they destroy more of the weak and sickly, and thus prevent the outbreak of epidemic. Moreover, great numbers of wounded grouse, if not destroyed by birds of prey, would live
^
-ocr page 59-
-*-
GEOUSE AND HAWKS.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 43
to real' a sickly brood, which would become diseased and succumb to the malady.
Birds and beasts of prey have become almost extinct in the Highlands. There is, however, a healthy feeling growing, that at least eagles and hawks should not be killed. The Duke of Sutherland, Mr. Cunliffe Brooks, and some others, are now preserving these birds in their extensive shooting ranges. Mr. John Colcjuhoun of Omara House, writes on 5th August: — quot; In my late correspondence about ' The Hunters' Badge ' in the * Field,' I mentioned that a golden eagle had hatched close to a shooting-lodge, where my son and his friend, the shooting tenant, saw the pair most clays they were shooting, followed by their eaglet about ten yards behind them. The old birds were evidently teaching the young one to hunt and kill prey. Soon after the sportsmen left for the winter one of the keepers trapped the old male by mistake. The widow and young one soon afterwards disappeared, but the former returned again last spring with another male, hatching in a new eyrie twenty yards off, where a second ' hopeful' is nearly ready to be taught to provide for himself.quot; Some Avell-meaning, but unwise individuals, set up the plea of cruelty to the grouse as a reason for destroying hawks. They say that it is horrible to allow poor defenceless birds to be torn to pieces by their enemies, and die a lingering death. They hardly know what they talk about. When hawks overtake their prey on the wing, they strike
t
-ocr page 60-
44
BIEDS AND BEASTS OF PEET.
them dead at once with the powerful hind-talon. It is as sudden a death as that of a pheasant shot clean. They make light of the poor hawk caught in a trap, to linger for clays and nights in indescribable torture, until it pleases the trapper to release it from agony by giving it the coup de grace when upon his periodical rounds. The spring-teeth trap is the most barbarous and cowardly of killing instruments against which the voice of humanity has been long raised.
We have two sorts of eao-les—the srolden ea^le and the sea eagle, both magnificent birds. Who has beheld their aerial evolutions without admiration and surprise, as they majestically swoop upon their quarry ! We have several kinds of hawks—the buzzard, the hen­harrier, the peregrine falcon, the sparrow-hawk, the goshawk, the merlin, and the kestrel, all filling an important place in the economy of Nature. Of beasts of prey we have but few, and they are fast dis­appearing. There is the mountain fox, the pole-cat, the marten-cat, the stoat, the weasel, and the rat, and a few others exceedingly rare. We certainly think the instrumentality of birds and beasts of prey bene­ficial, and that it is decidedly wrong to interfere with the balance of nature.
Accuse not Nature, she hath done her part ; Do thou but thine.
Our experience and observation are strongly in favour of the feathered tribes. Just as we are indebted to certain birds for their protection of cereals, roots,
-ocr page 61-
i:
FOLLY OF EXTEEJIINATIXG BIEDS.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 45
and fruits from destructive insects and blight, and of the soil from slugs and grubs, are we equally so to birds of prey for the part they take in the preservation of a healthy stock of grouse. We know that fruits, roots, and seeds are eaten by certain species of birds. The starling takes the cherries, the blackbird and the thrush the strawberries, the rook and the sparrow the wheat, the pigeon the barley and the pease, and so on; but then we ought not to overlook the fact that, if these birds were annihilated, small indeed would be the quantity of cereals, roots, or fruit that would arrive at maturity.
We know districts where quot;bird-murderquot; had been carried on to such an extent that there were scarcely any to be seen. Farmers and gardeners were, how­ever, speedily made alive to the truth that grubs and slugs, which, in the varied stages of their changeful existence, form the chief food of birds, are a hundred­fold more destructive to cereals, roots, and fruits, than our pretty plumed bipeds. We have invariably found that in farms and gardens where birds were systemati­cally shot, trapped, and destroyed by poison, and other means, a corresponding loss of produce from the ravages of insects was the result. It is in like manner detrimental to grouse-moors to exterminate birds of prey, as we shall presently show7. It is only the short­sighted who dispute their claims to toleration in return for the benefits they undoubtedly confer upon us.
Some observations on the Balance of Nature which
-ocr page 62-
46
THE quot; FIELD quot; ON THE
appealquot; in the quot; Field quot; of the 26th of August last ai-e so good, and from so high an authority, that we are tempted to reprint the article in support of our views.
It seems strange, in these days of wild birds' pro­tection by statute, to read from certain districts reports quot; of the successes during the past season of local sparrow and rook clubs. It is not as if the political bias of those who organise these societies Avas of an opposite tendency to that of persons who supported measures for the protection of wild birds in the breeding season. The views of the farmer are, as a rule, in a Conservative direction, and so are also the Acts just alluded to. Fifty years ago the fanner was even more Conservative than he now is, and yet he in those days was keen to wage war against the rook and sparrow, as the reputed natural enemies of his calling. It is almost needless to state that the researches of naturalists have long ago exposed the fallacy of supposing that either rooks or sparrows do damage to the farmer at all commensurate with one-tenth of the benefit they confer on him, by preying upon insects and caterpillars during the period when crops are not in a state to invite their attack. Prac­tical experience and experiment have proved over and over again that, in districts where certain species of birds have been exterminated, the crops have suffered to a far larger extent from the attacks of insects; and though in harvest season they may have been freer
-ocr page 63-
?
BALANCE OF NATURE.
47
from depredations of birds, the amount of produce that has been destroyed by beetle and caterpillar is much greater than any which would have been plun­dered by the birds. They lived first to protect the crops in their growth, and afterwards to eat of the fruits of their labours. The fallacy of supposing that destruction of such birds meant protection of crops, was a natural one for the bucolic mind to enter­tain in the first instance; but in the face of later recorded experiences, and of the march of education, it might have been supposed that agriculturists en masse would, in this country, have recanted their error, and have been only too glad to encourage their own protectors. And yet we read in more than one local journal of the proceedings of these clubs, the reports by their secretaries of the result of the opera­tions of slaughter during the past year, and self-gratulation on the results.
quot; The reason why the rook is looked upon with suspicion by farmers is on account of his operations on young wheat, and the ocular evidence that he digs up a certain number of young plants where at work on a field of this sort. It is naturally assumed that he is operating as a depredator. A little careful examination of the plants which he lias uprooted will show that each has been attacked by the wireworm, or by some other lame, and that these, and not the wheat plant, have been the object of the rook's search. It is evident that he selects his plants, and
-ocr page 64-
48 the quot;fieldquot; ox the balance of nature.
that he does not uproot one patch in entirety before proceeding to another part of the field. This fact alone might suggest that his motive was something different from a direct attack on the wheat itself; but if it required further confirmation it will be found in examination of the uprooted plants, and still more, if he is scared away just as he has turned up one plant, and that is at once inspected, the actual wire-worm may be found, for which the rook has been searching. Similar evidence of the benefit of the rook's operations may be found in a turnip field, especially when the turnip plant is young. The sparrow does not disclose such palpable evidences of useful work, but his value, like that of many another blessing, is best appreciated Avhen he is absent from the district, and when, in place of him, all sorts of insect pests prey upon the crops. That both rook and sparrow should, during the week or two when grain is ripening, be tempted to prey upon it, is intel­ligible ; but the cost of quot;lentingquot; a ripening corn field is very small, compared to the loss of crop which ensues when the protection of these birds is removed for the whole of the earlier part of the season. The farmer himself ayouIcI be the first to deride a sugges­tion that sheep-dogs should be exterminated because they might now and then be tempted to help them­selves to a bone, or even a joint, when the stock has been converted into mutton.
quot; One reason for the crusade against rooks and
raquo;
-ocr page 65-
#9632;P-11 -
I^-U
J|l|i mu J.lil.i
DECIMATION OP BIEDS OF PREY.
49
spaiTQ-ws being still maintained, and even revived of late, is that the wood-pigeon is really mischievous, without giving a satisfactory quid pro quo to the farmer. He will eat his own weight of food, over and over again, in a week, and will take it from the crops themselves for choice, rather than from the pests which prey upon them. It really 'pays to kill down these birds in the interests of agriculture; and the idea of a crusade against birds of some sort beino-once inaugurated, it becomes more difficult for the bucolic mind to discriminate in the matter of slauo-hter. The wood-pigeon is more of a pest than he was, because of the decimation of birds of prey, owing to game preservation. The balance of power of nature would tend to keep the wood-pigeon in due bounds; but while the same causes that protect game from feathered assailants protect also the pigeon, the latter is not annually thinned in the cause of sport, like the partridge and pheasant. He is in danger of becom­ing, to English agriculture, something like what the rabbit is to Australia. The latter animal was thoug-ht-lessly introduced, without calculation that he had not in that country to contend against the same enemies, in the shape of vermin, that he has to meet in England; hence he has overgrown his quarters, and has become an actual pestilence. Even the sparrow has become a complete pest in America and Australia; but here again the same doctrine of balance, or rather of want of balance, in nature crops up. In this
4
-ocr page 66-
50
THE BALANCE OF NATURE.
country the sparrow has his own functions to perform as a consumer of smaller animal life, and to be in turn food for carnivorous birds more powerful than himself. While the two rounds of the ladder of destruction exist on each side of him, he does more good than harm; but when he is transplanted to a new country, in which no natural provision has been made either for his sustenance or his decimation, he becomes possibly an anomaly, and then demands arti­ficial sustenance in the shape of the artificial produc­tions of agriculture. There may be insect life which requires destruction in his new home; but if it is of a different character to that which his natural instincts have impelled him to seek, it is intelligible that, with a choice of new food before him, he may unfortunately select that which he was not intended to consume. And, in addition to this, the absence of birds of prey, such as cruelly decimate his tribe in his mother country, tends to increase his numbers, and to make him still more dependent on artificial supplies of food. The partial failure of the sparrow as an agricultural ally in America and Australia should be held as evidence, not of mischief on his part in his own mother country, but rather of that general principle of the balance of nature, which man cannot safely disturb in one department without doing himself even more injury in another. If man is pre­pared completely to reorganise creation in the entire scale of the chain of destruction, he may perhaps be
-ocr page 67-
Bi
^I^S^PWWlll Jlaquo; JIH
ROOK AND SPABBOW CLUBS.
51
able to arrange it to his own satisfaction and benefit. But if he seeks to strike out one link only, or to introduce a solitary new link in a place unsuited for it, he must not be surprised if he finds in the end that his tinkering cannot compare with the organisation of Nature.quot;
Certainly not. God created every winged fowl after his kind for good purposes. Yet man, in his presumption and ignorance, persists in disturbing the balance of nature, and suffers for it. No observant man is insensible of this fact. Many useful birds are killed, not for food, but through ignorance, thought­lessness, and cruel selfishness. We should have thought that, in a country so enlightened, such bar­barous institutions as Eook and Sparrow Clubs would be impossible. Yet landowners and farmers alike seem bent on the extermination of these birds. In Nairnshire and other counties farmers rate themselves for a fund for rook destruction, and many landlords contribute to it, notwithstanding that rooks are among the best of farmers' friends. Probably the Nairnshire farmers desire to be saved from their dark friends ; but, had birds of prey been allowed to exist, rooks, pigeons, and sparrows would not be so exces­sively numerous.
The Earl of Cawdor, having been asked to contri­bute to the quot; Nairnshire Farmers' Association for the Destruction of Rooks and Pigeons,quot; writes, in the Inverness Courier, of 31st of August last, that he read
4 *
-ocr page 68-
52
LETTEE OF THE EAEL OF OAWDOB.
the report of the last meeting of the Association with astonishment and regret, and declines to encourage the destruction of the quot; Farmers Friend.quot; His lord­ship expresses his views as follows to the chairman of the Association :—
quot;Lochdhu, who presided, is a very good judge in most matters, but I must venture to say that I cannot think him a safe man to follow as a naturalist, and I fear that the farmers may have cause to repent the raid they have made against the rooks under his advice. Let them inquire of their Ross-shire neigh­bours what their experience is of a similar proceeding on their part some years ago. It would have been more satisfactory if the energetic secretary had in­sisted on the bodies of the rooks being handed to him instead of their heads; and if he had held three thousand post-mortem examinations of the crops of the birds and their contents, I should have been much surprised if he had not hurried off to Lochdhu and said that he found the birds' crops were full of wire-worms and other insects, and that grains of corn were the exception and not the ride; and that the destruction of such useful birds must be stopped at once.quot;
This is the reply of one of the most intelligent, observant men in all the North, who is, moreover, an excellent naturalist.
The attempts made to interfere with the balance of powers as arranged and sustained by Nature are,
-ocr page 69-
^RBVP^Ul JJ *.*.!
HIGHLAND GAMEKEEPEKy.
53
according to Yarrel, seldom successful. We nnhesi-tatingly say never successful. An extensive experi­ment appears to have been made in agricultural districts on the Continent, the result of which has proved that farmers do wrong in destroying rooks, jays, sparrows, and other kinds of birds. In our own country, on some very large farms in Devonshire, the proprietors determined, a few summers ago, by putting a price on the heads of rooks to test the effect of their destruction; but the issue proved disastrous to the fanners, for nearly the whole of the crops failed for three successive years, and they have since been forced to import rooks to their farms. A similar experiment was made in a northern county with like results. We predict it will be so with the Nairnshire farmers. They will have to recognise these quot; pilferers and plunderers quot; as their good friends and servants, and not as quot; rogues and vagabonds.quot; In like manner we consider hawks the sportsman's friends on account of their good services on the moors.
Highland gamekeepers are, as a rule, a respectable class of men, intelligent, trustworthy, and full of generous feelings; but they are instructed by the ignorant Cockney sportsmen that eagles and hawks commit dreadful ravages on grouse. Accordingly the keepers endeavour to exterminate them. Cockney sportsmen have but a superficial acquaintance with natural life. If they sec a single hawk about they are instantly down upon the keepers, and tell them that
4
-ocr page 70-
54
EAPTOEIAL BIRDS AND GROUSE.
tbey have neglected tlieir duty and deserve to be dis­missed. The prejudice of keepers against hawks is therefore not to be wondered at, nor that they do all they can to exterminate them. Falconers and natu­ralists detest such would-be quot; sportsmen,quot; who do not shoot for the love of sport, but for the vulgar ambition of making heavy bags by wholesale slaughter. They are simply snobs who cannot find any pleasure in studying our noble birds of prey in their true glory on the Highlands. They pride themselves in not being of those who think that birds of prey form an interesting feature of animal life and of the picturesque in nature. They see in the hawk on the mountain side, or on the cultivated plain, a mere depredator— a gloomy intruder, forgetting that raptorial birds con­tribute to the general health of the grouse stock by killing off the weak and sickly birds. An extensive landowner, and a sportsman of the first order, having been asked whether he preserved game with much care replied, quot; Yes, certainly.quot; Being asked if he preserved birds of prey, answered with considerable emphasis, quot; All eagles, peregrine falcons, merlins, and other hawks, and found them his best game­keepers, as he had plenty of game on his moors and lowlands. If a man has heath land and no grouse it is his own fault.quot;
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves.
The golden eagle (Aqulla chrysaetos) stands at the
-ocr page 71-
#9632;^^^^BPB^HF
GOLDEN EAGLE.
55
head of the list of birds of prey. It is truly a noble and majestic bird, of great beauty and muscular power. It inhabits the high northern mountains and cliffs, and although it is one of the most vigilant of the species, it is not nearly so great a grouse destroyer as is commonly supposed. Its food is fawns, blue hares, rabbits, rats, moles, weakly sheep, and fatally-struck deer, rock birds, gulls, crows, rooks, plovers, lap­wings, amp;c. It sometimes carries away young lambs from farms; but it rarely takes grouse. Eagles are of great use to sportsmen in keeping down other birds of prey. They are very valuable in deer-forests in destroying the vast numbers of mountain hares that nibble the sweetest and best grasses and plants, so essential to the health and condition of the deer. Those persons who have tried to prove that eagles are most destructive to the moors have always become involved in hopeless contradictions. To say that an eagle has been seen to bring seven full-grown grouse to the eaglets in less than four hours is incredible. We feel certain that an examination of the contents of the crops of the young eagles would disprove the statement. Eagles take a grouse occa­sionally ; but they much more than compensate in other ways for what little depredations they make upon the grouse. They do not breed so prolitically as game birds. The female lays ordinarily two eggs in the year; sometimes three, but the third is often addled. Some sentimentalists approve exterminating
-ocr page 72-
mmm
^
06
GOLDEN EAGLE.
the eagle, because they believe it tears to pieces its quarry in a cruel and barbai'ous manner, subjecting many beautiful birds to a lingering, painful death. This is a narrow and ignorant view. Eagles are by no means cruel, for they kill with a single blow of their death-dealing talons. Their strong hooked beaks are only used for ripping the carcase ; they never use them for killing their pre}'. What are the sufferings of the birds that are clutched by the king of birds compared with those
Of sufi'eriiig, sad humanity, And the afflicted ones who lie Steeped to the lips in misery, Longing, yet afraid to die ?
It measures, from the point of the beak to the ex­tremity of the talons, three feet four or five inches ; from #9632;point to point of its wings, about eight feet; and its weight is from fifteen to eighteen pounds. The male, which is much smaller, weighs only about twelve pounds. Its beak is much hooked, and is of a deep blue colour, the cere yellow; the eyes large and covered by a projecting brow ; the iris is of a bright yellow ; the general colour is a rich deep golden brown, of rather a bright rust colour at the back of the head; the quills are chocolate with white shafts ; the tail inclines to black, spotted with ash-colour. Its legs are yellow-feathered down to the toes, and are very scaly. Its claws arc large and powerful, enabling it to seize the largest game. Eagles,
4-
-ocr page 73-
mmmmmmmmm^
,
SEA EAGLE.
57
especially the golden, are exceedingly fond of the flesh of foxes and cats, consequently they are game preservers.
The sea-eagle, sometimes called the white-tailed eagle, is far more common than the golden eagle. It inhabits the hkrh rocks and cliffs that overhang the sea and our great lakes. It is a fish-loving bird, and fish is its most congenial food. It also preys on aquatic birds—gulls, guillemots, puffins, etc. In short, it kills multitudes of sea-fowl on the shores of its regular hunting-beats. At times, however, it goes far for food, when fawns, lambs, hares, rabbits, wild cats, and other animals fall victims to its hunger. It is particularly fond of salmon and trout. It takes a grouse when hard up for food; but it is a more unpleasant neighbour to the farmer than to the sportsman. It feeds on carrion of any kind, delighting in venison. It is of a very roving nature, and does not return year after year to the same spot like most of the other falconida?. It breeds in many parts of the main-land of Scotland, in the Hebrides, and in Shetland, and is more easily trapped than the golden eagle. Its young are hatched about the beginning of June, and quit the eyrie about the end of August. The evolutions of the old eagles in the air at this time are most beautiful, and their double scream is delight­ful to the lover of nature, and is heard at a great distance. The sea-eagle is not quite as large as the golden eagle ; although it measures in length about
-ocr page 74-
58
SEA EAGLE.
the same, its wings do not expand more than seven feet. Its beak is shaped like that of the golden eagle, and is of a bluish colour, irides yellow in some and bright hazel in others; strong bristly feathers hang down over its throat ; the top of the head and back of the neck are dark brown, inclining to black; the feathers on the back are light brown with dark edges ; the breast and belly are whitish with brown patches ; the tail is dark brown; the quill-feathers are dusky, the legs are yellow, and the talons black, and more circular than those of the golden eagle. It is a great destroyer of gulls, which feed a good deal upon the eggs of game-birds; but so little is natural history understood by keepers, that they are not content with shooting and trapping these eagles, but get at the eyries on the ledges of the high rocks by means of ropes, and with match and dry heath cruelly burn the poor eaglets in the nest before the tearful eyes of the horrified, distracted parents. All for grouse, which the bird of the genus Falco helps to increase by killing off the rapacious nest-plunderers, the sea-gulls, the hoodie-crow, and the magpie.
High from the summit of a craggy cliff Hung o'er the deep, such as amazing frowns On utmost Kilda's shore, whose lonely race Eesign the setting sun to Indian worlds, The royal eagle draws his vigorous young. Strong pounced, and ardent with paternal fire, Now fit to raise a kingdom of their own,
-ocr page 75-
m^^^
COMMON BUZZAED.
He drives them from the fort, the towering seat, For ages of his empire ; #9632;which in peace Unstained he holds, while many a league to sea He wings his course, and preys in distant isles.
59
The common buzzard (Buteo vulgaris) is one of the largest kinds of hawks, and exceedingly handsome. It Avas at one time plentiful all ovei- the north of Scotland, but is now becoming scarce in consequence of the war waged against it by game preservers. It is a very sluggish bird, and never chases its quarry like the true falcon. It builds its nest in old trees or upon rocks, where it watches patiently and pounces unexpectedly on its prey. Its down-edged feathers enable it to sail over the ground quite noiselessly, and thus obtain its prey unheard by its victims. It seldom soars, and is so lazy that it is glad to take a sick or wounded grouse rather than hunt the healthy. It lives a good deal on carrion, and cannot catch strong grouse or swift-winged birds of any kind. Its food mainly consists of leverets, rats, mice, shrews, moles, frogs, toads, worms, reptiles, beetles, and all kinds of insects and grubs. The buzzard is not, then, the dreadful destroyer of grouse that gamekeepers aver. Unlike many other rapacious birds it husbands eat­ables when satisfied, hiding them for a future time. When so engaged it utters a wild and melancholy note, which is not unpleasing to the ear. It is con­siderably smaller than the golden eagle, being about twenty-two inches in length, and four feet six inches
-ocr page 76-
60
HEN-HAKRIER.
in breadth. Its beak is lead-coloured, and of hooked shape. The upper feathers are dusky, and the lower pale, varied with brown. The wings are marked with bars of a darker hue, and the tail is rather grey beneath, tipped with a dusky white. The legs are of a yellow hue, and the claws black. It lays its eggs only once a year, two being the usual number; but it produces three occasionally, and rarely four. They pair in the beginning of March, and form their nests of heather, twigs, wild-grass, and wool. They are easily tamed, and have hatched broods of chickens, never eating them, even when ravenously hungry. Their great consumption of grouse is quite mythical.
The hen-harrier {Circus cyaneus) is no doubt destructive to game; but it, too, has redeeming quali­ties. It is not the sworn enemy of grouse that many keepers and sportsmen give it credit for; and its plumage is of so light a colour that the sea-gull, whose depredations are most serious as a destroyer of the eggs of game birds, is often taken for the hen­harrier.
There are few of the smaller animals that do not fall victims to this bird. Its flight is low, swift, and gliding, and very graceful. It is fond of solitude, and frequents extensive moors and glens, especially such as are covered with short brushwood and furze. Like the kestrel it has regular hunting-grounds. It makes its nest of a few slender sticks, twigs, and coarse grass, thrown loosely together under the pro-
-ocr page 77-
HEN-HARRIEK.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;61
tection of a furze-bush, and lays four or five eggs, which ai'e hatched about the middle of June. The male and female differ much in colour and afford a conspicuous illustration of the variety of plumage in birds of the same kind but of different sex. As it roosts only on the ground it falls an easy prey to the fox and cat. It is about thirty-nine inches across the winffs and about seventeen inches in length. Its bill is black; the cere and eyes yellow. The plumage of the upper part of its hody are of a bluish grey; and the back of the head, the breast, belly, and thighs, white. The male and female, however, vary much in colour, as we have said. The former is lighter and the latter darker. The middle feathers of the tail are grey, and the outer webs of the others are of the same colour, but the inner ones are marked with alternate bars of white and rust colour. The claws are black, and the legs, which are long and slender, yellow. Although it is a very rapacious bird, of great courage and strength, it seldom attacks healthy grouse and never seizes anything on the wing. It preys on young hares, rabbits, rats, and mice; lapwings, curlews, snipe, larks, small birds, water-fowl, frogs, lizards, vipers, and snakes. As many as twenty lizards have been found in the craw of a single harrier. It is quite a mistake to say that it is a great grouse destroyer.
Mr. E. T. Booth, the famous naturalist, and owner of the splendid museum of British birds in the Dyke
-ocr page 78-
62
HEN-HARBIBR.
Road, Brighton, states, in his descriptive catalogue:— quot; It is said to be very destructive to game, but my own observations would lead me to believe that it preys more on small vermin, and birds of about the size of the titlark, than on anything larger. In the summer of 1869, while walking over a moor in the east of Sutherland, I disturbed a ringtail (the female of the hen-harrier is known by this name) from her nest, which contained one young one just out of the shell, and five eggs on the point of batch-in o. As both the old birds were flying round in a state of great consternation, I sat down to watch their actions for a few minutes. On rising to leave the spot 1 discovered I had laid my gun on the back of an old grey hen, who now. got up from her nest, in which were three fresh-laid eggs, evidently showing that she herself had chosen this apparently dangerous locality for her nursery, as the harrier's nest was within six or seven paces. This is not the only instance I have met with of game and birds of prey being found in close proximity.quot;
The peregrine falcon [Falco peregrinus) is the well-known hawk that is trained for the chase, in which it holds the first place. It is very courageous, and makes its stoop with dash and fury. Its celerity of flight is almost incredible, nearly a hundred and fifty miles an hour. It will pursue for many miles at a stretch in a single chase, and hardly ever fails to secure its quarry. It never touches birds on the
L
-ocr page 79-
PEREGRIKE FALCON.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;68
ground, unlike the sparrow-hawk. At one time Scotland was celebrated for falconry; but the grand old sport has now fallen into disuse—has almost dis­appeared from amongst us. For the chase we think the peregrines should be taken from the nest before they are fully fledged, as they train better. Some sportsmen, however, prefer them when caught in full age and vigour. When full grown it is a handsome and beautiful bird, and whether it is even partially mi­gratory is still doubtful. We think that it is, and that, as a rule, it leaves this country early in autumn. It seldom soars like the eagle, and never strikes its prey near the ground. So impetuous is it in the pursuit of birds that it frequently causes its own destruction by dashing against large. trees or huge boulders. It secures its prey by sudden descent as well as by pursuit, and its cry is shrill and loud, and can easily be distinguished from that of other hawks. It builds early in the spring, usually in a crevice of a projecting rock or cliff, and lays three or four eggs, rarely more, sometimes only two. It is about the same size as the common falcon. Length from point to point of wings, forty inches, and about seventeen inches long. Its beak is blue, but black at the point; cere and hides yellow. The upper parts of the body are ash-colour, beautifully marked with bars of blue and black; under part of neck and throat white ; the quills are dusky, spotted with white; the tail is barred with blue and black. The claws
-ocr page 80-
64
PERTGRINE FALCON.
are black and the legs yellow. The hen is especially beautiful.
quot;Under the heading of 'Hawks and the Moors,' the peregrine has given rise to many discussions in the sporting papers; some writers declaring that they do but little damage on a grouse moor, being ol opinion that the few birds they take are usually the diseased and weakly, whilst others class them amongst the very worst of thieves. These discussions evi­dently being, for the most part, between falconers on the one side and game-preservers on the other, there can be but little doubt that each party takes a rather one-sided view of the case.quot;—E. T. Booth.
Its food principally consists of birds, such as sea-gulls, guillemots, plovers, curlews, ducks, land­rails, partridges, grouse, pigeons, rooks, and grey-crows. It is also fond of hares, rabbits, rats, moles, and other small quadrupeds, and at times kills cats and even dogs. Its castings have been proved, on examination, to be composed generally of the bones and feathers of gulls and other aquatic fowl; some mixed with the remains of partridges and the bones of rabbits and hares. This, we think, goes far to show that grouse is not the chief food of the peregrine, as many game-keepers assert. Moreover, it should not be forgotten that it will kill and eat kestrel and merlin and other species of hawks. In the end of November last a fine specimen of this bird was shot at Scarborough, which weighed one pound
-ocr page 81-
SPAEEOW-EAWIC.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 65
and three quarters, and measured thirty-eight inches across the wings. It was a mature male bird in excellent plumage, no doubt on its way to cross the channel.
The sparrow-hawk {Accipiter nissus) is a short-winged, active, little bird of great pluck and daring. Its courage is almost reckless, for it will fly at any bird, no matter what its size, and kills both in the air and on the ground. So strongly and precisely does it strike, that its first blow is fatal. It hunts in woods, moors, and open fields, and is partial to culti­vated districts. It seems to sail on the wing without exertion, stealthily, and swiftly, and at times it ascends and poises apjjarently motionless while on the look-out for its quarry. In this position it looks gentle and pretty; but soon it dashes with wonderful rapidity and snatches its prey. When thus disporting itself in a Highland glen the scene is grand and enchanting to every lover of nature and naturalist who may have the good fortune to behold the sight. Its food consists of birds, chiefly the smaller larks, thrushes, blackbirds, sparrows, swallows, linnets, yellow-hammers, bull-finches, pepits, and wrens; also, some that are larger—jays, pigeons, partridges, and grouse. It is likewise fond of rats, mice, moles, beetles, and grasshoppers. It does not always build its own nest; but takes possession of some deserted tenements of a crow, magpie, or other bird, it sometimes, too, makes its nest on the ledge or crevice
5
-ocr page 82-
11 '
H
^^^^^mm
60
GOS-HAWK.
of a rock. It lays from three to six eggs ; but rarely hatches so many as six. Curiously, the males and females appear to separate in winter. It is rather a small bird, the length of the male seldom exceeding ten inches, and the female fifteen inches. Its beak is blue; the eye bright orange, the legs yellow, and the claws black. A. female, which is described by Bewick, had a few scattered spots of white, which formed a faint line, running backwards towards the neck ; the top of the head and all the upper parts of the body were of a dusky brown colour; on the back part of the head there was a faint line of white; the scapulars were marked with two spots of white on each feather; the greater quill-feathers and the tail were dusky, with four bars of a darker hue on each; the inner edges of all the quills were marked with two or more large white spots ; the tips of the tail feathers were white, beautifully barred with brown; and the throat was faintly streaked with the same colour. The same author describes a male as having the upper part of his body of a dark lead colour, and the bars on his breast more numerous.
The gos-hawk (Auster palumbarius), apparently a corruption of goose-hawk, is indigenous to Scotland, especially to the central parts. Owing to the shape of its wings it is unable to take long flights, and there­fore takes more terrestrial than aerial quarry. It possesses undaunted courage and great muscular power, and in its habits generally it much resembles
'
-ocr page 83-
GOS-HAWE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 67
the spai'row-hawk. It does not stoop, but glides along straight after its prey quite close to the ground. Its food comprises hares, rabbits, rats, mice, moles, pigeons, grouse, partridges, gulls, wild ducks, snipe, lapwings, crows, rooks, magpies, blackbirds, and thrushes. But it is only when pressed by hunger that it will venture to cope with the larger birds. It rejects carrion. It is a prettier bird than the buzzard, and rather longer. Its beak is blue, tipped Avith black; the cere is yellowish green; the eyes yellow with a white line over them. Its legs are yellow, and claws black. The plumage of the head and upper parts of the body is deep brown, and each side of the neck is marked with white, which is the colour of the breast and belly, having numerous bars of black. Its nest is commonly composed of small sticks, moss, and grass, put roughly together, and it will tenant the same nest for years if undisturbed, repairing it from time to time. It produces three or four eggs, which are hatched about the middle of May, after three weeks incubation. It is from igno­rance that the gos-hawk is denounced as quot; very destructivequot; to grouse.
The merlin {Hypotrlovchis cesnlon) is the smallest amp;gt;nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; of the British falconida;, as dashing and spirited,
however, as any of the hawk tribe, and as bold as a game-cock. It is a beautiful bird, of about twelve inches in length, full of life and vivacity—as nimble as an eel, and voracious as a shark. In striking its
5 *
-ocr page 84-
#9632;
68
MERLIN.
prey it never fails to hit a vital part, so that its quarry
falls instantly. It makes its nest on the ground, in
rough land where there is abundance of boulder and
wild shrubs, and on the shelf of a cliff or rock. It
feeds on small birds, larks, starlings, linnets, snipes,
swallows, blackbirds, thrushes, and on cockchafers,
and other insects. It is said to kill full-grown
healthy grouse; but there is little authority for this
statement. Assertions of the kind are made by many
persons who, unable to distinguish one bird from
another, declare that the merlin is only a winter
visitor, although it breeds in some of our northern
counties! Its back and wing-coverts are a lovely
light blue.
The Elfin King the merlin's wing, Are liis pinions of glossy blue.
It is very like the peregrine falcon in general appearance, but not nearly its size. Its entire length is only about twelve inches, and seldom weighs more than eight ounces. Its beak is blue ; cere and iricles yellow. Its head is rust-colour streaked with black ; back and wings blue streaked with black, and edged with rust-colour. Its tail is long for its size, and is prominently marked with alternate dusky and pale bars, whilst its legs are yellow, and claws black.
quot; Immature birds of this species are frequently met with in the south, though the true home of this dash­ing little hawk is evidently in the land of the heather and mist. They are said to be very destructive to
-ocr page 85-
MERLIN.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 69
game, and as such usually pay the penalty that the possession of a bad name incurs. Whether it is that my own experience, with regard to this bird, has been too limited to form a correct judgment I am unable to say, but I hardly think that they are the desperate characters that they are generally described. Those which I have seen in the south Avere usually in pursuit of small birds, and while seeking this sort of prey they are frequently captured in the clap-nets that abound near Brighton.
quot; On the grouse moors in the north I have ex­amined the remains of the victims that they have consumed near their nests, and never found anything larger than a dunlin, which bird, with larks, pipits, and large moths (principally of the egger species), seemed to make up their bill of fare. Though frequenting most of the wild, rocky glens in the Highlands, they seem to have a partiality tor the more open moors, being particularly numerous in the flat parts of Sutherland and Caithness.quot;—E. T, Booth.
The kestrel {Tinnunculus alaudarius), or wind­hover, as it is sometimes called, is to be found in almost any part of the country. It has marvellous sight, observing the smallest mouse on the ground as it poises in the air. Field-mice are its chief food, and it is therefore most useful to farmers. Nevertheless, keepers who have a mania for game preservation will swear by all that is sacred that it is a bold destroyer of grouse and partridges. It is of the hawk species.
-ocr page 86-
—^-^^^^^^•#9632;^#9632;M
wmmmmm
70
KESTREL.
that is quite enough lor them. quot; Stonehenge,quot; one of our great authorities, says, quot; It will always prefer the mouse to any bird, and I believe rarely attacks any other prey than the mouse or the frog. It will not attack the young of the game birds, and its only fault is, that it will sometimes take the very young leveret.quot; This coincides entirely with our own experience. It sometimes changes its diet, no doubt, like all animals; but then it takes to small fish and the smaller reptiles, such as frogs, newts, amp;c. When frequenting the sea-coast it eats shrimps, small crabs, and flying-beetles. We are quite certain that it never poaches on game preserves—that it never destroys grouse. Its de­struction is exceedingly unwise, and much to be regretted, for, besides being harmless to game, it is a very pretty bird—a great ornament to the country.
quot; This is by far the most numerous of the hawk tribe in Great Britain. Though not generally so regarded, it is one of our most useful birds, being a decided ally both to the farmer and game preserver. I have been so frequently assured that kestrels have been detected preying upon young game, that 1 sup­pose some misguided old bird must, when greatly pressed by the cares of providing for a hungry brood, have snatched some precocious young pheasant from the neighbourhood of the coops, and, like many another poor bungling thief, been caught at the first attempt, while the greater rogues go free. The rats alone that these birds destroy, while procuring food
I
-ocr page 87-
i
KESTREL.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 71
for their young, would commit ten times more damage in one year than the poor inoffensive kestrels could possibly effect in their whole lives.quot;—E. T. Booth.
It forms its nest either on the ledge of a rock or on the topmost boughs of lofty trees, and constructs it of decayed branches, moss, and rough grass. It lays three or four eggs, sometimes five; but the fifth is usually small and often addled. Many naturalists maintain that the kestrel is a migratory bird. For our own part, we do not think it roves beyond the bounds of this country. At all events, the total dis­appearance of the species in winter, as alleged, is certainly disproved. It is a very remarkable bird in its general appearance, and is more like an owl than a hawk when young. Moreover, the plumage of the two sexes differs so widely as to require to be described separately. A naturalist of repute states that the male is in length fourteen inches ; breadth two feet three inches; its bill is blue ; cere and eyelids yellow; eyes black; the forehead dull yellow; the top of the head, back part of the neck, and sides, as far as the point of the wings, are of a lead colour, faintly streaked with black; the cheeks are paler ; from the corner of the mouth, on each side, there is a dark streak pointing downwards; the back and coverts of the wings are of a bright vinous colour, spotted with black ; quill-feathers dusky, with light edges; all the under part of the body is of a pale rust-colour, streaked and spotted with black; thighs plain; the tail-feathers
M\
-ocr page 88-
^^quot;
72
KESTKEL.
are of a fine blue grey, with black shafts; towards the ends there is a broad black bar, both on the upper and under sides; the tips are white; the legs are yellow, and the claws black.
The female kestrel is a beautiful bird, distinguished from every other hawk by its variegated plumage; its bill is blue; cere and feet yellow; eyes dark-coloured, surrounded with a yellow skin; behind each eye there is a bright spot; the back and wing-coverts are ele­gantly marked with numerous undulated bars of black; the In-east, belly, and thighs are of a pale reddish colour, with dusky streaks pointing down­wards ; vent plain; the tail is marked by a pretty broad black bar near the end; a number of small ones, of the same colour, occupy the remaining part; the tip is pale.
We will now make a few observations on beasts of prey called quot; vermin quot; by game-keepers. In our opinion, these animals should be fostered rather than be extirpated as so many depredators having no redeeming qualities.
The fox ( Vtdpes vulgaris) is the largest and best known of these animals. In England, and in most of the lowlands of Scotland, the fox is carefully pre­served for the pleasures of the chase; but in the Highlands, where no hounds are kept, he is systema­tically shot, and trapped, and everything done that will contribute to his extermination. So great is the prejudice against the poor fox that, but for the delight
'I
d
-ocr page 89-
^
THE FOX.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;73
taken in hunting him he would be as rare in this country as the wolf. In grouse districts he cannot ci'eep from his den without fearing to find his leg fast in a trap, and dare not eat a dead hare or rabbit lest it should be saturated with poison. His life is one round of misery, for should he be seen outside a cover, or on a moor, a charge of shot is instantly poured into him by the merciless keeper. The animal is too well known to need a minute descrip­tion. He is nocturnal in his habits, and usually issues forth to prowl for prey at the dusk of the evening. ?Je lives upon birds and other animals, hares and rabbits being his principal food. Eats, mice, frogs, weasels, amp;c., are also comprised in his bill of fare. He prefers rabbits to grouse, and bears so strong an odour that birds are often warned of his approach. This powerful odour- keeps birds away from his quot; earths,quot; as they are termed by sportsmen. In them the female fox produces and nurtures her young, of which she is exceedingly fond. When attacked by fox dogs and terriers she pluckily defends her poor little cubs and herself to the last without uttering a cry.
Mr. J. H. Walsh, Editor of the quot; Field quot; (quot; Stone-hengequot;), states, in his admirable book, quot;British Rural Sports,quot; in reference to the fox:—quot; In our present list it must appear as an enemy, although numerous and warm controversies have taken place as to its game-destroying powers. No doubt, the fox
-ocr page 90-
mm.
^
74
THE FOX.
11-
may be preserved in the same coverts with the phea­sant; and, I believe, if supplied with rabbits, he Avill not often fall upon any other game, and certainly not upon the hare, to which the rabbit is always pre­ferred; the scent of the fox is so strong that most animals are aware of his proximity, and, therefore, they are able to keep clear of him, except on rare occasions, of Avhich he does not hesitate to take ad­vantage ; the pheasant, for instance, seldom ventures within his reach; if disturbed, he has recourse to his winsrs, and does not often run into danger fast enough
Ö quot;nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;DO
to be off his guard against the scent, though he will often run down an open ride, or in the fields, where he is secure from this insidious enemy. If, however, a pheasant is wounded, he is sure to fall a prey to vulpine attacks, and so is the wounded woodcock or snipe; but this is of very little consequence, and such a poor maimed creature as a wounded bird is better out of its misery. Keepers are great enemies to the fox, and aggravate his faults, for two reasons; firstly, because he interferes with their chief perquisites, the rabbits ; and secondly, because he is the only legiti­mate scape-goat for their short-comings. If the complaint is made that there is no game, the answer is always ready, ' Why, sir, if you will preserve the foxes, you must not expect so much game.' There is no other game-destroyer that a keeper can charge with the loss, without damaging his own character, since, in proportion to the scarcity or abundance of
!
-ocr page 91-
POLE-CAT.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;75
all other vermin is his own character raised or depressed.quot;
Our good friend the late Mr. Frank Buckland, describing what he saw when visiting a Highland laird, tells us that at the head of a list of vermin destroyed on the estate were a number of foxes. In one of his interesting papers the great naturalist states:—quot; 1 told this gentleman he was quite wrong to kill these various birds and beasts, for that he was interfering with the balance of nature.quot; Few men knew better than poor Buckland that destroying these animals is an error of judgment. Whilst admitting that the fox is an enemy of the sheep farmer, by taking a lamb occasionally to feed its cubs, we deny that he prefers grouse to hare and rabbit. He never even runs after sheep, who are so accustomed to him that they take no more notice of him than of a hare. It is a curious fact that he never kills lambs near his den; but goes far afield, miles away, so that the farmer knows that when he has a litter on his land he never loses a single lamb by either the dog or vixen fox.
The pole-cat {Putorlus fcctidus) is very common in ^nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; this country, especially in the Highlands, and is a
most beautiful creature. It frequents wooded tracts, broken with crags and precipices, and likes to hide in stone heaps and dark crannies in secluded rocks. It is rather a prolific animal, producing five or six young at a time. The nursery is usually in a burrow well
-ocr page 92-
p
76
MAßTEN AND STOAT.
'
defended by roots of large trees and stones. The young ones appear about the end of May or the beginning of June. It hunts after sunset, and is a great enemy to hares and rabbits, having an almost insatiable thirst for blood. It feeds on birds, rats, mice, and squirrels. It is also very fond of fish, like the domestic cat, and eats frogs and toads in great numbers.
The marten {Martes ahieium et foina) lives very much like the pole-cat, and is the largest of the weasel family. It inhabits woods, living in the hollow of decayed trees, or in deserted birds'-nests, especially that of the magpie. It is reddish brown in colour. Unlike the pole-cat, however, it rarely eats flesh, preferring the blood and brains. It is exceedingly destructive, and a formidable enemy to all small animals and birds.
The stoat {Mustela erminea) is in shape like the weasel, but much larger and more swift of foot. Its endurance and delicacy of scent are so marvellous that it will run down a hare, although, of course, it has not the speed, by continuous pursuit. The poor hare seems to get completely paralysed, and soon resigns itself to its fate. In summer its colour is like the marten; but changes in winter to white, except at the tip of the tail. It takes to the water freely, being a gallant swimmer, and destroys vast numbers of water-rats, which are so destructive to birds' eggs. Its food consists of hares, rabbits, rats.
-ocr page 93-
WEASEL AND EAT.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;77
mice, birds, and reptiles. Young rabbits it kills in great numbers, as it penetrates their burrows without difficulty. The wild cat is its formidable enemy, keeping down its numbers.
The weasel {Mustela vulgar is) is more to be dreaded by the creatures on which it preys than any other of the Mustelina family. It is a most audacious little creature, measuring only about ten inches in length, including the tail, of two inches long. It is wonderfully courageous, and will attack almost any­thing. It fastens its sharp teeth in the back of the neck of its victim, retaining its hold until its prey is dead. It resembles the stoat in most respects, except that it has not the black brushy tip at the end of the tail. It produces four or five young at a time, and would become more than pleasantly numerous but for the cat, the eagle, and the hawk.
The rat {Mus decumanus) is the worst pest man has to contend against. He increases marvellously in numbers; and but for the cat we should be overrun by them. Fortunately for us he has many natural enemies, and is withal a cannibal, devouring the female rats, which are more tender. He is exceedingly voracious, and much of the damage done by him is often laid upon the innocent shoulders of poor reynard, stoat, and weasel. The water-rat is a variety of the common rat, and, although not web-footed, is quite at home in the water, and is thus difficult to destroy. He is very injurious to game by sucking
-ocr page 94-
t-i
78
ECONOMY OF NATURE.
eggs, and eating the young birds before they are fledged. He certainly does those things he ought not to do, and leaves undone other things. The bird preserver must kill rats, and he should always do so before the breeding season ; for the animal usually breeds three times in one year, and brings forth eight, t-welve, sometimes fourteen at a time. Game pre­servers should use every possible means to destroy rats. The best way is to encourage eagles, falcons, hawks, foxes, cats, martens, stoats, and weasels.
We have described the habits and food of these birds and beasts of pi'ey at some length, in order to expose what we conceive to be a great folly and injus­tice—destroying them without proper trial. It is like giving a dog a bad name and hanging him. Their death-warrant is signed by vulgar sportsmen, and irresponsible gamekeepers, without consideration of their useful operation in the grand economy of Nature. The trap, the gun, and poison, have hitherto #9632; formed the trinity of destruction of birds and beasts of prey, until they have almost become extinct. The notion that they are terribly injurious to game shows a pitiful ignorance of their habits and of their natural feeding tendencies, as the following evidence—given before the Select Committee, appointed in 1872, to inquire into the advisability of extending the protection of a close season to certain wild birds—clearly shows.
Lord Lilford, a most accomplished ornithologist, examined.
-ocr page 95-
f
BVIDBNOB OF LOED LILFORD.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;79
quot; From a game-preserving point of view, is there not a good deal to be said for sparing the hawk tribe? —There is a theory I know that the peregrine falcon, if left unmolested, would tend to keep down the grouse disease ; but I am very doubtful on the subject myself. I know that some people think the peregrine falcon would naturally take the weakest bird, and so keep down the likelihood of that disease. I am not prepared to say that there may not be something in that, but I think not much; yet I never allow the peregrine falcon to be killed on my own moors in Scotland.
quot; Have you anything more to say about the hawk tribes in their favour ?—-No ; they keep down birds Avhich are noxious to agriculture. The sparrow-hawk has that claim, for he destroys a great quantity of small birds, such as finches, sparrows, and so on.
quot; You think there is truth in the common expres­sion of preserving the balance of nature ?—I think so, certainly.
quot; You think it is a fair expression which sums up the case ?—Yes, I think so.
quot; Then, with regard to gamekeepers, do you find that gamekeepers, as a rule, are very cruel in the matter of birds ?—The keepers think that everything but same is to be murdered. I remember once seeino-five green woodpeckers, about the most harmless birds we have, hanging up among magpies, hawks, and jays.
-ocr page 96-
m
80
BVIDEXCE OF LORD LILFOED.
-
quot; Keepers would kill every raven, would they not ? —Yes.
quot; And they would kill every jay?—Yes.
quot; And every magpie ?—Yes.
quot; And the keeper would kill every hawk, would he not ?—Yes, if he were left to himself.
quot; Are you a game preserver ?—Yes.
quot; Do you stop your keeper from killing those birds?—Yes, everything; I have not sxicceeded altogether, I fear, but in Scotland I insist on their preserving eagles ; I will not have an eagle killed, or a peregrine falcon, or a merlin.
quot; Do you think that your sport is interfered with materially by your doing so ?—There is not the least interference in the world with the sport. I do not mean that we kill quite so many grouse as we should if the peregrine falcons were killed, because they do kill grouse, no doubt; I do not want to prove too much.quot;
The Rev. H. B. Tristram, F.R.S., a high authority, examined.
quot; You would yourself personally protect every kind of hawk, would you ?—Every kind of hawk, parti­cularly the peregrine; because 1 believe that the destruction of the peregrine has had something to do with the grouse disease. I have noticed that the hawk, in other countries, in pursuing a flight of birds, a covey of partridges, will always strike the hindmost, which is sure to be the weakest of the covey, and if
I
;|
-ocr page 97-
1
raquo;
EEV. H. B. TBISTBAJl's EVIDENCE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 81
there is any disease lurking it is in that bird; and so by the struggle for existence, where you have hawks, the race is kept purer and more healthy ?—A sports­man is very apt to shoot the strongest bird first.
quot; That is, scientifically speaking, a mistake; I mean the custom of driving by which one kills the strongest bird ; it is an injury to the breed, is it not?—It is a most fatal injury to the breed.
quot; Then I suppose you would say, on behalf of many hawks, that they destroy other kinds of vermin in all parts of England ?—I think, if the hawks were fostered too much, they might become the greatest of all vermin ; but we have now got to the other extreme. There are some hawks for Avhich, in a thickly-populated country like this, I could not plead strongly, such as the harrier ; but that is extinct, probably; but the kestrel, the sparrow-hawk, and the merlin, I believe all have their uses ; the peregrine certainly, apart from the question of sentiment with regard to the peregrine.
quot; With regard to the kestrel, I suppose it is the same bird as is often called the wind-hover ?—Yes, it is the same bird.
quot; Did I understand you correctly when I thought you said you had examined the crop of a bird ?—Yes.
quot; And you found nothing in it but wire-worms ?— Yes, one hundred and seventy-eight wire-worms.
quot; Was that your own personal experience ?—Yes, that was my own personal experience.
6
-ocr page 98-
82
EEV. H. B. TEISTEAm's EVIDENCE.
b
quot; Did you ever know a kestrel under any other circumstances destroy young partridges ?—Yes, cer­tainly I have, but not as a habitual article of food.
quot; What did you mean to imply when you said that you found no remnants of game of any kind, but only so many wire-worms ; did you mean that the kestrel was to be one of the protected birds ?—I meant to imply that all those birds have their uses, and that the kestrel is not a game-eating bird ; I do not say there is no kestrel that may not be found to eat a young partridge, but their natural food is wire-worms, beetles, and mice ; if any birds are to be protected this is a very useful bird, and public opinion is now beginning to protect it ; many landowners forbid their keepers to shoot it.
quot; You will understand that that list will be on the assumption that the Act of Parliament remains as it is ?—Just so.
quot; One more question with regard to gamekeepers destroying hawks; you have stated that you are of opinion that hawks do a great deal of good by the destruction of rats ?—Yes, some species do.
quot; You are, no doubt, aware that rats are the greatest scourge to partridges, and you are aware of the extent to which, if not sufficiently kept down, they destroy the eggs ?—Yes.
quot; You are of opinion that more might be gained in a game-preserving point of view by keeping up hawks to destroy the rats, than by killing a hawk which
-ocr page 99-
)
professoe newton's evidence.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 83
occasionally gets a young partridge ?—Yes ; I be­lieve that both the hawk and the weasel are game preservers ; of course, they are not rabbit preservers.
quot; Then, with regard to gamekeepers, has it ever struck you, as a very singular fact, how inaccurate they are in their observations of the habits of some animals ?—Yes, they are the most inaccurate class of men existing.
quot; They seem to consider any bird that has a hooked beak and claws as being necessarily destructive to game, do they not ?—Yes, if it is large enough.
quot; They never examine the crop or the stomach of a bird?—Never, to my knowledge.quot;
Professor A. Newton, F.R.S., a naturalist of great repute, examined.
quot; I should be right in summing up what you have said in this way, should I not, that, in the case of those birds which you have observed, the good which they do at times counterbalances the harm which they do at other times ?—Certainly, but I have not been able to come to that conclusion without a very considerable amount of investigation, and considering the matter from every point of view.
quot; If you were a game preserver, should you destroy your hawks ?—No, I should not, unless it was the sparrow-hawk.
quot; What would be your reason for sparing your hawks ?—I rather hold to the theory that the falcons may stamp out the grouse disease; that seems to me
6 *
-ocr page 100-
84
MR. SCOT-SKIRVING's EVIDENCE.
a reasonable theory, but I have no personal knowledge of it.
quot; It has been observed, has it not, that the falcon generally strikes the last bird of the covey ?—I think the falcon generally strikes the bird that comes easiest to him; of course, that would be a grouse or any other bird that was, perhaps, a little slack in its flight. I have been out hawking a great many times, but not so many times as the last witness.
quot;But you object to the hen sparrow-hawk ?—-It is, in these days, the only bird of prey that does any harm to game. The falcon, about which so much has been said, is, I think, in many places very harmless. I enjoyed the acquaintance of a falcon for a great many years. She used to come to a clump of trees on a large heath, near where I lived, early in the year, and stay there for about three weeks. This heath was full of partridges and stock doves. The stock dove is a far quicker bird in flight than a part­ridge; but this falcon never touched a partridge. That went on for several years; she pursued and fed on the doves.quot;
Mr. R. Scot-Skirving, gentleman farmer and natu­ralist, examined.
quot; Have you many sparrow-hawks left in Scotland ? —Yes, we have a good many sparrow-hawks. They are migratory birds, and they have almost ceased to breed with us, because the gamekeepers kill them all: they shoot the old ones in tho nest. But we still
:
-ocr page 101-
DE. MOREIS'S EVIDENCE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 85
have and always shall have a sprinkling of sparrow-hawks. They come to us in the winter.
quot; Does the sparrow-hawk act as a check to the wood-pigeon ?—I think he would to some degree; it is a very bold bird, and he will strike a wood-pigeon or a partridge on the wing ; still he preys much more on small birds.
quot; You yourself regret the almost complete exter­mination of the larger hawks, do you not ?—Very much indeed.
'c And many other farmers in Scotland also, I pre­sume ?—They regret it for one reason, because it allows the wood-pigeon to become so numerous. I regret it for the same reason, and because it takes away a beautiful feature from human life.quot;
Dr. Morris, the well-known ornithologist, examined.
quot; I dare say you are familiar with the common expression about the balance of nature; have any facts come to your knowledge which make you think that if that balance is disturbed it produces unfor­tunate consequences ?—Several facts have come to my knowledge quite recently, besides others that occurred in former years. On Lord Middleton's estate, near Nottingham, one of his tenants, Mr. Thornton, told me that at the present time Lord Middleton is paying for the destruction of seven hundred or eight hundred, and sometimes as many as one thousand five hundred, rats per month; he attributes that, as I certainly do, to the almost entire extinction of owls, hawks, and
-ocr page 102-
m
i
8G
DE. MOEEIS S EVIDENCE.
i f
1:
weasels, and more particularly weasels; the de­struction is so great, that he says he can hardly keep a chicken about his premises.
quot; Do you ever i*ecollect speaking to Mr. Waterton on the subject of birds of prey not feeding at home? No, I do not; I know that he used to have owls, jack­daws, and starlings, all nesting within a few feet of each other, and they never interfered with each other at all. I perhaps might be permitted to call the attention of the Committee to an article in the last ' Quarterly Review,' an exceedingly good article on this very subject. The writer mentions there, that on some of the moors in Scotland, since the de­struction of the hawks and eagles, the vipers have increased to such an extent that people can scarcely cross the moors in safety during the summer. He states that as a fact; he also mentions that the eagles live chiefly on the blue, or what is called the Alpine hare; the one that turns white in the winter. He says, that deerstalkers find great difficulty in getting to the deer, on account of the predominance of those hares; the moment you try to stalk a deer, up jumps one of those hares and bolts across, and frightens the deer away.
quot; How do you account for that great increase of rats of which you spoke?—In the first place, the soil at Lord Middleton's place is light soil in which they can burrow easily; all the hawks and weasels have been most carefully exterminated, so I was told ; my
...
-ocr page 103-
ME. EOBERT GEAT's EVIDENCE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;87
informant was Mr. Thornton. I think that increase of rats is entirely due to the destruction of hawks, owls, and weasels.quot;
Mr. Eobert Gray, author of the admirable book entitled, quot; Birds of the West of Scotland,quot; examined.
quot; What should you propose to do about the hawk family?—I should be inclined to protect them all.
quot; Will you be kind enough to state to the Com­mittee what, in your opinion, would be the advantage of doing so ?—I think, for one thing, if birds of prey were generally protected throughout Scotland we should hear less of the grouse disease.
quot; In what way would the hawk tribe help to keep down the grouse disease do you think ?—They would kill off the sickly birds.
quot; Have any instances of that come under your own observation ?—Yes, many.
quot; Will you be kind enough to state to the Com­mittee any case in point?—The common buzzard is a very useful bird in that respect; it is of indolent habits, and rests generally on the stump of a tree, or some rock in a solitary situation, and picks up young birds that are not able to save themselves, and wounded birds also; wounded birds, and sickly young birds, would, in the course of time, perpetuate a degenerate breed, and I incline to the views that those degenerate birds are the chief source of the so-called grouse disease.
quot; Perhaps you have heard that the theory has been
-ocr page 104-
I^quot;quot;PPP
'
88
ME. W. 0. ANGUS S EVIDENCE.
broached once or twice or mure, that, if hawks were generally preserved, it would have the effect of getting rid of the grouse, pheasant, and partridge disease, by reason of the hawk catching weakly birds when rising ?—Yes.
quot; Have you not heard that very often the old birds throw themselves between their young and their enemies ?—Yes.
quot;quot;Would it not probably follow that the parent birds would be killed, and that under such circum­stances you would loose the whole brood?—I have seen old birds protect their young in that way. All the stronger young birds were quite able to get behind the mother, but there Avas generally a bird outside which suffered, and that was the sickly bird of the brood. I have frequently noticed that. In the outer Hebrides, a district extending about one hundred and thirty miles, there is no grouse disease. There are many birds of prey still allowed to live there, and that is about the best argument I can give for the protection of hawks.quot;
Mr. W. C. Angus, Aberdeenshire, a naturalist of fame, examined:—quot; If I understand you rightly, you would protect a certain number of birds by a close season, and no more?—Yes, I would protect all birds that are decreasing; I would protect the eagle, the raven, the raptorial birds generally, and the owls. I may state that the late Prince Consort, on Deeside, gave an excellent example in that respect; such
-ocr page 105-
ME. \V. C. ANGUS S EVIDENCE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 89
species are strictly protected in the Royal forests both at Balmoral and Abergeldie. I think Mr. Mackenzie, of Kintail and Glen Muick, protects them also ; but certainly the Marquis of Huritly, who is himself an ornithologist, and Mr. William Cunliffe Brookes, Member of Parliament, are very strict in protecting raptorial birds.
quot; You mean the owls and the hawks of all descrip­tions?—Yes, and eagles; but those birds go over such a wide range of country, that unless they be generally protected the chances are that they will be destroyed somewhere.
quot; Has the sport of those gentlemen suffered in any Avay from that protection ?—Not that I am aware of; the quality of sport improved by the presence of those birds.
quot; You said that you had found in the stomachs of raptorial birds, moles, rats, and weasels ; in the stomachs of which raptorial birds have you found weasels?—I have found them in the golden eagle, in the peregrine falcon, and the sparrow-hawk.
quot; You have not found them in the stomachs of smaller birds, such as the kestrel or the merlin?—T have found moles and small weasels in the stomach of the kestrel, but it is generally beetles, mice, and small birds that you find in this species.
quot; Do you not think that the weasel does quite as much good in his way by destroying rats and mice, as any of those raptorial birds do, or more perhaps ?
-ocr page 106-
raquo;
90
DIVINE ORGANIZATION OP NATURE.
1
r;
—Yes, but he is destructive to hares aud rabbits
also ; I think, as a rule, nature, if left to herself,
would very fairly preserve the balance.quot;
We affirm positively that it is highly unwise, indeed
criminal, to interfere so ruthlessly with the Divine
organization of nature. quot;Why exterminate our best
allies? Why lift our hands so unsparingly against the
protectors of our moors ? Since we do so we must
expect evil consequences, as the laws of nature have
been imposed by an infallible Power.
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Reader, take the work of preservation to heart.
You have, without doubt, pondered the marvellous
economy of nature, manifesting His omniscience in
the minutest details within our ken. Help, then, to
restrain the ignorant rebels who would pervert the
infallible system of a Divine authority.
Accuse not Nature, she hath done her part; Do thou but thine.
!#9632;#9632;raquo;raquo;
H
mm
-ocr page 107-
mm
-ocr page 108-
-ocr page 109-
91
CHAPTER IV.
Yec grouse of other kind The fowler often finds, of larger growth And glossy jet, Black game, or Heathcock termed. Nor are the Eed on every healthy moor Or rocky monntain found ; full many a waste, Washed by the southern, or the western main, Has ne'er received them, though abundant else In store of footed, or of feathered game.
There are four species of grouse in the British Isles called capercailzie {Tetrao urogallus); black game {Tetrao tetrix); red grouse (Lac/ojms scoticus); and ptarmigan {Lagopus alhus). As the red grouse is the chief subject of this treatise, and affords better sport than all the others put together, we quot;will only notice the other branches of the grouse family very briefly. Capercailzie, or cock of the wood, as it is called by naturalists, is the largest of the birds of the grouse tribe, nearly equal to the turkey in size, and is also the most beautiful in plumage. It was once a
-ocr page 110-
92
CAPEECAILZIE.
common inhabitant of the Highland districts of Great Britain, but disappeared. Those now found were reared from importations, notably at Taymouth, where they are numerous. Their restoration in Ireland utterly failed, probably owing to the demoli­tion of the old woods. They are exceedingly abun­dant in Norway and Sweden, and are imported to this country by game-dealers, although the flesh is not considered particularly good eating. Its eggs, however, are very delicate and highly recommended to invalids. It lays eight or ten on a rough nest, composed of twigs of the brushwood it inhabits, and of coarse lt;n'ass and moss. It feeds on vegetable sub-stances, on the young shoots of fir, juniper, cranberry, and other trees, shrubs, and plants. It remains in the great forests of Norway and Sweden all the year round, and packs in winter in hundreds. When thus together they are easily shot by the hunter, who is never a fair sportsman, for after dark he slaughters the poor birds by torch-light as they gaze in amaze­ment at the blazing fire. Its favourite haunt in Scotland is the thick wood—the depth of the forest of pine, beech, oak, and birch. We rejoice that it is again the pride of the northern forest.
Capercailzie is increasing in Perthshire and neigh­bouring counties, and spreading wherever Alpine woods prevail. On the 25th of last October Mr. Renton and two friends bagged nineteen magnificent specimens of this noble bird. In connection with the
.
-ocr page 111-
IS CAPEECAILZIE GAME ?nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 93
clay's sport a very interesting case, involving the question as to whether capercailzie is included in the list of birds known as game, was tried at Perth on the 10th of November last, before Sheriff Barclay. As reported by the quot;Perthshire Advertiser,quot; John Thomson, innkeeper, was charged, at the instance of the Board of Inland Revenue, with having used a gun for the purpose of killing game, at Knockintober on September 2;3rd last, without having a game licence. He pleaded not guilty. John Stewart, gamekeeper, Kinnaird, stated that on the day in question he was out with a shooting-party. There were six guns altogether, and Mr. Thomson was one of the party. In the forenoon they shot in the Killiehaiigie caper­cailzie wood. Capercailzie were shot that day, but witness could not say whether Mr. Thomson, who had a gun, shot any of them. While at Knockintober, on the way home, a covey of partridges arose, and alighting in a turnip-field, eight of them were shot. Witness did not see Mr. Thomson fire, and did not know if he did fire. Mr. Thomson was invited personally by Mr. Renton, the shooting tenant, to join the party that day. The sheriff, on asking who informed against Thomson, was informed that it was John Campbell, ground officer to the Duke of Athole, his reason for doing so being that he had some spite against Mr. Thomson. Three gentlemen who Avere expected to join the shooting-party were unable to attend, and rather than send the beaters home it was
-ocr page 112-
94
INTERESTING OASE RELATIVE TO
suggested to Mr. Eenton that he should ask Mr. Thomson to join them, as he was a good shot. After Mr. Eenton invited Mr. Thomson he heard the latter saying that he had a gun licence. Witness was not aware that capercailzie were game. He had been a keeper for upwards of thirty years, and had never heard them spoken of or treated as game. James Stewart, gamekeeper, Kinnaird, and Robert Hankin-son, gamekeeper, Ballechin, corroborated. Both these witnesses agreed in stating that Mr. Thomson was out of gunshot distance when the partridges were killed. Mr. Manson, supervisor, Aberfeldy, in the course of his examination, stated that he was informed by John Campbell, ground officer to the Duke of Athole, that Mr. Thomson was in the habit of shootinsf game, although he had no game licence. Witness investigated this report, and was able to identify Mr. Thomson as having been out on the day in question. Mr. Thomson took out a game licence on September 26th, after the case had been reported. The solicitor who acted for the prosecutors maintained that capercailzie were included as game under the Act 1621, cap. 34. For the defence it was urged there was not a particle of evidence to show that he had used his gun for the purpose of killing game. The sheriff said that the case was a peculiar one, that he would take it into consideration, and give judgment next week.
We would observe that capercailzie are not men-
-ocr page 113-
-ocr page 114-
m
-ocr page 115-
gt;
SHOOTING CAPEECAILZTE IN SCOTLAND.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;95
tioned as quot; game quot; in any of the Acts affecting game in England or Scotland; neither in the Day Poaching Act, 1 and 2 Will. IV. c. 32, England; 2 and 3 Will. IV. c. 68, Scotland; Night Poaching Act, 9 Geo. IV. c. 69 ; and Poaching Prevention Act, 25 and 26 Vic. c. 114, United Kingdom. The Excise law regarding game—viz. the 23 and 24 Vic. c. 90, which requires a licence to be taken out for killing quot; game quot;—gives no definition ; but the definition fixed by 1 and 2 Will. IV., England, and 2 and 3 Will. IV., Scotland, has hitherto always been adopted, but neither includes the capercailzie. Indeed, at the time of the passing of both the Acts 9 Geo. IV. and 2 and 3 Will. IV., this bird had been an extinct variety of bird for many years in the United Kingdom. The Act of 1621 (James II.) certainly mentions caper­cailzies as quot; wyld foulles,quot; and makes provision against the buying and selling of quot; termigantis, quailzies, caperkailzeis,quot; etc., under a penalty of one hundred pounds; but we doubt not the Act of 1621 is obsolete so far as the Excise Acts are concerned in reference to game licences.—quot; Land and Water.quot;
Sheriff Barclay, in finding the case not proven, said he was not prepared to state whether capercailzie were game or not. He had had a conversation with Colonel Drummond Hay, of Seggieden, that day, who expressed the opinion that capercailzie were not game, but a species of grouse.
Black Grouse, familiarly known as black game,
-ocr page 116-
1quot;
96nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;BLACK GROUSE.
is abundant in most of the woods, and rough heath in the north. It is especially fond of the scrubby edges of forests in the summer. It is an exceedingly wild and wary bird when it has escaped the marksman for a season. It then becomes shy and crafty and difficult to shoot. It lodges on the ground in summer, and perches on trees in winter, preferring the fir and birch. It is a very pugnacious bird, and cannot live with its red brother. Indeed, it has been often noticed that where black game abound grouse have almost disappeared. Consequently, some sportsmen shoot the hens down hard, in their preference for the red variety. We know of instances in which the black cock being killed off, the red bird returned to its old haunts. The black cock never pairs—he is a polygamist, indulging in as many wives as he can get. The males separate from the females in the autumn and live together a batchelor life until the breeding season, when they all seek the hens and at once fall in love and quarrel. They sometimes combat to the death. It is exceedingly proud—the cock possessing an inordinate amount of self-esteem, disdaining to occupy himself in any way with family cares, and leaving the hen to prepare her nest, sit on her eggs, hatch them, and bring up the brood. Its nest is formed of twigs, wild grass, and short herbage, com­monly under the shelter of a bush or large stone. It lays from eight to ten eggs. Curiously, although black game is to be found nearly all over Scotland, it
.
-ocr page 117-
-ocr page 118-
-ocr page 119-
PTARMIGAN.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;97
is said that all attempts to naturalize them in Ireland have failed.
Ptaemigan is the smallest of the British grouse, and is only found among the rocks and stones on the highest mountains in the north and west of Scotland. In Norway and Sweden they abound, as they love Alpine solitudes. It is said by some old writers that they at one time existed in the hilly parts of England. However that may be, the Grampian range is now their most southerly resort. The ptar­migan is not indigenous to Ireland. The picture by Blwes is an admirable representation of them in a state of nature.
It seems to revel in snow, and seldom descends from the high mountains except in very severe winters. At night it roosts in snow, scraping out a hollow in which it lies. It makes its nest on the bare ground, among the stones or pieces of decayed rock, and lays eight or ten eggs in June. It sits early in July, incubation lasting for about three weeks. It feeds on various sorts of Alpine plants, berries, and seeds. Its flight is low and straight, but not rapid. It is a tame, dull, and stupid bird, affording little sport. In summer its colour is undistinguishable from the rock, stones, and moss, rendering it difficult for the eye to discern it. In winter it changes its garb to a pure white, except the space between the beak and the eje, which shows a black mark. When its plumage is changing colour it is a most lovely bird
7
-ocr page 120-
98
PTARMIGAN.
mottled all over, being feathered down to the very claws. It is truly the bird of the mountain, where nature is seen in her wildest and grandest beauty.
quot; It is only the oldest birds that assume the pure white dress so early as the end of the shooting season, the young occasionally retaining several grey feathers in their plumage a month or even six weeks later ; and, judging from my own experience, I should be of opinion that some of the more backward birds do not become thoroughly white till their second winter. This change is not a moult ; the white appears first at the point of the feathers, and then gradually spreads down to the root or quill. I have now and then killed ptarmigan which at first glance appeared perfectly white, but on being more closely examined showed several stains or lightly-marked blotches on their plumage, and on turning back the feathers I have discovered that a few were still half-grey, and their darker colour showing dimly through the pure white covering of the adjoining or overlapping feathers, gave the stained appearance to their otherwise spotless plumage.quot;—E. T. Booth.
Red Grouse (Lagopus scoticus) affords more enjoy­able shooting than any other bird. Seeing that it is found in England, Wales, and Ireland, we think it might well be named Britanniens. It does not natu­rally occur beyond the limits of the British Isles, and always breeds true, never cohabiting with other birds.
.
-ocr page 121-
BED GROUSE.
99
Unlike the ptarmigan it does not change its colour in winter, and feeds chiefly on heather. No doubt the red grouse slightly varies in the colour of its plumage, according to the locality in which it lives, and the season of the year. We know that its colour is different in the east of Scotland from what it is on the west coast ; and that there is some difference in its weight. The cultivation of the land has a good deal to do with this, modifying its habits and disposition. To see the red grouse in perfection we must go to the most remote and secluded parts of the Highlands, where it is the uninterrupted inhabitant of the moor —the native of heather and rock, of hill and glen. As cultivation advances the habits of all wild birds, and their choice of food, undergo change. Like the Red Indian, the red bird suffers with the cultivation of the land, and like him must recede before the plough and the spade. Neither can flourish under other than primitive conditions.
The excellence of the red grouse as an article of food need hardly be remarked on here, as there is hardly a better bird for the table. It pairs early in the year—in a mild season, in January. The female begins to lay her eggs about the end of March, num­bering from eight to fourteen, and sometimes sixteen. The male, unlike some birds, never sits on the eggs. As soon as the young are freed from the shell they move away for food, the old birds teaching them to pick the fine young heather and the tender leaves of
7 !
-ocr page 122-
100
RED GROUSE.
the berry-plants. The young broods lie close in the first of the season; but, as it advances, they get strong and wild and begin to pack, especially in wet windy weather. Although they have a strong attach­ment to the spot where they were hatched, if that be low-lying ground, they will make for the hills on being disturbed by the shooter. When hatched on high land, however, they seldom fly far, generally winoing their way round the base of the eminence. The morning and afternoon is the best time for finding them, for in the heat of the day they lie very close for hours in secluded sheltered spots, when even sporting-dogs will pass close to them without winding them. They feed morning and evening, and get scattered over the moor ; and grouse, like partridges, are approached best after they have fed. We know men who go at grouse at peep of clay, before the stars have faded out of sight ; but they never fill their bags satisfactorily. That quot;the early bird picks up the worm quot; does not always hold good with regard to sportsmen. If grouse do not get time to eat their breakfasts they are off at the first sight of man and dog. After feeding, they lie and rest, and are not so much on the alert. We have always found, too, that in windy wet weather the best way to approach them is from below, as they cannot see the sportsman so well as when he is descending from the high ground. In such weather they resort to the lee of the hills for shelter, and pack close together, affording an excellent
-ocr page 123-
m #9632;
GROUSE OF NOETH AMERICA. 101
opportunity for those who love slaughter instead of sport.
Some naturalists assert that red grouse inhabit the wilds of North America. This is an error, from our personal knowledge of that country. There certainly is a fine species of the grouse there; but it is the Tetrao obscurus, larger than the Scottish grouse, and different in other important respects. We fully de­scribed it in our remarks on the quot; Natural History of British Columbia.quot; He is larger than the Scottish grouse, and his flesh is comparatively insipid. His throat is capable of great inflation, and he utters a very peculiar cry, resembling that of an owl, which is heard for three or four miles. He is generally found perched on a lofty tree; and in uttering this mournful cry not unfrequently sounds his death-knell, as the sound is heard at a great distance, and guides the shooting savage to the unsuspecting victim. He also makes a sort of bumping sound with his wings, which can be heard nearly a mile off. The strokes of this drumming are at first slow, and repeated every few minutes, but gradually increase in rapidity until the sound is not unlike distant rumbling thunder. He drums the most after dawn, and in the evening before nightfall, The sound appears to be much nearer than it really is, and the inexperienced fowler cocks his gun, thinking himself within range: but he is deceived, and it is not until he has slowly and stealthily advanced many hundreds of yards further that he gets
-ocr page 124-
'
102
PLUMAGE OJ? THK RED GKOUSB.
a fair shot at him. By imitating the sound in the spring-time, the sportsman may shoot many a fine cock which flies towards him, thinking it proceeds from another of the species that invades his range. At other seasons of the year they are difficult to find, and one may travel the forest for hours without heing able to bag a single bird. They keep together in coveys until the pairing season, like grouse in Scot­land. A full pack consists of twelve or fourteen, and it is not uncommon for two packs, or coveys, to asso­ciate. Sometimes the whole covey may be shot, without any one of them taking wing.
There is a great discrepancy in the accounts given by naturalists of the haunts of the Tetrao obscurus ; but we are of opinion that it is a bird of the wilderness, that loves the hills and glens, as the red grouse of this country delights in the solitude of the moors.
The early plumage of the red grouse partakes of the hue of the female, which is of a pale ground tint, marked with white bars. Its mature plumage is a rich reddish brown, deepening in shade on the under part, with whitish tips, and barred across with dark brown. There is, however, a variety in the markings according to the districts of the country it inhabits. At breeding time the feathers of both the male and female change a good deal in colour, the white becoming somewhat yellowish. Moreover, the red bar above the eyes increases in size and depth of colour. We are told that Sir William Jardine shot a
-ocr page 125-
#9632;
f
ENGLISH AND SCOTTISH GEOUSE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;103
grouse on the moors of Galloway, whose ground colour was yellowish white, and whose dark markings were reddish brown, much lighter than the ordinary hue, while the quills were dirty white. Grouse bred in a moor in which the heather is of a bright purple tint are brilliant in colour, whilst those bred in poor, naked land, where the heather is brown, near culti­vated ground, are of a dingy colour. Their plumage so perfectly resembles the surface of the soil they inhabit, and mingles so Avell with the heather, moss, brackens, and rocks, that the most practical eye is often at fault in detectino; their whereabouts when squatting. Nature, ever watchful over her creatures, always makes some provision for their protection.
The grouse in Scotland is a larger and finer bird than that met with in England, and more delicate eating. No doubt the mountainous character of the country, the nature of the soil, temperature, and vegetation are the influences to which this may be attributed. The flesh of the grouse is as susceptible of modification by climate and food as that of sheep. The palate readily determines whether grouse have been shot on the east or on the west of Scotland —whether on high or low ground. The one has the pure heath flavour, whilst the other tastes of the level country herbage, and of corn stooks. We can all readily distinguish between the flesh of a mountain-fed sheep and an animal fattened on a Midland farm on artificial food. The superiority of the one to the
-ocr page 126-
104
FLAVOUR OF RED GROUSE.
other is unmistakable. In the London market the
Southdown and Scotch mutton is considered superior
to all others. So with the flesh of birds, which is
always strongly impregnated with the character of
the plants on which they feed. Who has not noticed
the strong flavour of pine in the capercailzie ?
Touching the flavour of grouse, we are tempted to
give the following remarks which appear in Baiiy's
justly popular magazine of last September:—
My old friend M. Alexis Soyer, of the Kefonn Club, tlio most intellectual gastronomer of his time, and a man whose society was much cultivated, used to say, quot; Ah, my dear Mr. Manner­ing, there is a wonderful gout in your bird of the heather which baffles me ; it is so subtle that I fail to analyse it. It is, of course, there, because of the food that it eats, the tender young shoots of your beautiful heath; but it is curious, sir, that in some years these birds are better than, in others. Once in about six seasons your grouse is surpassingly charming to the palate, the bitter of the backbone is heavenly, and the meat on the fleshy parts short and of exquisite flavour, but for common I feel no difference; in all other years the beast is mediocre, and not any of the attentions of my art will improve it. In such years I leave it alone, but in the years of its perfection 1 do eat one bird daily, roasted, and with nothing; no broad sauce, no crumbs, no chips, no nothing, except a crust of bread to change occasionally my palate. Ah, sir, grouse, to be well enjoyed, should be eaten in secret; and take my experience as your guide, do not let the bird you eat be raw and bloody, but well roasted, and drink with it, at intervals, a little sweet champagne. Never mind your knife and fork ; suck the bones, and dwell upon them. Take plenty of time ; that is the true way to enjoy a game bird. Some gentlemen hero (Eeform Club) think they can teach me the mode of my art. I hear them, but they are as more children in their methods of eating ; they follow the superstitions of their fellows. Bah I quot;
.
-ocr page 127-
r
SPORT ON THE MOOES.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;105
We do not agree with the famous chef that the quot; beastquot; is in any year mediocre. We esteem its flesh just as good one year as another, when it is in proper season, and from a hio-h northern moor. As we have just observed, where the grouse is wildest, its flesh eats the best, and it is well entitled to head the list of British game birds, whether for sport or for the table. By far the best and most enjoyable shooting we have had in our long sporting career has been on the Highland moors—the peaceful solitudes of nature— in pursuit of red grouse.
Sport on the moors last season was, upon the whole, eminently satisfactory. Naturally, on the vast range tenanted by thousands upon thousands of grouse, disease of some sort is never absent. We shall, how­ever, go fully into that subject presently. We wrote to the Press in July, that we had taken a great deal of trouble to get trustworthy information of the pro­spects of the moors for 1882; that, owing to the open winter and mild spring, grouse had a most favourable hatching season, so that the yield from the nests was highly satisfactory; that in nearly all the broods there was a good average of from six to twelve bonny cheepers, both in Scotland and in the north of England. We stated that the youngsters were well forward, and that there was plenty of excellent feed in the heather nursery, and capital shelter by night, so that the birds would be exceptionally strong on the Twelfth. Our prediction has been
-ocr page 128-
^
106
GROUSE-SHOOTING IN YORKSHIRE.
i
fully verified, as will be seen from the following reports.
Although some of the bags have been below the average of former years, the aggregate number of birds killed has been prodigious. In England sport has been much above the average, as it has been also on several of the Welsh moors. The following return made by Sir F. A. Millbank to the quot;Field,quot; con­firms this. Two hundred and two brace to one gun in a single day !
YOEKSHIEE.—Wemmebgill Lodge, Mickleton, Baknaed Castle.—I oncloso you the four clays' shooting on my moor. You will observe the first two days I had seven guns, the last two only four guns. Owing to the bad weather we could not get out on the 22nd and 23rd, as intended. Grouse are as numerous as in the great year 1872. Not a single unhealtby bird lias been seen ; the fine plumage and condition of the birds is a proof of their health. The birds are greatly packed in thousands together, some quot; packs quot; extending nearly half a mile in length, consisting of many thousand birds. The weather during the four days' shooting was pretty fine, although heavy showers fell at intervals.—Feedk. A. Milbank. Wejimeegill Moor Shooting.
I
Aug. 24.
Aug. 25.
Brace.
Brace.
Sir Frederick Milbank, Bart., M.P. .
. 202
171
Mr. Powlett Milbank
. 175
1301
Lord Kensington, M.P. . .
. 114
ISGf
Mr. A. P. Vivian, M.P. .
. 114
115
Col. Keith Fräser ....
. 104
8H
Mr. Mark Milbank ....
. 108
85
Marquis of Abergavenny .
. 94
81i
Total ....
. 911
801
Picked up afterwards
• 15|
16
Total killed
• 9261
817
'
-ocr page 129-
^
GROUSE-SHOOTING IN SCOTLAND.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;107
Sir Frederick Milbank, Bart., M.P.
Mr. Powlett Milbank
Mr. Mark Milbank .
Mr. Colliuson ....
Total brace
Picked up afterwards
Aug. 29. Brace.
Aug. 30 Brace.
115
921
. 100
75
58
52
89
G1J
. 8C2
281
. 14
IG
. 37G
297
2,416i
brace.
Total killed Total of four days' shooting
On Scargill moor, near Barnard Castle, Sir Charles Clifford, Dr. Daly, and Mr. Walter Clifford bagged seventy-four brace of grouse on the 12th, and thirty-seven brace on the 14th, birds being plentiful but wild. On the Kildale moors, and many others, large bags have been made. Lord Bolton and party shot two hundred and five brace of grouse on the 12th. Disease said to be quite unknown there, so that rents have risen to a fabulous range. Turning to Scotland, we find that at Tulchan, Morayshire, five hundred and ninety-one brace were shot on the 12th. At Huntly Lodge, Aberdeenshire, four guns bagged one hundred and thirty and one hundred and forty-four brace on the 12th and 14th ; the same number of guns having nearly the same return at Glenmachie in the same county—namely, one hundred and thirty and one hundred and forty and a half brace. At Moy Hall, in Fifeshire, one hundred and sixty brace fell to five guns on the 12th, and one hundred and twenty-nine
-ocr page 130-
•i
108
REPOET IN quot;LAND AND WATER.quot;
brace on the 14th; and at Finzean, Aberdeenshire, one hundred and fifty brace were bagged by four guns on the 12th. Sir Joseph Pease and party (four guns) killed at Corndarvon one hundred and eighty-one brace, one hundred and fifteen and a half brace, and one hundred and eleven brace; whilst in the Forest of Birse four guns bagged one hun­dred and eighty-one and a half brace, one hundred and twenty-four brace, and one hundred and two brace.
quot;Land and Waterquot; reports on 19th August:—#9632; quot; The grouse season of 1882 has so far proved con­siderably above an average year. Although no sensa­tional bags have been made, it is pretty certain that there is a large stock of grouse, both in Scotland as well as on the majority of English moors. Bags of over two hundred brace have been rare, but those of one hundred brace are comparatively common. The disease has unquestionably left its mark in more than one district, and strangely enough its ravages have been most marked in the opposite extremes of Scot­land, Caithness, and quot;Wigtownshire, and in parts of Inverness-shire. It has, however, been found not to be general in either county, but some moors in each have suffered severely. The lower moors of Inver­ness-shire have escaped, but some of the higher tracts of this grousing county seem to have suffered severely. If possible the weather on the quot; Twelfth quot; was too fine, the sun being so bright and the heat so intense it
-ocr page 131-
LAST YEAE'S GEOUSE SEASON.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 109
was dangerous to venture out on the open moors during the middle of the day. Scent seemed fairly good, but a few casts over rough heather under a burning sun quickly settled the dogs in the half-prepared condition they usually are at the commence­ment of the season. During the week the weather has at times been much cooler, and good bags have been made over dogs. Many of our correspondents write in the most cheerful strains of the sport they have already obtained and still hope to enjoy. On the Lcavs and the Northern Islands, according to the ' Scotsman,' from whom we have been able to cull some returns to add to the mass of notes cur cor-respondents have so kindly furnished us with, the season is scarcely yet in full swing, as the birds are there generally a week or so later than on the main­land. Regarding Ireland, a correspondent at Cork writes that in Kerry the mountains are literally alive with grouse, and no one to shoot them. This speaks volumes for the present unhappy condition of the country. He grimly asks if it is that grouse is ' too small ' a game for shooting in Ireland at the present day?quot;
The reports that have appeared in the principal Scotch newspapers show that sport has been good throughout the Highlands during the month of August, and well on into September. There were exceptions, of course, as there are every year ; but grouse were ex­ceedingly abundant, as the large supply at the various
-ocr page 132-
r
110
PRICES OP GROUSE.
markets proved. We are informed that up to the 24tli of August there was quite a quot; glut quot; in Leaden-hall market ; that the highest figure was three shillings and sixpence; hut that the larger proportion of the birds consigned brought only half a crown each. The following pi'ices are from the returns made by a highly-respectable dealer, for a consignment that reached London on the 14th of August:—quot; Thirty-six at three shillings and sixpence ; eighty-four at three shillings; twenty-four at two shillings and ninepence ; one hundred and twenty at two shillings and six­pence; one hundred at two shillings and threepence; eight at one shilling and sixpence: average two shillings and eightpence per single bird.quot; Another ticket, dated on the 22nd of August, gives the following prices: quot;forty-four at two shillings and sixpence; twelve at two shillings; seventy-two at one shilling and ninepence; twenty-three at one shilling and sixpence; or an average of about one shilling and elevenpence for each bird. As the bulk of the birds which will be shot this year have now been put on the markets, prices will improve somewhat, but as fewer will be shot the money returns will be comparatively small for the sportsmen.quot; In 1881 prices were considerably higher. Like everything else, the rate is regulated by supply and demand.
We have just met a gentleman who spent two months of the shooting season in the Highlands, and he fully confirms our views. He said he never saw
-ocr page 133-
_-nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; LINES FROM quot; PUNCH.quot;nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;Ill
so many sportsmen in the north before, so we presume they appreciate the following lines :—
AWAY TO THE GEOUSE.
'Tis pleasant to think of the chance of fair -weather,
Of leaving the long-winded bores of the House ! We 're off for the Twelfth, and the gay purple heather— Away to the Grouse !
Let others talk on in the weary Committee, Unworthy the labour of Members of nous ; Let mad quot; Bulls quot; and quot; Bears quot; play with Stocks in the City,
We 're off to the Grouse !
Let Merchants in Lanes, be they called Mark or Mincing, Drive bargains while striving each other to quot; chouse ;quot; Fine scorn for all business our souls arc evincing— We go to the Grouse !
The old dog draws on to where birds must be lying,
And there, at the point, he stands still as a mouse. A whirr of strong wings ! Then the feathers are flying! And down comes a Grouse ;
Then home in the twilight as clouds gather o'er us,
And into the tub we luxuriously souse ; Then dinner ! Such prospects make all join in Chorus— Away to the Grouse.—quot; Punch.quot;
-ocr page 134-
112
CHAPTER V.
Diseased Nature oftentimes breaks forth In strange eruptions.
It is now eighty years since the alarm of grouse disease was sounded in this country. Naturally, its appearance gave rise to much speculation, and many rival theories have from time to time been advanced and published, in the Press and in periodicals, as to its origin. Unfortunately, most of these contributions are from scientists, not from sportsmen, naturalists, and keepers. Hence they are not of much practical value, adding little but perplexity to the obscurity of the subject.
Amongst naturalists, sportsmen, and keepers, great difference of opinion prevails ; the want of posi­tive knowledge, affording in this, as in so many other cases, a wild field for the pranks of pretence and ignorance. But it is, nevertheless, true that men of high attainments differ widely as to the primary cause of the malady. Not a few assert that it has
-ocr page 135-
GEOÜSE DISEASE.
113
been imported into this country from abroad, like the rinderpest and the foot-and-mouth disease in cattle. This is palpably absurd, for in no other country does the red ffrouse exist. Without doffmatising' or haughtily disregarding the opinions of those who differ from us, we desire to submit our conclusions as to the cause of grouse disease. Before doing so, however, we shall lay before our readers the views of a few of those whose attention to the subject merits respect.
Among these, we find the name of Dr. T. Spencer Cobbold, author of a pamphlet setting forth his ideas, •which form what we may term the parasite theory. As this brochure has been ably criticised in the quot;Fieldquot; by Mr. William Coloquhoun, of Rossdhu, Dumbartonshire, a very distinguished authority, we cannot do better than give his review in full, after we have quoted a few paragraphs from the treatise itself. The learned doctor believes that grouse disease is caused by a minute organism which he calls a strongle. It is to be regretted that he did not pursue the subject further, and inform us what produced the strongle. Knowing this—the cause—we might be able to think of a remedy. The doctor states in his pamphlet:—
quot; A question will here naturally suggest itself to the mind of the practical man. Does not the fact of the occurrence of these parasites in the intestines of a so-called healthy grouse destroy the notion of disease
8
I
-ocr page 136-
114
DK. T. SPENCEE COBBOLD S VIEWS.
from this source ? My reply is, ' Certainly not.' A large experience with the symptoms produced by entozoa, both in human and animal bearers, enables me to assert Avith confidence that the measure of feebleness, disease, or suffering usually corresponds with the degree of parasitism; but not exclusively so, since another factor concerned in the welfare or destruction of the bearer, as the case may be, arises out of the constitutional vigour of the bearer. A strong bird will overcome or resist the irritation set up by the presence of hundreds of entozoa ; while a feeble bird, or one attacked before it is perfectly grown, will more or less rapidly succumb to the invasion. It is the same with mankind. One person will have convulsions from a single parasite, while another will play the part of ' host' or bearer to the same species of parasite without the slightest discom­fort. On these and other grounds, therefore, I do not hesitate to express the opinion that the present grouse murrain is due to parasites. The irritation, probable distress, and subsequent emaciation of the birds are readily explained by the presence of hundreds and thousands of strongles; and the mere circumstance that these parasites are very small, is quite sufficient to account for the fact that investi­gators have hitherto overlooked them.
quot; In a paragraph in the ' Times ' of May 28, T see it stated that ' the general opinion is that the disease is of a different type from that which prevailed in the
-ocr page 137-
THE PARASITIC THEOßY.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 115
moors some years ago.' It may be so. Let us look more closely to our present evidences. On comparing the results obtained by an examination of the fourth set of birds with those received last year, I could not but be struck with the differences observable as to the degree of parasitism. In the November series, tabu­lated above, seven of the birds were entirely free of tapeworms; and of the five which actually harboured them, two birds only contained more than two tape­worms apiece. The April birds, on the other hand, all contained tapeworms in more or less considerable numbers; three of the avian hosts beino; infested to a frightful extent. I sought to ascertain the number of tapeworms in one of these birds, and found that it was not far short of one hundred. The difficulty of being precise as to the number, arose from the quantity of detached heads and necks of the worms, and the fragmentary character of many of the bodies, or strobiles themselves. This, after all, was of no great moment. As to the strongles, they were present in large numbers in all; but, to my reckon­ing, and speaking generally, scarcely so numerous as in the November birds. At all events, the strongles appeared to me sufficiently numerous to weaken, or even destroy the avian bearers without the assistance of a second kind of parasite; and it, therefore, becomes highly probable that the concurrence of numerous tapeworms sufficiently explained the greater destruc-tiveness of the present outbreak as compared with
8 *
-ocr page 138-
116nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;OPINION THAT GEOUSE DISEASE
that of the previous season. In one extreme case I particularly noticed a remarkably gorged or distended condition of the cajcal villi, such as would result from continual irritation set up by parasites in over­whelming numbers. Careful microscopic investi­gation showed that there was no rupture of the capillaries, and, consequently, no extravasation in the CEeca or in any part of the intestinal canal. That this congested state of the villi was due to the strongles appeared the more certain, since the turgidity was only marked in that part of the caecum where the strongles were crowded together. With these data before me, I see nothing irrational in the belief that the grouse epidemics of recent years have been due to parasites. To say that these entozoa are merely the result of some cachectic or otherwise impoverished state of the birds, is merely oifering a gratuitous assumption resting on no solid basis of fact, and totally opposed to all the experiences of helmin-thologists. I cannot allow that these tapeworms are merely coincidently or co-ordinately associated with the disease; but I apprehend that the phenomena thus set up are of the same order as those which I almost daily witness in the practice of my profession amongst human bearers. I know, also, that similar diseased phenomena display themselves amongst quadrupeds, especially when the entozoa occur in unusual numbers and happen to occupy sensitive or vital organs.
quot; The presence of entozoa, it is true, is no proof of
1
-ocr page 139-
IS DUE TO STEOXGLES.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 117
disease. Like other creatures, they have a given territory, which it is their just prerogative to occupy; but when the territory is beset with more occupants than it can comfortably support, then the indications of incapacity duly manifest themselves. Impoverish­ment, distress, and, finally, destruction of the territory will ensue. This is what sometimes takes place in the human host, and still more frequently in the mammalian bearers; and, philosophically speaking, the bodies of men and animals constitute the invaded territories. In this view, further, the intelligent reader will not fail to perceive that these parasitic phenomena afford another curious illustration of the reality of the ' struggle for existence,' so prominently put forward in Mr. Darwin's work on the ' Origin of Species '; for here we see, as it were, a multitude of Liliputian creatures actively battling for their own existence at the expense of the avian territory. For more or less prolonged residence in this territory they are admirably adapted ; their organisation being expressly fitted for the parasitic mode of life. Fur­ther on this phase of the question I will not now dwell, but I may add the reflection that since more robust hosts than grouse succumb to parasitism, there need be neither surprise nor doubt as to the fact that game-birds perish under parasitic influences.quot; Mr. Colquhoun states: quot;I have just had put into my hands a brochure by Dr. Cobbold on the grouse disease, and at the commencement of his pamphlet
-ocr page 140-
118nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; de. cobbold's theoey
I find the folloAving remark: ' Like a certain writer in the quot; Field quot; (under the signature of W. C), they will perhaps say that quot; when animals become weakened by disease, the parasites increase in an overwhelming degree, and are mistaken by the ignorant for the disease itself.quot;' He goes on to observe: 'That is precisely the position which I for one, after twenty years' diligent study of parasites and parasitism, am prepared to defend against all comers, including the racy writer W. 0. himself.'
quot; Dr. Cobbold is completely mistaken in supposing that I ever held any such views; and how he came so far to misquote me I am at a loss to understand. I never said or wrote that worms in grouse resulted from a vitiated state of the body of the affected birds. What I have maintained for many years, long before Dr. Cobbold took any part in the discussion, and what I still maintain is, that the unwholesome food which grouse have been compelled to eat has occa­sioned both the worms with which which they have been infested, and, at least, one type of the disease.
quot; I may say that I have read with much interest Dr. Cobbold's remarks, and with all the respect due to his scientific attainments ; but he must excuse me for adding that I fail to perceive any new light which he has thrown on the origin or cause of said disease. True, he claims to have discovered a certain species of worm in the intestines of grouse, which he says is a species of strongle, and altogether new to science.
-ocr page 141-
DISPUTED BY MB. COLQXJHOUN.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 119
I quite agree with him that jxthncMJi qui meruit ferat; but I am convinced, and can prove, that he is quite under a mistake in thinkine; that he is the oris-inal discoverer of this little worm. Indeed it would be difficult, I believe impossible, for any man to prove that he was the original discoverer of it. For thirty years at least I have known of two kinds of worms with which dogs, particularly puppies, are troubled, and constantly the remark is made by gamekeepers and others, 'if it is only the longworm (tapeworm), it will be easily discharged; but that nasty little clinging worm is more difficult to get rid of.' We all know that the common tapeworm is often com­paratively innocuous. For many years (which I can prove by my writings) I have examined the intestines of grouse, and frequently found in them small worms in gi-eat abundance; and though Dr. Cobbold may not be aware of the fact, I can assure him that for long every intelligent gamekeeper knew right well that these small worms were most injurious to the grouse.
quot; Granting then, for the present, the parasitic origin of the epidemic among grouse, I find that Dr. Cobbold blinks entirely in his pamphlet the real matter at issue—the matter of most importance for us to know —viz., what causes these parasites in the grouse; for, without this knowledge, how are we to get rid, or keep rid of them? If the learned doctor is called in, and can only discourse learnedly on the nature
-ocr page 142-
120nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;SMALL WOBMS OK STEONG1ES.
und properties of the worm, what hopes can we have from him of a cure, which is the main thing we want? He scouts the idea of consulting ' the trusty keeper.' ' Of course this uneducated worthy knows all about it.' But, though he writes thus contemptuously o£ ' the trusty keeper,' he will find that it is the plain practical man after all that knows most about such matters; for seldom, I believe, are the men of science original discoverers. It is, 1 believe, the plain, prac­tical, and often uneducated man in all such cases who is the pioneer of science.
quot; For illustration, let me give a case which has just come under my notice, not an uncommon one, and which I think to the point. Some setter puppies were troubled with these same small worms— strongles I suppose we must dub them—and no sooner were they expelled by the usual means than another batch appeared. Now, if we had called in Dr. Cobbold, what would he have done in the cir­cumstances? Judging from his pamphlet, he would have called for specimens of the worms, and no doubt would have discoursed learnedly on their properties and formation, and enlightened us regarding the strobile and progiottides, amp;c. !Now, all this may be very interesting, I allow; but, my dear Doctor, I should be apt to say, What is the cause of the worms in my puppies? That is what I want to know. Here is his answer as regards the grouse: 'In the case of entozoa, an unusually wet season following a
-ocr page 143-
dr. cobbold's theory at paült.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 121
mild winter is eminently favoni'able to the excessive multiplication of certain forms of these creatures.' Unfortunately for his theory, we have had an un­usually dry spring this year; but at any rate, if he has no other advice than that to give, the case is hopeless, for we cannot control the elements. Well, the Doctor may shrug his shoulders, and gape and stare, but all his learning will not account for the infliction of parasites in my puppies, though the little kennel boy has easily solved the difficulty. Between the stable where these puppies were housed at night and the kennel where they were allowed to be during the day there is a sheep walk, and the boy observed that they ate greedily the dung of the sheep in pass­ing along. The cause now of their being so afflicted with worms is plain enough, and a cure easily effected.
quot; The case of the grouse is precisely analogous. True, we cannot dose the grouse as we do puppies to expel the worms; but we can at least endeavour to secure for them wholesome food, and prevent their feeding on what, for them, may be as prolific of worms as sheep's dung to the puppies. Prevention is better than cure. Assuming, then, that the grouse disease is 'essentially and exclusively (?) a parasitic disorder' (which is by no means proved), and that the worms are occasioned by unwholesome food (which I think cannot be disputed), from whom are we likely to get the most reliable information regard-
-ocr page 144-
122nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;OPINION OP THE OEIGIN BY
ing the food of the grouse ? Certainly not from the scientific man theorising in his study and longing to be a discoverer. The observant, bare-legged gillie, Avho traverses the moors from ' matin's prime to dewy eve,' can tell you more about it, if you are not sportsman enough to go and judge for yourself. In 1858 I published a pamphlet on the grouse disease, a copy of which I have before me. I issued circulars to some gamekeepers, requesting answers to certain queries which I sent them on the subject, and the following communication from an intelligent gamekeeper in Perthshire gives as rational an ex­planation of its origin as any I have seen:—
On tlio Dalnaspidal Moors, and all neighbouring moors, tliere was a decided change in the growth of heather within the last six years (writing in 1858):
In year 1832 the heather was in excellent condition. ,, 1853 also good.
,, 1854 damaged from hard frost without the protec­tion of snow. ,, 1855 damaged in the same way. ,, 1856 in an unwholesome state from previous years. ,, 1857 never in finer condition.
quot;Observe that the years '54, '55, '56 were the years when grouse suffered so much from the disease, and the heather Avas in such an unwholesome state as he describes. He goes on to observe:—
I.nbsp; I have examined many grouse's crops, and the only un­wholesome food that I discovered was corn.
II.nbsp; I have dissected many diseased grouse, and found the guts full of very small worms, and the hearts like a drop of dried blood.
-ocr page 145-
A PERTHSHIKE GAMEKEEPER.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;123
quot; Here, then, is positive proof of an intelligent gamekeeper finding very small worms in the intestines of grouse in 1854, when the disease broke out; but I knew well of the two kinds of worms found in various animals before that time, though I lay no claim whatever to the discovery.
III.nbsp; The grouse liave fed a great deal oil the stooks during the disease, and on the stubbles after the com was stacked, and also in spring on the sown corn. This year the grouse did not come to the corn as iu former years.
quot; The year to which he refers, when grouse did not
come to the corn, was 1858, when the disease had
quite disappeared.
IV.nbsp; My opinion is that corn is very unwholesome food for grouse. Let any person examine the droppings of grouse when fed on corn, and they will find them similar to tar, but rather browner in colour.
quot; Now, I can quite confirm this gamekeeper's state­ment, that the disease appeared in all its virulence after the heather had been damaged by hard frost, without the protection of snow, and that grouse did not show the same rapacity for oats till the disease appeared. Still, I must demur to his conclusion that oats are unwholesome food for grouse if taken in moderation. I have had grouse in confinement which throve remarkably well, fed on oats, with a sufficient supply of green meat, which shows that it is only when taken in excess, or probably when they gorge themselves with green or unripe grain, that it is injurious, or produces worms. Or perhaps it would
-ocr page 146-
mm
124
ANOTHER CAUSE OP GEOUSE DISEASE.
be nearer the truth to say that grouse were iujured by eating the damaged and unwholesome heather; and from the want of a sufficiency of their natural food, they were driven to the stooks or stubbles to satisfy their hunger, though no doubt gorging with oats to such an extent could not be otherwise than injurious. At all events, I have shown that not till the heather, their natural food, was damaged and unwholesome did the disease appear. But the crying evil, after all, as I have been arguing in the columns of the ' Field,' and otherwise through the Press, for a considerable time, is undoubtedly the overstocking of the moors with sheep. Pasture the increasing stock of sheep must have, and that can only be sup­plied at the expense of the grouse. Not more necessary is good pasture for sheep or cattle, or grain for the use of man, than is sound and whole­some heather for the sustenance and nourishment of grouse. I will not trouble you with statistics, though I have some by me, to show the enormous increase of sheep on the moors within the last thirty or forty years, from the opening up of the Highlands, and the facilities of communication by railroads and steam­boats. Take almost any good grouse moor in Scot­land for an example. Twenty years ago, perhaps, that whole expanse bloomed with the purple heather. Twenty years ago that stock of sheep—that crowd of white moving specks which you see dotted over the mountain side—could not have subsisted within their
-ocr page 147-
EESULT OP UNWHOLESOME FOOD.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 125
present boundaries. What has been given to the sheep has been taken from the grouse. Now, the natural course to pursue would be, as you diminish the food of animals under your care, the numbers of animals to be fed should be proportionately restricted. But strange to say, with a fanaticism which can scarcely find a parallel, just as their natural means of suhsistence is being so extensively curtailed, sports­men are endeavouring by every means in their power excessively to increase their numbers. The result is inevitable. When deprived of their natural means of subsistence they are put to their shifts to main­tain life; and yet men wonder what can cause their intestines to be so crammed with worms, and that disease should periodically decimate their numbers. The wonder would be if the case were otherwise. Deprive any animal of its natural food, and feed it on what may be to it unwholesome, and disease will inevitably ensue. We don't require doctors or scientific men to teach us that. Now, I can honestly say, without any exaggeration, that in some late springs I have seen moors, not only without a bush of wholesome heather, but without a single green blade of any kind upon them. In the name of com­mon sense, then, I ask, do we require any other cause to account for disease-in grouse ? or, if Dr. Cobbold prefers the circumlocution, the little worms dubbed strongles, which occasion disease ?
quot; The following question was put to me some little
-ocr page 148-
126
GROUSE DISEASE.
time ago: ' Can there be any doubt now that frosts and cold winds have more to do with grouse disease than over-stocking ? ' My friend will, I hope, excuse me for saying that he has propounded a very simple question, and by no means difficult of solution. No doubt the seasons have changed very much from what they used to be twenty or thirty years ago, and grouse have materially suffered from cold late springs, which have blighted the heather. Dr. Cob-bold sneers at such an idea, but it only shows how little real practical knowledge he has of the subject. ' How exquisitely simple ! How satisfactory! What logical reasoning! East and north-east winds we have had in abundance; but these, it is clear, will hardly account for the murrain alone, so in comes the old stereotyped phrase about the quot;blight.quot;' Nothing, in short, will satisfy the learned doctor which seems to interfere with the parasitic origin of the disease, as he lays claim to the discovery of the internal parasite in grouse. But granting, as I do, that this nasty little parasite does occasion disease in grouse, is there anything illogical in attributing the cause of the worm to the bird being compelled to cat unwholesome food, from its natural food, the heather, being damaged or destroyed from continued blighting east wind ? And thus the blight of the heather is really at least one cause of grouse disease. True, it has been rejoined, that occasionally disease has appeared when the season has been most pro-
-ocr page 149-
#9632;
CAUSES OF GEOUSJS DISEASE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 127
pitious for vegetation; but if sheep and grouse have alike been unduly increased on any moor, as I have before shown, and both are greedily competing for the nice green young shoots of heather, it requires no conjuror to predict which of thera must go to the wall.
quot; I appeal, then, to every true sportsman who is familiar with the moors at all seasons of the year, and has particularly studied the habits of grouse, and not like the writer of this pamphlet, who confesses to having not the ' slightest title to be called a sports­man,' and only not ' altogether unfamiliar with the habits of game,' and that he has ' shot over moors in the counties of Selkirk, Peebles, and Kirkcudbright.' I say, I appeal to those who are familiar with the abodes of grouse at all seasons of the year, whether it is not clear as demonstration that insufficient or unwholesome food is the cause at least of one type of disease among grouse. But the question still arises— Have we not had two types of grouse disease Dr. Cobbold evidently does not admit this when he says 'the disorder is entirely parasitic' All I can say is, that in the earlier stages of the grouse disease the attack was much more virulent, and the birds being found dead and dying in such numbers by the watercourses—-which latterly was not the case—gave unmistakable indications of a febrile affection. The plumage of the birds also presented a different appear­ance in the earlier attacks, the feathers having a dirty
-ocr page 150-
mmm
128nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; me. colquhoun's hobby.
or draggled look about them, which latterly I have not observed in diseased birds. There is a treatise by Dr. Alexander Smith, of Edinburgh, printed for private circulation, on ' Fever and Cholera,' in quot;which he attributes all remittent and intermittent fevers, including cholera, to the malaria type, which he holds to consist of emanations of material particles from imperfectly-drained soil, reaching the nervous centres by absorption through the lungs. This, I take it, is very much the atmospheric theory. But if we come to epidemics, I suspect their true pathology is to this clay among the questiones vexata of science. But Avhether there are different types of grouse disease or not—whatever may be the special cause or combina­tion of causes which produce it, we have but one remedy to apply.
quot; Of course we cannot use the same artificial means with wild as with tame animals—we cannot control the elements; but common sense may point out that we should at least endeavour to have their natural food—the young shoots of the heather—as wholesome and sufficient as possible, and their abode dry. That, at least, is my hobby, and
Each man's hobby, of course,
Is his galloping horse ; He believes there 's no steed of such mettle or force ;
And when he 's astride
Of Ins hobby, he '11 ride Just as wildly as I do on my hobby horse.
-ocr page 151-
DE. COBBOLD'S THEOBY DISPUTED.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 129
If you ever endeavour
To stop him, yon '11 never Succeed in persuading him out of liis course ;
He thinks he 's so clever,
No logic whatever Can reason him down from his own hobhy horse.
That's his galloping horse.
That's my galloping horse. That's yours, mine, and every man's galloping horse.
And we never can meet
With a tune half so sweet, As made by the feet of our own ' hobby horse.'
Further comment on Dr. Cobbold's pamphlet would be superfluous, were it not that it has enlisted wide sympathy among those who have some knowledge of grouse and the northern moors, and among others to whom the disease is unknown.
A well-known member of the faculty, Dr. Eobert Farquharson, disputes the Cobbold theory that the malady is entirely parasitic, and believes that a contagious epidemic better explains the various phenomena. He is of opinion that the idea of an epidemic and infectious fever fits the facts already obtained better than anything else, and that this has at all events the advantage of the possibility of sug­gesting a remedy. The learned doctor does not stand alone in this view of the matter, as many persons whose opinions ai^e worthy of respect think that the mysterious nature of the grouse disease places it within this category.
Dr. Farquharson says that he is forced to confess
9
-ocr page 152-
m
#9632;\
130nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;DE. EGBERT FARQUHAESON's OPINIOX.
that, notwithstanding the laborious investigations of later years, we know little of the origin and natural history of cholera ; and, although we may all claim a certain superficial acquaintance with scarlet fever or measles, who will venture to assert that we have any knowledge of the way in which they spring up quite unexpectedly from time to time, or the laws which regulate their relative severity under apparently similar conditions ? Whilst these phenomena remain unex­plained, he says, we need express no surprise that we can at present do no more in connexion with the subject than use a phrase which does good service on many similar occasions, and say that some epidemic influence is at work in devastating our moors. He holds that the capricious nature of the attacks argues in his favour, and no doubt it does in a very great degree, for we certainly find that the disease skirts as it were the very limits of a particular moor one year, returning another year to devastate the tract which it left untouched before. Moreover, he argues that as great differences prevail in the degree of loss of flesh observed, some dead or dying birds being found as plump as in their healthy condition, whilst others are found reduced to mere skeletons, this is in favour of its specific or constitutional nature. This difference, he thinks, depends on the dose of fever poison imbibed, so that whilst those dying from a very acute attack, or whose constitutions are unable to withstand its debilitating influence for more than a brief period,
-ocr page 153-
w^
ME. JOHN A. H. BBOWN'S VIEWS.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 131
retain the outward appearance of health, others present all the indications of excessive exhaustion. We have ourselves frequently picked up dead grouse, perfectly plump and in excellent plumage one season, and on the next season found diseased birds with attenuated bodies and dull disordered plumage. These had, however, died of diseased liver, which we found in every case black as ink, soft, and wasted. We are now, as we were then, of opinion that this unsound condition was the result of the birds feeding on old, dry, and hard heather, their crops being full of it, and undigested.
An excellent authority on the subject is Mr. John A. Hawie Brown, F.Z.S., of Dunipace House, Stir­lingshire, who kindly favoured us with his views in September last. He believes, in common with many other naturalists, that grouse disease is caused mainly by over-stocking, over-preservation, and the complete and indiscriminate slaughter of certain species of so-called vermin, notably the peregrine falcon ; also by the state of the young and old heather after severe and late frosts, which affects the degenerate stock more than in former years, when grouse were less numerous, but healthier and stronger, having a larger area of feeding-ground. Although there are many more sportsmen now, they do not adequately make up for the increased number of birds. We give the rest of the communication in Mr. Brown's own words.
9 *
-ocr page 154-
) .
132nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; UTILITY OF BIEDS OF PREY.
quot; Long ago the lairds and their friends alone shot over the moors, and were content with smaller bags. Now sportsmen who pay high rents want larger bags, and cram into a week's shooting what used to be the whole season's sport. As a consequence, many more birds are wounded, perhaps in the generative organs, or other parts, which wounds affect their constitutions, and if they survive, they probably breed weaker-constitutioned birds. Before all peregrines were shot down and trapped and destroyed, these weakly birds were picked off, being usually the easiest captured, the last of the covey or pack in flight. How many authentic instances can you give of grouse disease appearing to any alarming extent, or at all, in deer-forests ? My belief is, but I do not speak with data at my side, that if you investigate this part of the subject, you will find very few authentic records of grouse disease in the deer-forests of Scotland. Why ? Because peregrines, martens, wild cats, and ' vermin' are not slain indiscriminately in deer-forests, and the grouse there lives a more natural existence.
quot; Formerly birds were less plentiful, more healthy, and men were less greedy. Now grouse are swarm­ing, and a most unnatural state of things exists; and not pleased with this, even, men want more and more, and ofrud^e a sinsde bird to feed the falcon's young.
GOOnbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;./nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;O
As long as they do so, so long will grouse disease recur. A direct cause of rapid inci'ease of grouse is in the regular system of burning heather, a better
-ocr page 155-
mm
RESULTS OF HEATHEE-BUBNING.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;133
succession of young fresh food being supplied, but the natural outcome of this is that when late and severe frosts do come, as thej so often do in this country, a much larger area of good feeding ground is damaged. If there were less young heather, there would be fewer birds, I believe; but when late frosts did come, these late frosts would be less likely to do damage on a large scale. If we must have at the rate of fifty to one hundred birds per acre on our moors (I do not speak from statistics) we must burn our heather judiciously and well; if we have this unnatural stock one year, we must not be surprised if the following spring a severe late frost damages or destroys all our fine stretches of tender young heather, and, consequently, that our grouse become diseased. Formerly, I believe, when heather-burning was not so common, the young heather came away, to a limited and natural extent, beneath the old heather, which latter, to some considerable extent, protected it from the frosts of spring. Xow the ' young heather ' is ' forced ' up by the burning, and it has no protection at all, as formerly. Much more I could say in sup­port of what I have already said, but to me so self-evident seem the causes, and the whole sequence of the facts connected with the grouse disease, and so certain am I, that I shall in the main issues be sup­ported in what I say by those naturalists whose opinion is most worth having, that I do not think it necessary here to bring forward further proofs and
-ocr page 156-
134
CAUSES OF GKOUSE DISEASE.
statistics; but simply to repeat, that the first causes of grouse disease are to be found in over-stocking, over-preservation, ignorant and reckless slaughter of so-called vermin, greed, unnatural and rapid burning of heather, and a wholly artificial state of grouse farming. In different districts these causes may differ to some extent. In the west, for instance, if too large areas of heather are destroyed, where young heather takes three or four years to re-appear, or is entirely supplanted by ling and grasses, and where the hill-sides get pitted and worn into cup-shaped holes by the naturally wet climate and great rainfall, holding thus much moisture, then grouse do not increase in numbers, but become extinct or scarce, owing to the scarcity of natural food, and then, jjerhaps, the outcry is made, not against the inter­ference with Nature's laws in this direction, but against the superabundance of ' vermin.' Again, in Perthshire or Banffshire, or other localities where young heather rushes up as if in a hot-bed after the old heather is burned, in a single year, or at most two. and remains good for several years, the results arc different, and a large stock of grouse appears. But if the whole heather were burned at once, and severe late spring frosts came, so would the whole young heather some fine day be destroyed, and probably the grouse become extinct on lai'ger areas. In a country where grouse are scarce, the evil may arise from interbreeding; and, indeed, this evil may even be a
-ocr page 157-
LETTER FROM A GREAT AUTHORITY.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 135
factor on densely-stocked moors, strange as the asser­tion may at first blush appear, because on densely-stocked moors the interbreeding may only be less in degree, as this large stock has been produced to an unnatural extent upon an area calculated by Nature to contain a far less quantity. In sparsely-populated districts a judicious introduction of fresh blood is necessary, and even on densely-populated moors exchange of a feAV hundred netted brace for others from a distance would decrease the chances of disease, though I doubt if it would cure or entirely pre­vent it.quot;
The following letter will be read with great interest as coming from so distinguished an au­thority :—
Rossdbu, Lruss, Dumbartonshire, My dear Sir,nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; August 18th, 1882.
I have little to say about the grouse disease except what I have frequently said in the ' Field.'
If you were asked what was the cause of cholera, you would at once reply that there were various causes. Bad ventilation, bad drainage, unwholesome food, besides atmo­spheric influences. Any of these causes might account for cholera. So it is with the grouse disease par excellence. It may be caused from various influences. It has been observed to break out after an over-increase of stock on a moor, and thus some have leaped to the absurd conclusion that over­crowding is the cause of disease. Now, we must distinguish be­tween over-crowding and over-stocking. To talk of over-crowd­ing on a breezy hillside is absurd. But the Maltliusian theory must ever hold true, and if you over-stock beyond the means of an animal's natural subsistence, the inevitable result must
-ocr page 158-
136nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;GROUSE DISEASE.
follow. The causes of epidemics or epizootics are frequently not discernible, but I have all along been of opinion that un­wholesome food has in nine times in ten been the cause of outbreaks of disease in grouse, though, like human beings, or all animals, they are susceptible of atmospheric influences. As, then, ventilation or drainage can have nothing to do with dis­ease in grouse, as with domestic animals, I hold that there are but two known causes wliich may account for it—unwholesome food and atmospheric influences. As regards the first—un­wholesome food—there are vainous causes which may deprive grouse of their natural food, heather, and thus compel them to resort to that which is not wholesome. A long-continued blighting east wind, without rain, may for a time ruin the heather. Or, after careful burning, if there is such a stock of sheep on the moor as to crop up all the young sprouts of heather on which grouse thrive and siibsist, what is there for it but for the poor creatures to forage for what they can get to fill their crops ? Hence the first sign of disease is to see them on the low grounds, in the potato fields, or gorging to repletion on unripe grain.
I hold, then, that nine times in ten unwholesome food is the cause of grouse disease par excellence, though grouse are liable, like all animals, to various diseases. But I know, in answer to this, that it has been said that the disease has appeared on moors when the heather lias been in the best state for grouse. Well, then, I freely admit that, when that is the case, the cause of disease is more inscrutable, and so, I can see nothing for it but to fall back on my other theory—atmospheric influences. At least, I could suggest no other cause, and have seen or heard of no other, except contagion or infection.
It is a curious fact, which I think throws light on my theory of unwholesome food being the chief cause of the grouse disease, that in my young days, fifty years ago, grouse never left the moors or frequented the stubbles ; but now, in a late harvest, the moor-edged farmers are quite afilicted by the grouse feeding on their quot; stooks of corn. I can only account for this change in their habits from the fact that formerly the moors were less
1
-ocr page 159-
GROUSE DISEASE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;137
stocked with sheep, and therefore there was more of their natural food for the grouse.
I quite believe that if the heather disappeared in our country —and I think there is every appearance that in time the green will usurp the purple—that grouse would disappear too. But it is a mistake, nevertheless, to suppose that grouse cannot subsist without heather. I have proved it to be so. Some time ago we kept tame grouse here, and I sent a pair to a friend in Suffolk. On the way there the hen laid several eggs. These were set below a barn-door hen, were hatched and reared, and lived in perfect health for at least four years, without ever tasting heather, though supplied with plenty of green stuff and weeds which tliey liked. Like most such pets, they came to an untimely end by a cat getting at them and killing them.
I don't think I can add anything to what is well known regarding the management of moors. It is the common prac­tice now to bum in strips and by rotation. As for food and shelter, the sportsman must square the matter of food between the sheep and grouse, for there must be enough of young heather for the grouse or they cannot thrive; albeit what I have said about the grouse in Suffolk. As for shelter, grouse will take care of themselves. I would prefer burning to mowing old heather.
If I can give you any other information on this subject I shall be happy to do so.
I am, yours faithfully,
William Colquhoun.
The Earl of Morton -writes to us from Conaglen, Ardgour, Argyllshire, that there never has been any disease amongst the grouse there. His lordship thinks that the reason is that there are so few of them, the grounds never being ovei'-stocked.
General Macdonald, of Edinburgh, believes that the cause of the disease in grouse is a small species of
-ocr page 160-
138
CAUSES OP GROUSE DISEASE.
tapeworm dropped from sheep, probably in an embryo form, or from dogs, and taken up by the birds in their food and the water they drink.
Major J. Murray Kennedy, of the Holme, New Galloway, Kirkudbrightshire, states that the grouse disease seems to come after very good years when there are more birds left on the moors than usual.
Colonel J. S. Stirling writes to us from his estate, Garo'unnock, Stirlineshire:—quot; I believe the cause of the grouse disease is the over-stocking of the moors, or rather the leaving of too many birds at the end of the season, and that the remedy for it, now that the keepers have killed off the natural enemies of the grouse in the shape of hawks, amp;c., is to shoot them well down, keeping at it well on in the season, and, if necessary, driving them. Driving, also, has this advantage, that it kills off the old birds, who always fly first, and who are very quarrelsome, and do a deal of harm in the nesting season.quot;
Dr. W. G. Dickson, of Mougbuie, Dalbeattie, writes tons:—quot; My idea is that the tapeworm has become very common among grouse, as among other animals, that the worm becomes more common as numbers increase, and birds die of inanition from the presence of the worm in the body, and then birds die very thin, skin and bone. In these years of plenty, the worms are passed out of the bodies on to the heather, and the young birds pick up the segments and eat them. The eggs of the tapeworm thus enter
'
-ocr page 161-
VARIOUS OPINIONS ON GROUSE DISEASE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;139
the body, and, -working through the tissues, as we know that eggs and young of parasites do, either seat themselves in the liver, or some other organ, and act fatally without impairing the appetite or injuring the healthiness of the birds; and these die somewhat suddenly while plump and full, and with a full crop; and thus the numerous birds of one season become nids for the propagation of these parasites, and so dying off, leave the moor once more to the few that have not suffered from the worm or are able to with­stand it and live over a season.quot;
Mr. T. Watson Greig, of Lassintullich, Eannoch, Perthshire, writes to us:—quot; I had grouse disease some years ago on a moor in the west of Scotland, and the mode pursued was to kill and bury every bird we could find. It did not occur again, and the moor yielded a large increase, about double the number previous to disease. I purchased this moor in 1879, and have had no disease. There are always a certain number of birds die in spring, and where driving is indulged in this number is largely increased, and no doubt this is sometimes mistaken for disease. I try to shoot as many old cocks on the 12th as possible, and this moor, eight hundred acres, which formerly yielded about forty brace, now gives about ninety brace. It is my opinion capercailzie and black game interfere injuriously with grouse, if in large numbers.quot;
Mr. William Houstoun, of Kintradwell, Brora,
-ocr page 162-
140
GEOUSB DISEASE.
Sutherlanclshire, writes to us: — quot;As to grouse disease, I have been amongst it, and watched its various phases all my life, and nearly thirty years ago corresponded with the ' Field,' when the disease first became serious in this district. At that time it took the tapeworm type, and the birds all came down to the sea rocks to pick up particles of salt evaporated by the sun. Salt, being a cure for tapeworm, was suggestive, and I placed rock salt on the moor; but when the disease next appeared it had a different form, and I fear we are as far as ever from a solution of the cause. That it comes at regular cycles there cannot be a doubt, and although it has this season, 1882, only been partial as yet, I feel quite convinced it will spread. I do not believe in over-preservation being a cause, for the moors in this district and the one I rent myself are terribly affected now, and they have always been well shot down. I opened three birds this week in the last stages of the disease, and they all presented the same appearance. The liver like a clot of coagulated ink; intestines extended with a feculent yellow matter, and crop full of un­digested but fresh and green heather tops.quot;
Mr. W. J. McHafEe, of Torhousemuir, Bladnoch, Wigtownshire, writes to us: — That he believes the disease to be attributable to atmospheric influence, attacking grouse periodically, just as influenza, cholera, diphtheria, amp;c., visit the human being. That an experience of many years has satisfied him that the
-ocr page 163-
PEOFESSOB YOUNG ON GEOUSE DISEASE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;141
theories as to the disease being caused by grouse eating old heather, too much corn, or the total want of it, are all incorrect. Over-stocking is, as a matter of course, injurious to grouse, not that it tends to produce this particular epidemic, but simply because when too many animals of any kind are congregated together they become unhealthy, and less able to resist the attacks of this disease when it makes its appearance.
Many more extracts could be made from the numerous letters we have received on this subject; but as sufficient quotations have been given to show the prevailing opinions as to the causes of the disease, and as we shall have occasion to notice more of the rival theories in our concluding remarks, we will now turn our attention to the published views of those who have from time to time endeavoured to solve the question.
There is a paper in the first volume of the Natural History Proceedings, Glasgow, by Professor John Young, on certain aspects of the grouse disease, in which he records the result of several observations he had made while dissecting grouse, with a view to ascertain the cause of death. He found a portion of the small intestine completely plugged by a dense mass of tapeworms. He also described the appearance presented by three other specimens of grouse, which had died of the so-called grouse disease on a moor in Argyleshire. In all there was extensive inflammation
-ocr page 164-
m
i
142
GEOUSE DISEASE.
of the peritonaeum ; in three, more or less adhesion of the intestines to each other and to the abdominal Avails ; in two, perforations had taken place through the adherent surfaces, the length of the tract from gizzard to anus being thus reduced. In these last two (red grouse) tapeworms were abundant; of the other two (black grouse) one contained only a single tapeworm, the other was wholly free of them. The two species were further contrasted : the intestines of the red grouse presented their normal calibre, their muscular substance being softened (this being probably a pathological condition, though possibly increased by post-mortem change), whereas those of the black grouse were very much dilated and trans­lucent. Moreover, of these two the younger presented the earlier stages of peritonitis, granules of lymph occurring in patches over the surface. Professor Young considered these appearances as supporting the view that the disease in no way depended on the presence of the entozoa, but that the peritonseal inflammation was the true cause of death. Havins: had opportunity of examining fatal cases in different parts of the country, he had come to the conclusion that the mortality is not dependent on local conditions, but that the disease is the result of some general cause operating equally on birds placed under very serious conditions. The mortality is, in fact, due to mal­nutrition, to a cachectic state transmitted from parent to offspring, and predisposing the young to suffer
-ocr page 165-
MR. GRAY ON GROUSE DISBASE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; #9632; 143
from influences such as severity of seasons or temporary scarcity of food, which under other cir­cumstances they would have resisted successfully. Concerning the cause of that cachexy, Professor Young had not formed an opinion—had only observed its relation to the amount of shooting over certain moors. An explanation had been given by Mr. Gray, which seemed to meet all the ditficulties of the case, being founded on the history of the species in time, and in the peculiar circumstances in which the birds are placed in this country. Professor Young con­cluded by asking for further specimens from those who might have the opportunity to send them, with a view to the preservation of a suite of specimens, illustrating the stages of the disease.
Mr. G-ray, the Secretary of the Natural History Association, observed that in reviewing the wide­spread ravages of this disease, it was necessary, before forming a judgment, to consider the changes which over-protection had brought upon the life of the red grouse. The almost total annihilation of its natural enemies had, to a certainty, induced a greater number of sickly birds, and ultimately a weaker race had sprung up in districts where formerly only strong birds prevailed. Buzzards and hawks, amp;c., if allowed to live, would have captured both the sick and wounded, and thus have prevented the perpetuation of a degenerate breed; and if sportsmen would only content themselves with a. moderate bag, and allow
-ocr page 166-
144
CANON' TEISTRAJI ON GROUSE DISEASE.
part of the feathered stock on their moors to become the prey of animals ordained by Nature to play an important part in their own particular sphere, we should have fewer instances of disease to chronicle. Nature in her arrangements (continued Mr. Gray) is very nicely balanced, but when, by man's interference, that balance is deranged, it is impossible to calculate the evils that may follow. The red grouse, therefore, wholly confined as it is in its geographical distribution to the limited range afforded by the mountain tracts of the British islands, is in a somewhat perilous position as a species. Rigorously protected for two-thirds of the year, it is suddenly subjected to a destruction which has almost no parallel ; and, looking to these periodical outbreaks of disease, combined with this annual slaughter through which the bird passes, it does not seem inconsistent with common sense to predict its extinction altogether. In the struggle for life, certain species have been known before now to be restricted to narrow limits before their final dis­appearance ; and, bearing this fact in mind, it would be well for the holders of moors to consider the propriety of trying some other plan for prolonging the life of this fine bird, than the very questionable one now in force.
The Rev. Canon Tristram, F.E.S., College, Dur­ham, stated, at a meeting of the British Association, in a paper on the Zoological Aspects of the Grouse Disease, that he attributed the rapid extension and
-ocr page 167-
MR, ANDREW WILSON ON GROUSE DISEASE. 145
epidemic character of the disease in a great measure to the indiscriminate slaughter of predatory animals. These, it was true, destroyed game, but it was only of the weakest and the most diseased animals that they made their prey. In this way nature stamped out disease, a method successfully copied in dealing with the cattle plague. He commented severely on the encouragement given by landed proprietors to the destruction of birds and beasts of prey, com­plaining that upon this question game-preservers were more open to be influenced by ignorant gamekeepers than by naturalists.
We find in the quot; Edinburgh Medical Journal quot; an article on the grouse disease by Mr. Andrew Wilson, Lecturer on Zoology and Comparative Anatomy, Edinburgh. This gentleman believes that the true mode of investigating the subject lies in the direction of pathological inquiry. First to ascertain the nature of the lesion ; thence, if possible, to determine its cause ; and, conjointly with the latter point or separately, to suggest from our pathology the means for prevention and cure.
Mr. Wilson has had many opportunities afforded him for the examination of grouse dying from the disease, and, although he does not venture to pro­nounce with certainty upon the exact cause or nature of the fatal lesion, he has briefly detailed the results of his investigations. He states that, in most of the birds he examined, he observed a markedly congested
10
-ocr page 168-
f/^
#9632;#9632;
I
#9632;
146
GROUSE DISEASE.
*
appearance of the mucous surface, and of the diges­tive and respiratory tracts. Repeated dissections and careful observation satisfied him beyond doubt, of the almost invariable presence of this lesion in birds which were forwarded as having been found dead. These appearances were especially marked in three cases, the specimens of which were obtained through Pro­fessor Simpson, of Glasgow, and he was careful to determine that these appearances were not due to putrefaction or post-mortem changes. He observes, with reference to two of the theories advanced in the controversy on the grouse disease, as follows:—
quot; The first of these hypotheses is generally asso­ciated with the name of Dr. Farquharsou, of London, who maintains that the lesion or lesions partake of the nature of a contagious epidemic, propagated by association or contact, and which, like epidemics in general, are presumed to have their origin in conditions of a more or less determinable kind.
quot; The second theory, which lias Dr. Cobbold for its chief exponent, may be termed a hypothesis of 'parasitism. Dr. Cobbold's researches on entozoa and hehninthology justly entitle his opinions on those matters to be received with respect; and he accord­ingly maintains that the grouse disease has its essential feature in the growth and propagation within these birds of parasites or entozoa ; the result being to produce the ' pining' condition, with the secpielaa of inanition, disease, and death. The chief parasite, or
*
It
ii
raquo;
-ocr page 169-
GROUSE DISEASE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 147
that to which the diseased condition is thus presumed to be mainly due, is a round worm of small size—the Strongylus pergracilis of Cobbold—which appears to select the caacal appendages of the intestine as its abode. In the caeca these worms are met with some­times in very large quantities. The grouse tapeworm, Tamia calva, is also commonly present in the intestines; but I do not apprehend that the parasitic theory attaches to the tapeworm, of itself, any grave or responsible share in the production of diseased conditions.
quot; Of these two theories I must unhesitatingly prefer the former; and the reasons for enlistment under the banner of the epidemic hypothesis rather than under that of parasitism, are chiefly those derived from the consideration that the former theory fully comprehends all the conditions which the phenomena of the grouse disease may present ; and further, that the theory may be applied to the explanation of points and facts, of which the theory of helmintbiasis can take no heed.
quot; We thus find that these birds are almost invariably affected by both kinds of entozoa; most specimens to a moderate extent, some to a very great degree. But it is exceedingly rare to meet with a bird in which not a single parasite of either kind is present. Out of many cases examined not a single bird was found actually free from the characteristic tapeworm, and in one or two doubtful instances only could it be
10 *
-ocr page 170-
quot;
148
GEOOSE DISEASE.
-
asserted or suggested that none of the round worms were present.
quot; That the presence of these parasites was uncon­nected with the death of the great majority of the birds examined is, I think, proved by the want of any causal or obvious relationship between the infestation and the fatal issue; and also by the absence, in most cases, of the signs of fatal parasitism—such as in­anition, producing the ' pining' condition, actual per­foration, morbid appearance of the muscular tissues, amp;c. No one can deny that the presence of parasites in large numbers undoubtedly causes death in a specific and readily understood manner; but this fact will not explain the nature of the cause or disease which operates so fatally, without any exceptional development of parasites, and certainly without the slightest appearance of inanition or other concomitant symptoms of helminthiasis. Outside the parasitic hypothesis, applicable as that theory is to a certain class of cases, there lies, I am convinced, the great bulk of fatal instances, the exact cause of which fatality must be sought for in some lesion analogous to that involved in the idea of the epidemic theory. We must thus account for the death in numbers of grouse which, with what one may consider a normal and natural degree of parasitism, yet die and succumb to disease, and which on examination present well-nourished bodies, firm, healthy muscular tissue, and other signs of presumed health.
i
!
-ocr page 171-
MR. J. E. LOED ON GEOÜSB DISEASE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;149
quot; Conversely, the lesions found after death, as ex­emplified by the foregoing observations, are perfectly compatible with the theory and suggestion of a con­tagious epidemic disease, wliich runs through a defined course, and which, could the animals be observed during life with the requisite degree of care and attention, would probably be found to exhibit a symptomatology analogous to that of an acute febrile attack. And this view may receive some support from its serving to explain the varying degrees of intensity in the appearances observed on dissection, by presuming that the attack may terminate fatally at various stages in its course : or that the less marked appearances seen in certain cases may be consistent with symptoms of resolution and amend­ment.quot;
Our esteemed friend, the late Mr. John Keast Lord, naturalist to the British North American Boundary Commission, author of that charming book, quot;At Home in the Wilderness,quot; wrote several articles on the grouse disease in quot; Land and Water,quot; in 1867, when the malady was very prevalent. He thought then that the grouse disease belonged to the same category as cholera and rinderpest, but he advanced no opinion as to the origin of it. He assumed that the germ of the contagion floated in the air or in water, and was taken into the alimentary canal with the food. While discussing the subject since with him and another high authority, Mr. Frank
-ocr page 172-
150
ME. BUCKLAND ON GROUSE DISEASE.
Buckland, he yielded very much to our views that an unhealthy growth of the herbage, upon which grouse mainly depend for subsistence, was one of the causes of, or at least predisposed them to, the disease. The results of the post-mortem examinations that were made from time to time by Mr. Lord and Mr. Buck-land appear to have confirmed their idea, that the disease was disorganisation of the liver accompanied with inflammation of the chest viscera. They were of opinion that quot; stamping outquot; was the only means of putting an end to the further spread of the pesti­lence—that every sick and weakly bird should be shot and buried with some disinfectant, or put into a pit with quicklime. We think that there is far too great a tendency to ascribe the origin of all diseases to living germs and organisms, while other and more satisfactory explanations are at hand.
Havino- now put before our readers the various opinions of scientists, sportsmen, naturalists, and others, on the grouse disease question, we will make some concluding remarks.
-ocr page 173-
151
CHAPTER VI.
Attempt the euclj and never stand to doubt ; Nothing 's so Lard but search will find it out.
Although the grouse disease, its causes, and the means of remedying it, appeared at first exceedingly perplexing, we have, we think, cleared up the seem­ing mystery in the foregoing pages. The investiga­tions made by us many years ago on the subject left no matter of doubt in our mind. Lest, however, it might be thought that we are only adopting the opinions given in the preceding pages by others, we will reprint the views entertained by us many years since, and which we published in the Press at the time. In 1856 we expressed the same views as we do now. Although we have lost the paper, the fol­lowing extract from it, however, is to be found at page 717 of our work on quot;British Columbia,quot; issued in 1863. In writing about the birds of that country
-ocr page 174-
mmm
152
CAUSE OF THE SCAEOITY OF GROUSE.
we referred to grouse in Scotland, and the disease, as follows:—
quot; The disease which has prevailed amongst grouse is said to be almost as mysterious as the potato blight; and nothing that has yet been written about it has satisfied us of the causes which led to the dis­appearance of birds from the best-stocked moors a short time ago. We are of opinion that the passion for inordinately large bags, which has been indulged in on moors not let under lease, and the unceasing demand for the southern market, has led chiefly to the scarcity that existed. No stranger has the same interest in preserving game as the owners, who have a love for sport; but we regret to say that these have become few in number, and that exploring the fast­nesses of the Highlands is all but relinquished by our own country gentlemen. The paucity may also be ascribed to the decreasing number of the fox, and to not burning the overgrown portions of the heath each successive year; for when the heath becomes rank, the young birds, being caged in, are unable to move away for food, and are frequently found dead in their nests.quot;
We wrote our opinion in quot;Bell's Lifequot; of 16th June 1861, from which the following is an abridged extract:—
quot;Although many persons may not feel disposed to attach much importance to the opinions of the aborigines of British North America, it may never-
.t
'
-ocr page 175-
OPINIONS OF THE AMERICAN INDIANS.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;153
theless be a fact -worthy of mention that the notions of the Indians with whom we have conversed as to the cause of the disease of the grouse, in British Columbia and Vancouver's Island, entirely accord with the reason assigned by us. These enemies of the feathered fraternity say that the grouse of these rigid, inhospitable dependencies subsist mainly on seeds and berries, and on several species of ever­greens; in early spring they eat the tender buds of various trees; then when the winter has been more than commonly severe and the spring cold, the leaves and buds of the trees and shrubs lack the nutrition necessary for the healthy condition of the grouse, and, consequently, disease is engendered, of which they speedily die. So also of our Scottish moors; the severity of our winters is at times very great, and the same result follows.quot;
Our view as to the cause of the grouse disease was confirmed in quot;Land and Waterquot; in 1867, in which the following facts were submitted to the judgment of sportsmen:—There are two moors, one in Inverness-Shire, one in Aberdeenshire; the dis­tance between the two, as the crow flies, is probably not more than forty miles. The first-named moor contains forty thousand acres, the second thirty thousand. On the first there has been no disease, and more than two thousand brace of grouse, in the best possible condition, have been killed this season, and a large stock of healthy birds have been left to
-ocr page 176-
#9632;raquo;
164
ONE CAUSE OF GEOUSE DISEASE.
breed ; on' the second moor, although in ordinary years between two and three thousand brace of grouse have been killed, this season not one bird bus yet been shot, because the disease has prevailed to such an extent that few grouse are left. What has been the reason of these different results ? is the important question to be solved; and in what respect does one moor ditfer from another ? and was the weather similar in the spring of the year, or was it in any important respect different ? and if so, what effect did that difference produce on the heather ? On the moor on which the disease has prevailed, the keeper states that the last spring was one of the very worst he has ever known since he has been on the ground; and bis experience extends over seventeen years, in addition to about ten years' prior experience on other moors. There were continuous cold, sharp, cutting easterly winds, with occasional sleet and snow-storms, and the heather became hard and sapless; this having been the invariable consequence of similar weather since he has been on the ground. lie therefore infers that hard, indigestible, sapless heather has been to a great extent the occasion of the disease; especially as, in every instance, on opening a diseased bird, he has found the liver black and soft. One striking difference between the diseases of 1867 and that of former years, he states to have been, that the dead birds he has picked up this season were so plump, and in such excellent plumage, that they had the appear-
-ocr page 177-
DR. MACDONALd's LBTTBB TO quot; THE TIMES.quot; 155
ance of healthy birds; whei-eas in former years the diseased birds were mostly characterised by dull dis­ordered plumage and attenuated bodies.
The following letter from us appeared in quot; The Timesquot; of May 12, 1873:—
Sir,
The unsatisfactory accounts of the moors which continue to reach us from the north of England and Scotland are very greatly to be regretted. It seems that disease of an exceedingly virulent kind prevails in almost all parts of the Highlands, and in a form hitherto unknown. This heightens the mystery and renders it more incomprehensible than ever.
The striking dissimilarity which marks the disease in different years may not be altogether unworthy of notice at the present moment. In 18-17,1856, and 1865 the infected grouse exhibited a dull, disordered plumage and attenuated bodies. In 1807 they showed good plumage, a healthy appearance, and were perfectly plump, although the liver was discoloured and soft. This year they are beautiful in plumage, but wasted to skeletons, having large quantities of undigested berries and old heather in their crops.
Now, Sir, if I am asked to account for these remarkable differences, I really cannot do it, although, however, I have not much hesitation in advancing my humble opinion as to the causes of the disease. Well, then, I attribute it in a great measure—Firstly, to not burning or mowing sufficiently exten­sive patches of the old heather in the best feeding-grounds, to insure an adequate supply of young, tender heath-shoots for the bird's food, and cover of different ages for their protection in winter and for the breeding season ; because rank heather and decayed fibres, old seeds and berries, lack the nutrition neces­sary for the healthy condition of the grouse, and do not assimi­late with the system of the bird, consequently germinating disease, of which the creatures speedily die. Secondly, to the over-stocking of the moors, and to overtrapping birds of prey;
-ocr page 178-
r
r.^—-----
aquot;
*
.
j-
i
t
#9830; ,i
i
i
!
* .
1
1
;
1
*
#9632;#9632;H
mmwm
156
GROUSE DISEASE.
because over-stocking helps greatly to develop all sorts of maladies, especially parasitic diseases, while birds of prey con­tribute to the health of the live grouse by destroying the weak, sickly, and later-hatched birds, and such as get debilitated from other causes, and thus leave, though a smaller, yet a stronger, hardier, and healthier stock.
Nothing that has yet been written or said about the grouse disease will induce mo to abandon my belief that it is due in a great measure to the causes I have just stated, and I have been all my life more or less resident in grouse districts in this country and abroad. Moreover, I have not only shot thousands upon thousands of them, but I have also dissected many, and I found my conclusions upon my experience.
I am. Sir, yours faithfully,
D. G. F. Macdonald.
We might quote many more letters written by us since 1873 on this subject; but quot;we have given suffi­cient to prove that our views are of long standing, and are not based on information recently furnished to us by others.
Since we have arrived at a knowledge of the causes of the grouse disease, surely we can at least diminish its fatal results, if not neutralise it altogether. This is the end we have in view. Whilst there are a few who know the causes of the disease, and the remedies, the majority of landowners and sportsmen, unfor­tunately, too readily espouse every theory advanced, however opposed to the certain teachings of nature. This being so, we have fortified our views by the experiences and opinions of men conversant with the subject, to prove the correctness of our conclusions. We are fully convinced that the cause of disease is
-ocr page 179-
SüMMABT OF OPINIONS.
157
the mismanagement of the moorlands—a lack of
knowledare of the instincts of wild animals, and of the
purposes for which they were created. Were the
despised worm exterminated, the earth would become
unfruitful, and famine and death result. Let us
Find tongues in trees, books in the running brooks. Sermons in stones, and good in everything.
However highly we value opinions formed on scien­tific research, we value more the views of those who have studied nature, not in libraries and museums, but in the woods, fields, and moorlands. Facts with rearard to the red grouse must be sousrht for in the upland moors, where the mosses, heather, brakes, broom, and other plants, enrich the mountain-sides of the so-called barren waste.
It will be seen from the preceding pages that opinions differ very much as to the nature and cause of the grouse disease. We will, therefore, give a summary #9632;which may be convenient to the reader.
Summary of Opinions on the Gkouse Disease.
1.nbsp; nbsp;Dr. Cobbold.—That it is essentially and ex­clusively a parasitic disorder.
2.nbsp; nbsp;Dr. Farquharson. — That it is a contagious epidemic, like cholera, scarlet fever, or measles.
3.nbsp; nbsp;Mr. J. A. H. Brown.—That it is caused by over-stocking, over-preservation, slaughter of birds of prey, bad heather, and the artificial system of grouse farming.
-ocr page 180-
^mm
wm
#9632;#9632;
#9830;I
158 SUMMARY OP OPINIONS ON GROUSE DISEASE.
4.nbsp; nbsp;Mr. Colquhoun.—That it is caused by atmo­spheric influences, over-stocking, and unwholesome
food.
5.nbsp; nbsp;Baid of Morton. — That over-stocking is the
cause.
6.nbsp; nbsp;General Macdonald.—That it is caused by a small species of tapeworm dropped from sheep in an embryo form and taken up by grouse in their food.
7.nbsp; nbsp;Major Kennedy.—That it comes after an abun­dant grouse crop, when more birds are left on the moors than usual.
8.nbsp; nbsp;Colonel Stirling.—That it is caused by over­stocking ; remedy, to shoot the birds well down.
9.nbsp; nbsp;Dr. Dickson.—That the cause is tapeworm.
10.nbsp; nbsp;Mr. Greig.—That the affected grouse should be shot and buried, stamped out, in fact.
11.nbsp; nbsp;Mr. Houstoun.—That it takes the form of tapeworm one time, and bad liver another.
12.nbsp; nbsp;Mr. M'Haffie.—That the cause is atmospheric influences, like cholera, diphtheria, amp;c., and over­crowding.
13.nbsp; nbsp;Professor Young.—That the disease does not depend on the presence of the entozoa in the grouse.
14.nbsp; nbsp;Mr. Gray.—That the disease is owing to over-protection—the annihilation of the natural enemies of the grouse.
15.nbsp; nbsp;Rev. Canon Tristram.—That he attributed the disease in a great measure to the indiscriminate killing of predatory animals.
f :
-ocr page 181-
SUMMARY OP OPINIONS, CONTTNFED.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 159
16.nbsp; nbsp;Mr. Andrew Wilson. — That he does not believe in the parasitic theory of Dr. Cobbold, but in some lesion analogous to the epidemic theory.
17.nbsp; nbsp;Mr. John Keast Lord.—That the germ of the contagion floats in the air, and that unhealthy her­bage predisposes the birds to disease.
18.nbsp; nbsp;Dr. Macdonald.—That it is caused by the mismanagement of the moors, insufficiency of natural food, by want of systematic heath-burning, by too great a preponderance of sheep which nibble the heather tops, over-stocking, severe frost, excessive rain, and the extermination of the birds and beasfs of prey.
Just as we were concluding our summary, we had the pleasure to receive a communication from Mr. G. T. Booth, of the Dyke Road Museum of British Birds here, the most beautiful collection we have ever seen, in which ornithologists can revel to their heart's con­tent amidst the most lovely of God's creatures. It may with truth be said that it is the greatest attrac­tion in this fashionable and popular watering-place. Palmam qui meruit ferat.
Mr. Booth doubts if the grouse disease is by any possible means to be avoided under existing circum­stances ; because, if one sportsman, by judicious shooting and management, succeeded in keeping his birds in health, his neighbour would most probably neglect all precautions, and the malady would certainly spread, since he concludes, whatever may be the cause
-ocr page 182-
r-
#9632;#9632;!quot;^^^
^mmmmt
160
SIR. G. T. BOOTH S VIEWS.
iraquo; ;
that it is infectious. He believes that bad seasons, Dad food, wet, and other causes may weaken the birds and predispose them to disease; but that by judicious shootiuir, leaving a fair and not too abundant stock, and, above all, killing down the old cocks, the disease might be kept off. At all events, he thinks that if the old cocks were thoroughly thinned down there would be much less disease, as he noticed in several instances that they were the first sufferers. His own practice is always to shoot the single old cock grouse when and where he could. Mr. Booth being a natu­ralist and sportsman of many years experience, who has carefully studied the habits of grouse, both in health and disease, we regret that he does not give an opinion as to the origin of the disease, as it would be of great value.
Mr. Booth's view is upheld by a correspondent, who states that he knows a moor that is admirably managed, the practice being to shoot as few bens as possible, and never to kill a cheeper. The cock bird is always picked out of the covey with the first barrel, and in the late autumn cocks are stalked and shot. The effect has been that the moor, which a few years was almost without breeding birds, is uoav well stocked with grouse.
Lead poisoning is alleged by some persons to be the cause of the disease in grouse, which is, however, a very old notion. One gentleman mentions a moor on which seven hundred brace were killed the year
-ocr page 183-
LEAD POISOIOTG.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 161
before last, which involved the disposal of about two thousand ounces of shot; allowing about one and one-eighth ounces to each charge, and for misses, and No. 5 to have been chiefly used, and that there are about two hundred and ten pellets to an ounce, then about forty-two thousand pellets were dispersed. Shot become by oxidation the colour of the bloom on wortleberries, and might easily be picked up in mis­take for them. Moreover, it has been noted that it has been often after much rain that the grouse have been found diseased; and it must be observed that the purer the water, the more is lead acted upon by it, so that lead, which might be comparatively inert while the birds drank water containing salts, as most spring water does, such as carbonate of lime, amp;c., might suddenly become more actively poisonous when, possibly for some days in heavy rain, the liquid taken was not spring, but pure rain water. We do not hold with this theory, as we know moors on which shot has been scattered as thick as hailstones without any symptoms of the disease appearing, the heather birds being plentiful and strong.
Ben Maillie again affirms that the grouse malady is much analogous to fluke disease, known as the quot;rotquot; in sheep, which springs from eating grass among which there are the germs of the parasite which constitute the disease. He thinks that with the food these enter into the system, and live and grow there ; and that it is in an unusually wet year
11
-ocr page 184-
Pi
162
BIRDS AND BEASTS OF PREY.
that the disease is most prevalent and malignant. He concludes, therefore, that grouse become diseased, either by eating food or drinking water in which there are the disease-germs; by food which may be sound in itself, but is rendered unwholesome by the presence of these germs.
Two years ago thousands of sheep in Devonshire and Somei'set died from fluke, and at the beginning of last winter one of the county veterinary surgeons thought he would try an experiment upon a flock to see if it were possible to combat the malady. Happily his experiments were crowned with success. This must be satisfactory to such as believe the grouse disease to resemble the liver fluke ailment. As it is well known that fluke is developed in permanent pastures, and taken into the system with the grass, the veterinary turned out the flock on land that bad hitherto been fatal to sheep. One half he allowed to feed their own way; but with the food taken by the remainder he every day mixed a quarter of an ounce of salt, and half a pint of corn. On killing the uncared-for sheep, he found their livers so full of fluke that they could not have lived another season, whilst those to which the salt and corn were given were quite sound, and in excellent condition.
The birds and beasts of prey are growing scarcer and scarcer. They are the unfortunate victims of a new state of things. Forests, mountains, moors, and glens afford them no longer protection, so that we
-ocr page 185-
ANIMALS OF THE FOREST.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;163
fear their extinction is inevitable ere long. They will live only in our memories, to recall the selfishness of the higher creature man, who disregards the glorious maxim of quot; Live and let live ! quot; Surely they have troubles enough without having the ruthless hand of man constantly raised against them.
We often fancy that the life led by animals of the forest in a state of nature is an exceedingly happy one, and that they are exempt from care and trouble, —that they live an unconfined, unconstrained, and ever joyous existence. Such, however, is not the case. The career of flesh-eating animals especially is often extremely miserable. They frequently suffer agonising pangs of hunger, and when they fall in with quarry they often have to fight desperately to subdue and kill their victim. The strongest coming off vic­torious is frightfully mutilated in the fierce combat, and often so terribly mangled that it drags itself into the bush or into a hole to die a lingering death of thirst and hunger. Moreover, the howl of wild beasts in a state of nature is so forlorn and dismal that it impresses one with sadness, indicating that the poor creatures wander unsuccessfully for food. They sneak and sniff about too, like dejected, staiwing wretches, desperate upon the object of their diet, as we have often witnessed in the jungle and forest. They also suffer much from disease brought on by eating foul carrion, and long abstinence. If they live to old age, their lot is still more miserable. Their teeth are
11 *
-ocr page 186-
^^mm
m
164
LIFE OP WILD ANIMALS.
worn away, their claws are blunt, and they can no longer fasten on their prey. Thus they perish in the terrible misery of starvation. Even the fox, which is endowed by nature with so much cunning to secure his food and hide in apparent security, goes frequently without sustenance, and feels himself for ever in danger of trap and hound.
Nor is the life of the animals that live on grass and roots so free and happy as we imagine. The deer, the hare, and the rabbit., which seem to have so delightful an existence gamboling in green leaves, heath, and primrose, pass a life of anxious care. Gun, dog, and other enemies keep them in perpetual fear for their lives. Pleasing as it is to see a herd of deer browsing in the lone valley or on the hill-top, it is painful to observe the intense anxiety and nervous­ness which the creatures exhibit. They are fearful every moment of attack, and never stoop to nibble the green shoots and plants without a timorous glance on all sides, a fretful cocking of their ears, and a terrified sniff up the wind to see that all is right and safe. If the sharp crack of a rifle is heard, or a dead branch fall while they are slaking their thirst in the brook or well, they break away in a paroxysm of fright. Their graceful caresses and pretty play, their feeding and sleeping, are all carried on amid an almost unceasing dread of death. Nor are they always healthy. The hunter or stalker knows full well that they are often infested with parasites which
-ocr page 187-
BIRD AND INSECT LIFE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 165
render their existence a misery. Few, very few wild animals die a natural death. Their life is a series of cares, troubles, and privations, for graminivorous and carnivorous alike; and yet we often envy their existence. Nor are sweet and lovely birds exempt. The warbling lark, soaring so happily in the sky, is often in fear of the rapacious hawk. The hawk in turn is in alarm of its stronger foes, the eaode and falcon. The thrush and blackbird live in terror of wild cats and weasels. Nor is the life of the beautiful insects we so much admire all pleasure and play. The charming butterfly, which pursues its rapturous flight from flower to flower, from blossom to silken leaf and velvet rose, often flies for dear life from place to place. The myriads of other glittering insects sport about but for a while, until the feathered foe, the darting1 salmon, or the quick-eyed trout give them a living burial. The busy bee, which stores up its golden treasures in the sunny hours for its winter's aliment, is ruthlessly murdered and treacherously plundered after many months of toil, trouble, care, and watch­fulness. Such is their unenviable fate I Just as truly as man has his hidden ills, his cares, his troubles, his pains, his sorrows, in youth and in old age; so truly also have the quot; animals in a state of nature quot; an ecpial share of the ills that flesh is heir to.
The foe, true to its nature's instinct, Pursues and presses on to death.
The poor denizens of the forest cry to us for pro-
-ocr page 188-
—J,L—gt;-
giW^Mg
#9632;#9632;
166
LOVE OF NATURE AN INSTINCT.
tection. Man's mission is not to exterminate God's creatures. What do we see ? Wanton cruelty de­scribed as sport, and incessant attempt to destroy and exterminate every bird and beast of prey, in ignorance or defiance of the grand purposes of the Creator.
Country gentlemen, naturalists, sportsmen, and keepers, have the best opportunities of enjoying nature in all her beauty. To them every season of the year is interesting. To be a lover of nature is one of the greatest sources of happiness, and, happily, most people are sensible of her many charms. Birds, beasts, and even creeping things, give us delight. Verily the love of nature is an instinct. It is born to us, and we transmit it to our remotest descendants. The more our intellectual powers are developed, the warmer becomes the feeling with which we regard her ever-varying forms. The higher our civilisation advances, the loftier our appreciation of the beauties scattered around us. All races have a yearning for some pure fellowship with unsophisticated nature. To the lover of Nature her works are an unfailing-source of enjoyment! When he wanders abroad he finds loveliness for the eye and pleasure for the heart. As he rambles over the peaceful vale clothed with verdure and beauty, he feels a glow of delight thrill his soul; as he roams o'er wilds and solitary heaths, or revels amidst waving crops of golden grain; as he gazes on woodland scenery, flamed in all its brilliant tints; as he beholds the hoary fen, and dark moun-
-ocr page 189-
THE CHAEMS OF NATURE.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;167
tain-joool sleeping in silence with its heath-clad margin, its white grass, lichens, and water-lilies, its leaping trout, its wild clucks, widgeons, and stately herons, its huge stones and scattered rocks; as he rambles by the meandering stream, the gushing brook, the rocky glen, the clinging ivy, the overhanging foliage, the yellow broom, honeysuckle, and fern ; as he listens to the sweet call of the gallant stag, or sees him bound over the lone glade, the eagle hover aloft, and the strong-winged falcon still in view; as he listens to the hollow whistling of the winds, the plaint of rills, the murmur of waterfall, the rustling of leaves, the flapping of wild ducks in the tarns; as he hears the heath-hen plaintively murmuring her carol, and the black-cock crowing his deep response; as he hearkens to the fierce cry of ravenous birds, the forlorn howl of beasts of prey, the croak of toads and other reptiles, and the ocean's roar in the heavings of its blue limit­less waves ; as he listens to the gushing carol of the lark who sings in the bright sky, the cuckoo's tuneful voice from the solitary woods, the hum of bees, and the linnet's lay of love ; as he hears the wailing owlet ply her sad song, and the cormorant her unearthly screams; as he views the gorgeous flowers which give so great a charm, such grace and fragrance, the lilies of the waters expanding their bright chalices and diffusing their sweet odour amidst the pattering of the waterfall, or floating on the still surface of crystal lakes; as he sees the fairest lamp of night resume her
-ocr page 190-
168nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;. DEER EOEESTS.
throne, and each glittering star glide tranquilly through the ethereal sky,—surely solitude ceases to be lonely, and in everything does the lover of nature find the heaven-born delight which refreshes, purifies, and elevates the mind, although 'tis but the glory of the fleeting moment as we pass into new untravelled orbs where are disclosed the mysterious footsteps of Him whose throne is on the rolling worlds. We can all of us sympathise with the exclamation of the Arab scheik to Mr. Layard, as they were careering over the plain, then green with the first verdure, and enamelled with the beautiful flowers of spring: quot; 0, Bey! what has God given to us equal to this ? What else is there worth living for ? What do the dwellers in towns know of true happiness? They have never seen grass nor flowers. May God have pity on them! quot;
Come, then! the heather bloom
Woes with its wild perfume; Fragrant and blithesome thy welcome shall be ;
Gaily the fountain sheen
Leaps from the mountain green ; Come to our home of the moorland and lea.
As a large revenue is derived from the deer forests of the wild hill country in Scotland, and as forests are closely allied to grouse moors, we intended making some observations respecting them; but we have already overrun the space avo had limited ourselves to when we commenced this volume. The rents obtained for good deer-forests are enormous. It may be doubted whether such huge rents will be procured
-ocr page 191-
#9632; I
MAN VERSUS DEER.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 169
for long, since forests are now beginning to be thrown upon the owners' hands. This may bring about a change in these vast solitudes. They may soon be spotted with green patches of cultivated land, and the hill-sides once more dotted with pretty cottages—the happy homes of a thriving, sober, and industrious people hnbuecl with true piety and patriotism. We certainly would not lament the change.
But let it not be understood that we are entirely against deer forests. We highly appreciate them within due limits. What we raise our voice a^ainst is the clearance of crofters and small tenants for the purpose of converting their holdings into deer forests —the displacement of man for deer—cruelly evicting a noble race for the pleasures of the few. Such removals are outrages on humanity and justice, and a disgrace to a civilised nation. We trust that our readers will do all in their power to help us to save the remnant of a brave, industrious, self-denying, patriotic race from a cruel fate. Foresting* vast tracts of valuable grazing and cultivable land has been, and still is, a curse to the poor Highland peasantry.
Have we not seen, round Britain's peopled shore Her useful sons exclianged for useless ore ? Seen all her triumphs but destruction haste, Like flaring tapers, bright'ning as they waste ? Seen Opulence, her grandeur to maintain, Lead stern Depopulation in her train. And over field's where scattered hamlets rose. In barren solitary pomp repose ?
-ocr page 192-
170nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;DEBE-STALKING.
We have real love for deer-stalking, which is a manly and exhilaratiug sport. The diversion affords ample scope for skill and manoBUVring. It exhibits so well the graceful movements of the stag, and displays in such a beautiful and interesting manner his defen­sive instincts, that it creates a deep and absorbing emotion in the stalker. It is a noble sport, and our happiest days have been among the Scottish wilds in pursuit of the red-deer (Gervus elephas). To bring down a stag-royal—the chieftain of the mountain corrie—is a highly interesting and exhilarating effort. We are carried through bog, through burn and stream, through glen, forest pass and sylvan flat, up hill and mountain, and down precipice; creeping, crawling, wading, running or crouching, heedless alike of mire, water, and fatigue. Success and failure—plans well laid and executed—difficulties overcome by skill— give the highest zest to the sportsman. Even when all ends in disappointment, as we see the fine old stag throw up his antlered head sniffing the air and starting off with graceful bounds from the mountain-top to the distant corrie, reminding us of the words of Scotland's greatest poet,—
The best laid schemes o' mice and men Gang aft a-gley ;—
we have experienced delight which a deer-stalker can only feel as his pulse beats vigorously from excite­ment. It is the combination of many circumstances
-ocr page 193-
SCOTCH SCENEBY.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;171
that produces the charm of what is rightly called the noblest of British sports.
Magnificent creature ! so stately and bright! In the pride of thy spirit pursuing thy flight ; Hail, king of the wild, whom nature hath borne O'er a hundred hill-tops since the mists of the morn ; The joy of the happy, the strength of the free, Are spread in a garment of glory o'er thee.
There may be richer spots in the world; but there
is none more beautiful than Scotland with her süperb
views, noble range of mountains, and glittering lakes.
This charming scenery is at its finest during the
sporting season; the pretty birch tree is then
goldening in the leaf, the quot;wimpling burn runs
stronger, and the heather is in its richest beauty.
These glorious days bring out colour on objects not
seen at other times; and our beloved Queen shows
how much she loves at this season the
Laud of brown heath and shaggy wood, Land of the mountain and the flood ;
which is, indeed, the recreation ground for the whole nation.
-ocr page 194-
gt; ^—ggggraquo;—^——#9632;#9632;
172
APPENDIX
Heather- Burning.
This important subject was fully discussed at a meeting of the sheep farmers and sportsmen on the Sutherland Estate, held at Golspie, on 26th September 1870. There were present His Grace the Duke of Sutherland, who occupied the Chair, the Marquis of Stafford, the Master of Blantyre, Messrs. H. Wright, J. Peacock, W. S. Fräser, S. Bateson, W. Houstoun, Major Westen, Colonel Tod Brown, and many others.
It was resolved :—
1.nbsp; nbsp;That Heather-burning, as at present carried out in this
County, is in a very unsatisfactory state, and that it would be for the combined interests of the Landlord, Sporting, and Farming Tenant that it should be put under a proper system.
2.nbsp; That over-burning, as now so frequently complained of,
may not proceed from an insatiable desire on the part of the Farmer for young heather, as from his being too weak-handed to control the fire when once kindled,—and that his having, individually, to pay a staff of assistants for so doing, would be beyond his means. 8. Seeing, therefore, that the expense of putting on sufficient strength to burn the ground properly, into a rotation of patches, should not be borne by the Farmer alone, the
-ocr page 195-
laquo;quot;
HEA.THER-BUENING.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 173
alternative lies in the co-operation of the Landlord, Sportsman, and Farmer, by contributing their respective quotas towards the outlay.
4.nbsp; That as tbe general adoption of such a scheme must
depend much upon its being worked economically, a Committee be appointed, consisting of Sportsmen and Farmers, to ascertain the modes of burning in districts where best carried out, and the probable expense attend­ing such.
5.nbsp; That, meantime, it might be worth the consideration of
Sportsmen (who have generally taken no active hand in the proper burning of their moors) to experiment by turning out their keepers and gillies with a few assistants, to accompany shepherds di;riiig the burning season, and so help to keep the fires within bounds.
(j. That this Meeting, considering that it would be advan­tageous that the Sporting Tenant co-operate with the Sheep Farmer in controlling the fives when once lighted, suggest that communications be maintained between the Sheep Farmers and the Sportsmen, in order that it may be known beforehand what ground the Sheep Farmers have it in contemplation to burn, in conformity with the terms of their leases, so that due arrangements may be made for providing a staff of men in readiness. It should be an understanding that no fire be lighted until a suffi­cient number of men to control it be present on the ground, the servants of the Shooting Tenant being bound to attend on being required to do so.
7. That the following Committee be appointed for the pur­poses mentioned in Eesolution No. 4 :—Wm. Houstoun, Esq., Convener; The Master of Blautyre ; Colonel Tod Brown ; S. Bateson, Esq. ; George Barclay, Esq. ; Wm. Mitchell, Esq. ; E. H. Sykes, Esq.
-ocr page 196-
^BBS^mmamm^mmmmammmf
174nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;HEATHER-BURNING IN SUTHERLAND,
At a Meetixg of the Sheep Faemees and Spoetsmen on the Sutheeland Estate, held at the Drill Hall, Golspie, September 25, 1877, Me. S. Bateson in the Chair—it was resolved :—
1.nbsp; nbsp;That for every Shepherd or assistant sent out by the
Farmer to burn, two Assistants should be provided by the Sportsman.
2.nbsp; nbsp;That, as far as possible, the ground intended to be burnt,
should be carefully gene over and marked off previously, arid that in no case should Heather of less than seven years' growth be set fire to, except for the sole purpose of burning the Strips necessary for ensiuing the wished-for rotation ; this resohuion, however, is not to be understood as applying to wet flow groimd or bent grass.
3.nbsp; nbsp;That in no case should it bo permissible for a Shepherd
or Keeper to light a fire single-handed, nor should a smaller squad than three work together.
4.nbsp; nbsp;That the ground should be burnt in Strips of not more
than sixty yards in breadth, but when this is not prac­ticable, in patches of not more than about five acres in extent.
5.nbsp; nbsp;That although experience has shown that under the old
system of burning, the grant of extended leave may not have been safe, yet that under peculiar circumstances it is suggested that it might be judicious to grant such leave, provided these new and more careful regulations are carried into effect—this suggestion to apply especially to wet flow ground or bout grass.
6.nbsp; nbsp;That sufficient notice be given by the Shepherd to the
Keeper, in order that he may be able to attend with his assistants at the appointed time and place ; that the Keeper be informed of the number of assistants he is required to bring ; and that he send back word to the Shepherd whether or not he will be able to attend with such assistants.
-ocr page 197-
1
WILD BIRDS PROTECTION ACT.
175
That, in the event of the Keeper not being present with his assistants after receiving due notice from the Shep­herd, the latter be authorized to hire two men for every one provided by the farmer and that the Shooting Tenant be liable for, and bound to pay the expenses thus incurred.
S. Bateson, Chairman. W. Houstoun, Convener.
Dunrobin Castle, Sept 27, 1877.
I coxstder the foregoing resolutions form generally a reason­able and practicable basis for arrangements between the Farming and Sporting Tenants in this County in the matter of Heather-burning.
Sutherland.
Wild Birds Protection Acts, 1880 and 1881.
These Acts have been published in a neat handy form, with excellent terse explanatory notes, by Mr. Horace Cox, quot;The Field quot; Office, from which we extract the following :—
quot;It doubtless will surprise many readers to learn that, by the Act of 1880, wild birds of every species found in the United Kingdom are protected in spring and summer. Not only will wildfowl and sea birds, the nightingale and the goldfinch, be allowed to breed in peace, but hawks and crows, blackbirds and sparrows, also have a close-time provided, though not of an equally stringent character. The gamekeeper and the gardener, however, need not be greatly exercised at this concession to the enemy ; for, with their master's authority, they will have much the same power as heretofore to quot; slay and spare not.quot; On the other hand, persons who regard all b.'rds as welcome friends will find them less open than before to attacks from without. Formerly no man could feel that his grounds were safe from the incursions of birdcatchers and hedge-poppers. Many an owner of a country estate, who has an affection for song birds would preserve his nightingales and blackcaps with as much care as another would bestow on pheasants and partridges ; but
-ocr page 198-
#9632;BB
176nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;CLOSE-TIME FOR WILD BIEDS.
till tins Act was passed he was nearly powerless to protect his favourites from molestation—for any follow with nets and traps might trespass on his grounds almost with impunity, by pre­tending that he came merely to catch linnets or other unpro­tected birds ; and any ' rough ' with a gun might put it over a fence and shoot thrushes and bullfiuchos at his own sweet will. Henceforth, however, nobody will be allowed, for five months in the year, to catch or kill, or attempt to catch or kill, any bird whatever, except on land where he has a right to be, either by ownership, occupation, or permission.
quot; But, although all wild birds now have a close time, the nature of the protection which they are to receive differs con­siderably. Some species have become so rare, and others are so rapidly decreasing in numbers, that, unless a check were put upon their destruction during the breeding season, they pro­bably would become extinct before long. The birds which are specially mentioned in the Schedule are of this class ; and for killing, taking, or selling them during the close-time, a penalty of twenty shillings each may be inflicted. On the other hand, the birds not included in the Schedule are those which stand less in need of protection ; and with respect to these the penalty will not exceed five shillings a bird, for a repeated offence, while a first prosecution will only cause the offender to be repri­manded and pay costs. Moreover, the birds comprised in the latter category are protected only against the outside public ; and it is within the power of owners and occupiers of land to preserve them or not, as they think best. But owners and occupiers have no greater privilege than other people with regard to catching or killing the birds named in the Schedule ; for with such species the close time is as absolute as is that for game birds.quot;
It is pretty generally known that the Close-time Committee of the British Association rendered valuable services, since the question was very carefully considered by them. This Com­mittee included some of the highest living authorities on the subject of birds.
-ocr page 199-
BRITISH ASSOCIATION C0113IITTEE.
177
As to the general principles upon whicli legislation should be carried on, the British Association committee said :
quot; The increasing interest taken by the public generally in the question which your committee have been now for five years appointed to investigate, is shown by signs too numerous to mention. Your committee, however, observe with regret that in the minds of some persons it has been mixed np, if not con­founded, with other questions which are entirely distinct. Two of these may be specified—(1) the Utility of Birds to Agricul­turists, and (2) the State of the Law as regards Cruelty to Animals. Your committee, not having been appointed to con­sider these questions, content themselves with remarking that both are doubtless of great importance to the community, the one from a moral, and the other from a material point of view, but are likewise entirely outside the duty of your committee.
quot; In order to assist the clearer view which your committee hope that the public will in time take of the question of Bird Protection, your committee unanimously beg leave to submit for consideration the following remarks as to any future legis­lation :—
quot; (1) However much we may desire it, we cannot in practice stop the killing of some birds during the breeding season ; if we pass a law totally prohibiting it, that law will either be evaded, or, if enforced, will become so irksome as to be speedily repealed.
quot; (2) No law, to be effectual, should pick and choose certain kinds of birds, leaving out nearly allied kinds.
quot; (3) An effectual law dealing with a whole group of birds may be passed, as witness the highly successful ' Sea Birds Preserva­tion Act.'
quot; (4) A law protecting birds which cannot be shown to want protection is a mistake.
quot; (5) The crucial test of whether a bird wants protection or not is whether its numbers are decreasing or the contrary.
quot; (61 With some very few exceptions (nearly each of which can be satisfactorily explained), none of what are commonly
12
-ocr page 200-
178nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;BEITISH ASSOCIATIOK COMMITTEE.
known as'small birds,' are decreasing throughout the United Kingdom generally.
quot; (7) Most' small birds ' are generally increasing in numbers, some remarkably so.
quot; (8) Setting aside ' sea birds,' #9632;which may now be considered safe, no birds have so much diminished in numbers as ' birds of prey' and ' wildfowl.'
quot; (9) No law for the protection of ' birds of prey,' if passed, could at present be carried out.
quot; (10) A law protecting'wildfowl,' if passed, could be carried out effectually, provided that the penalties are in proportion to the inducement to break it.
quot; (11) ' Wildfowl' form a group subject to great persecution on account of their marketable value, especially as articles of food; they are commonly killed (many of them because then more easily killed) long after they have paired and have begun to breed ; they, besides, lie under the same disadvantage as do the few ' small birds ' which are decreasing—the diminution, namely, through agricultural improvements, of their breeding haunts ; already many kinds of ' wildfowl,' which a few years ago used to breed frequently and regularly in this country, have ceased or nearly ceased from doing so ; they are perfectly inno­cuous, conscqueutly ' wildfowl' are eminently deserving of protection.
quot; (12) The principle of what has been called a ' black list, favoured by some persons, would be the most fatal step of all in bird protection, since it would discourage, if not entirely check, the healthy feeling which is steadily, if not rapidly, growing in favour of many birds which have long been per­secuted.quot;
We exceedingly regret that a number of Naturalists should have arrived at the conclusion that no law for the protection of birds of prey, if passed, could at present be carried out. With all due respect for their opinion, we beg to differ from them. The great utility of these birds is now acknowledged, and a
-ocr page 201-
UUJlaquo;^
CfiOSE-TIME FOE WILD BIEDS.
179
feeling in their favour lias taken root. We feel certain that any proposed enactment for their protection would not meet with the opposition that is feared. As our readers may like to know who are the gentlemen forming the Close - time Committee, we may state that the reports are usually signed by from six to eight names, including regularly those of the Eev. H. P. Barnes, formerly Vicar of Bridliugton, Yorkshire, and one of the originators of an Association for the Protection of Sea Birds in that district; Mr, H. E. Dresser (Hon. Sec), author of quot; Birds of Europe quot;; Mr. J. E. Harting, author of a quot;Handbook of British Birdsquot; and editor of the Zoologist; Professor Newton, F.E.S., Cambridge University; and the Eev. Canon Tristram, author of quot; The Ornithology of Palestine,quot; amp;o. Those whose names have also occurred, but less frequently, have been Mr. C. Spenee Bate, author of quot; Sessile-eyed Crustacea ;quot; Dr. Günther, F.E.S.,head of the Zoological Department, British Museum ; Mr. T. Har-land, of Bridliugton, another of the originators of the Sea Birds Protection Association; Dr. J. Gwyn Jeffreys, P.E.S., author of quot;British Conchology;quot; Et. Hon. G. J. Shaw Lefevre, M.P., now First Commissioner of Works; and Mr. T. J. Monk, a Sussex naturalist.
Close Time foe Wild Birds.
Until within the last few years our wild birds were unpro­tected by the Legislature, except such as were included in the Game Laws ; and even some of these had no close season. Now, however, by the Acts of 1880 and 1881, all wild birds are alike protected from March 2 to July 31 inclusive, except in St. Kilda. One section of the Act of 1880 authorises the exten­sion or variation of the close season. The powers given have already been taken advantage of in some counties, such as Essex, Lincolnshire, Huntingdonshire, amp;c. The penalty for killing any bird in the following list is twenty shillings for each offence.
12 *
-ocr page 202-
#9632;
lc0
WILD EIKDS PKOTECTED BY LAW.
American quail. Auk. Avocet. Bee-eater. Bittern. Bonxie. Colin.
Cornisli chough. Coulterneb. Cuckoo. Curlew. Diver. Dotterel. Dunbird. Dunlin. Eider duck. Fern-owl. Fulmar. Gannet. Goatsucker. Godwit. Goldfinch. Grebe. Greenshank. Guillemot. Gull, except Black-backed gull. Hoopoe. Kingfisher,
Kittiwake.
Lapwing.
Lark.
Loon.
Mallard.
Marrot.
Merganser.
Murre.
Night-hawk.
Night-jar.
Nightingale.
Oriole.
Owl.
Ox bird.
Oyster catcher.
Peewit.
Petrel.
Phalarope.
Plover.
Ploverspage.
Pochard.
Puffin.
Purre.
Razorbill.
Redshank.
Reeve or Ruff.
Roller.
Sanderliug.
Sandpiper.
Scout.
Sealark.
Seamew.
Sea parrot.
Sea swallow.
Shearwater.
Sbelldrake.
Shoveller.
Skua.
Smew.
Snipe.
Solan goose.
Spoonbill.
Stint.
Stone curlew.
Stouohatch.
Summer snipe.
Tarrock.
Teal.
Tern.
Thickknee.
Tystey.
Whaup.
Whimbrel.
Widgeon.
Wild duck.
Willoek.
Woodcock.
Woodpecker.
There is a farther penalty of ten shillings on offenders against the Acts refusing their names and addresses ; and any wild bird not included in the above list may be shot by the landowner or his authorised representative.
-ocr page 203-
^
^
TECHNICAL TEEMS.
181
Close Time foe Game.
Blauk-game
Grouse
Landrail
Partridge
Pheasant
Ptarmigan
Quail .
llth Dec. to 19tli Aug. 11th Dec. to llth Aug. 2nd March to 81st July. 2nd Feb. to 31st Aug. 2nd Feb. to 80th Sept. llth Dec. to llth Aug. 2nd March to 31st July.
Technical Teems used by Spoetsmex.
A brace of black game. A leash of black game. A pack of black game. To raise a black cock or x^ack. A brace of grouse. A leash of grouse. A brood or pack of grouse. To raise grouse. A brace and a half of par­tridges. A brace of partridges. A covey of partridges. To spring partridges. A brace of quail. A brace and a half of quail. A bevy of quail. To raise quails. A gaggle or flock of geese. A team of wild ducks. A badelyuge of ducks. A sord or sute of mallards. A dopping of sheldrakes. A wing of plover. A congregation of plovers. A building of rooks. A murmuration of starlings. A trip of dottrell.
A brace of pheasants.
A leash of pheasants.
A ni (or nid) or brood of phea­sants.
To push or spring a pheasant.
A couple of woodcocks.
A couple and a half of wood­cocks.
A flight of woodcocks.
A fall of woodcocks.
To flush a woodcock.
A couple of snipes.
A couple and a half of snipes.
A wisp of snipes.
To spring a snipe.
A walk of snipes.
A herd of swans, and of curlews.
A covert of coots.
A sege of herons and bitterns.
A spring of teals.
A couple of pointers or setters.
A leash of pointers or setters.
A couple of spaniels.
A couple and a half of spaniels.
A brace of hares.
A leash of hares.
To start or move a hare.
A paira coujdea brace—k pair is two united by nature (par) ; couple by an occasional chain (copula) ; and a brace, by a noose or tie. A pair of swans. A couple of hounds. A brace of partridges—a pair is a male and female ; a couple, two
-ocr page 204-
182
FORM OF SPORTSMAN S JOURNAL.
accidental companions ; a brace, tied together by the sports­man. He keeps a pair of pheasants in the hen roost. We saw a couple of pheasants feeding on the bank. You shot a brace of partridges.
Barren Pairs.—When the nest of a partridge happens to be destroyed late in the season, the old birds remain together, and are called a barren pair. However, it sometimes happens, that what are called a barren pair prove to be both cocks—the following appears to be the reason :—When, after pairing time, two cock birds happen to be left in the same district, after the animosity which accompanies genial desire has subsided, the two male birds associate and remain together, if undisturbed, until the following spring.—But barren pairs, whether male and female or otherwise, never lie well, or in other words, are much more difficult to approach than a covey. It sometimes happens that four or five male birds associate, in which ease they are called Old Bachelors.
FOEM OF A SPOETSMAN'S JOUENAL.
Where killed.
When.
Black
Game.
Grouse.
1
o
o o o
o
1
Ö
*3
CO
deg;1 Ig
4^
Total each Day.
Shots missed
Remarks on
the Weather.
Scent, amp;c.
Monday ...
i
i i
iTuesday ...
1 |
;
Wednesday
1
i1
Thursday...
1
1 Friday......j
!
'Saturday...!
1 1
Total each i Week
|
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS.
-ocr page 205-
m
s
a
-ocr page 206-
-ocr page 207-
WORKS BY DR. MÄCDOMLD.
Fifth Edition, 802 jpojffilaquo;. Price 21s.
CATTLE, SHEEP, AND DEER.
(CONTAINING ALSO REMARKS ON THE GAME LAWS AND GROUSE MOOR?.)
BT
D. G-. F. MAODONALD, C.E., LL.D.,
F.G.S., F.E.G.S., M.E.S.L., F.A.S.L., J.P., ETC.
Drainage Engineer and Surveyor of Improrements executed under the control of the Inclosure Commissioners for England and Wales ; Engineer-iu-Chiof to the Inspector General of Highland Destitution, and Valuer of Koads, Bridges, and Pulilic Works to the Scottish Board : Contractor for Agricultural ImproTements, Tramways, and Railroads : Member of the Royal Agricultural Society of England : Meinher of the Highland Agricultural Society of Scotland ; late of the Government Survey Staff of British Columbia, and of the Inter­national Boundary line of Xorth America; Author of quot;What the Farmers may do with the Land,quot; quot; The Paris Exhibition,quot; quot; Decimal Coinage,quot; quot; British Columbia and Vancouver's Island,quot; quot; Hints on Farming,quot; quot; Estate Management,'' quot;Napoleon III., the Bmpress Eugenie, the Prince Imperial, and the Franco-Prussian War,quot; amp;c. amp;c.
DEDICATED TO
HIS GEACE THE DIJKB OF SUTHEßLAKD, E.G.
PATROXISED BV
HEE MAJESTY THE QUEEN;
His Eot.vl Highkess the Feince of Wales;
His Imperial Majesty the Sultan; His Ihpekial
Majesty the Emperok of the French; His Imperial
Majesty the Ejiperor of Germany; His ImpeeialMajesty
the Ehperor of Ecssia ; His Imperial Majesty the Emperor
op Austria; His Majesty the Kino of Italy; His Majesty the
King of Denmark; His Majesty the King of the Belgians ; His
Majesty the King of Sweden and Norway; His Eoyal Highness the
Beke of ErnNHURGH; His Eoyal Highness Prince Arthitr ; His Imperial
Highness Prince Loris Napoleon ; Field Marshal His Eoyal Highness
the Diike of Cambridge ; His Eoyal Highness the Prince Christiak
of Schleswig-Holstein; The Marquis of Loese; His Serene
Highness the Duke of Tech ; His Serene Highness Prince
Edward of Saxe-Weimae ; The President of the United
States; His Highness the Khedive of Egypt; The
Eight Hon. Benjamin Disraeli ; the Eight
Hon. W. E. Gladstone j His Excellency
M. Syltain Van de quot;VVeyee;
etc., etc., etc.
M
quot; The author of this handsome volume is -well-known throughout the High­lands as the talented son of the late Rev. Dr. Macdonald, of Ferrintosh, familiarly styled ' The Apostle of the North,' whose pious memory is
-ocr page 208-
11nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; WORKS BY DE. MACDONALD.
enshrined in the hearts of thousands of his countrymen. The son has not followed in the same footsteps as the sire—we mean professionally: but that he has equally distinguished himself in the sphere in which his talents have been employed, and shoquot;wn diligence, earnestness, and ability in his calling, are apparent from the success he has attained in his profession, the positions of trust and responsibility -which he occupies, and the academical honours #9632;which he has so meritoriously secured. The information conveyed by the author is very extensive, and will bo found accurate and useful to all con­cerned.quot;—/laquo;rcraess Advertiser.
quot; This book is from the pen of a well-known and voluminous writer, not only on agricultural subjects, but on all cognate sciences. As a literary effort, it is unequalled. Several sections bear the impress of careful study, large experience, much thought, and acute observation, and these are pre­sented in very forcible language. The work is replete with information, and it is a question whether such a varied knowledge of cattle, sheep, and deer can be found in any other single work.quot;—The Scotsman.
quot; The reputation which JIr. Macdonald has gained as an agricultural authority by his works upon ' Estate Management' and ' Hints on Farming ' will be enhanced hy his present work treating upon • Cattle, Sheep, and Deer.' The subject is a broad one, including all the various breeds and varieties of these animals reared in Great Britain, together with every detail concerning rearing, breeding, and feeding them ; but it has been thoroughly and carefully treated in every particular. The volume is, in fact, full of information from end to end, and it should be in the hands of every country gentleman,farmer, and breeder throughout the country.quot;—Standard.
quot; This is a remarkable book. In its yolnminous contents we have a mass of information on the origin and progress of the various breeds of cattle and sheep to be found in no other work on the subject, and how one man could collect so many details and marshal such au array of particulars is beyond our conception. That Dr. JIacdonald is a gentleman of groat experience there is not the least doubt, and the success of his previous works on agri­cultural subjects is mainly owing to their thoroughly practical tendency. quot;We can confidently recommend the work, and we would add the suggestion that copies of it presented as prizes by landowners at our agricultural shows would be very acceptable.quot;—Yorkshire Gazette.
quot; The name of the author is an ample guarantee that the work is thoroughly practical and scientific : and that a second edition should have been called for in the short period of a few weeks speaks infinitely more for the high reputation of the volume than anything that wo can write on the subject. Moreover, we think that the two-fold nature of the book—half agricultural, half sporting—makes the reading exceedingly agreeable. 'Wo most cordially and unreservedly recommend it to every landowner, farmer, and sportsman, and to every person indeed who desires accurate information on the subjects of which it treats.quot;— WoodJ'ord Times.
••Dr. Macdonald's previous works on agricultural subjects have been received with such universal favour, that we should be disappointed in finding that any book hy him did not rise above a mediocre standard. His high literary attainments and great scientific research have never been more clearly exhibited than in his present work.quot;—Nottinghamshire Guardian.
quot; Mr. Macdonald has a practical knowledge of the subjects upon which he writes, and his published works, whose name is legion, ought to be a warranty for his literary powers. In his work, three chapters are devoted to the breeding and feeding of cattle, with collateral information as to the best means of turning them to profit. Two more chapters discuss the manage-
-ocr page 209-
WORKS BY DR. MACDONALD.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;Ill
ment of sheep, and the rest of the Tolume is given to the subject of deer, #9632;with remarks upon the game-laws. . . . Our limits are so nearly reached that -we cenuot glance at the array of short-horns, middle-horns, long-horns, and polled cattle. But our readers will find ahundanee of detail in these pages as to the difference of these and other breeds. The same may bo said of the chapters upon sheep, about which Mr. Jiacdonald is peculiarly at homo.quot; (First notice.)—Stlurduy Review.
Puhlishers:Steel amp; Jones, Spring Gardens, London, S.W.
Ninth Edition. Two Vols. Patronised by her Majesty the Queen.
HINTS ON FAEMING- AND ESTATE MANAGEMENT,
By D. G. F. MACDONALD, C.E, LL.D.
(F.G.8., F.K.G.S., M.R.S.L., F.A.S.L., J.P., ETC.)
Publishers:Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts, amp; Green.
•#9632; A very truthful, interesting, and comprehensive view of agriculture and its requirements.quot;—Ahkrinan Jlec/ti.
•• This is a new edition of a work which has done good service in stimu­lating the tenant-farmer to improve his condition by obtaining a more abundant increase from the land. There is a practical character about the hints and suggestions which cannot fail to make the book useful to the class for whoso benefit it has been writtenquot;—Observer.
quot; There is really a great deal of information on nearly every topic con­nected with farming. The subjects are not introduced in any regular order but seem to arise according to the occasion. The information is conveyed, too. in an agreeable manner, and recommends itself by the vein of common sense running through the whole. The author advances nothing upon mere theory, and evidently shows that he thoroughly understands the subject he treats of. The work is one. in fact, which will recommend itself to everyone connected with farming from its own intrinsic merits.quot;—The field.
•• His remarks are entitled to the highest respect from our agricultural friends, who. we doubt not, will profit from a perusal of this able, interesting, and important volume.quot;—YbrJcshire Gazette.
quot; Dr. ilacdonald is widely known as a gentleman of great experience in rural matters, and his statements and opinions are almost universally accepted.quot;—Standard.
quot; Dr. Jlacdonald's skill in husbandry—his occupation as a civil and agricultural engineer, drainage surveyor, and land agent—his education, experience, and extensive general knowledge—give, we think, immense weight and importance to his ' Hints on Farming,' and ' Estate Management,' as well as to his opinions generally on such subjects.quot;—Times.
-ocr page 210-
I
i
i-
IVnbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;WOEES BY DE. MACDONALD.
quot; His name is quite sufficient to giiarantee that the work is eminently practical and scientific.quot;—Free Press.
It is a raluable addition to our agricultural knowledge, and we have no doubt it will have a large circulation in Ireland.quot;—Kilkenny Journal.
quot; We can recommend Mr. Macdonald's treatise to all interested in agricul­ture or entrusted with the management of landed property.1'—Kent HeraJd.
quot; The author o£ this remarkably useful and candid book is not only a civil engineer, but a practical farmer and land agent. He is evidently thoroughly honest, and minds no more cutting down an antiquated prejudice than he would an overgrown thistle or dock. He is not a mere theorist, but a practical man. Hence the great value of the work. We would recommend every farmer to got this most valuable work for himself.quot;—North Wales Chronicle.
quot; Dr. Macdonald is an author of acknowledged ability, and he has fully maintained the character throughout his hints on farming and estate manage­ment.quot;—Literary Critic.
quot; The author appears to possess the combination of theory and practice in a very eminent and useful degree.quot;—C'arlota Post.
quot;All classes in the kingdom owe much to Mr. Macdonald for his very able and practical work.quot;—Banner.
quot; Everything affecting successful agriculture scorns to be treated of in Dr. Macdonald's book. He draws a comparison between Scotland and England, and shows that the produce of Scotland is greater than that of England, in consequence of the Englishman's rigid adherence to expensive and antiquated notions.quot;—Galway Express.
quot; A truly excellent work, that can hardly fail to command the attention of all who are connected with rural affairs.quot;—Pioneer.
quot; Dr. Macdonald holds a good place among the literary advisors of farmers, and is a first-class intelligent farmer.quot;—Invergordon Times.
quot;It is a good specimen of what books ought to be—multum in parvo. We strongly recommend it to all interested in agriculture as an excellent, well-timed publication.quot;—Leader.
quot; This is a most sensible book. Mr. Macdonald writes in a clear and pointed style on subjects that he has thoroughly studied.quot;—Lpsicich Express.
quot; A faithful picture of our agriculture, and written in an agreeable, prac­tical, and independent style.quot;.—Albion.
quot; Herein consists the value of the book : it is eminently practical, and on such a subject a • grain of practice,' to use the well-known saying, 'is worth a load of theory.' There is sufficient in the book to satisfy the most exact­ing. The subject of agriculture is of the greatest importance, and Dr. Macdonald handles it in a thoroughly instructive manner.quot;—Public Opinion.
quot; Its pages give ample proof that the writer is thoroxighly conversant with every detail of agriculture.quot;—Sentinel.
quot; An important and valuable publication, which for clearness of arrange­ment, conciseness, and practical knowledge, challenges comparison with any work now extant on similar subjects.quot;—Northern Whig.
Estate Management......price £1 11 6
Hints on Farming . . . . . . „nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; 110
!
1
K
i
!l
f
V'
-ocr page 211-
^^
WOEKS BY DE. MACDONÄLD.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;v
Seventh Edition. One Vol. 8vo. with a comigt;rehensive Map.
BRITISH COLUMBIA AND VANCOUVER'S ISLAND.
By D. GK F. MACDONALD, LL.D., C.E.,
F.6.S., M.E.S.L., F.R.G.S., F.A.S.L., J.P., ETC.
(Late of the G-oTei-umont Surrey Staff of British Columbia, and of the Inter­national Boundary Line of North America.)
Publishers:Longman, Geeen, Longman, Eobeets, amp; G-eeen.
14 The author of this disenchantment tells ns that British Columbia is a miserable country—that it wants fine land, prairie, and climate.quot;—Post
quot; This is in every respect a most important work, and deserves the serious consideration of the Government and the country.''—Observer.
quot; A very able, praiseworthy, and interesting work, boldly written, tingling of truth throughout, and one that will doubtless be read with much avidity.quot;—Independent.
quot; Dr. Macdonald writes down the land as one almost accm-sed by nature.quot;__
Athenmum.
quot; The most wretched and miserable country under the sun. What we heard of it in England was a gross fabrication of infamous lies concocted by interested persons.quot;—Star, Xov. 5, 1802.
quot; A most startling book, after the glowing articles which have issued from the press.quot;— Guardian.
quot; We have no reason to believe Dr. Macdonald other than an unprejudiced reporter of what he heard and saw in the much-vaunted Colony.quot;—Critic.
quot; An important and remarkable publication, which warns our countrvmen from rushing hoodwinked on to ruin.quot;—Mirror.
quot; Whoever may be disposed to go on a venture to British Columbia can never say that they were misled by Mr. Macdonald.quot;—Bell's Weekly Messenger.
quot; This is a very able and useful work, scholarly and trustworthy, setting foi-th the truth in a bold and fascinating style, blending information and entertainment agreeably and successfully. The work is altogether most attractive.quot;— Warder.
quot; This is an excellent literary production, affording much valuable informa­tion. In the face of Dr. Macdonald's statements, it is surely a doubtful benevolence that ships off poor governesses and seamstresses to this distant colony.quot;—Albion,
quot; This instructive volume has been most opportunely published by a gentleman worthy of all trust, and whose scientific attainments are varied and profound.quot;—Standard,
quot; The statements with which this book abounds are extremely important, inasmuch as they present the strongest possible contrast to the popular belief
-ocr page 212-
VInbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;WOEKS BY DE. MACDONALD.
on the subject in this country. His appreciation of natural scenery is keen, and his descriptions are vigorous and life-like.quot;—London Review.
quot;Dr. Macdonald's practical knowledge of agriculture — his education, profession and experience,—give a weight and importance to his opinions in respect of the productiveness or sterility of a country which members of other professions cannot expect to command.quot;'—Spectator.
quot; This handsome volume will take its place as the best book published on the subject. It abounds with information on every topic in connection with the country, and deserves the attention of everyone.quot;—Kentish Chronicle.
quot; This handsome volume, from the pen of a talented and distinguished countryman, awakens interest alike from the importance of the subject and the thorough fidelity with which it is treated. We unhesitatingly aver that no volume on a kindred subject has ever issued from the press presenting a better prima facie claim to implicit reliance. Mr. Macdonald obviously aims at a truthful and unvarnished statement of facts.quot;—Northern Ensign.
••Dr. Macdonald furnishes a great deal of interesting information regarding the Indian tribes of British Columbia, the natural history and botany of the country, and has made up altogether a goodly volume of facts, hints, and theories.quot;—Inverness Courier.
quot; This work demands the serious attention of everyone intending to emigrate to British Columbia or Vancouver's Island—of everyone who would desire information respecting those regions.....We are, more­over, disposed to believe Dr. Macdonald writes in perfect good faith, and has no inducement to advance statements unwarranted by facts or opinions not well grounded. We regard the work as a most valuable one.quot;—'The Field.
quot; These are true statements, and no blame can be strong enough to be applied to those who have ignorantly, carelessly, or wilfully misled, or have furnished up old woodcuts, and dished up glowing paragraphs, to lead many families into misery, famine, and death.quot;—Family Heruld.
•#9632; The fact of this work having reached a seventh edition in a comparatively short period, indicates its claim to be considered of standard excellence, which it undoubtedly is.quot;—Morning Advertiser.
•• His book is practical, sensible, and well-informed on local matters.quot;— Examiner.
'• His description of the festive entertainments of the Red Indians is highly amusing, and his hints to emigrants are most valuable. We cordially recommend the volume as the work of an accomplished scholar, and an honest truth-telling man.quot;—Morning Herald.
•#9632; Dr. Macdonald paints the country as a great barren ice-bound, hungry waste. Xo doubt British Columbia is very severe in the winter season. Cox's • Columbia Eiver,' Washington Irving's • Astoria,' and various other books, go to prove this.quot;—Atlas.
#9632;#9632; I have now read your book from end to end, and I can state very frankly, from my personal knowledge of British Columbia, as well as from deductions formed from accounts communicated to me by many persons who have traversed the oonntry since 1858, that I give full confirmation to all you have said respecting the climate, soil, and physical aspect of the colony.quot;—A Resident FOB neaklv Tex Yeaks.—Vide Standard, Nov. 6th, 18G2.
quot; We earnestly recommend the book, w-hich is full of interest, and replete with information.quot;—Illustrated London News.
-ocr page 213-
WORKS BY DE. MACDONALD.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; VU
Fourth Edition.
WHAT THE FARMERS MAY DO WITH THE LAND.
Bt D. G. F. MACDONALD, O.E., LL.D., J.P.
Publisher:Heney Adams, Parliament Street, Westminster.
quot;A sounder, better argued, or more thoroughly sensible practical pam­phlet, is not often mot with. Mr. Macdonald belongs to the go-ahead class of agriculturists, and sees nothing in store for the farmer but prosperity, if he only goes the right way to extract it from the land. The superior economy and efficiency of the Scottish sy stem of agriculture are practically demonstrated from a rarioty of details, stated with great clearness and much method of arrangement. Altogether the pamphlet is one calculated to do good and sot the farmers thinking, and we hope that its rural circula­tion may prove equal to its merits.quot;—Atlas.
quot; A pamphlet abounding with information such as cannot fail to reeom-mend itself.quot;—Times.
quot;This is an excellent, practical, and well-timed pamphlet, stimulating the English agriculturists to improToment. Dr. Macdonald writes like a man in earnest, and one who is practically acquainted with the subject, and wo hope that his pamphlet will bo circulated among the Jar niente bucolic interest.quot;—Morning Chronicle.
•• Dr. Macdonald appeals to the English farmers to apply the most improved Scottish system of cultivation to their lands ; reminds them that the barren north produces on an average (thanks to enterprise and skill) more than a third more corn per acre than the genial south j and reads our sluggishly-moving English friends a sound lecture on their tendencies to retrograde rather than to go ahead ; filling his pamphlet with hard-hitting facts and excellent and sensible practical details.quot;—Inverness Courier.
•• Of all the pamphlets which have recently been published on agricul­tural improvement, none of them contain more practical information in such small compass.quot;—Northern Ensiipi.
quot; It is a most sensible pamphlet : we would cordially recommend it.quot;— Examiner.
quot;If one of the greatest elements of success consists in speaking to the times and speaking in language not to be mistaken, then we say this pam­phlet must obtain a wide circulation, and be the means of doing a vast amount of good.quot;—Observer,
-ocr page 214-
VUlnbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; WORKS BY DR. MACDONALD.
quot; Its pages convey a vivid and correct picture of the present state of agriculture. The • Hints ' are most valuable.quot;—Guardian.
quot; We recommend this pamphlet to our agricultural friends. It is the work of a practical man, not a mere theorist.quot;—Gloucester Journal.
quot; This work is clearly and concisely written, and is certainly by a master in farming. It should be perused, not only by the landed proprietors and farmers of England, but by everyone quot;who is in any quot;way connected with the occupancy and cultivation of the soil.quot;—Tke Weekly Dispatch.
quot; A very able pamphlet.quot;—Lord Lytton.
May he had also of
Dr. Macdonald, 61, Hugh Street, Eccleston Square, London, S.W., and Lymington House, Brighton.
Fourth Edition.
NAPOLEON III, EMPRESS EUGENIE, PKINCE IMPEEJAL,
AND THE
FRANCO-GERMAN WAR.
By DUNCAN GEO. FOEBES MACDONALD, C.E., LL.D., J.P.
Publishers :Steel amp; Jones, Spring Gardens, London.
quot;Dr. Macdonald vindicates the Emperor, Empress, and Prince'Imperial with an energy and earnestness that do him honour. JIany of his statements tell terribly against Germany, whose hands are far less clean than her friends hereabouts would fain make people believe.quot;—Northern Ensign.
•#9632; This is an eloquent pamphlet, which was issued only a few weeks ago, and which has already reached a third edition—in which the character and claims of the Emperor jSTapoleon to popular confidence are set forth with a frankness and a fervour which a great number of our fellow-countrymen will heartily approve.quot;—Sunday Times.
quot; Dr. Macdonald speaks in the highest terms of the Emperor, of whom, in addition to his general high character, he relates facts in proof of his asser­tion that Napoleon did not seek the war. He accords great praise to the Emperor for valour, coolness, and intrepidity, and contends that, in giving
-ocr page 215-
#9632;
WOEKS BY DK. MACDONALD.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; IX
up his sword at Sedan, he never was more faithful to his army and to the cause of his country, and truer to his own honour.quot;—Brighton Examiner.
quot; It is truly most noble and generous of Dr. Macdonald to stand up so boldly for a maligned and imprisoned sorereign, even though he has tilled so great and important a part in the conduct of the world's affairs.quot;— Oxonian.
quot; Written in an able, fluent, agreeable style, which cannot fail to please and fascinate the reader.quot;—Weymouth Guardian.
quot; It is, indeed, an eloquent tribute of admiration of the Imperial family of France, showing how the country advanced in prosperity under the reign of the Emperor Napoleon.quot;—Dover Telegraph.
quot; Dr. Macdonald protests wisely against man}'' popular errors, and we cordially wish him success.quot;— Week/// Dispatch.
quot; It is really most refreshing to meet with some writings concerning the Emperor, which are neither virulent abuse nor childish fiction.quot;—Figaro.
quot;The fact that though France declared the war, Prussia had pre-arranged it, is clearly brought out.quot;—Morning Advertiser.
quot;Most admirably written, giving much interesting information hitherto unpublished.quot;— Western-super-Mer Gazette.
quot;We are glad to find that Dr. Macdonald is not ashamed to express his opinions, not ready like so many of the old haunters of the Tuileries to have a spiteful fling at the sick lion.quot;—Land and Water.
quot; The brocbrtre is written with masterly power, and is an able justification of the Emperor. Wo strongly recommend it to all intelligent students of history, and its revelations.quot;—Portsmouth Times.
quot; The Imperial family and the whole French nation owe a deep debt of gratitude to the author, who is an ardent friend of both.quot;—Southern Times.
quot; The brochure should be read even by those who have taken the German side of the fearful war.quot;—Hastings and St. Leonards News.
quot; Entertaining a strong personal regard for fair France, his view is very favourable to the French.quot;—Bell's Life.
quot; It is worth the while of the Prince Imperial to have Dr. Macdonald's statements and sentiments printed in letters of gold.quot;—Morning News.
quot; Seldom has so much important matter been put down on so few pages, and never, indeed, have we read more unreserved thorough-going honest statements.quot;—Mirror.
quot; This is a pamphlet which deserves a wide circulation, and it is refresh­ing to meet with a man who at this crisis has the pluck to declare his views.quot; John Bull.
quot; A very able pamphlet pointing out the origin of the war—the cause of the failure of the French arms—and how by his consummate genius the French Emperor up-rooted the ill-feeling which had so long existed between England and France.quot;—Western Review.
-ocr page 216-
WORKS BY DE. MACDONALD.
quot; At the time war was declared there was full liberty in the Chambers, responsible rule did not exist, and the Ministers were answerable to the Chambers. The whole correspondence with Prussia was communicated to the Corps Legislatif, who by 247 against 10 voted for the war, whilst the Senate voted unanimously. What pretence, therefore, is there for asserting that the war was the sole act of the Emperor? quot;—Brochure, p. 8.
quot; This book is written in a fluent charming style, and cannot fail to please and fascinate the reader.quot;—Portland Guardian,
quot; Few can be faithful when fortune fails. Dr. JIacdonald's enthusiasm and generosity of spirit are as praiseworthy as they arc rare.quot;—Lloyd's.
#9632;#9632;For twenty years Napoleon has been regarded as the foremost statesman and most sagacious monarch of the world. History will secure him justice, such as is now denied him; and Dr. Macdonald abundantly vindicates the policy of the Emperor, his genius, and the beneficial effects of his rule.quot;— Brighton Gazette.
quot; We entirely agree with the author that Napoleon ruled France as no one
else
more than he
d that the French people must be held responsible for the war Weekly Express.
quot; Although we do not agree with all that is said in this book, yet we think there is much nobleness of spirit displayed in its pages. The unsuccessful rarely have friends, so that Dr. Macdonald's generosity and sympathy is most praiseworthy and creditable to him.quot;—British Bress.
quot; In our author the French monarch has found an ardent defender, one of those still loft whose respect and admiration do not depart with the flight of power and greatness. Napoleon made France our trusted and friendly ally, which ought not to have been ignored when dark clouds began to obscure his fortune.quot;—Yorkshire Gazette.
quot; We heartily congratulate Dr. Macdonald on his success. History will tell that it was Prussia who tilled the field of hatred and sowed the seeds of war.quot;—Sen t inel.
•• In the war with Russia, during the Indian Mutiny, and the American war, the Emperor was our steadfast ally. We should therefore boar friendly sentiments to him ; and it is highly creditable to Dr. Macdonald to have stepped forward and have so boldly defended Napoleon when down-fallen and in misfortune.quot;—Becorder.
11 It is an able opportune defence of the Imperial Family, and of the French nation, full of interest, pith, and power, and shows that Prussia had pre-rcsolved to force France into war.quot;—Leader.
'; In Dr. JIacdonald's remarkably well-written essay, he has brought to­gether all the most recent facts of chief interest relating to the Emperor, the Empress, and their Imperial son. He refutes the charges made by the Revolutionists against the Emperor, and he proves that Prussia had long determined to drive France into this war, and that it had been spoken of by German Generals two years before as a pre-determined fact.quot;—The Tablet.
quot; Napoleon has an able and zealous champion in Dr. Macdonald, who shows that the Emperor was unwillingly forced into the war by a revolu­tionary party, and by the aggressive designs and overbearing conduct of
-ocr page 217-
WOEKS BY DR. MACDONALD.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;XI
Prussia, and by tho turbulence and plots of Gambetta and his compeers.quot;— Critic.
quot; Tho flush of success had bccharmcd tho pious King's conscience to slum­ber, and a spirit of exaction and cruelty carried him away from justice and mercy. Tho indemnity claimed by the victors is exorbitant, crushing, cruel, —and has received tho condemnation of the civilised world.quot;—Banner.
quot; Our author states that the Emperor Napoleon possesses great calmness of mind, cool courage, largo intellect, rare sagacity, and an exceedingly kind disposition, never turning his back upon a friend. These arc excellent qualities which tho French nation ought to continue to appreciate.quot;—Fort­nightly Review.
quot; Xapoleon III. was the best ally of this country of all tho sovereigns -who ever sat on the throne of France.quot;—Lord Mahueshuri/.
quot; This book is evidently written in the interests of truth and justice, and our author advises ' Ca;sar William' and Count Bismarck that moderation has proved the truest •wisdom.quot;—Taunton Courier.
quot; A truthful and brilliant treatise, exculpating the Emperor Napoleon from the charge that ho was eager for war, and showing that it was evident from tho first that Prussia had determined to humiliate France. The Doctor also alludes to the shameless spoliation of Denmark.quot;—British Preview.
quot; Dr. JIacdonald's Napoleon III. is an enthusiastic apology for the Emporor, whose great nobleness of sentiment, heroism, and magnanimity, we are told, shines brightly in his dark hour of misfortune.quot;—Examiner.
Eighth Edition. THE
HIGHLAND CKOFTEES OF SCOTLAND.
SOCIALLY CONSIDEEED WITH EEFBEENCE TO PEOPEIETOES AND PEOPLE.
By DtnsrCAlSr GEORGE FORBES MACDONALD, C.E., LL.D., J.P.
Author of quot; What the Fanners may do icith the Land,quot; quot; Estate Management,quot; quot;Hints on Farming,quot; quot; Cattle, Sheep, and Deer,quot; amp;c. amp;c.
quot; Dr. Macdonald has the advantage not only of writing as a Highlander, but of having a thoroughly practical knowledge of the subject, and having had an extensive acquaintance with the management of estates. It is satis-
13
-ocr page 218-
XUnbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; WOEKS BY DE. MACDONALD.
factory to know that the appeals and reiuonstranecs which ho and others have addressed to Highland proprietors hare not been wholly without efi'oct. The wrong which has been clone, and is still being done, is, however, so flag­rant and cruel, so unpatriotic and unjustifiable, so disastrous in its effects upon the people of the Highlands, that we trust that he and all who are engaged in pleading the cause of a sober, industrious, and thrifty peasantry, will continue their efforts until they are crowned with complete success.quot;— The Echo.
quot; It is melancholy to read of the cruelties committed on the Scotch High­landers—friends, relatives, mothers, wives, and children turned out of house and home for sheep and deer. Dr. Macdonald writes ably, zealously, and fearlessly. He is a thorough patriot, deserving the heartiest thanks of all true Highlanders.quot;—Northern Telegraph,
quot; This is a very able and excellent work, and is a wann and generous advocacy of the interests of the Highlands and the Highlanders.quot;—WoodJ'urd Times.
Dr. Macdonald lashes the capricious ovictors and unprincipled appropri-ators of tenants' improvements with that power, truth, and knowledge which give all his writings such immense success and influence. Both Scotland and Ireland have felt the hand of the exterminator with a vengeance, and all that Dr. Macdonald has written is quite as applicable to the one country as to the other.quot;—Limerick Reporter.
quot; This is a remarkable publication by the talented sou of the famous Scottish preacher. Dr. Macdonald, of Ferrintosh. The condition of the High­land peasantry is such as to excite the indignation of every man and woman of right feeling. Indeed, we could hardly credit the cruel conduct of cer­tain lairds, were it not told us on the authority of our able and distinguished author, who is in all respects a gentleman above suspicion, and intimately acquainted with the northern Highlands and the people. Truly the infor­mation is most startling.quot;—Midland Courier.
quot; 'We have before rrs ' The Highland Crofters of Scotland,' from the pen of a well-known writer on the management of estates, farming, and agricul­tural subjects generally. There arc very few men so well qualified to treat of the crofter system as Dr. Macdonald—indeed, of the entire land question #9632;which is attracting so much attention, and which must be taken up by our legislators at once, as the present state of matters is quite a scandal to the country.quot;—Express.
quot; Mr. Macdonald makes a vigorous appeal on behalf of the peasantry of the Highlands, and advocates the letting of the land in allotments under proper leases. He argues that, while the lease would give an independence of feeling to the occupier, it would, at the same time, secure confidence between landlord and tenant. The doctor deals with all the points bearing on the question with great ability, and his comparisons are strikingly forcible. His style is clear and attractive, and it must attract great atten­tion amongst social reformers.quot;—Brighton Guardian.
•• Dr. Macdonald fully exposes the cruel extermination system pursued by many largo landholders in the Highlands. The remedy is suggested, and he abundantly proves that the system of small holdings is more profitable thi.n that of large ones. The mischievous law of entail is pointed out as the bane of prosperity to the Highlands. Throughout the pages Dr. Macdonald
.
-ocr page 219-
WOEKS BY DE. MACDONÄLD.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;XÜl
proves himself the true friend both of the Highland peasantry and the landed proprietors.quot;—Invergordon Times,
quot; This brochure, is remarkable and startling. Dr. Maedonald tells us that, in eonsequcuco of banishing the Highland peasantry to make room for more sheep and more deer, the rural society on which agriculture has to depend is composed of only human remnants. The worthy doctor shows sturdy independence throughoiit every page, and his patriotism ought to receive public recognition, for his work cannot fail of doing an immense amount of good.quot;—Northern Advertiser.
quot; The author sets forth as many grievances as the Irish suffer from, and protests against restrictions and limitations on land. He favours holdings of all sizes—and small holdings in abundance.quot;—Weekly Times.
quot; The doctor lifts up his voice in no uncertain tones on the subject of driving the peasants of Scotland from their homes to make room for deer and sheep farmers. Every philanthropist and every true Scotchman shoxild read the book.quot;—Hampsldre Gazette.
quot; Now, with these facts before us, it is not surprising that the cry of the crofter is pretty much the same as that of the evicted Irish peasantry. The Scotch are not a nation to submit tamely to oppression, and Dr. 3Iac-donald shows them first their grievances, and then the way to got an amelioration of them. The crofters are certainly greatly wronged.quot;—Cheshire Chronicle.
'• Dr. D. G. F. JIaodonald, the son of the ' apostle of the north,' brought up in the Highland manse, in the midst of the Ferrintosh crofters, comes for­ward, charged with the feelings of a true Highlander, and makes a vigorous, a valuable, and massive contribution to the tide which has been swelling in the affairs of the crofters, and what the Scotsman says of him in regard to another work is applicable here—he brings ' careful study, large experience, much thought, and acute observation' to bear on the subject, and what he has to say is ' presented in very forcible language.' Wo have to add, how­ever, that with all his force there is no bitterness, no setting of class against class; he has such a complete view of the question, that he is able to put it without straining after temporary effect.quot;—'The Highlander.
quot; Dr. JIacdonald vigorously and eloquently protests against clearing small tenants off estates in Scotland to make way for sheep or deer, and he also strongly urges the reclamation of waste lands and the letting of them to crofters.quot;—Murk Lane Express.
The following has been addressed to Dr. D. G. P. JIacdonald by the well-known philanthropist of Brightling:—quot; Dear Dr. JIacdonald—Yoru-pamph­let on the ' Highland Crofters of Scotland' will do great good, and if you follow up your last effort to get Justice to the poor you will do as much for your country as John Knox, and more than Adam Smith. May God keep you in health to work for Him. Yours very truly, Hekbt Athertok (Late of the Bengal Civil Service).quot;
London :—Steel amp; Jones, Spring Gardens, S.W.
-ocr page 220-
mm
LONDON PRINTED BT W. H. ALLEN amp; CO., 13 WATEBLO PLACE,
J2$1.
-ocr page 221-
BOOKS ON HORSES AND RIDING.
LADIES ON HORSEBACK.
Learning, Park Eiding, and Hunting; with Hints upon Costume, and numerous Anecdotes. By Mks. Power O'Donoghue (Nannie Lambert), Authoress of quot; The Knave of Clubs,quot; quot; Horses and Horsemen,quot; quot; Grand­father's Hunter,quot; amp;c. Crown 8vo. with Portrait, 5s.
THE HORSE; AS HE WAS, AS HE IS, AND AS
HE OUGHT TO BE.
By Jambs Ikvine Lupton, F.E.C.V.S., Author of quot; The External Anatomy of the Horse,quot; amp;c. Crown 8vo., Illustrated, 3s. Gd.
HOW TO RIDE AND SCHOOL A HORSE ;
With a System of Horse Gymnastics. By Edwaed L. Anderson. Crown 8vo., 2s. 6d.
A SYSTEM OF SCHOOL TRAINING FOR HORSES.
By Edwabd L. Anderson, Author of quot;How to Eide and School a Horse.quot; Crown Bvo., 2s. 6d.
ILLUSTRATED HORSE DOCTOR.
Being an Accurate and Detailed Account, accompanied by more than 400 Pictorial Eepresentations, characteristic of the various Diseases to which the Equine Eace are subjected ; together with the latest Mode of Treat­ment, and all the requisite Prescriptions written in Plain English. By Edward Mayhew, M.E.C.V.S. Bvo., 18s. 6d.
ILLUSTRATED HORSE MANAGEMENT.
Containing descriptive remarks upon Anatomy, Medicine, Shoeing, Teeth, Food, Vices, Stables ; likewise a plain account of the situation, nature, and value of the various points; together with comments on grooms, dealers, breeders, breakers, and trainers. Embellished with more than 400 Engravings from original designs made expressly for this work. By E. Mayhew. A new Edition, revised and improved by J. E. Lupton, M.E.C.V.S. 8vo., 12s.
London: W. H. ALLEN amp; CO., 13, Waterloo Place.
-ocr page 222-
FOUNDEES OF THE INDIAN EMPIRE:
CliveWarren HastingsWellesley. Vol. /., Lord Clive. By Colonel G. B. MALLBSON, C.S.I.,
Author of quot; History of the French in India.quot; 8fo., witli Portrait and Four Plans, 20s. quot; Colonel Malleson has once more found a work worthy of his gifts. In the present volume lie deals only with the lirst of the heroic triumvirate, and it is his intention to devote equal space to each of the others. When, therefore, the work comes to he finished, the public will have a really authentic history of Birtish India, covering the whole of the period from the laying of the foundation-stone to the virtual completion of the strueture by Arthur 'Wellesley. . . . How this splendid edifice of empire was built up, with ' blood and iron' for the cement, forms a story which Englishmen should never tire of reading. Xor will many minds weary, we answer tor it, over the graphic pages, full of life and fire, and vivid Local colouring, in which the ablest of recent Indian historians tells the wondrous tale.quot;—Globe.
WAND E R IN G S itTTÄLOCHIST A N.
By Major-General Sir C. M. MacGEEGOE, K.C.B., C.S.L, C.I.E.,
Bengal Staff Corps, Quartermaster-General in India.
Author of quot;Narrative ot a Journey throughtheProviiiceof Ehorassan.quot;
8w., with largeMay and numerous Illustrations, 18s.
quot; Few living travellers have a truer eye for the salient physical features, the ethnical relations, and political situations of the less-known Asiatic regions than the distinguished author of this pleasantly written volume. The work is full of instruc­tive scenes, while the graphic descriptions of the peculiar Balueh scenery are abun­dantly illustrated by numerous artistic sketches from the pencil of General Jlac-Gregor. The accompanying sketch-map is on a large scale, and gives, for the first time, a correct idea of the water-partings and drainage systems in Sistan and West ^lakran.quot;—A cadßmy.
FLOTSAM AND JETSAM:
A Yachtsman's Experiences at Sea and Ashore. By THOMAS GIBSON BOWLES, Master Mariner.
Crown 6ro., Is. 6d. quot; Now and then a work of this kind may actually be what its writer thought it would be, amusing and readable; and amongst successful books of this order must be classed the book which Mr. Bowles has recently offered to the world.quot;— Saturday Review,
THE EUPHRATES ROUTE TO INDIA,
lit connection with the Central Asian and Egyptian Questions. By Sir WILLIAM ANDREW, O.I.E.,
Author of quot; India and Her Neighbours.quot; Second Edition. 8co., nith Maps, 5s. quot; This book is a storehouse of clearly-stated information on this subject, which will be increasingly important as years roll on.quot;—Statist,
quot; The introduction which precedes this edition leaves no point uneonsidered or unexplained, and a more lucid survey of the whole question could not be desired.quot;— Land and Water.
London : W. H. ALLEN amp; CO., 13 Wateeloo Place, S.W.
-ocr page 223-
T. W. WATSON,
4, PALL MALL,
LONDON.
GUNS, RIFLES, REVOLVERS,
AND
SPORTING TACKLE,
For All Parts of the World.
THE
Carlton Hanunerless.
nPHIS is a Hammerless Gun of an entirely new construction, and an inspection from Sportsmen is specially solicited. Among the prominent features of tliis Gun are the ease of Opening and Closing, the Safety from Accidental Discharge, and the facility of Mounting and Dismounting.
The barrels are of especial excellence; they are manu­factured on a patented process which produces them with a degree of truth and accuracy which is not attained by any other method.
PRICES AND DIÄGB.AMS ON APPLICATION.
4, PALL MALL, LONDON.
-ocr page 224-
/joSZb Z
I.
TO SPORTSMEN.
KEEP YOUR DOGS IN CONDITION
BY USING
SPRATTS PATENT
MEAT quot;FIBRINEquot; VEGETABLE
DOG CAKES
(WITH BEETEOOT).
The latest improvement and the most successful Food for Sporting Dogs.
USED IN THE ROYAL KENNELS.
quot; Eoyal Kennels, Ascot, April 2nd, 1882. quot; Dear Sirs,—Your Meat Biscuits containing beetroot are not to be equalled.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; Pkaxk Goodall.quot;
quot; Woodville, Falmouth, Dec, 1881. quot; Gentlemen,—I have never in my long experience been so well satisfied #9632;with the way my dogs have done their work, they being excellent in coat and hard in condition. In your Beetroot addition to the ' Fibrine ' Cakes you have solved a problem in dog feeding to the great satisfaction of all sportsmen who shoot in the old-fashioned style —viz., over dogs.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; Thomas quot;VVebbee.quot;
Professor Williams, F.E.S.E., F.K.CV.S., writes:—
quot; New Veterinary College, Edinburgh, Aug. 21st, 1882. quot;We find your ' Fibrine ' Dog Biscuits (with beetroot) most useful and economical in feeding our dog patients.quot;
THESE BISCUITS contain Beetroot as vegetable matter in addition to the other highly nutritious ingredients of our PATENT quot; FIBEINE quot; DOG CAKES, which, for the last twenty years, have had such a world­wide reputation.
The nutrient and anti-scorbutic properties of Beetroot are unrivalled.
\\ *
Beware of wortMess Imitations pushed by traders for the sake of
extra profit.
See each Cake is stamped quot;SPEATTS PATENTquot; and an X.quot;
U
LOCURIUM
#9632;gt;#9632;gt;
(PATENT)
For Cuts, Bruises, and Wounds ot all kinds; also heals Broken Knees in Horses
and Sore Feet in Dogs.
TO GAME REAKEBS.
USE
SPRATTS PATENT GAME MEAL.
Pamphlet, ivith practical information on the Bearing of Young Pheasants, the Con­struction of Aviaries, and the Treatment of Birds xvhilst jyenned for Lay ing, 3d.post free. Pamphlet on Poultry Rearing, price id. post free.
quot; SPEATTS PATENT,quot; Bermondsey, London, S.E.
-ocr page 225-
CHARLES LANCASTER,
INVENTOR OF THE
SMOOTH OVAL-BORE
FOR
EXPRESS
(•360, -400, -450,-500, amp; -577). Prices—-.£36 to £5G 10s. Nett.
AND
rook, yvavrraquo; rabbit
(•295, -320, -360, and -880). Prices from £5 to £10 Nett.
AND
MINIATURE MATCH HIFLKS,
GOLD MEDAL AWAKDED AT CLEVES, 1881.
See The Field, March 2G, April 2, June 11, 18, aud 25; July 9, 23, 30; Aug. 6, 20,1881 and Land and Water, Xov. 29 and Dec. 24. The Field, Feb. IS, 25; Jlay 13,20 and 27 ; Nov. 18,1882.
INVENTOR AND PATENTEE OF THE
FOUR-BARREL B.L. HAMMERLESS GUN,
Weight, 71b. 4oz.; and
BiXPRBSS RXFLB,
Weight, 101b.
äSv
ff-i^a.
4-BARREL B.L. PISTOL,
#9632;455 C.F.; Weight, 21ba. 8oz. •380 C.F.; Weight, lib. lioz.
Price, £8 Nett.
Top-Lever Snap Action Hammer or Hammerless Guns,
Ejecting the Exploded Cases. Prices from £36 to £45 Nett.
The quot;Colonialquot; Quality 12-bore Top Snap B.L. Gun. Plainly flnished,
but good sound work. Price—£20 nett; Case and Fittings for same, £3 nett. Gilbert's Patent Two-eyed Sig-ht, £1 Is. nett. Fixing same to Barrels, 10s. Gd.
CARTRIDGES, 10s. per 100 (for Cash with Order only).
Elcy's Best Green or Kynoch's Brass Cases Loaded with 3 drachms of
Curtis and Harvey's Best Powder, 4 Best Wads, and IJoz. Hard Shot, thin Cases
included. Stout Cases, for Rail. 6d. first 200, adding 2d. each additional 100.
Schultze or the New quot; E.G.quot; Powder, Is. 3d. per 100 extra.
PBICE LISTS ON APPLICATION,
151, NEW BOND STREET, LONDON, W.
(ESTABLISHED 1826.)
-ocr page 226-
CROUSEJOORUDEERfORESTS.
The quot; Highland Sportsman quot;
SHOOTING AND ESTATE AGENCY,
UNDEK THE MANAGEMENT OF
MR. ROBERT HALL,
AUTHOE OP THE quot;HIGHLAND SPOETSMAN.'
Lisn
SPORTING TO
Sent Post Free
TFTquot; PARTERS LET,
on Application.
CHIEF OFFICE:
43, OLD BOND STREET, LONDON, W.
THE HIGHLAND SPORTSMAN,
A COMPEEHENSIVE GUIDE TO THE HIGHLANDS OP SCOTLAND FOR THE SPOETSMAN AND TOUEIST.
The Second Edition of this Successful Work is nmo in the Press carefullv filaquo;,laquo;.,*' quot; Corrected, and also Enlarged, with Maps anä numero^nZtm^
';Can be heartily reoommenaea.quot;-Vide Morning Fast. Vide Äo'i ' a ^^ Whi0h 8Pdeg;rtlaquo;men will do well to take in hand.quot;-|| As complete a guide as could well be imagined.quot;-Vide Graphic
mountain, is
OFFICE: 43, OLD BOND STREET, LONDON, W,
-ocr page 227-
CHÄMBERUN'S
F H E^ S^INT T Squot; FD O D :
AROMATIC SPANISH MEAL,
OÄYGAR EXCELSIOR, raquo;OlIBH: SUPER MEAT raquo;REAVEraquo;,
OBTAINED THE
ONLY AWARD FOR GAME FOOD,
PARIS INTEENATIONAL EXHIBITION, 1878.
MEDAL AND DIPLOMA, MANNHEIM SILVER MEDALt _ CLEVES,.. 1881.
BRONZE
1880.
T HE great and increasing yearly demand for the AROMATIC SPANISH MEAL and CAYOAR EXCELSIOR is the best proof that the use of these Celebrated Foods (which have now been used iy all the Prinoinal Rearers of Game for MORE THAN THIRTY YEARS) is. not only highly beneficial, but absolutely necessary to the successful Rearing of young Pheasants and Game.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp;jquot;quot;quot;5
quot;i wS?PPlies0 constantly forwarded to, the Royal Parks : H.R.H. the Prince of Wales at Sandnngham ; and to all the Noblemen and' Landed Proprietors m the United Kindom, France, Germany, Holland, Belgium, Sweden.
Mr. James Chamberlin.nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; Belle Vue, KirbvLonsdale Feh 7 iRlaquo;a
turüs in the pens, and for rearing the young ones, I haTina reared last season nea 51 sSS^lS ^ being W1U' I e^eot *0 rear aSltf as many ttds coS
Head Keeper to the Earl of Beotive, M.Rnbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; quot;^ * TOHN HAEEOD.
CHAMBERLIN'S
MEAT DOGS' BISCUITS.
AS SUPPLIED TO
The ROYAL KENNELS at SANDRINGHAM.
PKICE 18s. PBB CWT., BAG IKTCXUDED.
SPECIAL QUOTATIONS fob 5 CWT. and 1 TON LOTS.
Write for the New Book of Prices, with Treatise on.Pheasant Rearing, and a lot of information about Game, free by post.
JAMEy^CHAMBERLIN,
GAME, POULTRY, AND DOG FOOD WAREHOUSE
POST OFriCE STEEET, NÜEWICH. '