UNIVERSITEITSBIBLIOTHEEK UTRECHT
4100 7422
-ocr page 3-b'
or THE
BEING
FirURES AND DESCRIPTIONS OE THE ORGANIC REMAINS PROCURED DURING ^nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;' THE PROGRESS OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA.
PUBLISHED BY OKDEK OF HIS EXCELLENCY THE GOVERNOR GENERAL OF INDIA IN COUNCIL.
(Ser. XIL)
Voi. HI.
(LOWER (ÏONDWAKAS.)
By OTTOKAR EEISTMANTEL, M.D.,
Palseontologist, Geological Survey of India.
quot;3 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;. r Acn®-.-^
M187a)^Hl_I340RAJiILia:E-4ALCHI^^^ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;BEDS i 40. ™ ,
XXVII. -* nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;’
1 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;(SuppL 1881) ¦ THE FLORA OF THE TALCHIE-EARHAHBAEI BEDS dd 40
Pj£^XXVin-XXXI. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;pp. 49-64;
2 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;(1880) : THE FLORA OF THE DAMUDA-PANCHET DlYISIOHS
1-77; Pis. IJ~XVIJIÜ. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Oirst half); pp.
78 149; Pis. XVIIJ-XLVIIJ. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;^''‘'acius.on), pp.
CALCUTTA :
SOID AT THE
OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF GOVERNMENT PRINTING; GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OFFICE, AND BY ALL BOOKSELLERS;nbsp;LONDON: TEÜBNBR amp; CO.
MDCCCLXXXI.
y*IKXED AT THB OÏFICB OB SUPBBINrBNDBNT OV amp;OrXByUBNI PHllTTJNS, MAëlIJfeaOfFSJtST, OAIOVTTA»
-ocr page 4-. I
4’
lt; .• lt;
M
¦-
rK.
- / nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;: ^.V^v;::/ï.v:.:^'..
VoL. Ill
The present volume, the third of the Possil Flora of the Gondwdna System in T da fa made up of four fasciculi, composing two parts. It contains the descrip.
^^and illustrations of the fossil plants of the Lower Division of the Gondwana sy^tem^so far as represented in the survey collections, up to the beginning of the
year 1880.
Others subsequently received will he described in a succeeding volume. The ames of all the animal remains found in the various groups together with thenbsp;flora have been recorded.
The first part of the present volume (composed of two fasciculi, No. 1 and gu 1 published in 1879 and 1881) contains the descriptions and illustrations ofnbsp;the lowest o-roups of the Gondwana system, viz., the Talchir shales and Karharbarinbsp;beds The^former are present in almost every coal-field, at the base; while thenbsp;'Karharbari beds are typically developed in the Karharbari coal-field, and are alsonbsp;kimwn from the Mohpani coal-field, and have recently been identified in the Southnbsp;Rewah basin by Mr. Hughes. The Talchir shales have not, however, been foundnbsp;fosiliferous in all the coalfields; at present we know of distinct fossils from the
following districts only, viz.. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;^
--The Deoghur (Kuraun) coal-field, in the Santal Parganas, close to Khur-
^ matar and Muddapur Stations, E. I. Railway (Chord line); from here Talchir fossils were first discovered by the Survey.
S —The Kdranpfira coal-field, in Hazaribagh district, where Mr. T. Hughes first ' ascertained their occurrence, and where I have myself recently collectednbsp;them Mr Hughes’ fossils are included in this volume, while those col-IPcted by me will be illustrated in a following volume.
Tvi iDp bpcinning of this year I also collected Talchir fossils in the Aurunga coal field, on the northern face of the Latiahar hill. These will also be
included in the next volume,
-ocr page 6-iv nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;PEEFACE.
d.—Quite recently Mr. Hughes has sent Talchir fossils from the South Eewah basin, Sobagpur. This discovery is of importance in connexion with thenbsp;presence of the Karharhari beds (mentioned above), and of a typical Eani-ganj group, showing that similar relations existed here as during thenbsp;formation of the Bengal coal-fields.
The Karharhari beds are highly fossiliferous where known to exist. The first impulse to our knowledge of this interesting flora was given by Mr. I. J. Whitty,nbsp;C.E., late Superintendent of the Karharhari Collieries, E. I. E., who in 1876nbsp;sent to our Museum a magnificent slab of shale, containing, as it were, the nucleusnbsp;of the entire flora, as afterwards made known. I have subsequently visited thenbsp;coal-field several times, and with the kind assistance of the ofiicers in chargenbsp;I have made the collection of Karharhari plants which now fills five table-cases innbsp;our Museum comprising the specimens described and figured in this part.
In the Mohpani coal-field one bed is also highly fossiliferous from which I collected in 1878. There were also some specimens from earlier times in ournbsp;collections, probably collected by Mr. J. G. Medlicott.
This first part contains 31 Plates (six of which are double Plates), illustrative of the flora of the Talchir shales and Karharhari beds ; on the whole tolerably wellnbsp;executed.
The second part (composed of two fasciculi. Nos. 2 and 3, published in 1880 and 1881) treats of the fossils of the Damuda and Panchet Divisions. They arenbsp;more numerous than those of the Talchir-Karharhari beds, especially in the Damudanbsp;Division, which is the coal-bearing portion of the Gondwana system.
In bringing together the specimens of these rocks, many ofiicers of the Survey, past and present, have contributed.
The descriptions and illustrations refer to all the fossils hitherto known from these rocks excepting those recently collected by Mr. Hughes in South Eewah andnbsp;by myself in the Karanpura and Aurunga coal-fields, which have, however, beennbsp;mentioned in their respective places. They will be described and illustrated in thenbsp;next (fourth) volume of the Gondwana Flora.
This second part is paged separately from the first one, and has, like it, a separate index.
It is illustrated by 47 Plates, also numbered separately, their numbers being distinguished by the addition of an A after the Plate number.
Although this volume concludes a description of the whole Gondwana flora as at present known, this can only be regarded as a basis for further researches; fornbsp;large areas remain unsurveyed and additions to our collections are made continually.nbsp;These will in due time be made known by descriptions and illustrations, alwaysnbsp;with reference to the volumes already published.
Calcutta, June 1881.
OTÏOKAE FEISTMANTEL, M.D.
-ocr page 7-Peeface to the Volume ......
1. THE FOSSIL FLORA OF THE TALCHIE-KAEHARBARI BEDSnbsp;Talchir group .......
Plants of the Talchir group Karharbari beds in the Karharbari coal-field .
Enumeration of the plants of the Karharbari beds Probable existence of the Karharbari beds in the Central Provini
Systematical desceipiion of the Fossils Tabular list .
I. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;EquisEtacej!
Genus: Schizoneura, Schimp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;meriani. Schimp.
Genus: Vertebraria (Boyle)
II. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Filices ....
Order: Neuro^teridew
Genus: Nenropteris, Bgt.
Sub-genus: Neuropteridium, Schimp.
Nenropteris valida, Feistm.
Order: Dictyopteridea .....
Genus: Qangamopteris, Mc’Coy ....
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;cylopteraides, Fdisim.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;var.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;subanricnlata
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;var. areolata
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;var. attemata
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;huriadica, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;major,nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;angustifolia. Me'Coy-
Genus : Glossopteris, Bgt.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;communis, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;(dumudica)
„ decipiens, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;sp.
Sagenopteris stoliezkana, Feistm.
III. CTCADEACEa: ....
Genus: Glossozamites, Schimp. .
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;stoliezkanus, Feistm.
a. Noggerathiopsidece
Genus: Nóggerathiopsis, Feistm. .
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;hislopi, Bunb. sp. (Feistm.)
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„ var. subrhomhoidalis
IV. Conifer(?) .
Genus : Euryphyllum, Feistm. .
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;whittianum, Feistm. .
Pas*.
1—48 1nbsp;2
3
4 ih.
6
ih,
1
ih.
8
ih,
ih.
9
ih.
ih.
10
ih.
11
12
ib.
13
.14
ih.
15 ih.
16 ih,nbsp;ih.
17 ih,
18 ib.nbsp;ih.nbsp;ib.
19
20
23 ih.
24
25
26 ih.
VI
iAEHAEBiEI COAL-EIELD
(including th
V. CoNIEEEa;
Genus: Voltzia, Bgt.
„ Mterophylla, Bgt.
Genus : Alhertia, Schimp.
„ comp, speeiosa, Schimp.
Fossil seeds Geneeal eesults
List I. Speoifical identities „ II. General identitiesnbsp;„ III. Analogous forms
Eemaeks 03sr the disteibution of the fossil plants in the
I. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Localities in the Southern portion, near Serampur
1. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Shaft No. 11 A near Buriadi
2. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Mines near Chunka
a, Shaft No. 16 I, „ No. 16 G.nbsp;c, „ No. 16 A.
3. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Locality Domahni
II. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Localities in the northern portion of the field, east of Karharhari
1. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Localities in the bottom seam district near Passerabhia, east of Karharhari
a, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Shaft No. 5 D.
b, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„ No. 5 G.
2. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Localities near Passerabhia, 3rd seam district
«, Shaft No. 17 C. h, „ No. 17B.
3. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Locality Mathadi, south-west of Passerabhia, shaft No. 1
4. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Locality Jogitand, Shaft No. 2 .
III. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The seams on the Buddhua and Komaljore hill, 4th seam
Horizons and Floras in the Karharhari coal-field List showing the distribution of fossils in the Karharhari coal-fieldnbsp;fossils) according to the horizons and localitiesnbsp;Disteibution of the fossil plants in the MohpAni coal-fieldnbsp;The Shapue coal-field (near Baitul) ....
Appendix (not paged).
1 (Suppl.): THE FLOEA OF THE TALCHIE-KAEHARBARI BEDS Mohpani coal-field—additional fossils .
Karharhari coal-field—additional fossils From the 1st seamnbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„ 2nd seam
General list of fossils to be described .
Equisetace^! ....
Genus: ScTiizoneura, Schimp, and Moug,
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;comp, gondwanensis, Feistm.
Equisetaceous stalks Genus: Vertebraria, Eoyle
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indiea, Eoyle
Filices .... a. Eeuropterideoe .
Genus; Neuropteris, Bgt.
Sub-genus: Neuropteridium, Schimp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;validum, Feistm.
b, Eictyotceniopteridem . nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Page.
27 lb.
28
29 ib.
30 ib.
32
33 ib.
36 ib.nbsp;ih.
37 ib.nbsp;ib.
38 ib.
39 ib.nbsp;ib.
40 ib.
41 ib.
42 ib.
43
44
45
47
48
Talchir
49— 60nbsp;49nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;60
50— 51
51— 52
51 ib.
52 ib.nbsp;ib.
53—55
53 ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.
Genus: Grlossojiteris, Bgt.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;communis, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;longicaulis, Feistm.
Development of Qlossopteris . c. Dictyopteridece .
Gangamopteris cyclopteroides, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;huriadica, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;angustifolia, Mo’Coy
Gtcadeacejs ..... a. Zamiece
Genus: Ifoggerathiopsis, Feistm.
Distribution of this genus in Australia Systematical position of NaggeratMopsisnbsp;Classification of the family Noggerathiopsidecenbsp;Noggerathiopsis, Feistm., and Mhiptozamites, Schmalh.
Distribution of the Zamiece—Table illustrating the_
Noggerathiopsis liislopi, Feistm.
Incerice sedis—Seeds . nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;,
Samaropsis, sp. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;,nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Carpolithes milleri, Feistm. ....
Carpolitlies ......
Seeds .......
Index to the first portion (I and I Suppl.) of Vol. Ill, Gondwana Flora Plates I—XXXI to illustrate the Flora of the Talchir-Karharbari beds (Part I and Suppl)
2 AND 3. THE FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS Inteodectokt Remaeks ......
A. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The Efijmahal region—(Rajmahal hills)
B. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Birbhum, Deogarh, and Kai'hai’bari region
Sahajori coal-field Jainti coal-field .
Karharbari coal-field
C. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Damuda valley region
I. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Damuda valley coal-fields
Raniganj coal-field Jharia coal-fieldnbsp;Bokafo coal-fieldnbsp;Karanpura coal-field
II. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Coal-fields of Palamaun (Palamow)
Auranga coal-field
D. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Son, Mahanadi and Brahmani region
Rfimkola and Tatapani coal-fields South Rewah and Sohagpur .
Bisrampur coal-field .
Raigar-Hingir coal-field Talchir coal-field
E. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Satpura region
Satpura basin
F. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Godavari region .
I. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Neighbourhood of Nagpur
II, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Warda-Pranhita-Godavari basin
Chanda coal-field South-eastern extension
vu
Paoe.
53 ih.
53— 54
54 ih.nbsp;ib.
54— 55
55
55— 59
55 ih.nbsp;ih,
56
57 ih.nbsp;ih.
58—59
59 ih.nbsp;ib.
60 ih.
61—64
1—140
1
2
3 ih.
4 ib.
4—10
4—9
4—8
8
9
ih.
9—10
9—10
10— 15nbsp;10—11
11— 13nbsp;13
13— 14
14— 15
15— 18
18—22
18—20
20—22
ih.
22
VlU
which Lower Gondwana fossils
ntherto heen found, to
known,
gether
G. Sikkim Damudas ....
List of groups of Lower Gondwanas .
Alphabetical list of the coal-fields and areas from localities at which they were foundnbsp;Alphabetical list of localities, at which Lower Gondwana fossils havenbsp;fossils identified at each locality .
The various localities from which Lower Gondwana fossils are known, alphabetically arranged groups .....
General list of fossils of the Lower Gondwanas Conclusions drawn from this listnbsp;Description of the fossils .nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;•
Crypt ogamse or Acotyledones .
Pteridophyta—Equisetaceoe .
Genus : Schizonenra, Schimper Known species and range of the genus out of Indianbsp;Eelations and differencesnbsp;Schizoneura gondwanensis, Feistm.
Description . nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Damuda and Panchet form identical .
Eelations .....
Stems .'.....
Eange and localities of Sch. gondwanensis, Feistm.
ScJiizoneura comp, meriani. Schimp. .
Schizoneura, sp. . nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Genus: FJiyllotJieca, Bgt.
Known species and distribution of Fhyllofheca, Bgt.
Fhyllotheca indica, Bunh.
Eelations and differences Stems ......
Eange and distribution of Fhyll. indica, Bunh.
Fhyllotlieca rohusia, Feistm.
Analogies and differenoies Locality and horizon ....
Genus: Trizygia, Eoyle.
Trizygia speciosa, Eoyle
Group: Sphenophylloideie Eaniganj and Barakar formnbsp;Eange and distribution of Triz. speciosa, Eoylenbsp;Genus: Veriebraria, Eoylenbsp;Analogiesnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.....
Veriebraria indica, Eoyle Eange and distribution of V. indica, Eoyle .
Eesumé of the Eqnisetacece in India Filicesnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.....
a. Cyatheacem
Genus: Cyathea ....
Cyathea comp. TcMhatch^, Schmalh.
Locality nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.....
Genus: Sphenopteris, Bgt.
Sphenopierispolymorpba, Feistm.
Eange and distribution of Sph. polymorpha, Feistm.
Genus: FicTesonia, L’Hérit FicTcsonia hughesi, Feistm.
Page.
22— 23nbsp;23
23— 28
28—47
47—50 50-56nbsp;57—58
58 lb.nbsp;ih.
59 ih.
60 61nbsp;ih.
63 ih.nbsp;ih.
63—64
64 ih.
65 ¦ih.
67
lb.
68 ih.nbsp;ih,
69 ib,nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.
70 ih.
71 ib.nbsp;ih.
72 ib.
73
75 ih.nbsp;ih.nbsp;ih.
76 ib.nbsp;ib.
77
78 ib.
with th with thnbsp;ithin th
IX
Relations of this species Order: PolypodiacecB
a. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Group of Asflenium uohithyense, Heer,nbsp;Asplenium whithyense, Heer.
b. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Type; Polypodium, Linn.
Alethopt. lindleyana, Eoyle .
Alethopteris, sp.
o. Type: Phegopteris, Mett.
Alethopt. phegopteroides, Peistm.
Pecopteridece, inoertse sedis Pecopteris concinna. Pres!.
Genus; Merianopteris, Heer Merianopt. major, Peistm.
Order: Neuropteridece Genus: Neuropteridium, Schimpnbsp;Genus: Cyclopteris, Blt;;t.
Cyclopteris paehyrhacMs, Gopp. Insect-wing-lihe leaf .
Order; Pachypterideai Genus : Thinnfeldia, Ettingh.
Thinnfeldia comp, odontopteraides, Peistm.
Its classification Distribution in Australianbsp;European relationsnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Order: Tceniopteridece .
Genus: Macrofceniopteris, Schimp. M.acrot. danmoides, Koyle sp. .
Its relations nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;,
Macrot. feddeni, Peistm.
Related forms
list of species of Macrotseniopteris with Type : Vittaria, Swartz.
Genus : Palaovittaria, Peistm. , Palceomttaria Tcurzi, Peistm.
Relations and diSerences Type : Oleandra Cav. and Angiopteris,nbsp;Genus: Oleandridium, Schimp.nbsp;Oleandrid. stenoneuron Schenk.
Genus: Angiopteridium Schimp. Angiopter. me’Clellandi (Moor sp.) Schinbsp;Angiopt. infarctum, Peistm.
Sub-order: Ptictyotceniopteridem Genus: Glossopteris, Bgt.
Distribution of this genus, in a.—Australianbsp;h.—Africa .
c. —India .
d. —Russia .
e. —Asia Minornbsp;/.—Italy .
Range of this genus Fructification
Section a: Forms with narrow nets
(M
orr. sp
regard
Mitch
mp.
to the character
of the secondary veins
Paoe.
79 ih.nbsp;ib.
80 ib.nbsp;81nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;82nbsp;ib.
ib.
84 ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib,
85 ib.nbsp;ib.
87 ib.nbsp;ib.
ib.
90 ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.
91 ib.nbsp;ib.
92 ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;9.3nbsp;94nbsp;ib.
ib.
96 ib.nbsp;ib.
Olossopterü communis, Feistm.
Distribution cf the species Eelations
Gloss opt. communis, var. Stenoneura.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;intermittens, n. sp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;stricta, Bunh.
^ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;muscefolia, Bunh.
„¦ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indica. Schimp.
Section b. Intermediate forms .
Glossopt. browniana, Bgt. lts fructification—of two kindsnbsp;Section c : Broad-netted forms .
Glossopt. retifera, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;conspicua, n. sp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;sp. (ingens)
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;divergens, n. sp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;damudica, Feistm.
Section d : Narrow-leaved forms .
Glossopt. angustifolia, Bgt.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;leptoneura, Bunh.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;formosa, n. sp.
Section e .• Eound-leaved forms
Glossopt. orbicularis, n. sp.
Incertffi ....
Glossopt. decipiens, Feistm.
Order: Dictyopteridece Genns'. Gangamopteris, Mc’Coynbsp;Gangamopt. anthropJiyoides, n. sp.
„ whittiana, Feislm.
„ hughesi, Feistm. .
Eelations and differences Gangamopteris, sp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;cyclopteroides, Feistm.
lts distribution .
Its varieties .
Other species of the genus Its range in India and Australianbsp;Genus: JBelemnopteris, Feistm.
Belemmpt. wood-masoniana, Feistm.
Its relations Incerte sedis
Sagenopteris (P) longifolia, n. sp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;(?) polyphylla, Feistm.
„ comp, rhoifolia, Presl.
,, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;(?) stoliczJcana, Feistm.
Genus: Actinopteris, Schenk
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;bengalensis, Feistm.
Genus : AnthropJiyopsis, Nath .
PHANEEOGAMa:—Gymnospermcc nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Class: Cycadeaceoe Genus : Pteropbyllum, Bgt.
Pteroph. burdwanense Feistm. (Mo’Clell. sp.) A species of Anomzamites, Schimp.
Page.
98 ih.
99 ih.nbsp;ib.
100
101
ib.
102
ib.
ib.
103 ib.
104 ib.nbsp;ib.
10.5
ib.
ib.
106
ib.
107 ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.
108 ib.nbsp;ih.
109 ib.
110 ib.nbsp;ih.nbsp;ih.
111 ib.nbsp;ib.
112 ih.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.
113 lb.
114 ih.nbsp;ib.
115 ib.
116 ih.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;117
Vterophyllnm, (?) sp. .
Genus: Glossozamites, Schimp. . Glossozam. stoliczTcanus, Feistm.nbsp;Suh-Family: Noggerathiopsidec^
Genus: Nöggerathiopsis, Feistm.
Nöggerathiopsis kislopi, Feistm. Squamm .....nbsp;Class: Conifermnbsp;Order: Taxacemnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;y
Family: Salishurece nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Genus : Em-yphyllnm, Feistm. .
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;whittianum, Feistm.
Genus: RMpidopsis, Schmalh. .
Shipidopsis densinervis, n. sp. lts affinities and differences
Mhipidopsis gingkoides, Schmalh. Genus; Cyclopitys, Schmalh.
Order: Abietaceee Genus : Voltzia, Bgt.
„ heterophylla, Bgt.
Genus: Alhertia, Schimp.
Seeds (Samaropsis, etc.)
Sterns of coniferous plants
Animalia .....
Crustacea . nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Genus: Estheria, Strauss.
„ mangaliensis, Jon. .
Fisces (Scales) .
Fatrachia Lahyrinthodontianbsp;Gonioglyptus longirostris, Huxl.
Fachygmia incurvata, Huxl. .
Brachyops laticeps, Owen Archegosaurus (.? ) sp. ?
Beptilia .....
Finosauria
Ankistrodon indicus, Huxl.
Ficynodontia Ficynodon orientalis .
Insect wing
Geneeai, eemabks ....
Appendix .....
1. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;List of fossils according to the horizons with reference to the figures
2. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Supplementary list of localities at which Lower Gondwana fossils were found
Index to the 2nd Part of Vol. Ill . nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Plates \A—XLVIIjI to illustrate the Flora of the Damuda and Panchet divisions
XI
Paob.
117 ib.nbsp;ib.
118 ib.nbsp;ib.
119
120 ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.
121
ib.
ib.
122
ib.
ib.
ib.
th.
123 ib.
124
125 ib.
ib.
ib.
126 ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.nbsp;ib.
127
ib.
ib.
ib.
ib.
ib
ib.
128—132
133
133-136
136—140
141—149
DIEECTIONS EOE THE BINDER.
Eour fasciculi make up the present Tolume—See title-page to the volume.
Remove title pages and prefaces of all four fasciculi, as well as the tables of contents of the first three fasciculi (No. 1, No. 1 Supplement, and No. 2).
Bind text (pages 1—64) and plates (I—XXXI) of the first two fasciculi (No. 1 and No. 1 Supplement) together; as also the text (pages 1—149) and plates (LA—nbsp;XLVII.4) of the two other fasciculi (Nos. 2 and 3), and these two parts then formnbsp;the volume and have to be hound together in the order indicated.
Bind title-page, contents and preface to the volume at the beginning of part 1 (first fasciculus).
Replace plate YLJA, issued originally with fasciculus 1 of this volume, by the same plate (VII^) issued now.
-ocr page 15-WITH PLATES 14-XVI AMs.
BY
O. FEISTMANTBL, M.D.,
PALiEONTOLOGIST, GEOLOGICAL SUEVET OF INDIA.
The fossil flora of the Damnda division, the chief coal-hearing gronp of the Lower Gondwanas, is mnch more numerous than that of the Talchir-Karharharinbsp;beds, both as regards the number of specimens and species, while, on the othernbsp;hand, the flora of the Panchet group, the uppermost member of the Lower Gondwanas and locally overlying the Damuda division, is a very small one. The determination and comparison of the plants of the Panchet group has shown, that to anbsp;very great extent they are forms which are already represented in the Damudanbsp;sub-division, for which reason I have decided upon describing both floras together.nbsp;Before proceeding to the description, I shall enumerate the fossils of the variousnbsp;coal-fields according to the groups and localities, as far as known at present, fromnbsp;which it will be best seen what fossils are known from the various groups and innbsp;what relation they are to each other.
In the Baniganj coal-field, where the Damuda division appears best developed, it was sub-divided into three groups : the Barakar group (being best developed in thenbsp;west of the field on the Barakar river). Iron shales, and Baniganj group (so namednbsp;from the town of Baniganj); and it is yet overlaid by rocks comprised under thenbsp;heading “ Panchet division.” The other Bengal coal-fields show the same groupsnbsp;more or less developed: while in the fields to the west and south certain groups
' For general understanding, I may mention that the lower portion of the Gondwana system is sub-divided into three divisions, which are in ascending order: (a) the Talchir division, which includes the Talohir group proper and thenbsp;Karharbari beds ; {bj the Damuda division, which contains most of the Indian coal, and is again sub-divided into threenbsp;groups ; (c) the Panchet division, the top of the lower Gondwanas.
For further information see the Memoirs of the Geological Survey, and especially the Manual of the Geology of India, 1879, Vol. I, pp. 107—134.
-ocr page 16-2 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;, FLORA OF THE HAMÜHA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
occur, some of which differ in mineral character from those of Bengal, yet palgeon-tologically can he correlated with the latter. This will he indicated in discussing the fossils of the various coal-fields, taking them in order from east to west andnbsp;south, as observed in the Manual of Indian Geology (Vol. I, p. 162).
A.—The Rajmahal hegion.
Mdjmahdl Hills.—In his memoir on the geology of the B,ajmahal hills,' Mr. V. Ball treats fully of the Damuda series of this area, showing that it mostlynbsp;belongs to the Barakar group. Only very few fossils are known.
Mr. Ball mentions some leaves of Glossopteris (1. c., p. 27) from shales near Ramgarh (south of the Brahmani river), and there are a few specimens in ournbsp;collections from some other localities :—
1. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Musinia, on the Brahmani river (Brahmani coal-field).
Yertebraria indica, Eoyle—one specimen distinctly branching'.
Glossopteris sp.
2. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Burgo, in the Pachwara coal-field, on the Bansloi nadi, west of Amrapara.
Yertebraria indica, fioyle.
Macrotoeniopteris danmoides, Royle (this specimen will be found figured in the next part, Plate XXIA fig. 2).
Glossopteris communis, Pstm.—two or three specimens of the usual form.
At these two localities the plants are preserved in dark-grey 'coal-shale usually met with in
the Barakar group.
3. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;There are a few fossils from two other localities, differing lithologicallynbsp;from the mode of preservation usual in Barakar fossils. One of the localities, asnbsp;indicated on the labels, is “ Lohundia, upper bed below trap.” The rock in whichnbsp;the fossils (which, according to our present knowledge, must be considered asnbsp;“ Damuda fossils”) are preserved, is a light purplish-grey, fine, soft shale, whichnbsp;resembles more some shales from the Upper Gondwanas, and I think thesenbsp;are the shales to which Mr. Ball refers {1. c., pp. 47 and 48), saying thatnbsp;the white beds of the Duhrajpur group on the Kair Pahar “ were considerednbsp;by Mr. Blanford (MSS.) to have so strong a resemblance to some in the vicinity ofnbsp;Lohundia and Ramzanpfir in the north of the area, that he suggested a possibilitynbsp;that the latter should he referred to the same group; hut he added that the resemblance may only he accidental.” In this latter conjecture Mr. Blanford was probably correct; for the fossils from Lohundia, as far as known, must be classednbsp;with the Lower Gondwanas, although they may represent a higher group than thenbsp;Barakars, for I have determined—
Glossopteris communis, Pstm., with a very narrow net-venation.
Glossopteris indica. Schimp., a narrow-leaved form.
‘ Mem. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. XIII, pt. 2, 1877.
-ocr page 17-FLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;3
Glussopteris angiistifolia—Bgt. This form is especially represented in the Eaniganj group. Small, scale-lihe leaflets: similar to some in the Raniganj group.
Winged seeds—of which I can form no opinion to what plant they might belong, as no other plants but Glossopteris occur with them. Winged seeds of the same nature are knownnbsp;from the Raniganj (Kamthi) group in the Raniganj field. South Rewah and Satpuranbsp;basin (Bijori horizon).
These fossils show a decided relation to those of the Raniganj group, and it is perhaps not improbable that these beds at Lohundia (in the Hura coal-field) represent that group—a view already suggested by Mr. Ball in 4is G eology of the Rajmahal hills [1. c., p. 26).
4. The other locality lies further to the south of the area. Tw o specimens are preserved in- our collection, both being of identically the same rock. There isnbsp;no other record about them except that one bears the inscription “Dubrajpur.”nbsp;They consist of a purplish-grey shale, the fossils on it being much paler. Theynbsp;most probably come from the Gopikandar beds, close to the east of Dubrajpurnbsp;{1. c., p. 186).
It is very much to be regretted that their exact position is not known, for although there is a Glossopteris preserved in them, yet there is also another fossil, anbsp;hrosid-lenYed Pht/llotheca, very much similar to one from the Siberian Jura, recentlynbsp;described by Prof. SchmalhauseA of Kiew. This association is of a certain importance ; for either are these fossils from the Damuda rocks of Gopikandar, and thennbsp;there is another fossil of genuine Jurassic type in association with Glossopteris,nbsp;or they are from the Dubrajpur group (judging from the PJiyllotheca), when therenbsp;would be another instance of Glossopteris in Upper Gondwanas. In either casenbsp;the discovery of the new Phyllotheca here in India is of interest; it will be figured onnbsp;Plate XIV A bis ^).
The fossils represent two species only ;—
Tliyllotlieca rohusta, n. sp.—the new species mentioned above. (PI. XIVJ bis.)
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.—Both from “ Dubrajpur.-’-’
B.—Biubhum, Deogarh, and KarharbIei region.
From this region very few fossils can be recorded as coming from the Damuda series, and only from two coal-fields :—
1. Sahayori coal-field, in the Deogarh «rea. —In his report on this coal-field;^ Mr. Hughes mentions in the Barakar group (p. 254) “ many fine specimens of Glos-sopteris in the shales accompanying the coal,” but he does not mention anynbsp;species, and I could not identify the specimens in our collections.
‘ Mem. de I’Acad. Imp. d. Sc. de St. Petersbourg, VII Ser., Tome XXVII, No. 4.
^ As I identified it only after the plates -were numbered, I had to intercalate a new plate after Plate XIV A as XIV A bis.
^ Mem. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. VII, 1870.
-ocr page 18-4 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;PLOUA or THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
2. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The Jainti or Karaun field deserves notice, because that here the first,nbsp;and up to date the most numerous, Talchir fossils were found, which were described in my previous paper, and which wiU also be taken into the comparative listnbsp;of the Lower Gondwana fossils.
3. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Karharbdri coal-field.—In my Elora of the Talchir-Karharbari beds^ I hadnbsp;an opportunity to point out, that in the Karharbari coal-field, which is mostlynbsp;composed of Talchir and Karharbari beds, at one locality only, on the Lumki billnbsp;(in the southern portion of the field), there were found a few fossils which indicatenbsp;a higher horizon than that of the Karharbari beds, and I thought it best tonbsp;consider the beds on the Lumki (Komaljore) hill as representatives of thenbsp;Damuda division. I also indicated that the seam on the Bhudua hill may be of thenbsp;same horizon.
The Lumki hill fossils are—
ScJdzoneura gondwanensis, Fstm. Fragmentary, but distinct. This fossil is, it is true^ especially frequent in the Eaniganj group, but it also is known in the Barakar group,nbsp;and the genus in the Talchir division also.
Vertebraria indica, Boyle. Known from the whole Damudas.
SphenopterispoLymorplia, Fstm. Known from the Kaniganj group also.
Glossopieris communis, Fstm. A common Damuda fossil.
Gangamopteris,^^. A form resembling somewhat certain long-leaved forms of GangUmopteris cyclopteroides, Fstm., of the Karharbari beds.
Erom the stratigraphical position of these beds on the Lumki hill, I suggested that they should be considered as belonging to the Barakar group.
The fossils of the Karharbari beds, including those which I recently (April 1880,) collected from the second seam at shafts No. 24 and No. 40 (Passerabhia),nbsp;from which seam hitherto no fossils were known, will be taken in consideration atnbsp;end of this chapter, when the general table of the Lower Gondwana fossils will benbsp;given.
C.—Damuda Valley region.
J. Damuda valley coal-fields.—Prom this region the greatest number of fossils have been hitherto made known.
1. Baniganj field.—It was in this coal-field that the Damudas were earliest studied in detail, and where a regular three-fold grouping was first established.nbsp;In this coal-field also the Panchet rocks were first separated. All these groups arenbsp;fossiliferous. A detailed description of this field was given by Mr. WIT. Blanford.^nbsp;Erom this coal-field also plants were first described hy European authors, as I shallnbsp;mention when speaking of the Baniganj group.
’ Pal. Ind,, Ser. XII, 1, pp. 43. 44.
^ Mem. Geol. Suiv., India, Vol. III.
-ocr page 19-a. BardJcar group.—In 1877 I visited the western portion of the Raniganj coal-field where the Barakar group is best developed, and collected a number ofnbsp;fossils from these beds at two localities. A short account of my observations wasnbsp;given at that time,^ to which some slight corrections are now reqidred.
The fossils are (I find it necessary to introduce also the new names already here)—
Vertebraria indica, Eoyle—Various forms, amongst them also several branching specimens. (Figured on PI. Xllld, figs. 1, 2, 4-, 8, PI. XIVfigs. 1, 4). From Kumerdhubi andnbsp;Nirscha.
Equisetaceous stems.—These may he either of ScJiizoneura or EJiyllotlieca (PL XIIU, fig. 7). Kumerdhubi.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm. (Figured PI. XXXIU, fig. 2). Kumerdhubi and Nirscha.
Gl. communis, var. stenoneura.—A variety with a much narrower net-venation than in the original species (Pis. XXXII^, fig. 3, XXXIIU, fig. 1). Kumerdhubi.
GL indica. Schimp. Kumerdhubi.
Gl. browniana, Bgt. Kumerdhubi.
Gl. damudica, n. sp. (Pis. XXXI^, figs. 1-3 ; XXXIIJ, fig. 1). Kumerdhubi.
Gl. ingens. n. sp. Fragmentary. (PI. XXXI4, figs. 4, 5). Kumerdhubi.
Gl. inter mittens, n. sp. (PI. XXXIII.4, figs. 2-4). Nirscha.
Angiopteridium infarctum n. sp. (Pis. XXX IVJ, figs. 4, 5.) Kumerdhubi.
Squamm gymnospermarum (?) Scales of cycadeous plants (PI. XLVII A, figs. 19-21). Kumerdhubi.
These are all the plants at present known from the Barakar group in the Rani-ganj field.
The next horizon in this field and from which plants are known is that of—
h. The iromhales.—These shales being generally very fine and compact, the fossils are mostly well preserved. They are, however, only very few—
Glossopteris commvmis, Fstm.
Glossopteris damudica, n. sp. A splendid specimen will be figured on PI. XXXA, fig. 1.
An insect-wing-like leaf, figured on PI. XVIA his, figs. 7, 7lt;i.
Coniferous stems. There are several fragments of stems, with little scars, which remind very much of coniferous stems, and which again agree with a Siberian plant. Inbsp;shall refer to it more closely when describing these fossils in the proper place,nbsp;PI. XLVIU, figs. 5-7.
The best of these fossils are from Kulti, on the Barakar extension of the East Indian Railway.
c. Raniganj group.—This group contains in this coal-field the richest coal-seams ; from it also most of the Lower Gondwana plants are known. From this group also the first fossils were known to European authors. Already in hisnbsp;“ Prodrome d’une histoire des végétaux fossiles, 1828,” Adolphe Brongniart mentions
’ Rec. Geol. Surv., Vol. X, p. 73.
-ocr page 20-In his “ Histoire des végétanx,” etc., we find another species of Glossopteris, i. e., Gl. angmtifoUa, also from Eaniganj. Prof. Göppert (1836) and later Schimpernbsp;(1869) gave copies of Brongniart’s drawings. At present the flora is much morenbsp;numerous, for besides that there was in our Museum a large collection of plantsnbsp;from the Eaniganj field, made during the survey of that field, I had an opportunity to collect several fossils myself in the neighbourhood of Assensole,^ andnbsp;I had also a collection of plants from Eaniganj placed at my disposal by Mr.nbsp;•I. Wood-Mason.®
Most of these fossils are ferns, which will be illustrated in the next number, but a list of them all is given now.
UQUISBTACEM
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm.. Eaniganj; Assensole, north branch of the Nunia river. Pis. ÏA, llA, III^, figs. 1, 2 ; PI. TV A, figs. 1, 2 ; PI. T A, figs. 1—5; PI. VI^, figs. 1—3 ;nbsp;PI. VIIJ, fig. 2; Pis. \lllA, XTVA, fig. 5.
Stalks of ScJiizoneura. PI. IXA, figs. 1—6. Eaniganj.
Phyllotlieca indica, Bunb., the real form. PI. XII^, fig. 6. Eaniganj.
; PL XTVA, figs. 2, 3. , amp;c.
Eaniganj, Mangalpur.
Fertebraria indica, Eoyle. PL XIIA, figs. 10, 11; PL XllI^, fig. 3 Eaniganj, Assensole, (northern and southern branch of Nunia river'nbsp;Trizygia speciosa, Eoyle. PL XI^, figs. 1, 3,4,5, 7, 8 ; PL XIIAfig. 1-
FILICES.
Sphenopteris polymorpTia, Fstm. Eaniganj. Pis. XVJ, XVU, figs. 5, 6; PL XYIA bis, figs. 1—6. Sitarampur. PL XVI.!, fig. 3.
Alethopteris {Asplenium), comp, whitbyensis, Gopp. Eaniganj. PL XIXA, figs. 2, 2a.
Aleihopt. lindleyana, Eoyle, Eaniganj. PL XVllU, fig. 2; PL XIX^, figs. 3, 4; PL XXIlIyf, fig. 10; PL XXXIX^ fig. 11.
Alethopt. pJiegopteroides,Tsim. Eaniganj. PL XVIIIfig. 1.
Pecopteris affinis, McClell. Eaniganj. PL XXXIX^, fig. 10.
Merianopteris major, n. sp. Eaniganj field. PL XIXA figs. 9—11.
Macrotaniopieris danmides, Eoyle. Eaniganj. PL XXA.
Paiaovittaria kurzi, Fstm. Eaniganj. PL XLIV^.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm. (type). Eaniganj field; Assensole, north branch, Nunia river.
PL XXIXA fig. 4; PL XXXVJ, figs. 1, 2; PL XXXYIA, figs. 1—3.
GL communis, var. stenoneura. Eaniganj. PL XXXVIIIA fig- 5.
Gl. indica. Schimp. Eaniganj. PL XXYA, fig. 3; PL XXXVJ, fig. 3.
Gl. hrowniana, Bgt. Eaniganj. PL XXVIIA fig- 4.
Gl. intermedia, n. sp. Eaniganj. PL XXIXA, figs. 3, 6.
' Written Eana-Gnnje in Brongniart’s work (pp. 54 and 169).
^ I gave a short account of them in Rec. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. X, p. 75.
^ These were already described by me in the Jour. As. Soo. Bengal, 1876, (Vol. XLV.)
-ocr page 21-FLORA OF THE DAMTJDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;7
Gl. retifera, Pstm. Kaniofanj ; Sitarampur. PI. XXVIII.i, figs. 2, 7, 10; PI. XLI^, fig. 9. Gl. nonsjiicua, Tx. s-^. Raniganj ; Assensole^ north branch of the Nunia river; Dadka; Sitarampur. PI. XXVIII^, figs. 5j amp;, 8, 9.
Gl. divergens, n. sp. Raniganj. PI. XXVIIIvIj figs. 3, 4.
Gl. augustifolia, Bgt. Raniganj; Assensole, south branch of the Nunia. PI. XXVII/^, figs. 6, 8, 9, 11—13; PI. XXXIVJ, fig. 3; PI. XXXIXJ, figs. 1, 2.
Gl. formosa, n. sp. Raniganj. PI. XXXIX, figs. 3—7.
Gl. oriicutaris, n. sp. Raniganj; Assensole, north branch of the Nunia river. PI. XLIiI,figs. 1, 2. Glossopteris, sp. Raniganj. PI. XXXIV^, figs. 1, 2.
Gangamopteris whiitiana, Fstm. Raniganj. PI. XLIII, figs. 1, 2.
Gangamopteris, sp. Raniganj. PI. XXVII^, figs. 7, 10.
Gangamopteris antkrophyoides, n. sp, Assensole, south branch of Nunia river. PI. XXXIX.I, figs. 8, 8«.
Belemnopleris wood-masoniana, Fstm. Raniganj. PL XLIII, figs. 3, 4.
Sagenopieris{l') lorigifolia, n.s-p. Raniganj. PI. LXi, fig. 1.
Sag. (.0 polyphylla, Fstm. Raniganj. PI. XLI^, figs. 3, 4; PI. XLIII^, fig. 5.
Sagenopteris, sp. ? Raniganj. PL XLI, fig. 7 ; PL XLII, figs. 2, 4.
Actinopteris ? lengalensis, Fstm. PL XIX^I, fig. I. Raniganj.
Bictyopteridium sporiferum, n. sp. PL XXIII^, fig. 12.
CTCABEACEM.
Fteropliyllum burdwanense, Fstm. Raniganj. PL XLVII.4, fig. I. Nöggerathiopsis (= Rhiptozamites) Jiislopi, Eunb., sp. PL XLV, figs. 10, 11.nbsp;Squama. Raniganj. PL XLVII/i, figs. 8, 16.
CONIFEBJU.
Voltzia ? scale. Raniganj. PL XLVII..4, fig. 19.
Samaropsis comp, parvula, Heer. Raniganj. PL XLVII.lt;Ij figs. 14, 15.
If we compare the fossils enumerated above, we shall find that all the plants of the Barahar group, except Gl. ingens, n. sp., Glossopteris intermittens, n. sp., andnbsp;Angiopteridium infarctum, n. sp., are found also in the Raniganj group, and thatnbsp;two species of the three from the iron shales are both in the Barakar and Raniganjnbsp;groups. The Raniganj group is the richest in forms, and in this group in this coalfield altogether the most species have hitherto heen distinguished.
d. Panellet group.—This group was established in Mr. Blanford’s report, and at first a lower and upper division was distinguished; hut later, the name Panchet wasnbsp;retained for the lower division only, as belonging to the Lower Gondwanas, while thenbsp;upper Panchet group, although no fossils have been found in it, is considerednbsp;as probably representing the Duhrajpur group. M e have to deal here with thenbsp;lower portion only, or with the Panchet group proper. It is fossiliferous, and is thenbsp;only group of the Lower Gondwunas in which hitherto animal fossils have beennbsp;found numerously.
-ocr page 22-ANIMALS.
Dicynodon orientalis, Huxley. Deoli, Damuda river, south-west of Assensole. Anhistrodon indicus, Huxley. Ibid.
Gonioglyptus longirostris, Huxley. Ibid.
Tachygmia inmrvata, Huxley. Ibid.
Estheria (comp, mangaliensis, Jon.) South of Maitur, north-west branch, Nunia river.
PLANTS.
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm. The same species as in the Kaniganj group. Maitur, northwest branch of the Nunia river, north-west of Assensole. PI. XA.
Eecopteris concinna, Presl. Pretty frequent. Ibid. PI. XVIU, figs. 1—6.
Cyclopteris pachyrliachis, Göppt. Ibid. PI. XVII^, fig. 7.
Oleandridium comp, stenmeuron, Schimp. Ibid. PI. XIX^, figs. 5—8.
Glossopteris. Two species can be distinguished, although the specimens are only fragmentary, but the net-venation can be well seen, and it can be referred to that of two species in the Damudanbsp;division, i.e.—
Glossopt. indica, Schimp., and 61. communis, Fstm.(Figures see in Eec. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. X, pp. 139, 14-0, figs. 8—8, on plate facing page 140).
Samaropsis comp, parvula, Heer. Several winged seeds, which are of the same type as those already mentioned in the Kaniganj group, only a little smaller. North-west branch of thenbsp;Nunia river. PI. XLVIU, figs. II—13.
A comparison of the fossils in the Panohet division with those in the Eaniganj gronp shows that there is great resemblance of the two floras, four species out ofnbsp;seven being identical.
The Estheria appears to be identical with some forms occurring at other localities, which are also considered as representatives of the Eaniganj group.
Eurther general remarks can be given only at the end, when the floras of the other districts have been named.
2. Jharia coal-field.—The next coal-field from which we have to record fossils of the Damuda series is the Jharia coal-field, to the west of the Eaniganj field.
Several fossils were collected by Mr. Hughes, by whom the coal-field has been described and I published a short note on a DicTesonia from this coal-field.^ Allnbsp;the groups of the Damuda series and also the Panchet rocks are found in this field,nbsp;but fossils were only found in the Barakar and Eaniganj groups; from the latter thenbsp;fossils are in our collections.
a. Erom the Barakar group Mr. Hughes mentions {1. c., p. 311)—
Vertebraria {indica, Koyle).
Glossopteris, sp.
* nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Mem. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. V, pp, 237—336.
* nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Rec. Geol, Surv., India, Vol. X, p. 198, figs. 10,11.
-ocr page 23-FLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;9
6. From the Eaniganj group are kuowu {1. c., p. 313).
ScAizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm. PI. ÏYA, fig. 3.
Vertehraria indica, Koyle.
Dicksonia hughesi, n. sp. PI. XXIIIAj figs. Ij 2. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;^
AletJiopteris [Asplenium) comp, whitbgensis, Göpp, PI. I.tKA, figs. 2^ 3.
Maerotaniqpteris danteoides, Royle. PI. 'KY.A, fig. 1.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm. PI. XL^, fig. 4.
Also from the Talchirs a Glossopteris is mentioned {1. c., p. 243).
3. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Boharo coal-field.—The next field to the west of the Jharia coal-field is thenbsp;Bokaro field, which was described by Mr. T. H. Hughes in 1869.^ All groups ofnbsp;the Damuda field occur; fossils, however, were very rare, and occurred in thenbsp;Barakars and the Eaniganj group only. I could identify only one specimen innbsp;our collections.
a. jBarakar group.—Mr. Hughes mentions the genus Asterophylhtes on p. 40 of his report from a section near Layeo. This specimen I have identified in ournbsp;collections; it bears a label on which is written: “ AsterophylUtes, Bokaro coal-field.”nbsp;The specimen is, however, not an AsterophylUtes, but Trizygia speciosa, Eoyle.
Ö. Baniganj group.—From this group one fossil only is mentioned by Mr. Hughes {1. 0., pp. 63,161) from near Hurdeeamo, south-west of Sarun. Mr. Hughesnbsp;mentions Schizoneura as being very numerous here ; I think we can with all probability presume that it was the common Eaniganj species Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm.
4. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The Karanpura field deserves a notice here, only in so far as the Talchirsnbsp;yielded several fossils, which I have already described {1. c.), and they will benbsp;named again in the general comparative table of the Lower Grondwana fossils.nbsp;The Damudas did not yield any fossils.
II. Coal-fields of Palmaun {Palamow).—Of this area, the Auranga coal-field only, described by Mr. Ball, 1878,^ comes into consideration, as having yielded somenbsp;fossils.—Mr. Ball describes the Barakar and Eaniganj groups and also the Banchetnbsp;group. He did not, however, collect any fossils from the Damudas, only a fewnbsp;from a doubtful horizon, to be mentioned presently.
Barakar group.—A few fossils were brought in 1879 by Mr. Griesbach, collected (on his way to the Sirguja coal-fields) in the Auranga coal-field, at a locality west of Murup, in the coal-beds, most likely Barakars : these fossils were :
Trizygia speciosa, Royle.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
I have mentioned them already in a short note in the Eecords for 1880, p. 65.
Doubtful horizon.—South-east of Panripara, near Latiahar, Mr. BalH found
' Mem. Geol. Snrv., India, Vol. VI, pp. 39-108.
Mem. Geol. Snrv., India, Vol. XV, Pt. 1.
* Mem. Geol. Snrv., India, Vol. XV, Pt. 1, p. 89.
-ocr page 24-10
FLORA OP THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
several fossils in a red shale, like some shales of the Mahadevas, but as they were in immediate proximity of a fault, it was not possible to determine with certaintynbsp;the true horizon; this is much to be regretted, for the fossils, compared withnbsp;others, are of decidedly Damuda forms; yet they might as well come from thenbsp;Panchet rocks, and it would even not be surprising, although very interesting, ifnbsp;they were from the Mahadevas. On the label, which Mr. Ball gave me with thenbsp;fossils, he wrote “ horizon uncertain, but apparently Mahadevas.” In this case theynbsp;would be from the Upper Gondwanas. But at present I name the fossils here,nbsp;treating them as of the Panchet group ; they are : —
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Pecopteris ? or Cyclopteris ?
Glossopteris communis, Pstm.
Gl. indica, Schimp.
Gl. damudica, n. sp.
Squama gymnospermarum. These are also known from the Raniganj group.
Samaropsis small winged seeds.
D.—Son, Mahanadi, and BrIhmani region.
1. Mamhola and Tatapdni coal-fields.—These fields, in the eastern extension of the Son basin, were lately surveyed by Mr. Griesbach^ who also brought a goodnbsp;collection of fossils upon which I gave a short note in the Records.^ Of the Damudanbsp;series Mr. Griesbach distinguished the Bardkar and Raniganj groups, and also thenbsp;Panchet division. All were found fossüiferous. I shall at present give only anbsp;general list of the fossils from all groups collectively:—
| ||||||||||||||||||||
* nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Mem. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. XV, Pt. 2. * nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Vol. XIII, pt. 1, p. 65. |
11
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Names. |
Barakar group. |
Baniganj group. |
Panohets. |
Glossopt. browniana, Bgt. ... |
Sendur river, west of Mit-gain. | ||
Glussopt. damudica, n. sp. ... |
Sendur river, west of Mit-gaiu; between Mahan river and the Tamor hill. |
Morne river, north of Pa-rasdiha. | |
Glossopt. indica. Schimp. ... |
Between Mahan river and the Tamor hill (Majur-daki); north-west of Keonti;nbsp;west of Dhonda. |
Between Chumra and Gidhi. |
Ledho nala. |
Glossopt. angustfolia,^^t. ... |
Banki nala, between Chumra and Gidhi ; between Mahan river andnbsp;Tamor hill; Morne river,nbsp;north of Parasdiha;nbsp;Budatand nala nearnbsp;Budatand; south ofnbsp;Nowadih; in the Ledhonbsp;nala. |
Ledho nala. | |
Glossopt. retifera, Fstm. |
Banki nala, between Chumra and Gidhi. | ||
Glossopt. formosa, n. sp. |
South of Nowadih | ||
Olossopteris, sp. |
Nala west of Narolah. | ||
Thinnfeldia comp, odon-topteroides, Morr., sp. PI. XXIIIA, figs. 6-8. |
...... |
Ledho nala near Karam-diha. | |
Noggerathiopsis hislopi, Fstm. |
Between Mahan river and Tamor hill (Majurdaki);nbsp;Suidud nala. If mile northnbsp;of Bheria. |
The observations of interest which can be based on these fossils are —
a.—The establishment o£ the true Raniganj group.
1. —The close relation of the various groups, especially of the Eaniganj-Panchet groups. The
fossils which I have marked as coming from the Panchet group might as well be considered as coming from the Raniganj group, but it appears that stratigraphieally these localities belong to the Panchet group.
2. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;South Hewah and Sohdgpur.—Under this title a very large portion of thenbsp;great Gondwana basin of the Son has hitherto been described {see Manual, Geologynbsp;of India, pp. 199-204). The names indicated the two areas where the lower (coalbearing) groups are exposed, on the north-eastern and the southern margins of thenbsp;basin. Since the early explorations the Sohagpur district has been transferred tonbsp;the Rewah State, so that it is now more truly South Rewah than is the area sonbsp;designated; for this latter we may therefore substitute the name Go^at coal-fields.
-ocr page 26-12
I’LOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
from the large tributary of the Son which drains that part of the ground. A survey of the whole basin has recently been undertaken by Mr. Hughes; there are severalnbsp;fossils amongst our older collections brought by Mr. J. G. Medlicott and Mr. Hacket;nbsp;lately a good number of fossils were sent by Mr. Hughes. No horizons werenbsp;indicated with the former fossils, but I think they come from a horizon representingnbsp;the Raniganj group, as Mr. Hughes’ fossils do.
a. Gopat coal-fields.—There is a collection of plants labelled “ South Eewah, J. G. Medlicott, 1861,” without any further indication of locality. The fossils arenbsp;in a soft, light greenish-grey or reddish-grey shale, very much like that I shallnbsp;mention hereafter from the Bijori horizon of the Satpura basin, and are—
FeHehraria indica, Royle—the branched form.
Stems (? Sckizoneura).
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Nöggerathiopsis hislopi, Fstm.—very numerous (PI. XLV J, figs. 1-5). (Comp. Rhip-tozamites, Sehmalh.).
ToUzia lieterophylla,'amp;gi. (PI. XLVII^, figs. 19, 20).
Small seeds, probably of FoUzia.
Another collection of fossils is labelled, “ Sent by Mr. Medlicott, 1861.” There is little doubt that these also are from South Eewah, hut there is no further indicationnbsp;as to any particular locality. The fossils are preserved in a dark grey sandy shale.nbsp;They are only few—
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.—a variety with very narrow and straight veins, PI. XXIX A, figs. 5-9.
Nöggerathiopsis hislopi, Fstm,
If we consider these fossils as a whole, and compare them with other floras within the Damuda series, we shall perhaps do best to range them with the representatives of the Raniganj group in the neighbourhood of Bijori, Nagpur, andnbsp;elsewhere.
h. Recent collection from South Rewah.—While this paper was going through the press, Mr. Hughes, who is now engaged upon a regular survey of the Southnbsp;Eewah coal-field, has sent in a good number of fossils. To complete the above list,nbsp;I name those belonging to the Lower Gondwanas ; they are from several localities,nbsp;and to avoid repetition, a collective list may be sufficient here :—
Sckizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm.: Bajbai, 2 miles east of Gopat river; Mahan river, near Minarra; between Minarra and Gajar; Chanduidol.
Phyllotheca, sp.; Mahan river, between Minarra and Gajar.
Fertehraria indica, Royle; Bajbai, 2 miles east of Gopat river; Mahan river, near Tansar. Many nice specimens are in this collection.
Alethopteris covcr^. Whitljyensis,G.'ó^^.-. Mahan river near Minarra; between Minarra and Gajar.
Angiopteridium comp. McClellandi, O. M.; Mahan river, between Minarra and Gajar.
-ocr page 27-13
Glossopteris commmis, Fstm.: Bajbai, 2 miles east o£ Gopat river; Mahan river near Minarra; between Minarra and Gajar.
Glossopteris indica, Schimp. : Bajbaij 2 miles east of Gopat river; Mahan river near Minarra.
Gl. retifera, Fstm. : Mahan river near Minarra.
Gl. angustifolia, Bgt.: Bajbaij 2 miles east of Gopat river ; Mahan river near Minarra ; between Minarra and Gajar.
Glossopt. formosa, n. sp. Chanduidol.
Glossopteris, sp. From river running between Parasi and Kunjwar (nearly opposite (west of) Parasi.)
There is no doubt that these fossils belong to the Raniganj group proper, and they support the suggestion made above about the horizon of the fossils of the oldernbsp;collections. Even the shale agrees completely with that of the Raniganj group,nbsp;in the Raniganj field. (See also Rec. G. S. I., Vol. XIII, pt. 3.)
c. SoMgpur coal-fields.—There is a collection of fossils in our Museum, labelled “ Sohagpm’, J. G. Medlicott, 1861,” without other reference; they arenbsp;preserved in a light yellowish-reddish sandy shale, and are—
Vertehraria indica, Royle—the more branched form, as known from Kamthi {pee further), and also a section (PI. XIV A his, fig. 3).
Gl. communis, Fstm.
Gl. hrowniana, Bgt. (PI. XL^, fig, 5).
Gl. damucUca, n. sp. (PI. XL4,fig. 6). Rare.
We have another collection from this field, made by Mr. Hacket (1872), with which the following locality is given: “ Son river, west of Garara.” The fossils arenbsp;preserved in a dark greenish-grey micaceous sandy shale, and are—
f ertehraria indica, Royle.
Macrotmniopteris feddeni, Fstm.—a form known also from Nagpur.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Dictyopteridium, sp ? (PI. XLII^, fig. 5).
5. Bisrampur coal-field.—In Mr. Ball’s survey of this coal-field ^ he distinguishes of the Damuda series the Barakar group only. Fossils were rather rare, and they are only mentioned from one locality. On pp. 35-36 {1. c.) Mr. Ball describesnbsp;a seam in the Galphula river, near Bilaro, in the shales of which there were foundnbsp;Glossopteris sp. and other plant-remains which I could not, however, identify innbsp;our collections.
4. Raigarh-Hingir coal-field.—In this coal-field, Mr. Ball ^ distinguished of the Damuda series the Barakar group, in which no fossils were observed, and thennbsp;another group, above the Barakars, which he at first called “ upper sandstones ”nbsp;or “Hingir group.” In this some fossils were found in highly ferruginousnbsp;shales; I gave a preliminary list of the same (Mr. Ball’s paper 1. c., p. 115).nbsp;Later Mr. Ball brought some more fossils from the same horizon, and the re-
‘ Rec. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. VI, pp. 25-41.
- Eec. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. VIII, pp. 102-121 (a short note was given 1. c., Vol. IV, pp. 101-107).
D
-ocr page 28-14
FLOEA OF THE HAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
examination of the whole collection led to the conclusion, that the “ Hingir group ” can well he correlated with some other groups of the Damudas, already known,nbsp;especially with the “ Kamthis.”^ The fossils are —
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm. Garjan hill, Hingir.
Tertebraria indica, Koyle, both the branched (Kamfhi) and common (Raniganj) form. Garjaii hill, Hingir j Girundla; Kodaloi, and on the Bilpahari.
Sphenopteris comp, polyrnorpha, Fstm. Garjan hill.
Glossopteris conmwiis, Fstm. Garjan hill.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indica, Schimp. Ibid.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;hrowniana, Bgt, Ibid.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;damudiea, n. sp. Ibid.
These fossils, considered by themselves, without reference to the rocks in which they are preserved, must be taken in the first place as fossils of the Eaniganj group.nbsp;As regards the rock in which they are preserved, I think it has rather more resemblance to the “ iron shales” than to Mahddeva shales or any rocks of the “ Kam-this,” so that a correlation of the “ Hingir group ” directly with the Eaniganj groupnbsp;would appear more appropriate.
B. Talchir coal-field.—This is the coal-field which was first regularly surveyed and described by the Geological Survey. We find the report on the same in thenbsp;first volume of the Memoirs of the Geological Survey^ In this report the namesnbsp;of the groups, Mahadeva, Damuda, and Talchir, were at first introduced. Thenbsp;Damudas were at that time not further sub-divided. In the Manual of the Geologynbsp;of India (p. 212) the Damuda series is described as consisting of the Barakars andnbsp;Kamthis, and it is in the former that numerous fossils were found. They werenbsp;found at two localities (see the mentioned report, 1. c., pp. 56 and 59); {a) in thenbsp;nala west of Gopalprasad, in ferruginous clay, imbedded in carbonaceous shales,nbsp;and {b) at Talchir, in sandy shale of light colour, overlying the carbonaceous beds.
The fossils are—
Vertebraria indica, Boyle. Talchir and Gopalprasad.
Trizygia speciosa, Boyle. Pis. HIA, figs. 2, 9, XII^, fig. 2. Gopalprasad.
Cyatliea comp. tcJdhatcheffi, Sehmalh. PL AVI.!, figs. 1, 2, 4. Talchir.
Glossopteris indica, Schimp. PI. XXIX^, fig. 7. Gopalprasad.
Gl. communis, Fstm. Gopalprasad and Talchir. PI. XXXVIII.f, fig. 2.
Gl. intermedia, n. sp. PI. XXIX4, figs. 1, 2. Gopalprasad.
Gl. damudiea, n. sp. Gopalprasad. Pis. XXVJ, fig. 4, XXX.4, fig. 2.
Gl. angustifolia, Bgt. Gopalprasad.
Bietyoptendium ? sporiferum, n. sp. PI. XXIII.i, figs. 3, 4, 5. Talchir and Gopalprasad.
Of interest amongst these fossils is the rather numerous occurrence of Trizygia ; and the occurrence of a fern which I at first referred to my Sphenopt. polyrnorphanbsp;of the Eaniganj group, but which now has to be referred to what at first was
* Ball; Kec. Geol. Surv., India, Yol. X. p. 171.
quot; On the geological structure and relations of the Talchir coal-field by Messrs. W. T. and H. P. Blanford and W. Theobald, IScO; Mem. Geol. Snrv., India, Yol. 1, pp. 33—88.
-ocr page 29-15
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
described by Göppert as Sphenopteris anthrisclfolia^, but wbat recently Prof. Schmalbausen. described as Cyafhea tchihatcheffi ^ from tlie Kusnezk basin in tbenbsp;Altai, the flora of which is a jurassic flora, and has many relations to our Damudanbsp;flora, as I shall point out hereafter.
E.—Satpura Region.
I. Satpura basin,—Besides several previous papers on this ground, the most recent report on the Satpura basin is that by Mr. H. B. Medlicott,® in which, besidesnbsp;several groups of the Upper Gondwanas, also several groups in the Lower Gond-wdnas are distinguished. It is true that also in the original report^ on this areanbsp;by Mr. J. G. Medlicott two groups of “Damudas ” were distinguished as “Lower ”nbsp;and “ Upper Damudas.” But this latter was subsequently replaced by the namenbsp;of Jabalpur group, as its flora differed widely from that of the “Upper Damudanbsp;group ” (Raniganj group) distinguished in the Raniganj field.
We shall therefore keep to Mr. H. B. Medlicott’s report, and as the Jabalpur group and Mahadevas (Denwa, Bagra, and Pachmari groups) belong to the Uppernbsp;Gondwanas, we shall have to deal with the lower groups only. I shall proceed innbsp;ascending order.
i. TalcMr division.—The Talchir group of this basin was not found fossilifer-ous, but in the Mohpani coal-field (in the north-east) and in the Shahpur coal-field (in the south-west) fossils were observed which seem to correlate the beds innbsp;which they occur, with the Karharbari beds of the Talchir division. I pointed tonbsp;these relations in my Talchir-Karharbari flora.® About the Mohpani fossils beingnbsp;of the Karharbari type, I think there is no doubt, and I shall enumerate them onlynbsp;in the general table at end of this chapter; but the Shahpur fossils are not sonbsp;numerous, and it will be well to mention them here again with the Barakar fossils.
I have, however, to mention here one Mohpani species, which I omitted to figure in my previous publication, i. e.—
Nöggerathiopsis hislopi, Fstm.,
and tbe figures of it given hereafter in the supplemental plates will help to complete the observation on the genus Nöggerathiopsis, Fstm., in its relations to Rliip-tozamites, Schmalh.
5. Damuda division.—In this division three groups are distinguished, and a fourth indicated : the Barakar group, Motur horizon, Bijori horizon, and Aimed beds.nbsp;Two only of these were found fossiliferous, and by fixing their horizon from thenbsp;fossils, the position of the others may approximately be determined.
' Göi)pert, in Tchihatcheff, Voy. dans 1’ Altai orient., 1845, p. 387, Tab. 28, 29.
quot; Beitv. z. Jurafl. Russlands, 1879; Mem. de 1’ Acad. Imper. de St. Petersbourg, VII Ser., Vol. XXVII, No. 4, p- 24, especially PI. II, figs. 1, 2—5.
’ Mem. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. X.
* Mem. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. II.
^ 1879, Pal. Ind„ Ser. XII, 1.
-ocr page 30-16
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
a. Bardkar group.—Formerly the Mohpani coal-beds also were included in this group, hut as I mentioned above they may better now be classed with thenbsp;Karharbari beds. We have therefore at present to include here only the plantsnbsp;from the Shahpur coal-field and from the Pench valley. I have given a short notenbsp;of the former in 1879 S where I also mentioned that at one or two localities theynbsp;seem to indicate the presence of Karharbari beds. I observed fossils at fournbsp;localities. I enumerate the fossils collectively—
Fertehraria indica, Boyle. Mardanpur outcrops.
Equisetaceom stalks (Schizoneura?). Kotmi section; Dolari outcrops.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm. Kotmi section.
Glossopteris sp. Dolamp;i outcrops.
Gangamopteris cyclopteroides, Fstm. Kotmi and Dolari outcrops.
From this fossil, which is* so very frequent in the Karharbari beds, both in the Karharbari and Mohpani fields, I supposed that the beds at these localities also may represent the Karharbari beds.
NöggeratJiiopsis hislopi, Fstm. Kotmi section ; Suki outcrops; Dolari outcrops.
For the present these fossils may be correlated with those of the Barakars elsewhere.
In an eastern continuation, the coal-beds are again met with in the Pench valley, in the vicinity of Umrét, near the village Barkoi. There are severalnbsp;specimens from this place and from Bhuwan in our collections ; but we must firstnbsp;mention some that were previously noticed. In his note on the geology of somenbsp;parts of Central India, Lieutenant Sankey ^ mentions the following genera fromnbsp;near Barkoi—
Phyllotheca.
Fertehraria.
SpJienopteris.
Pecopteris.
Glossopteris.
In a subsequent note on the same subject by the Rev. Mr. Hislop® the following genera are mentioned—
Phyllotheca.
Fertehraria.
Glossopteris.
Cyclopteris.*^
No species were named.
* nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Eeo. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. XII, pp. 79, 80.
“ Quar. Jour. Geol. Soc., Vol. X (18.54), p. 55.
^ Ibid., Vol. XI, p. 557.
* nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;This is what we now know as Nöggerathiopsis.
-ocr page 31-TLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS. 17
The specimens in our Museum represent—
Vertebraria indica, Koyle. Barkoi.
Equisetaceous stem. (Probably Mr. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;s Ehyllotheca). Barkoi.
Glossopteris communis, Pstm. Barkoi.
01. indica, Schimp. Barkoi and Bhuwan.
Noggerathiopsis hislopi, Fstm. PL XLVI^, figs. 3^ 4. Barkoi.
The fossils are preserved in a black ferruginous shale, resembling that from the Barakars in the Talchir coal-field, and there is no objection to consider thesenbsp;beds as Barakars.
h. Motur horizon.—In this horizon, succeeding the Barakars, no fossils have been found as yet, and the correlation with other horizons is therefore somewhat precarious. But from the intermediate position between the Barakars and the nextnbsp;group, the Bijori horizon, which most likely represents the Kamthi-Eaniganjnbsp;group, we may consider it as probably representing the ironstone-shales in thenbsp;eastern coal-fields.
c. Bijori horizon.—These beds, which overlie the Motur horizon, are fossili-ferous, and take their name from Bijori near the foot of the Pachmari hills on the south, at which locality a portion of a Labyrinthodont reptile was found. Plantsnbsp;are known from two localities, from near Barikondam, and further to the west fromnbsp;near Harapala (between Borighat and this place); at both these localities I havenbsp;collected a good number of specimens, and there were a few from the former localitynbsp;already in our collections. I gave a short note of these fossils in 1879.^
The fossils known at present from this horizon are—
ANIMALS.
Archegosaurus ? sp. Bijori. Skull and a portion of the vertebral column.
PLANTS.
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm. From Barikondam, PI. 111^4, fig. 4, and between Rorighat and Harapala.
Vertebraria indica, Royle. The branched form. Between Rorighat and Harapala.
Trizygia speciosa, Royle. Denwa nadi, Pachmari.^
Bichsonia, sp. Barikondam. (PI. XXIII^, figs. 11, 13).
Glossopteris communis, Fstm. Barikondam.
Gl. damudica, Fstm. Barikondam.
Gl. retifera, Fstm. Barikondam.
Gl. angustifolia, Bgt. Barikondam, and between Rorighat and Harapala.
Gangamopteris, Small, rounded leaf. Barikondam. (PI. XXXIX J, figs. 9, 9a.) Samaropsis comp, parvula. Heer. Barikondam. (PI. XLVII^, figs. 9, 10.)
^ Eec. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. XII, pp. 76—79.
* This is the locality ¦written on the label on the specimen.
-ocr page 32-18
FLORA OF THE DAMHDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
If we compare these fossils with those of other groups mentioned in the foregoing pages, we shall find the greatest relation with the fossils from the Raniganj group, and we may therefore consider this Bijori horizon as local representative innbsp;the Satpura basin of the Raniganj group, with which also another group, thenbsp;Kamthi group, will have to he correlated.
Almod beds.—In his description of the Bijori horizon {l.c., p. 27), Mr. Medlicott indicated the existence also of some higher beds (between the Bijori horizon andnbsp;the Pachmari sandstone) near Almod and Rorighat as Almod beds; I saw thesenbsp;beds at Almod and again further east immediately below the Pachmari sandstone.nbsp;No distinct fossils have been found as yet, but lithologically these beds differ somewhat from the plant-bearing shales of the Bijori horizon, and it is quite probablenbsp;that these beds represent the Panchet rocks of other fields.
F.—Godavaei Region.
I. Neighbourhood of Nagpur.—On this district we have several important papers by the Rev. Mr. Hislop, published in the Quar. Jour. Geol. Soc., Londonnbsp;(Vols. XI, pp. 68, 656, XVI, p. 151, XVII, p. 346, etc.,) and in other Journals;nbsp;the most recent paper, however, is by Mr. W. T. Blanford.^ There is also a papernbsp;by Sir Ch. Bunbury on plants from Nagpur.^
Of the Gondwana rocks we find in this district the Talohir group, and a higher group of the Damuda series, which Mr. Blanford {l.c., pp. 11,31, etc.) called Kamthinbsp;group.
As the Talchir group is here unfossiliferous, and the Barakar group is not exposed, I shall at once enumerate the fossils of the—
a. Kamthi group.—The position and correlation of this group is discussed by Mr. Blanford in his paper {l.c., pp. 31—36), and the conclusion at which he arrivednbsp;is (p. 36) that “ it is far from improbable that they (the Kamthi beds) represent,nbsp;in part at least, the Raniganj group of the Damudas, or they may be intermediatenbsp;in age between the Damudas and Panchets.”
In the general table in the Manual, Geology of India (p. 108), the Kamthis in the Godavari district are represented as equivalent of the Iron shales (Motur),nbsp;Raniganj (Bijori horizon), and Panchets (Almod beds) of the other fields. In fact,nbsp;the Kamthi beds contain plant fossils of real Damuda type, and may safely benbsp;taken as representing the Raniganj group (with the equivalents in the Satpuranbsp;basin. South Rewah, and Raigarh-Hingir field).
We have, as mentioned above, a paper on some plants of Nagpur by Sir Ch. Bunbury, others are in our collections. I shall enumerate them together, omitting some of Sir Ch. Bunbury’s doubtful forms.
* Mem. Geol, Surv., India, Vol. IX, p, 295 et seq.
^ Quar. Jour, Geol. Soc., London, Vol. XVII, with plates.
-ocr page 33-FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS. 19 The localities from which we know fossils are—¦
Kamtlii (Bunb. and our coll.), about 8 miles north-east of Nagpur.
Silewada (Bunb. and our coll.), about 10 miles north of Nagpur.
Bbaratwada (Bunb. and our coll.), about 8 miles north-west of Nagpur.
Tondakberi (Bunb.), about 14 miles north-west of Nagpur.
Chicholi (our coll.), about 12 miles north-north-west of Nagpur.
Chorkheri (our coll.), about 36 miles north-west of Nagpur.
In the memoir referred to, Mr. W. T. Blanford also noticed several of these localities as plant-hearing, but besides these also Bokhara, about 6 miles north ofnbsp;Nagpur, where Fhyllotheca was observed.
In enumerating now the plants collectively, I shall quote only the figures of my paper, while Sir Bunbury’s figures will be duly noticed in the text—
Fhyllotheca indica, Bunb. (PI. XITrt, figs. 3—5, 7—9). Bharatwada, Bokhm-a, Chicholi. Vertebraria indica, Boyle. Both the common and the more branched form. Kamthi, Tonda-kheri.
Pecojoteris and Cladophlebis, Bunb. Kamthi.
Glossopteris communis, ¥sim. With fructification. PI. XXVIi, figs. 1, 4; XXVIIi, fig. 1; XXXVII^, fig. 3. Silewada.
Gl. indica. Schimp. Pructif. Pis. XXVI4, fig. 3; XXVIIrt, figs. 3, 5. Silewada, Chicholi hill, Chorkheri.
Gl. browniana, Bgt. FmctiL Pis. XXVIrt, fig. 2; XXVIIA, fig. 2. SilewMa (Bharatwada.) Gl. damudica, Fstm. From Kamthi.
Glossopt. stricta, Bunb. PI. XXXVIIrt, figs. 1, 2. Kamthi, Silewada.
Glossopt. musecfolia, Bunb. Kamthi, Silew'ada. (This species appears to be doubtful).
Glossopt. leptoneura, Bunb. Kamthi.
Gangamopteris Imgliesi, Fstm. PI. XLIIU, figs. 6—8. Kamthi.
Angiopteridium comp. McClellandi, Oldh. PI. XXIrt, figs. 4—7. Kamthi. (To this has, I think, also Sir Bunbury’s Taniopteris dmmoides, McClell., to be referred).
Macrotceniopteris danmoides, Boyle., sp. Kamthi; the typical form.
Macrotmniopt. feddeni,Fstm. Pis. XXIjI, fig. 3; XXII^i. Kamthi.
Nöggerathiopsis hislopi, Fsim. Bunb. sp.; Bharatwada (PI. XLVrt, figs. 6, 8). Silewada (PI.
XLVrt, fig. 7); Kamthi (Pis. XLVrt, fig. 9, XLVII.4, figs. 1—3) ; Chorkheri. NöggeratJiiopsis, sp. Fragments of leaves, with strong veins. Kamthi.
Seeds (of ? Nöggerathiopsis). Bharatwada.
This is the list of fossils from the original Kamthi group in the Nagpur district, and we shall fix now the horizon, so as to be able to refer to it when naming thenbsp;fossils of this group in the other districts. A comparison of this list with thenbsp;previous ones will show that there is the greatest coincidence with the fossils fromnbsp;the Raniganj group. We have the real Fhyllotheca {indica), Gl. communis, andnbsp;Gl. indica numerous, Gl. damudica rarer, the true Macrot. danceoides, Gl. leptoneura, which represents the Gl. angustifolia.
We miss, it is true, Schizoneura and Trizygia. But Trizygia was not found also in several other fields, in the true Raniganj group (for instance, Jharia coal-field
-ocr page 34-20
ELORA OE THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
and Bokaro coal-field). As to Schizoneura, the case stands differently. We know that it generally occurs in the Baniganj group, hut we know as well that it was alsonbsp;found in the higher Damuda rocks of the Ptaigarh and Hingir coal-field, which were atnbsp;first distinguished as Hingir group, hut later^ (1877) and recently^ (1879) correlatednbsp;with the Kamthi group, specially from the lithological point of view; hut from anbsp;palaeontological point of view these Hingir beds represent, as already mentioned, thenbsp;Baniganj group, and through these Hingir (Baniganj) beds, the Kamthi group,nbsp;although differing in lithological character, has to be considered as representativenbsp;at least of the Baniganj group (if not also of the Ironstone shales).
II. Wardha—Pranliita—Godavari basin.—Erom this great basin Lower Gond-wana fossils are so far known from the northern portion (Chanda coal-field) and the south-eastern portion, while from the central portion we know fossils from thenbsp;Upper Gondwanas (Kota-Maleri beds) only.
1. Chanda coal-field.—OnVhis ground there is a detailed report by Mr. Hughes, 1877.® Of the Lower Gondwana rocks the Talchir, Barakar, and Kamthi beds arenbsp;distinguished. Erom the first two, no fossils were procured.
Kamthi group.—The fossils are not many. Mr. Hughes has enumerated most of them in his Memoir, p. 69, et seq. The localities are—
Mangli, about 36 miles north-west of Chanda, and about 11 miles north of Warora.
Kawarsa, about 16 miles west of Chanda, and about 12 miles south-east of Wun.
Isapur, about 4 miles south-south-east of Chanda.
Charwat, about 3 miles south of Chanda.
Anur, abont 32 miles south-south-east of Chanda, near Antargaon on the Wardha river.
Porsa, Wardha valley, about 36 miles south-east of Chanda.
I shall diseuss the fossils from the localities separately—
Mangli and Kawarsa.—These are again localities where in the Lower Gondwanas animal remains were found; they are land and fresh-water animals; but at both localities also some plants were met with.
ANIMALS.
Brachyops laticeps, Ow. Prom Mangli.
Ganoid fish-scales. Mangli.
Estheria, two forms; one, the larger, described as Estheria mangaliensis, Jones.^ Prom Mangli.
The other one is smaller, but it is quite possible that it is of the same species. Mangli. Estheria, sp., Kawarsa. I think this is identical with the smaller variety from Mangli, andnbsp;probably the same as the form in the Panchets of Bengal.
‘ Eec. Geol. Suit., India, Vol. X, p. 176.
^ Manual, Geol. India, p. 128.
^ Mem. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. XIII.
See Eupert Jones: Quar. Journ. Geol. Soc., Vol. XIX, p. 149.
-ocr page 35-21
FLORA OF THE HAMUDA AND FANCHET DIVISIONS.
PLANTS.
Vertebraria indica^ Royle. Kawarsa.
Equisetaceons stems. Fragmentaiy {Ehyllotheca or Schizoneura). Kawarsa.
Glossopteris. Very fragmentary^ but three forms can be distinguished as—
Gl. angustifolia, Bgt. Gl. communis, Fstm.^ and Gl. damudica. Kawarsa.
Fernstem or Rhizome. Mangli.
Coniferous stem. Mangli. PI. XLVII^^. That this cannot be a Knorria may easily be recognised from Sir Ch. Bunbury’s drawing. I shall mention it again further on in the text.
From the occurrence of EstJieria, from the condition in which the plants are preserved, and from the lithological character, I thought that it might be possiblenbsp;to correlate the beds at these two localities with the Panchets in Bengal. But asnbsp;Messrs. Th. Hughes and W. T. Blanford include them both in the Kamthis, Inbsp;adopt for the present this classification, as altogether these two groups (Panchet andnbsp;Kamthi-Raniganj group) are in close relation.
The fossils from Mangli are in a thin laminated red shale, with brownish-yellow markings where the fossils are preserved; the Kawarsa fossils are in a soft, lightnbsp;yellowish and greenish-gi’ey, argillaceous shale, and are very fragmentary.
Isdpiir and Anur.—The fossils, from these two localities are preserved in a reddish and white, hard shaly sandstone. They are only plants—
Equisetaceons stem. Anur.
Glossopteris communis, Ystm. Isapur (PI. XXXVIIA, fig. 4, PL XXXVIIIA, figs. 1—3), and Anur.
Glossopt. angustfolia, Bgt. Amir.
Gl. hrowniana, Bgt. Isapur and Anur.
Gl. indica, Scbimp. Isapur (PL XXVA, figs. I, 2).
Eterophjllum, sp., Anfir. There are some fragments of leaflets, which appear to belong to this
Cliarwat.—Some plant fragments were found at this locality in a soft, brownish (ferruginous) sandstone. I at first thought that this rock resembled very muchnbsp;the Gollapili sandstone (Rajmahal beds, near Ellore), and was inclined to considernbsp;these sandstones at Charwat as representatives of the Rajmahal group. But afternbsp;a re-examination of the fossils, it appears to me, that some of the fragments representnbsp;Glossopteris, which would be more in favor of this locality, belonging also to thenbsp;Kamthi group. The fossils are, however, altogether very scanty—
Glossopteris, sp.
Some radiately striated forms, which I thought may belong to Actinopteris.
Seeds, similar to some, observed at Bharatwada, in the N agpur district. They are rather numerous, and it is impossible to determine them, as there is no plant to which they might be referred.
Eorsa.—From here some fragmentary fossils were sent in (1879) by Mr. King, preserved in a reddish-white tough shale. These are—
Equisetaceons stems (Eliylloiheca or Schizoneura).
Glossopteris comm,unis, Fstm.
Gl. indica. Schimp,
r
-ocr page 36-22
PLOIIA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
2. South-eastern extension.—Erom this region there are fossils from two localities in onr collections, which were collected partly by Mr. King and partlynbsp;hy Mr. W. T. Blanford, by both of whom we also have papers on this ground.nbsp;Only the Kamthi group was found fossiliferous.
The two localities are—
Sadgudiam, 16 miles north of Ellore.
Kunlaeheru, north of Ellore.
The fossils are—
Vertehraria indica, Royle. Kunlaeheru (PI. XlII^, figs. 5, 6) ; Sadgudiam.
Aletkopteris, sp. Kunlaeheru.
Olossopferis communis, Fstm. Kunlaeheru.
Glossopt, indica, Schimp. Kunlaeheru.
Sagenojiteris, sp. (PI. XLId, fig. 8, PI. XLII..4, figs. 1, 3). Kunlaeheru.
Anthrophyopsis, sp. (PI. XLU, fig. 5.) Kunlaeheru.
Rhipidopsis, sp. (PI. XLVI4, figs. 1, 2, p. ). Kunlaeheru. This last is a genus occurring in the Jura of Russia, to which our species appears closely related.
A third locality, where fossils were met with, is mentioned hy Mr. W. T. Blanford in Bee. Geol. Surv., India, vol. V, p. 26; it is—
Somavaram, about 20 miles north-west of Ellore—and the fossils found were Glossoptens sp.
G.—Sikkim Damudas.
All the basins and localities of Lower Gondwanas, mentioned in the fores'oino-pages, lie within the peninsular area of India: the only spot where Lower Gondwanas are found in the extra peninsular area is in Sikkim. But the fossils are only very few. We have a report on these beds by Mr, Mallet^ where alsonbsp;the fossils are mentioned; the first notice of these fossils was by Dr. Hooker innbsp;his Himalayan Journals^; he mentions—
Fern-leaves, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Trizygia.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Vertehraria.
The Trizygia has, however, not been met udth again; hut accepting the observation as correct, and including the fossils in our museum, we have the following fossils:—
Fquisetaceous stems, FhyllotJieca ? ScMzoneura ? Museum.
Vertehraria indica, Royle. Museum and Dr. HookeEs observation.
Trizygia {speciosa, Royle). Dr. Hooker's observation.
Glossopteris ? indica, Schimp. Museum.
Ï Eec. Geol. Surv., India, Vols. IV, pp. 49,69, 82, 107; V, pp. 23, 112; VI, p. 57; VU. p. 159; X, p, 55. and also Manual, Geology of India.
^ Mem. Geol. Surv., India, Vol. XI.
3 Vol. I, p. 402.
-ocr page 37-23
PLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
It is ratlièr difficult to decide from these fossils to which group of the Damudas they belong, for the Trizygia speciosa is not a fossil of the Eaniganj group only;nbsp;on the contrary, it has been also found equally numerous in the Barakars; it cannotnbsp;therefore be adduced as the evidence of these beds belonging to the Baniganj group.nbsp;The fossils indicate the Barakar group as well as the Baniganj group. Mr. Malletnbsp;places them with the Baniganj group, in which I do not see any objection to follownbsp;him.
This is the state of our knowledge of fossils in the Lower Gondwanas at present; it is, however, hoped that further researches will increase this our knowledge, asnbsp;always some of the officers of the Geological Survey are employed in exploringnbsp;the Gondwana deposits. At present Mr. Hughes is employed in South Bewah, andnbsp;his researches will certainly prove most valuable, not only for the geology, hut alsonbsp;for the palseontology of that district, as already shown by his collection of fossilsnbsp;mentioned above. (See also Bee. G. S. I., Vol. XIII, Pt. 3.)
With regard to the several groups mentioned in the foregoing pages and also in my previous paper on the Talchir-Karharbari flora, we can adopt the following list ofnbsp;equivalent groups (as identified by their fossils) with reference to the Bengalnbsp;standard list: (order ascending)—
( Talcliir group=Deoghar field, Karunpura field.
1 Karharbari beds=Karharbari field, Mohpani field (? Sbapui- field). ^Barakar group=Bengal fields and Satpura basin.
I. Talchie Division
-r, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;T,nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;) Iron sbales=Probably Motur horizon, Satpnra.
II. Damuda Division ... -s . nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
I Baniganj group = Hingir-Kamthis; Bijori horizon, Satpura basin ; Kamthis of
V. IS'agpur and S. Godavari.
III. Panchet Division
Panchet group = Probably the Almod beds of the Satpura basin.
ALPHABETICAL LIST OF THE COAL-EIELDS AND ABEAS EBGM WHICH LOWEB GONDWANA FOSSILS ABE KNOWN, WITH THEnbsp;LOCALITIES AT WHICH THEY WEBE FOUND.'
Aubanga coal-field, in the Palamow area.
1878. Ball; Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. I.
1880. Peistmantel: Bee. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pt. 1, p. 65.
Localities.—Murup, west of—Barakar group; fossils collected by Mr. Griesbach.
Panripura, south-east of—near Latiahar, horizon doubtful; fossils collected by Mr. Ball.
’ The fossils of each locality will be found in the alphabetical list of the localities. (See further on). At most of the localities plants only were found, and they are here therefore not specially marked. The occurrence of animals, however, is noticed at the respective locality.
-ocr page 38-24 FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS, Biseamptjr coal-field, Son region.
1873. V. Ball: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VI, pp. 25-41.
Locality.—^Galpliula river, near Belaro; BaraLar group.
Bokako coal-field, Damuda valley region.
1867. T. Hughes: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VI, pp. 39-108. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;'¦gt;
Localities.—Hurdeeamo, south-west of Sarun ; Raniganj group.
Layeo, section near ;—Barakar group.
Bbahmani coal-field.—Eee Rajmahal hills.
Jharia coal-field, Damuda valley region.
1866. Hughes: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. V.
1877. Feistinantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol, X, p. 198.
Raniganj and Barakar group; the localities are not specified : fossils mentioned on pages 313 and 311 respectively.
Talchir group fossils occurred in the Boosjooreea river {see 1. c., p. 243). Karanpura coal-field, Damuda valley region.
1871. Hughes: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VII, pt. 3, p. 269.
1879. Feistmantel: Talchir-Karharhari flora. Pal. Ind., Series XII—1, p. 2.
Locality.—Below the junction of the Lurunga and Tordag streams. Talchir fossils.
Karaun field (Jainti coal-field), Deoghur district.
1863. Blanlord: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. Ill, p. 38.
1870. Hughes: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VII, pt. 2.
1879. Feistmantel: Pal. Ind., Ser. XII—1, pp. 1, 2.
Locality.—KumaF, Parganah Saruth-Deoghur (on the original labels of the sjiecimens).
Talchir fossils plants and insect wing.
1870. Hughes: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VII, pt. 2.
1877. Feistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. X, p. 196.
1879. Feistmantel: Pal. Ind., Ser. XII—1.
' I am not certain about the position of this locality. On Mr. Hughes’ map, (1. e.), there is a Khumar marked about 7 miles north-east of Karaun, hut out of the field altogether; there is, however, Khumarhad, about 9 miles,nbsp;north-west of Karaun, within the Talchirs; this would correspond better, I think.
-ocr page 39-25
'Buriadi (shaft No. A)
.Chunka (sjiafts Nos. 16,16G) ...
) Domahni (ghat)
\Jogitand (shafts No. £, No. 5)
'Mathadi (shaft No. 1)
^Passerabhia (shaft No. 5D, SG^ 17 B, 17 C, 24, 40) 1. Lumki (Komaljore) hill
Mohpani coal-field, Satpura basin.
Karharbdii beds.
yy
yy
yy
yy
yy
yy
Barakar group.
1870. Medlioott (H. B.): Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. Ill, pt. 3 (and subsequent papers).
1879. Feistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XII, p. 74.
1879. Id. Pal. Ind., Ser. XII, pt. 1, p. 4, 47.
1855. Hislop and Hunter: Quar. Jour. Geol. Soo., Vol. XI, pp. 58, 565.
1863. Hislop: Quar. Jour. Geol. Soo., Vol. XVII, p. 3415 et seq.
1862. Bunbury (Sir Ch.): Quar. Jour. Geol. Soo., Vol. XVI—Plants.
1872. Blanford (W. T.): Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. IX, pt. 3.
Raigaeh and Hingie coal-field.—Brahmani region,
1871. Ball: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VI, pp. 101—107; id. 1875 : Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VIII, pp. 102—121; ic{. 1877 : Eec. Geol. Surv, India, Vol. X, p. 171.
Rajmahal hills, Rajmahal area.
1877. Ball (V.): Geology of the Eajmahal hills; Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pt.2.
SBurgo (Pachwara coal-field), Barakar group.
Mussiiiia (Brahmani coal-field), „ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„
Ramgarh „ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„
IDubrajpur (Gopicandar area), Raniganj group (?)
^¦^Louundia (Hura coal-field), ,, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;(?)
Ramkola coal-fields. Son region.
1880. Griesbach (C. L.) ; Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV.
1880. Feistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII.
-ocr page 40-Chumraj west of— nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;...nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;... Barakar group.
Dhonda, west of—
2.lt;
Ledho nala, near Karamdiha Mahan river and Majurdakinbsp;Mitgain^ west of—Sendur rivernbsp;Reontij west of—
Sendur river (Mitgain) ...
Kaniganj group.
Suidud nalaj 1^ mile north of Bheria Suknai nala, north of Sarseranbsp;Tamor hill—See Majurdakinbsp;I'Banki nala, between Chumra and Gidhi ...
Budatand, nala at—
Chumra and Gidhi, between—See Banki nala Ghui, south of—
Gidhi and Chumra, between—See Banki nala Gouri and Ghui, nala between—
Karamdiha, near—
Lan jit, near—
Ledho nala, near Karamdiha ...
Mahan nala and Tamor hill, between—
Meguli, • north of—
Panchet group.
Nowadih, south of— r Ledho nala, near Karamdiha ...
t.Narola, nala west of— nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;...nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;...nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„
Raniganj coal-pield.
1863. W. T. Blanford ; Report on the Raniganj coal-field : Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. III. 1877. Reistmantel: Reo. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. X, pp. 73-75.
Localities.—
Barakar group.
ƒ Kumerdhuhi, near Barakar (. Nirsa, west of Barakar
Kulti, between Sitarampur and Barakar. Iron shales.
Bamganj group.
'Assensole, in the north-west and south-east branch of Nunia river Beldanga, south-east branch of Nunianbsp;Dadka, north-west branch of Nunianbsp;c. Khumm’pur, south-west branch of Nunianbsp;Mangalpurnbsp;Raniganjnbsp;Sitarampur
r Deoli, near—bank of Damuda river, south-west of Assensole. Panchet group. Animals ^ (.Maitur, south of—north-west branch of Nunia. Panchet group. Animals and plants.
1870, Th. Hughes ; Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VII, p. 2.
-ocr page 41-27
1854, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Sankey (Lieut.); Quar. Jour. Geol. Soo., London, Vol. X, p. 55.
1855. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Kev. Hislop : Ibid., Vol. XI, p. 357.
1860. J. G. Medlicott; Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. II, pt. 2.
1870. H. B. Medlicott: Kec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. IV, pt. 3. (Molipani.)
1873. H. B. Medlicott: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. X, pt. 1. (Satpura basin.) 1875. H. B. Medlicott: Bee. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VIII. (Shalipur coal-field.)nbsp;1879. Feistmantel: Bee. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XII. Fossils.
Mohpani (Molipani coal-field). Talchir division (Karliarbari beds).
f Dolari outcrops Kotmi sectionnbsp;Mardanpur outcropsnbsp;Suki outcropsnbsp;Barkoinbsp;^Bbuwannbsp;fBaricondamnbsp;c. Bijori
(^Ilorigbat and Harapala, between—
Sbahpur coal-field, Barakar group.
b. -
^ Penck valley,
^Bijori korizon. Plants and reptiles.
•J
Shahpue, coal-field. See Satpura basin.
1854. Hooker : Himalayan Journals, Vol. I, p. 402.
1875. Mallet: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XI, pp. 2, 30.
1871. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Blanford (W. T.): Bee. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. IV.
1872. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Idem : Ibid., Vol. V.
1874. King (W.) ; Bee. Geol. Surv. India, Vol, VII, p. 158.
1877. Idem ; ibid., Vol. X.
1869, J. G. Medlicott : Mem. Geol. Surv, India, Vol. II, pt. 2.
1879. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Manual Geology of India, pp. 199-204.
1880. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Mr. Hughes’ recent collection.
1
... Raniganj group (Kamtkis).
...J
Sokagpur (Coll. J. G. Medlicott.)
Sone river, west of Garara (Mr. Hacket’s fossils) Soutk Rewak (generally) (Coll. J. G. Medlicott)
-ocr page 42-Chanduidol
Mahan river, between Minarra and Gajar nearMinarranbsp;near Tansar ...
Parasi and Kunjwar, river running between-
3)
33
South Rewah coal-field, Rani-ganj group. (See also Ree. G.
3—note of Mr.
¦quot; h S. L, Vol. XIII, pt, i Inbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;on a second collection
... I nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Th. Hughes.)
Talchir coal-ribld.—Mahanadi region.
1859. Mem. Geoi. Surv. India, Vol. I, pt. 1.
I Barakar group.
Talchir, sandy, light-coloured shales Gopalprasad, west of Talchir, ferruginous clay
Wardha valley coAL-riELD.—Chanda coal-field (Wardha—Pranhita—Godavari basin.)
1877. Th. Hughes: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII.
Anfir, about 32 miles south-south-west of Chanda, nearquot;)
. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;I
Charwat, about 8 miles south of Chanda ... nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;... ^ Kamthi (Raniganj) group.
Isapur, about 4 miles south-south-west of Chanda
Porsa, about 36 miles south-east of Chanda, Wardha valley^
Kawarsa, about 16 miles west nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ofnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Chandanbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;andnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;12nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;miles')
south-east of Wun nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;...nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;...nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;___ jnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Kamthis (PPanehets). Plants and
Mangli, about 36 miles north-west of Chanda and about j”
11 miles north of Warora nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;...nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;...nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;...J
1877. Hughes: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pp. 70, 80.
Kamthi (Raniganj) group—
Hquisetaceous stems (?)
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Gl. hrowniana, Bgt.
Gl. angustifolia, Bgt.
Pterophyllum, sp.
' I include also the localities and plants of the Talchir-Karharhavi beds. Those specimens which were figured are marked by the numbers of plates and figures placed opposite the names. The Roman numbers with an A appendednbsp;indicate the plates of the present Memoir, those without an A indicate the plates in the Talchir-Karharbari floranbsp;(Pal. Ind., Ser. XII—1, Pis. I—XXVII).
-ocr page 43-29
1877. Eeistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. X, p. 75.
ScMzoneura gondwanensis, Fstm., north branch.
Vertebraria indica, Royle, north and south branch.
Glosiopteris communis, Fstm., north branch.
Glossopteris conspicua, n. sp., north branch.
Gl. angustifolia, Bgt., south branch.
Gl. orbicularis, n. sp., north branch.
Gangamopieris anthrophyaides, n. sp., south branch. PI. XXXIX^, fig. 8.
1880. Fossils sent by Mr. Hughes.
ScMzoneura gondwanensis, 1'stm.
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Gloss, indica. Schimp.
Gloss, angustifolia, Bgt.
1880. Grieshach: Mem. Geol. Sur\r. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 34.
1880. Feistmantel; Reo. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pp. 67, 68.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Gl. indica. Schimp.
Gl. retifera, n. sp.
Gl. angustifolia, Bgt.
1879. Feistmantel: Reo. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XII, p. 77.
ScMzoneura gondwanensis, Fstm. (PI. III^, fig. 4).
Trizygia speeiosa, Royle.
Bkksonia, sp. PI. XXIII^, figs. 11, 12.
Gl. communis, Fstm.
Gl. retifera, Fstm.
Gl, damudica, Fstm.
Gl. angustifolia, Bgt.
Gangamopteris, sp. PI. XXXIX.4, fig. 9.
Samaropsis comp, parvula. Heer. PI. XLVII^, figs. 9 10.
-ocr page 44-1854. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Sankey (Lieut.): Quar. Jour. Geol. Soc., London, Vol. X, p. 55.
1855. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Eev. Hislop : Ihid., Vol. XI, p. 557.
Vertebraria indiea, Royle.
Equketaceous stalks (Ehyllotheca ?)
Gl. communis, Fstm.
Gl. indiea, Schimp.
Nöggerathiopsis hislopi, Fstm. (Bunb. sp.) PI. XLVU, figs. 3, 4.
1877. Feistmantel: Reo. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. X, p. 75.
1855. Hislop and Hunter : Quar. Jour. Geol. Soo., London, Vol. XI, p. 370 et seq.
1861. Bunbury (Sir. Ch.) : Ibid., Vol. XVII, p. 325 et seq.
1872. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Blauford (W. T.): Mem. Geol. Sury. India, Vol. IX, p. 307.
PhyllotJieca indiea, Bunb. PI. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;figs. 3—5, 7—9.
NoggeratMopsis hislopi, Bunb. sp. (Fstm.) PI. XltVA, figs. 6, 8.
Seeds.
Specimen in the Survey collections.
Glossopteris indiea. Schimp.
1864. Major Gowan: Jour. As. Soc., Bengal, XXXIII, pp. 336, 442.
1873. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Medlicott (H. B.): Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. X, p. 159.
Archegosavjms (?) sp. (?)
1875. Ball (V.): Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VIII, p. 115.
Vertebraria indiea, Royle.
1855. Hislop and Hunter: Qnar. Jour. Geol. Soc., London, XI, p. 370.
1872. Blanford (W. T.): Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. IX, p. 308.
, Phyllotheca indiea, (Bunb,)
-ocr page 45-FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS. 31
Boosjookeba mveb. See Jliaria coal-field, Talchirs.
Budatand, nala at—Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujali.
1880. Griesbach; Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 65.
1880. Peistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 68.
Bcliizonema gondwanensis, Fstm.
Glossopteris angustif(jlia, Bgt.
Burgo, in the Pacliwara coal-field, Rajmahal hills.
1877. Ball (V.): Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 33.
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Macrotaniopteris danmoides, Royle. PI. XXI^, fig. 2.
Glossopteris communis^ Fstm.
Buriadi, shaft No. IIA (or No. 2, new). Karharharicoal-field.
1879. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Peistmantel: Talchir-Karharbari flora. Pal. Ind., Ser. XII—1, pp. 36—45.
Neuropteris valida, Fstm. Pis. II—VI.
Glossopteris deeipiens, Fstm. PI. XVIII, figs. 3—5; PI. XXIV, fig. 6.
Gangamopteris cgclopteroides, Fstm. PI. XII, figs. 2, 3; PL XXVI, figs. 1—3.
„ var. subauriculata. PI. XIII, fig. 2; PI. XV, figs. I—3 ; PI. XV, fig. 3.
„ var. areolata, PL XVI, fig. 4.
„ var. atlenuata. PI. XII, fig. I; PI. XIV, figs. 1,2; PL XVI, fig. 5.
„ luriadica, Fstm. PL XVIII, figs. 1, 2.
„ major, Fstm. PL XIV, fig. 3; PL XVI, figs. I, 2.
Noggerathiopsis hislopi, Fstm. PL XIX, figs. 2, 6 ; PL XX, fig. 1.
Ewryphgllum whittianum, Fstm. PL XXI, fig. 1.
Voltzia heterophylla, Bgt. Pis. XXII, XXIII, XXV.
Alhertia, sp. PI. XXVI, fig. 2; PL XXIV, fig. 3.
Samropsis, ep. PL XXIV, fig. 5.
1877. Hughes, Wardha valley coal-field: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII.
Chandtjidol, South Rev^ah coal-field.
1880. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Fossils sent by Mr. Hughes.
Schizonenra gondwanensis, Fstm.
Glossopteris formosa, n. sp.
Charwat, about 8 miles south of Chanda.
1877. Hughes: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pp. 69, 73.
-ocr page 46-Glossojjteris ? sp. ? (Fragments).
Seeds.
Peculiar radiated forms (which I at first determined as Actinopteris).
1872. Blanford (W, T.): Mem. Gfeol. Surv. India, Vol. IX, p. 309.
Phyllotheea indica, Bunb.
Glossopieris indica, Schimp. (Our coll.)
1855. Hislop and Hunter; Quar. Jour. Geol. Soc., London, Vol. XI, p. 340.
1872. Blanford (W. T.); Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. IX, p. 313.
Glossopieris indica, Schimp.
NöggeratMopsis Jiislopi, Bunb. sp. (Fstm.)
1880. GriesbacE; Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 37.
1880. Feistmantel: Kec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 66.
Glossopieris communis, Fstm.
1879. Feistmantel: Fal. Ind., Ser. XII—1, pp. 37, 45.
Gangamopieris cydopieroides, Fstm., No. 16 (4).
Gang, major, Fstm., No. 16 (4) and 16 G 1,6).
1877. Feistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. V, p. 75.
Glossopieris conspicua, n. sp.
1862. Blanford, W. T.: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. Ill, p. 129.
1864. Huxley: Pal. Ind., Ser. IV—1, witb 6 Plates.
1879. Lydekker: Pal. Ind., Ser. IV, pt. 3, with 6 Plates.
-ocr page 47-33
Dicynodon orientalis, Huxl.
Ankistrodon indicus, Huxl.
Gonioglypttis longirostris, Huxl.
Packygonia incurvata, Huxl.
1880. Griesbaoh; Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 62.
1880. Feistmantel: Kec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 67.
Glosiopteris communis, Fstm.
Gl. indica, Schimp.
1875. Medlicott (H. B.): Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VIII, p. 77.
1879. Feistmantel: Jour. Geol. Soc., London, Vol. XII, p. 81.
Equisetaceous stalks.
Glossopteris, sp.
Gangamopteris cyclopteroides, Pstm.
Noggerathiopsis hislopi, Pstm.
1879. Feistmantel: Talchir-Karharbari flora. Pal. Ind., Ser. XII—1, pp. 38, 39, and 45, 46.
Eeuropteris valida, Pstm.
Gmigamoptens major, Pstm.
Gang, angmtifolia, McCoy.
Sagenopteris ? stoliczkana, Pstm. PI. XIII, fig. 4.
Glossozamites stoliczkanus, Pstm. PI. XX, figs. 4, 5.
Eöggerathiopsis hislopi, Pstm. PI XIX, figs. 3—5.
Voltzia heterophylla, Bgt. PI. XXIV, fig. 4.
1877. Ball (V.): Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 186.
Eliyllotheca rohusta, n. sp. PI. XIV A bis.
Glossopteris communis, Pstm.
1873. Ball; Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VI, p. 36.
Glossopteris, sp. (and other plant remains, not named further 1. c., and which I also could ^ not identify).
-ocr page 48-34
1875. Ball: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VIII, p. 115.
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm.
Vertehraria indica, Royle,
Splienopteris ?polymorpha (.^) Fstm.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Gl. indica, Schimp.
Gl. irowniana, Bgt.
Gl. damudica, n. sp.
1880. Griesbach; Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 62 (Noudiha)
1880. Peistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 68.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
1875. Ball (V): Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VIII, p. 115.
Verlebraria indica, Royle.
(Fossils in
1859. Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. I, p. 59.
Vertehraria indica, Royle.
Trizygia speciosa Royle. PI. XI A, figs. 2, 9 j PI. XII A, fig. 2. Glossopteris communis, Fstm. PI. XXXVIII A, fig. 2.
Gl. indica. Schimp. PI. XXIX A, fig. 7.
Gl. intermedia, n. sp. PI. XXIX A, figs. 1, 2.
Gl. angustifolia {!') Bgt.
Bictyopteridium sporiferum, n. sp. PI. XXIII A, figs. 3-5.
1880. Griesbach: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 62 (Nondiba).
1880. Peistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 67-
Vertehraria indica, Royle.
1879. Peistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XII, pp, 78, 79.
-ocr page 49-Schizoneura gondwanemis, Fstm.
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Glossopteris angustifoUa, Bgt.
1866. Hughes: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VI, pp. 63 (101).
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Pstm.
1877. Hughes: Mem. Geol, Surv. ludia, Vol. XIII, pp. 69, 74.
Glossopteris communis, Pstm. Pis. XXXVIIJ!, fig. i; XXXVIIU, figs. 1, 3 ( ? miism/ulia, Bunb.)
Gl. indica, Schimp. Pis. XXVH, figs. 1, 2.
Gl. browniana, Bfft.
1865. Hughes: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. V, pp. 227-336.
1877. Peistmantel; Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. X, p. 198.
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Pstm. PI. TV A, fig. 3. Raniganj group.
Vertebraria indica, Royle. Barakar and Raniganj group.
Bicksonia Imghesi, Fstm. PI. XXIIId, figs. 1, 2. Raniganj group.
Alethopteris comp, Whitbyensis, Göpp. PI. XL^, figs. 2, 3. Raniganj group. Macrotceniopteris danmoides, Royle. PI. XXI^, fig. 1. Raniganj group.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm. PI. XL^, fig. 4. Raniganj group.
Glossopteris, sp. Barakar group.
Glossopteris, sp. Talchirs (in the Boosjooreea).
1879. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Eeistmantel: Pal. Ind., Ser. XII, p. 42 (45, 46).
1880. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Fossils collected by myself.
Gangamopteris cyclopteroides, Fstm. No. 2 shaft.
Glossopteris decipiens, Fstm. No. 2.
ISdggerathiopsis hislopi, Bunb. sp. (Fstm.) No. 2 and No. 5, var. subrhomboidalis. (PI. XX, fig. 2.) No. 2.
-ocr page 50-36
1855. Hislop and Hunter: Quar. Jour. Geol. Soc., Vol. XI, p. 369.
1862. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Bunbury : Ibid., Vol. XVII, p. 385 et seq.
1872, Blanford (W. T.): Mem. Geol. Surv. India., Vol IX, p. 313,
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Pecopteris and CladopJilebis, Bunb. [1. c).
Angiopteridium comp. MeClellandi, O. M. PI. XXI^, figs. 4-7.
Macrotaniopteris dancsoides, Eoyle (the true form).
Macrot.feddenijPstm.. Pis. XXI^, fig. 3; XXIIH.
Glossopteris damudica, Fstm.
Gl. mumfoLia, Bunb,
Gl. leptoneura, Bunb.
Nöggerathiopsis, sp.
1880. Griesbach : Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 45.
1880. Peistmantel: Eeo. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm,
Thinnfeldia comp, odontopteroides, Morr,, sp. PI. XXIIU, figs. 6-8.
1867. Hughes: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VII, p. 296.
1879. Peistmantel: Pal. Ind., Ser. XII—1, pp. 1, 2.
Gangamopteris cyclopier aides, Fstm. PI. XI, figs. 2-4.
„ angustifolia, McCoy. PI. IX, fig. 5.
Glossopteris, sp.
1863. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Blanford, W. T.: Mem. Geol. Snrv. India, Vol. Ill, p. 38.
1870. Hughes: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VII, pt. 2.
1879. Peistmantel: Pal. Ind., Ser. XII—1, pp. 1, 2.
Schizoneura, sp. PI. I, fig. 1.
Noggerathiopsis hislopi, Fstm. PI. XIX, fig. 1.
-ocr page 51-37
1877. Hughes: Mem. Geol, Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pp. 70 and 77.
Esiheria (?Mangaliensis, Jones) : small form. f ertebraria indica, Koyle.
Equisetaceous stalks.
Glossopteris commurds, Fstm.
Gl. damudica, n. sp.
Gl. angustifolia, Bgt.
1877. Peistmantel: Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. X, p. 75.
1875. Ball: Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VIII, p. 115.
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Komaljore hill. See Lumki hill.
1875. H. B. Medlicott: Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VIII, p. 80.
1879. Feistmantel: Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XII, p. 79.
Equisetaceous stalks, [ScMzoneurd].
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Gangamopteris cyclopteroides, Fstm.
Eöggerathiopsis hislopi, Bunb. sp. (Fstm.)
Kulti, Raniganj field.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Glossopteris damudica, Fstm. PI. XXX^i, fig. 1.
Insectwing-like leaf. PI. XVI^ bis, figs. 7, la.
Coniferous (?) stem. PL XLVII^, figs. 5-7.
1877. Feistmantel: Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. X, pp. 73, 74.
Vertebraria indica, Boyle, Pis. XIII^, figs. 1, 2, 4, 8; X.1YA, figs. 1, 4. FAgllotheca or Sckizoneura ? (stalks). PL XIII^, fig. 7.
-ocr page 52-Glossopieris communis, Fstm. PI, XXXII A, fig.
Gl. indica, Schimp.
Gl. browniam, Bgt.
Angiopteridium infarctum, n. sp. PI. XXXIV A, figs. A, 5.
1872. Blanford, W. T.: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. V, p. 27.
1874. King (W): lUd., Vol. VII, p. 159.
AletJwpteris, sp.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Glossopteris indica, Schimp.
1880. Gïiesbach; Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 64.
1880. Feistmantel; Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pp. 67, 68.
ScUzoneura gondwanensis, Fstm.
1866. Hughes: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VI, p, 40 (78).
Trizygia speciosa, Hoyle.
1880. Griesbach: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 44.
1880. Feistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pp. 66—69.
Vertebraria indica, ^oyle.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
1
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Glossopteris ar^gnstifolia, Bgt.
-ocr page 53-Glonopteris communis, Fstm.
Gl. indica, Schimp.
Gl. angustifolia, Bgt.
Thinnfeldia comp, odontopteraides, Morr,, sp, PI. XKIII^i, figs. 6—8.
1877. Ball: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII (map facing pages 40 and 48)-
Glossopteris communis, Fstm. Very narrow.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indica. Schimp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;angustifolia, Bgt.
5ca^e-like leaves, like those from Raniganj and the Bijori horizon.
Winged seeds.
1879. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Feistmantel: Taloliii-Karharbari flora. Pal. lud., Ser. XII—1, pp. 43, 44.
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm. PI. I, figs. 2, 3.
Vertebraria indica, Boyle.
SpJienopterispolgmorpha, Fstm.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Gangamopteris, sp.
1880. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Griesbach: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 63.
1880. Feistmantel: Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pp. 67,68.
Vertebraria indica, Boyle.
Glossopteris angustifolia, Bgt.
1862. Blanford (W. T.): Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. Ill, p. 130.
Est/ieria (comp. Mangaliensis, Jones).
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm. PI. X^.
Fecopteris concinna,Vvea\. PI. XVII.1, figs. 1—6.
-ocr page 54-Cycloptamp;rüpachyrhachis, Göpp. PI. XVIIA^ fig. 7.
Oleandridium [stenoneuron, Schimp.) PI. XIX^j figs. 5—8.)
Glossopteris indica,^(i\öxa.'^., axiH communis, Fstm. (Ree. Geol. Surv. o£ India^ Vol. X, pp. 139—140j figs. 3—8.)
Samaropsis coita^. parvula, Heer. PI. XLVII^, figs. 11-13.
1880. Griesbach: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 63.
1880. Peistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pp. 66, 67.
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Qlossopteris damudica, Fstm.
GL indica. Schimp.
Nöffffcrathiopsis Jmlopi, Fstm. (Bunh.)
Trizygia speciosa, Royle. PI. XIA, fig. 8.
1854. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Owen : Quar. Jour. Geol. Soo., Vol. X, p. 473.
1855. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Owen; Ibid., Vol. XI, p. 37.
1861. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Bunbury ; Ibid., Vol. XVII.
1862. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Jones: Estheria, Palmontographical Society, p. 78.
1877. Hughes : Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pp. 69, 71.
Brachyops laticeps, Ow.
Ganoid fish scales.
Estheria mangaliensis, Jones (two forms.)
Bhizom of fern (Bunhury’s figure).
Coniferous stem (resembling a form in the Ironstone shales).
1875. Medlicott (H. B.): Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VIII, p. 79.
1879. Peistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XII, p. 79.
Vertehraria indica, Boyle,
1879. Feistmantel: Pal. Ind., Ser. XII—1, pp. 42, 45, 46.
-ocr page 55-41
Gawjamopteru cyclopteroides, Fstm. PI. XIII, fig. I.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;var. attemiata. PI. XIII, fig. 3.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm. PI. XVII, figs. 1, 2.
1880. Griesbach: Mem. Geol. Sarv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 38.
1880. Feistmantcl: Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 68.
Olossopteris communis, var, stenoneura.
1880. Fossils collected by Mr. T, Hughes.
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm.
Jlethopteris comp. Whitbyensis, Gopp.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Gloss, indica, Scliimp.
Gloss, retifera, Fstm.
Gloss, angustifolia, Bgt.
1880. Fossils collected by Mr. T. Hughes.
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm.
Phyllotheca, n. sp.
Alethopteris comp. Whitbyensis, Gopp.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Gloss, angustifolia, Bgt.
Angiopteridium comp. Mc’Clellandi, O.M.
1880. Griesbach : Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 33.
1880. Feistmantel: Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pp. 66, 67.
Vertehraria indica, Hoyle.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Gl. browniana, Bgt.
Gl. damudica, ii. sp.
1870. Medlicott (H. B.) : Rec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. Ill, pt. 3.
1879. Feistmantel: Pal. Ind., Ser. XII—1, pp. 4, 47.
-ocr page 56-Equisetaceotis stalks.
Gangarnopteris cyclopteroides, Fstm. PI. XXVII, figs. 2, 3.
,, var. attenuata. PI. XXVII, fig. I.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Nëggerathiopsis hislopi, Fstm. (Bunb.) Suppl.
1878. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Ball: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, p. 60.
1879. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Peistmantel; Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 65.
Trizygia speciosa, Royle.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
1880. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Griesbach : Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 68.
1880. Peistmantel: Eeo. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pp. 67, 68.
Tertebraria indica, Boyle.
Glossopteris damudica, n. sp.
Gl. angustifolia, Bgt.
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Glossopteris, sp.
1880. Griesbaoh : Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 62.
1880. Peistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 68.
Glossopteris, sp.
1877. Peistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. X, p. 74.
Tertebraria indica, Boyle.
Glossopteris intermittens, n. sp. PI. XXXIII.^, figs. 2—4.
1880. Griesbaoh : Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 42.
1880. Peistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 68.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
„ formosa, n. sp.
-ocr page 57-43
1878. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Ball: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, p. 89.
Horizon uncertain, but according to Mr. Ball, “ apparently MahMevas; as it may, however, be as well Panchet group, I mention the fossils here—
„ indica, Schimp.
„ damndica, n. sp.
1880. Fossils collected by Mr. Th. Hughes.
1879. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Pal. Ind., Ser. XII-1, pp. 39—42, 4-5, 46.
1880. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Fossils collected by myself from the 2nd seam.
Fikst |
SEA.M. |
Second Seam. |
Third |
Seam. | ||
No. 5 D |
No.SG |
No. 24 |
No. 40 |
No. 17 B |
No. 17C | |
(9) |
(12) |
(29) |
(33) |
(23) |
(24) | |
Schizoneura- comp. Meriani, Schimp. PI. I, figs. 6, 7 |
| |||||
Schizoneura comp. gondwanensiSi Fstm. .... |
| |||||
Eqnisetaceous stalks (numerous)..... |
| |||||
Vertebraria indica, Royle. Pi. I, figs. 8, 9 |
|
. .. |
| |||
JS^euvopteris valida^ Fstm. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;...... |
|
| ||||
Gangamopteris cgclopteroides, Fstm. PI. XIlI, fig. 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;var. attenuata . |
| |||||
Gangamopteris, sp. ....... nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;. |
|
| ||||
Crlossopteris communis, Fstm. ...... |
|
-t- |
' |
|
| |
G-lossopteris, otlier species nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;...... |
... |
|
... | |||
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;damndica, Fstm...... |
| |||||
N'óggerathiopsis kislopi, Fstm. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;..... |
|
|
' |
-i- |
-t- |
|
Seeds .......... |
-1- |
|
... |
|
* There were hitherto no fossils known from the second seam (counting from below) in the Karharbari coal-field ; quite recently (April 1880) I collected a good number of fossils from this seam, at shafts No. 24 and No. 40nbsp;(Passerabhia) ; I include their names already here, in order to complete the list; but a more complete note, togethernbsp;with the sections of the shafts, will be found in Rec. Geol. Surv. of India, Vol. XIII, pt. 3 (1880). Some of the fossils,nbsp;together with others from the first and second seams (also recently acquired), will be illustrated in a supplementalnbsp;fasciculus to my Talchir-Karharbari Flora.
-ocr page 58-44
1879. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Fossils sent by Mr. W. King.
Equecetaceons sterns.
Glossopteris conmiutiis, Fstm. I p „ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; .
,, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indica, Schimp. )nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;”nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;^
FiAiGARH and Hingir coal-field.
1875. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Ball: Rec. Geol. Surv.India, Vol. VIII, p. 115.
1877. Ball: Ihid., Vol. X, p. 171.
Baniganj group—
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm. Garjan hills.
Fertehraria indica, Royle. Gai-jan hills, Girundla, Kodaloi.
SpJienopterispolgmorpJia, Fstm. Garjan hills.
Glossopieris communis, Fstm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indica. Schimp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;hrowniana, Bgt.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;damudica, n. sp.
1877. Ball: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, pt. 2, p. 27.
Glossopteris, sp.
Baniganj, Baniganj field.
1862. Blanford (W. T.): Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. III.
1876. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Feistmantel : Jour. As. Soc., Bengal, Vol. XLV, p. 329.
1880. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Griesbaoh: Mem. Geol. Svirv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, pp. 61-62.
1880. Feistmantel; Eeo. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 67.
Glossopteris indica. Schimp,
Vertebraria indica, Eoyle (branched and common form).
Sahajori (coal-field).
1867. Hughes; Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VII ,pp.253, 254.
-ocr page 59-Glossopteris, sp,
1854. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Hooker’s Hiraalaj'an Journals, Vol. I, p. 402.
1876. Mallet: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XI, pp. 2-30.
Phyllotheca, sp. (?). Equisetaceous stalks.
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Trizygia speciosa, Royle. (Dr. Hooker^s quotation).
Glossopteris indica, Schimp.
1855. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Hislop and Hunter : Quar. Jour. Geol. Soe., Vol. XI, p. 370.
1861. Bunbnry: Quar. Jour. Geol. Soc., Vol. XVII, p. 325.
1872. Blanford (W. T.): Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. IX, p. 304.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm. (Fructificating). PI. XXVIfigs. 1,4; PI. XXVII.4, fig. 1; PI. XXXVII4, fig. 3.
„ indica. Schimp. (Fructificating). PI. XXVU, fig. 3; PI. XXVIL4, figs. 3, 5. „ browniana, Bgt. (Fructificating). PI. XXVU, fig. 2 ; PI. XXVII^, fig. 2.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;stricta, Bunb.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;musmfolia, Bunb.
Noggerathiopsis hislopi, Bunb. (Fstm.) PI. XLV^, fig. 7.
Baniganj group—
Sphenopteris polymorplia. PI. XVI^, fig. 3.
Glossopteris retifera, Fstm. PI. XXVIII^, fig. 2.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;conspicua, n. sp.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;PI. XXVIIU, figs. 5, 6, 8.
I860. J. G. Medlicott: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. II.
1879. Manual Geology of India, pp. 199—204.
Raniganj (Kamtbi) group—
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Gi. browniana, Bgt., PI. XL A, fig. 5.
Gl. damudica, n. sp., PI. XL A, fig. 6.
-ocr page 60-Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Macrotmniopteris feddeni, Fstm.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Pietyopicfidium, sp. PI. XLII A, fig. 5.
Vertebraria indica, Royle (light shale).
Eguisetaceous stems (light shale).
Glossopteris communis, Fstm. (light and dark shale).
NoggeratJiiopsis hislopi, Bunb. ^Fstm.) (light and dark shale). PI. XLV A, figs. 1-5.
VoUda lieterophjUa, Bgt. (light shale). PL XLVII A, figs. 19-20.
amp;maU seeds (light shale).
1880. Giiesbach.: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, pp. 59—63.
1880. Eeistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 67.
Nöggeratliiopsis Jdslopi, Fstm.
1876. H. B. Medlicott: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. VIII, p, 81,
1879. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Eeistmantel: Ihid., Vol. XII, p. 80.
NoggeratJiiopsis Jiislopi, Fstm.
1880. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Griesback: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XV, pt. 2, p. 52.
1880. Eeistmantel: Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XIII, p. 67.
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
1859, Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. I, p. 59.
Vertebraria indica, Royle,
Cyathea comp. tcJiihatcJieffi,, Schm. PI. XVI A, figs. 1, 2, 4.
' Besides the fossils named above, there is another collection lately sent by Mr. Hughes, but they cannot be included here: they will be described and figured (as far as necessary) together with others subsequently. {See alsonbsp;E. G. S. I., Vol. XIII, pt. 3).
-ocr page 61-FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS. 47
Gl. communis, Fstm.
Bictyopteridium sporifemm, n. sp. PI. XXIII A, figs. 3—5.
Tamor hill; Bardkars. See Majurdaki.
Tansar, near—on Mahan river, S. Rewah coal-field.
1880. Fossils collected by Mr. Th. Hughes.
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
T’oNnAKHEBi, about 14 miles north-west of Nagpur.
1855. Hislop and Hunter: Quar. Jour. 6eol. Soc., Vol. XI, p. 370.
1861. Bunbury: Ibid., XVII, p- 338.
1872. Blauford (W. T.): Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. IX, p. 307.
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Glossopteris—fragments.
Tordag and Lbbijnga streams (below the junction of the)—
Talchir fossils. See Karanpura field.
Umkét coal-field, in the Pench valley, Satpura Basin, Central Provinces. Bardkars.
1854. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Sankey (Lieut.): Quar. Jour. Geol. Soc., Vol. X, p. 55.
1855. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Rev. Hislop: lUd., PL XI, p. 557.
See Barkoi.
THE VARIOUS LOCALITIES FROM WHICH LOWER GONDIVANA FOSSILS ARE KNOWN, ARRANGED ALPHABETICALLY WITHINnbsp;THE GROUPS.
Talchie-Kaeharbari beds.—(The localities in the Shapur coal-field are included within the Barakar group.) Talchirs marked = T., Karharbari beds=K.B.nbsp;Buriadi, Karharbari coal-field, shaft No. IIA (2)=K.B.
Chwnlca, Karharbari coal-field, shaft Nos. 16 (4) and 16G (6) ; 1st seara=K.B.
(ghat), Karharbari coal-field; 1st seam=K.B.
Jharia coal-field=T.
Jogitand, Karharbari coal-field, No. 2 and No. 5 shafts, 1st seam=K.B.
Karanpura field—
Karaun field (Kumar, Purgannah Saruth-Deoghur, Birbhum)=T.
Biirunga and Torddg streams, Karanpura field=T.
Mathndi, Karharbari field, No. 1 shaft (39); 1st seam=K.B.
Mohpdni eoal-field=K.B.
Passerabkia, Karharbari coal-field, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd seams; shaft No, 5D (9); 5(i (12);
24 (29); 40 (33) ; 17B (23); 17C (24)=K.B.
Sitariva river.—See Mohpani=K.B.
Torddg and Lurxinga streams, Karanpura fieid::=;T.
-ocr page 62-48
Barkoi, near Umret, Pench valley, Satpura basin, C.P.
Bhuwan, Pench valley, Satpura basin, G. P.
Burgo, Pachwara coal-field (on the Bansloi river), Rajmahal hills.
Chumra, west of—Ramhola coal-field, Sirgujah.
BliAmda, west of—Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah.
Bolari (outcrops), Shapur coal-field, Satpura basin.
Galphula river, near Bilaro, Bisrampur coal-field.
Gopdlprasdd, Talchir coal-field (fossils in dark ferruginous shale).
Jharia coal-field.
Komaljore hill, Karharbari coal-field.
Kotmi (section), Shapur coal-field, Satpura basin.
K'lmerdkubi, near Barakar, Raniganj coal-field.
Layeo, close to—in the Bokaro coal-field.
Ledho nala, near Karamdiha, Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah.
Lumki hill, Karharbari coal-field (the same as Komaljore hill).
Mahan river. See Majurdaki.
MajurdaJci, near—between Mahan river and Tamor hill, Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah. Mardanpur outcrops, Shapur coal-field, Satpura basin.
Mitgain, west of—Sendur river, Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah.
M4rup, west of—Auranga coal-field, Palamow district.
Mussinia, on the Brahmani river (Brahmani coal-field), Rajmahal hills.
Nirsha, near Barakar, Raniganj coal-field.
Ramgurh, Rajmahal hills, south of Brahmani coal-field.
Beonti, north-west of—Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah.
Sahajori coal-field.
Sendur xiYQV. /See Mitgain. (Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah).
Suidud nala, mile north of Bheria, Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah.
Sulci (outcrop), Shapur coal-field, Satpura basin.
Suknai nala, north of Sarsera, Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah.
Talchir, Talchir coal-field. (Fossils in sandy shale.)
Tamor hill. See Majurdaki. Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah.
Umret coal-field, Pench valley, Satpura basin, C. P.
Ironstone shales—
Kulti, Raniganj field, between Sitarampur and Barakar.
Anér, about 32 miles east-south-east of Chanda, Wardha valley coal-field=K.
A ssensole, north-west and south-east of—^in the Nunia river=R.
Bajhai, 2 miles east of Gopat river. South Rewah coal-field=R.
Banki nala, between Chumra and Gidhi; Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah= R.
Barikondam, Upper Denwa valley, Satpura basin, south of Pachmari=B.
Beldanga, south-east branch of the Nunia river—R. See Assensole.
Bhdratwdda, about 8 miles north-west of Nagpur, C. Prov.=K,
-ocr page 63-49
Bijori, Satpura basin, south of Pachmari=B. Reptiles.
Bilpahari, Eaigarh and Hingir eoal-field=K.
Bokhara, about 6 miles north of Nagpur=K.
Bttdatand, nala at—Ramkola coai-field, Sirgujah==R,
Chanda, Wavdha valley coal-field. SeeIsapur=K.
Chanduidol, South llewah eoal-field=R.
Charwat, about 8 miles south of Chanda—K.
Chicholi Hill, about 12 miles north-north-west of N8gpur=K.
Chorkheri, about ö6 miles north-west of Nagpur=K.
Chumra and Gidhi, between=R. See Banki nala.
Badka, north of Assensole, Raniganj coal-field=R.
Bubrajpur, north of Brahmani field, Rajmahal Hills=R. (?).
Garjan Hills, Raigarh and Hiugir eoal-field=K.
Ghui, east of—Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah=R.
Gidhi and Chumra, between==R. See Banki nala.
Girundla, Raigarh and Hingir coal-field=R.
Gouri and Ghui, nala between—Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah=R. llarapala (between this and Rorighat), Satpura basin=B.
Hurdeeamo, south-west of Sarun, Bokaro coal-field=R.
Isdpur, about 4 miles south-south-east of Chanda, Wardha valley coal-field=K.
Jharia coal-Jield=B.
Kamthi, about 8 miles north-east of Nagpur=K.
Karamdiha, near—Ramkola coal-field, Sirguiah=R.
Kawdrsa, about 16 miles west of Chanda, and 12 miles south-east of M’^un=K. ; animals and plants.
Khimarpur, in the north-west branch of the Nunia river, Raniganj coal-field=R.
Kodaloi, Raigarh and Hingir coal-field=K.
Kunldcheru, south Godavari, Ellore district=K.
Lanjit, near—Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah=R.
Ledho nala, near Karamdiha, Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah=R.
Lohundia, in the Hura coal-field, Rajmahal Hills=R. (?)
Mahan river and Tamor Hill, between—Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah^R.
Mahan river. South Rewah, between Minarra and Gajar; near Minarra; near Tansar—R. Mangal'pur, Raniganj field—R.
Mangli, about 60 miles south of Nagpur, and 36 miles north-west of Chauda=K.; animals and plants.
Meguli, north of—Ramkola field, Sirgujah=R.
Minarra, near—on Mahan river, South Rewah=R.
Minarra and Gajar, between—on Mahan river, South Rewah=R.
Morne river, north of Parasdiha, Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah=R.
Nowadih, south of, Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah—R.
Banripura, Hills south-east of—near Latiahar, Auranga coal-field, Palmaun area=R. Farasi and Kunjwar, from river running between—South Rewah=R.
Porsa, on the Wardha river, about 36 miles south-east of Chanda=aK.
Raigarh and Hingir coal-field=K.
Raniganj, Raniganj coal-field R.
Sikkim (Darjeeling, Pankab^ri) =R. (?).
Silewada, about 10 miles north of Nagpur=K.
Sitarampur, Eaniganj field=E,.
Sohdgpur, in South Rewah=R.
Son river, west of Garara—R. (Mr. Ch. Hacket, 1872, Th. Hughes, 1880.)
South Rewah (Coll, of Messrs. J. G. Medlicott, Ch. Hacket, and Mr. Th. Hughes)=R. Tansar, near—on Mahan river. South Rewah=R.
Tondakheri, about 14 miles north-west of Nagpur=K.
Beoli, near hanks of the Damuda river, Raniganj field, south-west of Assensole; animals. Ledho nala, near Karamdiha, Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah.
MaiMr, south of—in the north-west branch of the Nunia river, north-west of Assensole ; animals and plants.
Narola nala, west of—•Ramkola coal-field, Sirgujah.
GENERAL LIST OP POSSTLS OP THE LOWER GONDWANAS.
I give now the systematical list of all fossils hitherto known from the Lower Gondwanas ; the chief divisions are indicated in six columns, i. e.:—
Talchir division = Talchir group, Karharbari beds, first and second column.
Bamuda division:
Bardkar group =third column.
Iron shales (Motur horizon) = fourth column.
Raniganj group (=Hingir group, Bijori horizon, Kamthi group) = fifth column. Panchet division, Panchet group (Almod beds) = sixth column.
I have, for general understanding and comparison, taken in also the fossils of the Talchir-Karharbari beds, which were already described in a previous fasciculusnbsp;of the Palseontologia Indica.
To avoid repetition of the loealities, I indicate wdthin the columns the coal-field only where the fossils were found; and to save room, I use abbreviations, of whichnbsp;an alphabetical list follows^:—
Anr. — Auranga coal-field (Mr. V. Ball, Mr. Griesbach).
Bisr. — Bisrampur coal-field (Mr. V. Ball).
Bok. = Bokaro coal-field (Mr. Hughes).
Jhar. = Jharia coal-field (Mr. Hughes).
Karanp. — Karanpura coal-field (Mr. Hughes).
Karaun. = Karaun (Jainti) coal-field (Mr. Hughes).
Karh. = Karharbari coal-field (Messrs. Hughes, Whitty, Miller, and Feistmantel).
Mohp. = Mohpani coal-field (Messrs. H. B. Medlicott and Feistmantel).
Ndgp. — Nfigpur area (Rev. Hislop, Mr. W. T. Blanford, and F. Fedden).
Rdjm. = Rajmahal Hills (Messrs. Oldham, V. Ball, Feistmantel).
Ramk. — Ramkola coal-field (Messrs. C. L. Griesbach and Feistmantel).
' The names in brackets indicate those gentlemen, either officers of the Survey or others, who have either surveyed the respective coal-fields, or have collected fossils and published notes.
-ocr page 65-51
Ranig. = Raniganj coal-field (Messrs. W. T. Blanford, Th. Oldham, Feistmantel).
R. 11. = Raigarh and Hingir coal-field (Mr. V. Ball).
Sahaj. = Sahajori coal-field (Mr. Th. Hughes).
Satp. — Bijori horizon (Raniganj group) in Satpura basin (Capt. Gowan, Messrs. J. G.
and H. B. Medlicott, V. Ball and Feistmantel).
Shap. — Shapur coal-field (Messrs. H. B. Medlicott and Feistmantel).
Sikk. = Sikkim (Dr. Hooker, Mr. Mallet).
8. G. ~ South Godavari (Messrs. W. T. Blanford and W. King).
R- — S. Rewah (Messrs. J. G. Medlicott, C. Hacket, and Th. Hughes), including Sohagpur (Mr. J. G. Medlicott).
Talch. = Talchir coal-field (Messrs. W. T. and H. B. Blanford, and W. Theobald).
Vmr. = Umrét coal-field in the Bench valley, with Barkoi and Bhuwan (Lieutenant Sankey, Rev. Hislop).
Ward. — Wardha valley coal-field (Mr. T. Hughes).
LOWER GONDWANAS. | |||||||
¦Names of Classes, Orders, |
Talchib Dmsiow. |
Damuda Division. |
Panchbt Division. |
Rbmabes. | |||
Families, amp;c. |
Talchir group. |
quot; Karhar-böri beds. |
Bar^kar group. |
Iron shales. |
Raniganj (Kjfmthi) group. |
Panehet group. | |
PLANTS. | |||||||
A. CKYPTOGAJM. I. PTEEIDOPHYTA. 1, Eqvisbtacb.®. | |||||||
Schizoneura comp. Meri’ ani, Schimp. |
Karh. | ||||||
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm. Schizoneura^ sp. ? |
K.iraun. |
(?) Karh. |
Karb., Mhop.... |
Ranig., Jhar., Bok., Ramk.,nbsp;E. H., S. K.,nbsp;Satp. |
Ranig. |
Schizoneura paradoxa^ Schimp, and Moug.,nbsp;Europe. | |
Phyllotheca indica, Banb. |
Eanig., Nagp, |
Phyllotheca sibirica. Heer.; Phyïl. deliques-cens in East Siberia andnbsp;the Altai; Phyllothecanbsp;australisy Bgt., in Australia. | |||||
Phylloiheca rohusta, n. sp. |
? Rajm. |
Phyllotheca etschurotv-skii, Schmalh., in the Altai. | |||||
Phyllotheca^ sp. |
... |
S. E. | |||||
Trizygja speciosa, Koyle . |
Bok., Aur., Talch. |
Ranig., Satp., Sikk. |
Sphenophyllum ? | ||||
Veriebraria indica^ Royle . |
Karh. |
Rajm., Karh., Ranij?., .)har.,nbsp;Bamk., Talch.,nbsp;Shap., Umr. |
Eanig., Jbar., Eamk., S. R.,nbsp;E. H., Satp.,nbsp;Nagp., Ward.,nbsp;S. G., Sikk. |
Aur. (?) |
Vertehraria australis, McCoy, in Now Southnbsp;Wales. |
52
LOWER GONDWANAS. | |||||||
Names of Classes, Orders, |
Talchie Ditision. |
Damuda Divisioir, |
Panchet Division. |
Remarks. | |||
Families, amp;c. |
Talchir group. |
Karhar-b^ri beds. |
Bardkar group. |
Iron shales. |
Raniganj (K^mthi) group. |
Panchet group. | |
Equisetaceous stems . 2. PlMCES. |
... |
Karh., Mhop. |
Ranig., Shap., Umr. |
... |
Ranig., Jhar., S. R., Satp.,nbsp;Nagp., etc. | ||
a. CïATHEACEiE. | |||||||
Cyathea comp. TcTiihat-cheffi, Schmalh. |
... |
... |
Talch. |
... |
Jura of the Altai. . | ||
Sphenopteris polymorphaf Fstin, |
... |
Karh. |
... |
Ranig., K. H. (?) |
... |
Very likely also a Cya-tkea. | |
Eichsonia hughesi, Pstm.... h. POLYEODIACEa:. |
... |
.*« |
Jhar. (?) Satp. |
*• |
Conf. Eicksonia sapor-tana, Heer, Jura of East Siberia. | ||
a. Group of Asplenium WHITBYENSB. | |||||||
Alethopteris {Asplenium) whithyensisy Gopp. |
... |
... |
... |
Ranig., Jhar. S. R. |
... |
The same elsewhere. | |
Alethopt. Undleyana, Eoyle |
... |
... |
Ranig. | ||||
Alethopteris, sp. |
... |
... |
... |
S. G. | |||
Alethopteris phegopteroides, Pstm. |
... |
... |
Ranig. |
... |
Phegopteris decussata, Mett. | ||
/3. Incbet.®. | |||||||
Peeopteris afflnis, McCl. . |
... |
... |
...... |
... |
Ranig. |
... | |
Pecopt. concinna, Presl. |
... |
... |
Ranig. |
Rhset. in Europe. | |||
Merianopteris major, n. sp. |
... |
... |
Ranig. |
... |
Merianopteris angusta. Heer, Keuper, Europe, | ||
C. NEUEOPTEKIBEa;. | |||||||
Neuropteris {Neuropteridi* um) valida, Fstm. |
... |
Karh. |
... |
Neuropteridium grandi-foliunif Sch. | |||
Cyclopteris (?) pachyrha-chis, Gopp. |
... |
... |
Ranig, |
The same in Europe. | |||
Insect wing-like leaf |
... |
... |
Ranig. |
... | |||
d. Pachyptbeide®. | |||||||
Thinnfeldia comp, odontop-teroides, Morr., sp. |
... |
Ramk. |
Thinnfeldia rotnndata, Nath. Rhffitic, Sweden. | ||||
e. TjENIOPTEEIDBa). | |||||||
Macrotceniopteris dance-aides, Koyle. Macrotceniopt. feddeni, Pstm. |
... |
... |
Rajm. |
... |
Ranig., Jhar., Nagp. S. R., Nagp. |
Macrot, lata, Oldh. Rajmahal group. Macrot. ahnormisy Gutb., Perm, Europe. |
53
LOWER GONDWANAS. | |||||||
Talchib Division. |
Damuda Division. |
Division. | |||||
Names of Classes, Orders, Families, amp;c. |
Remabss. | ||||||
Talchir group. |
Karhar-bSri beds. |
Bar^kar group. |
Iron shales. |
RaniganJ (K^mthi) group. |
Panchet group. | ||
^al(Bovitiariob Icurzi, Fstm. |
Ranig. | ||||||
Oleandridium comp, steno- |
Ranig. |
Rhmt., Europe. | |||||
neuron^ Schenk. | |||||||
Angiopteridium comp. |
... |
Nagp., S. R. .. |
Eajinahal Group. | ||||
mc^Clellandi, Oldh. | |||||||
Angiopt. infarctum^ n. sp.. |
Kanig. |
... | |||||
f.—Dictyotjjniop- | |||||||
TEEIDE.®. | |||||||
a. Fobms with naeeow | |||||||
NETS. | |||||||
G-lossopteris communis, Fstm. |
Karli., Mohp. |
Bajm., Karh., Ranig., Aur., |
Ranig, |
Rajm., Eanig., Jliar,, Ramk., |
Eanig., Ramk., |
Most common form. | |
Ramk.jTalch., |
S. R., E. H., |
Aur. (?) | |||||
Sbap., Umr. |
Satp., Nagp., Wardh., S. G. | ||||||
G-lossopteris communis, var. |
Eanig. |
Ranig., Ramk. | |||||
stenoneura. | |||||||
Gl. intermiUens, n. sp. |
Ranig. |
... |
... | ||||
Gl. stricta, Bunb. |
Nagp. | ||||||
Gl. (?) muscefolia, Bunb. . |
Nagp. |
Doubtful. | |||||
Gl. indica. Schimp. |
- |
Ranig., Raink., Talch., Umr. |
... |
Rajm., Ranig., Ramk., R. H., |
Eanig., Eamk., | ||
S. R., Nagp., Wardh., S. G., |
Aur. (?) | ||||||
Sikk. | |||||||
jS. Intbbmbdiatb iobms. | |||||||
Glossopteris hrowniana, Bgt. |
... |
Ranig., Ramk. |
Ranig., S. R., R. H., Nagp., |
In New South Wales in lower and upper coal- | |||
Wardh. |
measures. | ||||||
Gl. intermedia, n. sp. |
... |
Talch. |
... |
Ranig. | |||
y. Beoab-nbtted poems. | |||||||
Glossopteris retifera, Fstra. |
... |
Ranig., Ramk., S. R., Satp. | |||||
Gl, conspicua, n. sp. |
Ranig. |
... | |||||
Gl. (?) ingens, n. sp. |
... |
... |
Ranig. | ||||
Gl. divergens, n. sp. |
Ranig. |
... | |||||
Gl. damndica, n. sp. |
Karh.... |
Ranig., Ramk., Talch. |
Eanig. |
Ramk., S. R., R. H., Satp.,nbsp;Nagp., Wardh. |
Aur. (?) |
Gl. parallela, Fstm,, N, S. Wales. | |
ë. Naeeow-bbated | |||||||
FORMS. | |||||||
Glossopteris angustifolia, Bgt. |
... |
... |
Talch. |
... |
Rajm., Eanig., Eamk., S. E., |
Ramk... |
61. linearis, Mic’Coj., N. S. Wales. |
Satp., Wardh. |
54
LOWER GONDWANAS. | |||||||
Talchie Divisioir. |
Damitda Division. |
Panchkt Division. |
Remarks. | ||||
Families, «amp;c. |
Talchir group. |
Karhar-bari beds. |
Bardkar group. |
Iron shales. |
Raniganj (KiJmthi) group. |
Panchet group. | |
Ol. Uptoneura, Bunb. |
„ |
Nagp. |
Gl. angustifolia ? | ||||
Gl. formosa, XL. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;. |
... |
Ranig., Rami., S. R. |
... | ||||
«. EoirND-lBAVED lOBMS. | |||||||
Glossopteria orbicularis, n. sp. |
... |
... |
Ranig. | ||||
ƒ. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;iNCEEIiE, | |||||||
Glossopteris decipiens, Fstm. |
Karh. ... |
Passage form. | |||||
Olossopteris, sp. Glossopteris, sp. g. Dicttoptbeid^;. |
Kamp;anp. |
Rajm., Saliaj.; Jhar., Bisr.,nbsp;Shap. |
Ranig., Wardh. |
... |
Various fragmentary and undeterminable forms. | ||
Gangcmopteris mthropTiy-oides, n. sp. |
... |
Ranig. |
Anthrophyopsis, Nath. | ||||
Gangam. buriadica, Fstm. |
Karh. ... | ||||||
Gangam. major, Fstm. |
... |
Karh. ... | |||||
Gangam. comp, angustifolia, Mc^Coy. |
Karanp. |
Karh. ... |
Victoria and New South Wales. | ||||
Gangam. whittiana, Fstm. |
... |
Ranig. |
Anthrophyum. | ||||
Gangam. hughesi, Fstm. |
ÏI%p. | ||||||
Gangam» eg clop ter oides, Fstm. |
Karaun., Karanp. |
Karh., Mohp. |
Shap. | ||||
Gangam» cyclopteroides var. subauriculata. |
Karanp. |
Karh. ... | |||||
Gangam. cyclopteroides „ a/reoiata. |
Karanp. |
Karh. ... | |||||
Gangam, cyclopteroides ,, attenuata. |
Karanp. |
Karh., Mohp. |
...... | ||||
Qangamopteris, sp. . |
... |
Karh. | |||||
Gangamopteris, sp. . |
... |
Ranig. | |||||
Gangamopteris, sp. . |
... |
... |
Satp. | ||||
'Belemnopteris wood-mason-iana, Fstm. |
... |
Ranig. |
Pteris. sagittcefolia, Ratld., living. | ||||
Anfhrophyopsis (?) sp. |
S. G. | ||||||
Dictyopteridium, sp. |
... |
... |
Talch. |
Ranig., S. R.... | |||
iNCEBTiE SBDI3. | |||||||
Sagenopteris (?) longifolia, n. sp. |
... |
... |
... |
Ranig. |
... |
LOWER GONDWANAS.
Talchie Division.
Damttda Division.
Panchbt
Division.
Names of Classes, Orders, Families, amp;c.
Bsuabes.
Talchir
group.
Karhar-Mri beds.
Bar^kar group.
Iron
shales.
Raniganj (K^mthi) group.
Panchet
group.
Sag. polyphylla, n. sp.
Sagenopteris (?), sp.?
Sagenopferisy another species.
Sagenopferis (?) stolicz-Tcanay Fstm.
Actinopteris hengalensisy Fstm.
Radiary striated forms Fern stem ? or Rhizome
B. PHANEROGAMS.
II. GTMNOSPERM^.
1. CyCADEACE.®.
Pterophyllum hurdwanensSy M^Cl., sp. (Fstm.)
Pterophyllumy sp.
Glossozamites stoUczJcanus, Fstm.
^oggerathiopsis hislopi, Fstm.
Nöggerathiopsis hislopi van:, suhrhomhoidalis.
Föggerathiopsisy sp. .
Scales—{Sguamce gymno-
2. CONIFERS.
a. Salisbtjbb.®.
Furyphyllvm whittiammy Fstm.
Rhipidopsis densinervisy n. sp.
h. Abietace.®. VoUzia heterophyllay Bgt.nbsp;Voltzia (?), scale ?nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Albertia, sp. .
Karaun.
Karh.
Karh.
Karh.
Alohp.
Karh.
Karh.
Karh.
Karh.
Rumk., Shap., Umr.
Ranig.
Ranig. Ranig.nbsp;S. G.
Ranig.
Wardh.
Wardh.
Ranig.
Jhar., Wardh.
Ranig., S. R,, Nagp.
Nagp.
Kajm., Ranig.
S. G.
S. R.
Ranig.
Aur, (?)
Doubtful.
Nöggerathiopsis, in Australia, Rhiptozamites, Schmalh., in Jura ofnbsp;Siberia.
Similar in the Jura of the Altai and Rhaet. ofnbsp;Sweden.
Rhipidopsis, Jura of Russia.
------- - - |
liOWEK QONDWANAS. | ||||||
Karnes of Classes, Orders, Families, amp;c. |
Talchie Divisioit. |
Damtjda Divisiok. |
Pan CHET Division. | ||||
TalcLir group. |
KarLar-)ari beds. |
Bardkar group. |
Iron I sliales. |
lanigao.) (Kdmtbi) gmup. |
Pauchet group. | ||
c. Taxodiacb^. | |||||||
Samaropsis comp, parmla^ Heer. |
Karh. |
Ranig., Satp. |
Eanig. Aur. (?) |
Jura of Siberia. | |||
Inoebm. | |||||||
Carpolithes milleri, Fstm. |
Karh. | ||||||
Seeds (winged) . |
... |
Rajm. |
... |
..... | |||
Seeds, sp.? |
... |
S. R., Nagp., Wardh, | |||||
Comferons (?) stem . |
... |
Wardh. |
?lihifodopsiSi Schmalh. Jura of Russia. | ||||
. ANIMALIA. | |||||||
Cbctstaoba. | |||||||
’Estheria nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;mangaliensisy Jones. |
... |
...... |
... |
Wardh. |
... | ||
Estheria (comp, mangalien* sis). |
... |
... |
... |
Eanig. |
Smaller form. | ||
Pisces. | |||||||
Scales of Ganoid fish |
... |
MangU |
Lepidotus ? In our coR lections. | ||||
Dicyuobontia. | |||||||
Dicynodon orientalis, Huxl, |
... |
... |
Ranig. | ||||
Dinosaubia. | |||||||
AnTcistrodon indicusy Huxl. |
Ranig. | ||||||
Labïbibxhodontia. | |||||||
Gonioylyptus longirostris, Huxl. |
... |
... |
Eanig. | ||||
Eachygonia nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;incuT'Gata, Huxl. |
... |
... |
Ranig. |
...... | |||
BracJiyops laticeps, Ow. |
... |
... |
Wardh. |
... | |||
Archegosaurus, sp.? . |
Sdtp. |
... | |||||
Insect wing |
Karaun |
... |
... |
... |
__ |
57
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
At present I shall draw from this list conclusions referring only to the Lower Gondwanas. Comparisons between the fossils of the Lower Gondwanas and thosenbsp;of other formations in other countries, as well as between the Lower and Uppernbsp;Gondwana fossils, will he given (with lists) after the description of the fossils.
If we examine the preceding list, we find as the oldest floras of the Lower Gondwanas those of the Talchir group and the Karharhari beds the relation ofnbsp;which to each other, etc., were already discussed in a previous fasciculus. Thenbsp;fossils of these two groups were found to correspond more closely with each othernbsp;than with any of the higher floras of the Lower Gondwanas, and both were comprised under the common heading “ Talchir division. The richer flora of thesenbsp;two groups is that of the Karharhari beds, and that of the Talchir group is subordinate to it.
In the flora of the Talchir group there are hardly any elements of the flora of the subsequent (Damuda) division. We find only fragments of {?) Schizoneura andnbsp;one undeterminable Glossopteris : the predominant fossils being Ganganiopteris.
In the Karharhari beds, the characteristic fossils of which also are forms of Gangamopteris, we find for the first time, hut rather scarce, the genus Verte-braria ; Glossopteris somewhat more numerous; and also Schizonem a wad Nöggera-thiopsis appear—the latter numerous. Besides these there are other fossils whichnbsp;are in relation with European forms, while the Gangamopteris correlates these bedsnbsp;with certain rocks in Victoria.
The floras of the next three groups, Barakar, Ironshales, and Raniganj, with their respective equivalents {see above), are to each other in the same relation asnbsp;those of the Talchir group and Karharhdri beds, and they are therefore comprisednbsp;under the same heading as the Damuda division.
The most characteristic (and partly most numerous) fossils of these groups are Schizoneura, Vertehraria, Trizygia, Sphenopteris, Macrotcemopteris, Glossopteris,nbsp;and Nöggerathiopsis; identical species occur in all three of them, or at least in thenbsp;Barakar and Raniganj groups.
These are completely sufficient to bring all these three groups into closest
But there are two other elements in these floras of the Damuda division, i. e., several forms are very closely related with Triassic and Jurassic forms in Europenbsp;and Siberia, while others have their representatives in Australia and South Africa.nbsp;These relations give the Damuda flora a peculiar interest; they have alreadynbsp;been duly noticed in the Manual of Indian Geology, and will be discussed in thenbsp;concluding portion of this paper; the horizon of the Damudas must be affected bynbsp;that of the Talchirs and their representatives.
The last (highest) flora with which we have to deal here is that of the Danchet group. M^e find two peculiar forms of plants; but the others are those of thenbsp;Damuda division, so that the flora of the Panchet group does not differ by far
-ocr page 72-58
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
so much from that' of the Damuda division as does the flora of the Talchir division, and it always occurs to me that the Panchet group might rather be includednbsp;as a fourth group in the Damuda division. Besides the plants, animals also werenbsp;found in the Panchet group : Estheria, Eicynodontia, and Lahyrinthodontia. Thenbsp;Estheria appear to he identical, or at least very closely allied to certain forms innbsp;certain beds at Mangli and Kawarsa, classed with theKamthis (=:Raniganj group).nbsp;EahyrintJiodont reptiles are also known from the Raniganj (Bijori) group of thenbsp;Damuda division, while Eicynodon is found in South Africa in beds representingnbsp;the Raniganj and Panchet groups. It would appear therefore that also, with regardnbsp;to the animal remains, the Panchet group shows a close connection with thenbsp;Raniganj group.
This may be sufficient at this place; these are merely observations, based on the palaeontological relations of the groups themselves. All other relations regarding these groups were fully described and discussed by Mr. W. T. Blanford in thenbsp;Manual of the Geology of India, pp. 109—134.
DESCRIPTION OF THE FOSSILS.
In the systematical description of the fossils, I shall follow Schimper’s system, partly from the new Handbook of Palaeontology by Schimper and Zittel, as far as itnbsp;is here available d the rest will be taken from the same author’s previous work onnbsp;botanical palaeontology.'^ I shall also add the etymological derivation of the namesnbsp;of the fossils.
PTEBIEOPHYTA.
equisetacea:.
The Equisetaceae of the Lower Gondwanas cannot he said to be very uumerous, at all events not very various. There occur altogether four genera only; and if wenbsp;except one, which will be described as Vertebraria, and which has an almost generalnbsp;distribution through all the groups of the Lower Gondwanas (except the Talchirnbsp;group proper) and occurs at most of the localities, the others are found either onlynbsp;in certain horizons or in a few districts. But they are interesting genera onnbsp;account of their relations.
These four genera are: Schizoneura, Phyllotheca, Trizygia, and Vertebraria. The relations of these various genera will be shown under the description of each.
‘ Handbuch der Palseoiitologie. Scliiniper mid Zittel (Phytopal£eoiitolog3' 1)3’ Schiniper). Of tbe botanical portion we have at present one part (pp. 1—152), 1879, Vol. II, pt. 1.
- Traité de Paleontologie végétale, 1869—75 (3 Vols. and Atlas).
-ocr page 73-59
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AXD PANCHET DIVISIONS.
In a short paper published in the 3rd part of last year’s' (1879) Records, I noticed some of the relations of the first three of the above genera in general, andnbsp;especially of Trizygia. At present this can he done more in detail.
Genus: SCHIZONEURA,^ Schimper, 1849.
1828. Convallarites, Brongniart: Prodr. d’une Histoire des végétaux fossiles, Paris, p. 128.
1828. Equisetum, Brongniart: Histoire des veg. fossiles, partly (p. 115).
1828. Convallarites, Brongniart: Flore du gres bigarré. In Ann. des sc. nat. Ime series, XV, PI. XIX.
1844. ScMzoneura, Schimper et Mougeot: Monogr. des pi. foss. d. gres bigarré des Vesges, pp. 48—61, Tab. XXIV—XXVI.
1850. Sc.hizoneura, Unger: Genera et species plant, fossilium, p. 316.
1864. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Calamites, Heer : Urwelt der Schweiz.
1865. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Calamites, Schenk, in Schoenlein, Abbildungen der fossilen Pflanzen im Keuper Frankens.
1869. Sehizoneura, Schimper : Traité de Pal. végét, p. 280, pis. XIII—XVI.
1876. ScMzoneura, Heer : Primaral world of Switzerland, p. 51.
1876. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ScMzoneura, Feistmantel: Jour. As. Soc., Bengal, Vol. XLV, pt. II, p. 344.
1878. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ScMzoneura, Nathorst: Om Floran Skdnes Kolforande Bildningar. I. Floran vid Bjuf, p. 24,
II. Floran vid Höganas och Helsingborg, Stockholm, 1878, p. 9.
1879. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ScMzoneura, Feistmantel: Pal. Indica, Ser. XII, 1. Talchir-Karharbari flora, p. 7.
1877. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Feistmantel: Eecords Geol. Surv. India, Vol. X, p. 199, lt;fec.
1879. Feistmantel: Ibid., Vol. XII, p. 163.
JPlantis herbaceis vel subarborescentibus. Caulibus rmnosis {? verUcillatim), ipsis ramisque articulatis, anguste longitudinaliter sulcatis, costis suloisque (^proscipuenbsp;in caulibus majoribus) juxta postis. Articulationibus vaginis circumdatis, imprimenbsp;foliis coalitis, integris, tandem in folia secundum tineas commisurales vel, frequentis-sime, duas in partes, folia opposita simulantes, dissolutis.
The chief Character of this equisetaceons plant, the stems and stalks of which are articulated and longitudinally ribbed, lies in the sheaths which are found in thenbsp;joints of the stalks. These consist in the first stage of development of a certainnbsp;number of longitudinal leaflets with a central vein, attached along their margins.nbsp;In the process of development, however, this sheath splits along the sutural linesnbsp;either into the leaflets again, in various degrees of completeness or, as it appears,nbsp;much more frequently into two portions, generally equal in size and spread out sonbsp;that they appear opposite.
A similar case is also seen in the living Equiseta, where in the young stage the sheaths are also more or less closed, and open only by growing up of the internodes.
The number of leaflets in the sheath vary, and they always begin to split from the top.
These relations are sufficiently illustrated in Schimper’s plates.
Known species and range of the genus out of India.—The srenus has no wide geographical (and geological) distribution.
' SX'Tquot; nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;reiipov the vein. When first establishing this genus. Prof. Schimper thought that
the leafsheath splits along the thick veins, and called it therefore ScMzoneura; this surmise, however, proved wrong and was corrected by Prof. Schimper himself, but the name was retained
-ocr page 74-60
The species known are :— nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;'
Schizonenra paradoxa} Schimp, and Moug. [1. c.) Convallarites erect.a and nutans, Bfongniart {I.C.), known from the lower Trias (Gres bigarré) of the Vosges.
Schizoneura meriani,^ Schimp., 1869, Equisetum meriani, Brongt. Schenk in Sehoenlein, amp;c., known from the upper Trias (Keuper) in the neighbourhood of Stuttgart, Sulz on the Neckar,nbsp;Sinsheim in the Grand-dukedom Baden, and in Bavaria.
Schizoneura hwrensis,^ Schimp., 1869 [Calamites hmrensis, Hisinger*), known from Rhaetic in Sweden, in Hanover, and in Baden.
Schizoneura ? lateralis^ Schimper. This species, which was at first described as Equisetum, is placed by Schimper also with Schizoneura^ while Professor Heer places it with PhpllothecaJ Thenbsp;original specimen is rather badly preserved, and both these views may be considered equally correct;nbsp;known from the Oolite of Haiburne Wyke and Scarborough, Yorkshire.
The range of Schizoneura in Europe is therefore Trias—Oolite (taking Equisetum laterale also as belonging to this genus).
Relations and differences.—^The relations of this peculiar genus are not many. Eegarding the sheath in the articulations, a certain analogy can he seen between thisnbsp;genus and Equisetum of the present flora in its young state.
The palaeontological relations are only in so far of importance as according to Mr. Grand Eury,® this genus {Schizoneura) of the Grès higarré may he considerednbsp;as representing the genus Asterophyllites of the Palaeozoic. I have already hadnbsp;occasion to mention this relation,® pointing out the morphological similarity of thesenbsp;two genera.
As regards the differences, I have only to indicate two incorrect correlations made by various authors, especially with regard to the Indian forms ; Schizoneuranbsp;was correlated with Zeugophyllites (the Australian form) and also with Nöggerathia.
In a short note in the Eecords,^® I have shown that the correlations were only based upon superficial resemblance, and that there is really a generical differencenbsp;between Schizoneura, Schimp., Zeugophyllites, Bgt., Nöggerathia, Stbg.
As regards Eoggerathia, I shall have occasion to point to it again.
Eegarding Zeugophyllites, I may here say what is needful.
It appears to me that a slight confusion gave rise to the correlation of Schizoneura and the Australian Zeugophyllites. Brongniart established the genus Zeugo-phyllites^^ on a specimen from India; he called it Zeugoph. calamoides, and the locality is given “ Mines de Eana-gunje,^^ pres Eajemahl, dans 1’ Inde septentrionale.”
* nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Paradoxus, strange.
^ Merian, proper name.
^ Prom Hor in Sweden.
¦' Hisinger, Lethaea Suecica, 1836—1840.
^ Prom latus, lateris, side.
® Trait, d. Pal. végétale, Vol. I, p. 284.
’’ Juraflora Ostsibiriens nnd des A,marlandes, 1876, pp. 43, 44
* nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Plora carbonifere du Dptmt. de la Loire, etc., 1877, p. 404.
® Reo. Geol. Surv. India, 1879, Vol. XII, p. 165.
Vol. X, p. 200.
“ Prodrome, 1828, pp. 118, 121, 176.
This of course means Raniganj.
61
¦FLORA OP THE HAMUHA AND PANCHET HIVISIONS.
As regards this species, I would uot be disinclined to think that it may have been a specimen of Sohizoneura, which is numerous at Raniganj. Brongniart gavenbsp;no figures, hut the diagnosis may well fit to that of Scliizonenra. He mentions sixnbsp;to eight equal and well-marked veins in each of the opposite leaves, he also alludesnbsp;to a splitting of the leaves at top (although he does not mention anything of anbsp;coalescence of several leaflets); hut he compared the leaves with Palm leaves andnbsp;placed ZeugophylUtes with the Palms. Schimper thought that it might have heennbsp;a Fteropliyllum. The Australian ZeugophylUtes was subsequently (1845) describednbsp;by Morris,^ and the slight confusion I have alluded to was, that, although Morris innbsp;his paper only provisionally placed the Australian leaf with Brongniart’s Zeugo-pliy Hites and pointed out the difference from Sohizoneura, yet both these forms werenbsp;considered identical amongst themselves and with Schizoneura? But as mentionednbsp;before, Brongniart’s ZeugophylUtes can hardly be taken into consideration (althoughnbsp;the circumstances might permit of its being considered a Sohizoneura of Raniganj),nbsp;and the Australian ZeugophylUtes appears really to differ from Sohizoneura, althoughnbsp;even in this case the material seems to be insufficient, only one specimen (onenbsp;leaflet) having ever been figured. We may therefore safely dismiss the correlationnbsp;of Sohizoneura with ZeugophylUtes, at least with the Australian form.
It appears to me that we have two species of Sohizoneura in India.
Sohizoneura gondwanensis,® Estm. Plates ÏA—XM.
1876. Peistmantel: Eeo. Geol. Surv. of India, Vol. IX, p. 69.
1876. Id,: Jour. As. Soo., Bengal, Vol. XLV, p. 345.
1879. Id.: TalcMr-Karharbari flora, Pal. Ind., Ser. XII, pt. 1.
Trunco articulato, ramoso; caulibus, (ramisque) articulatis, striatis magnitu-dine variantibus, vaginis in articulis ex 12—22 pluribusque foliolis consistentibus, plerumque duas in partes, folia opposita simulantes, partitis, nonnunquam in foliolanbsp;dissolutis ; partibus vagince frequentissime oblonge-ovalibus, magnitudine variantibus,nbsp;5—14 nervis crassiuscuUs, equalibus {singulorum foliolorum) percursis, scope tineasnbsp;commissurales exhibentibus. Fructificatione adhue ignota.
Description.—This Indian form which in general appearance bears the characters of the genus as established by Prof. Schimper is rather numerous in the Lower Gondwanas, and exhibits a great variety as regards size of stems and stalks,nbsp;form and size of the portion of the sheath, and number of the leaflets.
Most of the specimens were found with sheath portions in the articulations, but there occur also a great number of leafless stems in the rocks of the Lower Gondwanas, many of which are, I believe, of Sohizoneura gondwanensis, at least at those
* Strzelecki, New South Wales and Vandiemen’s Land, p. 250, PI. VI, fig. 5.
’ Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. II, p. 327. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;•
^ From the ancient tribal region, Gondwana.
-ocr page 76-62
TLOBA OE THE DaMUDA ANH PANCHET DIVISIONS.
places where this species is very numerous. I refer for instance to Plates Ya(, fig. 3, VII^, fig. 1 ce, VIII^, fig. 2, and IX A. Judging from these stems, the plant mustnbsp;have been of a good size. The stem was articulated and ribbed—the ribs and sulcinbsp;were in juxtaposition, a character which we also find in the European (Triassic)nbsp;ScMzoneura (although it is also found in some palseozoic species of Calamites). Thenbsp;stems appear to have been branched (Plate NA, fig. 3). The leaved specimens maynbsp;represent branehes (in older specimens), as well as unbranched (younger) plants.nbsp;They are also articulated; the internodes ribbed.
The articulations hear the sheaths. These are generally separated into two almost equal portions. In most of the specimens these are well seen to he embracingnbsp;(amplexicaules). These portions of the sheath have various forms—some are oblongnbsp;laneeolate (Pis. lA, figs. 1, 3, 4, III^, fig. 2), mostly, however, oblong-oval. Theynbsp;are traversed by a varying number of equally strong well marked longitudinal veins,nbsp;approaching at the base and the apex. The number of these veins is very varying;nbsp;and, correspondingly, the breadth of the sheath portion. The least number is 5, 6, 7nbsp;in each portion {see VI. lA, figs. 1—4), and consequently the portions (pseudo-leaves)nbsp;are narrow.
In the majority of the specimens, the number of the veins in the sheath portions is much larger, generally 9, 10, 11; the greatest number of veins I observed in a specimen (PI. YA, fig. 5), which is a sheath portion, was 14 veins (thenbsp;thicker lines; the thinner ones have another meaning, of which I shall speaknbsp;presently). These veins represent as many single leaflets as the sheath portionnbsp;consists of (which it is composed). That this is indeed so we can see in thosenbsp;specimens w^here, besides the thicker vems (or ribs), there are also in the inter-spaees thinner lines (Pis. II^, fig. 2; TV A, figs. 2,3; YA, figs. 2,5; VI.^,nbsp;figs. 1, 2, 3; YllA, figs. 15, 2; YlllA, figs. 1, 2), the nature of which will henbsp;understood from the following:—
In most of the cases the sheath portions are entire at their apex; in several cases, however, a splitting was observed, which takes place between the veins andnbsp;along the thinner lines where these are seen. (Pis. ÏA, figs. 3, 4; III^, fig. 2;nbsp;YIÏÏA, fig. 1). Where the splitting of the sheath portion is farther advanced, therenbsp;we can see better that the sheath portions consist of single leaflets, and that thenbsp;splitting takes place along the commissural lines of the leaflets; flg. 3, PI. lllA,nbsp;exhibits a specimen where the sheaths are almost entirely reduced into the singlenbsp;leaflets; on PL YA, fig. 2, the sheaths are partly divided into single leaflets, andnbsp;partly have two or three leaflets still joined together, the splitting along the linesnbsp;of junction being well seen; so also in fig. 2, PL YIA. In fig. 15, PL YllA, thenbsp;sheaths are resolved entirely into the leaflets which are long and broad, the veinsnbsp;well marked; but there is still a portion of the sheath preserved (to the right of thenbsp;figure between the two internodes);_ fig. 2, PI. VII^, exhibits various states ofnbsp;splitting; a very far-advanced splitting is also seen in fig. 6, PL VIII^. That
-ocr page 77-63
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
these sheath portions and leaflets were originally joined to one common sheath, is partly exhibited by four specimens figured in this paper; they are, fig. 2, PI. II^,nbsp;a specimen with two articulations, in both of which the sheath is not entirely split,nbsp;but is still entire in the lower portion. The same is partly seen also in fig. 2,nbsp;PI. VI^, also in fig. 2, PI. YII^, and in fig. 2, PI. VIII.^.
Damuda and JPanchet forms identical.—The specimens hitherto referred to in the text were all from the Damuda division. But there is also a form of ScMzoneuranbsp;in the top formation of the Lower Gondwanas, i.e., in the Panchet group of Bengal.nbsp;The specimens are figured on PI. ~KA. They are not so large as those from thenbsp;Damudas, but all the characters of these are also found in these Panchet forms.nbsp;The sheath portions are oblong-oval, embracing, and show up to nine veins. I couldnbsp;not observe the commissural lines, the specimens being rather badly preserved; butnbsp;there is no doubt that the veins are those of the single leaflets. There is nonbsp;character of distinction between the Damuda and Panchet forms.
'Relations.—Of the known species of ScMzoneura, our species resemble most closely the Lower Triassic ScMzoneura paradoxa. Schimp.^ Our plants appearnbsp;somewhat stronger, and the number of the leaflets composing the sheaths, larger,nbsp;the sheath portions therefore broader; they also are shorter, their shape morenbsp;generally oblong-oval; in ScMzoneura paradoxa. Schimp., the number of leaflets doesnbsp;not seem to exceed eight, while the smallest number of leaflets in ScMzoneuranbsp;gondwanensis, Fstm., is ten.
Stems.—As mentioned before, there occur with the leaved stems many without leaves, or partly so {see Pis. YA, YllA, YÏÏ1A, and IX^). Most of these stemsnbsp;were generally designated as Rliyllofheca. My opinion, however, is, that theynbsp;mostly belong to ScMzoneura and to ScMz. gondwanensis ; it is at least certainly sonbsp;with the specimens figured on PI. YA, fig. 5; PI. VII^, fig. la, which completelynbsp;resemble the other stem of the same figure to which the leaflets belong; PI.nbsp;VIIIM, figs. 2, 3, are partly leaved stems, and PI. TKA, figs. 1, 2, are really also ofnbsp;ScMzoneura gondwanensis. There are, however, several other stems figured (PI.nbsp;YÏIÏA, fig. 4; PI. TKA, figs. 3, 4, 5, 6) which may also be of ScMzoneura gondwanensis, but which also might be considered as belonging to another species, ScMzoneura meriani, which will be next described.
Range and localities of Sch. gondwanensis, Fstm.—
1. Takhir division :
Karharbiiri beds, Karharbdri coal-field. I have collected this year at Passerabhia, shaft No. 40, several fossils, which are from the roof of the second seam, and amongstnbsp;which are two fragmentary specimens, which I can refer only to Schizoneuranbsp;gi'ndwanensis, Fstm. The sheaths are split. Mohpani coal-field (Pis. TIIA,nbsp;fig. 3, VIU, figs. 1 a, 0).
* Schimpei- and Mougeot: f.r. Pis. XXIV—XXVI, 1844. Schimper: Tr. Pal. végét.. Pis. XIII-XVI, 1869.
64 FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
2. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Damnda division:
(a) Barakar group:—
Lumki hill, Karharbari coal-field (Pal. lud. XII, pt. 1, PL I, figs. 3, 3).
(5) Raniganj group:—
Raniganj (Pis. Ij, JIJ, 1114, figs. 1, 2; IVA, figs. 1, 2; VA, VIA, VII4, fig. 2;
VIII4, 1X4) j Assensole (north-west branch of Nunia river).
Jharia coal-field (PL IVA, fig. 3).
Hurdeamo, south-west of Sarun, Bokaro coal-field.
Nala at Budatand and Lanjit, Ramkola coal-field.
Garjan hills, Baigarh coal-field.
Bajbai, 2 miles east of Gopat river; Chanduidol; Mahan river near Minarra, and between Minarra and Gajar (and other localities). South Bewah coal-field.nbsp;Barieondam (PL III4, fig. 4) and near Harapala, Satpura basin.
3. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Fanehet division:
Maitur, north-west of Assensole, north-west branch of Nunia river, Raniganj coal-field, PL X4.
ScHizoNEUEA comp. Mbeiani, Schimp.
1828. Equisetnm, Bgt.: Hist. d. végét. foss., p. 116, Tab. XII, fig. 13.
1865. Catamites, Schenk, in Schcenlein, 1. c., Tab. V, fig. 4; Tab. VI, figs. 1, 2, 4.
1869. Schizoneura, Schimp.: Tr. Pal. végét.. Vol. I, pp. 782-783; Pis. XV and XVI.
1879. Feistmantel: Pal. Ind., Ser. XII, PI. I, figs. 6-7.
In my Talchir-Karharbari flora {l.c.), I have mentioned some specimens from Passerahhia, Karharbari coal-field, which I thought might he referred to the abovenbsp;species.
There are also among the Raniganj plants several stems which agree quite well with this European species (PI. VIII^, fig. 4 ; PI. 1X^4, figs. 3-6). I havenbsp;mentioned them already with Schizoneura gondwanensis, but their appearance is alsonbsp;that of Schizoneura meriani, Schimp.
I am afraid, however, that I shall have to leave this question unsettled, for although these Ptaniganj stems resemble closely Sch. meriani, yet their associationnbsp;Avith Schiz. gondioanensis makes me hesitate to separate them from the species.
Schizoneura, sp.
1879. Feistmantel: Talcbir-Karbarbari flora, p. 8, PI. I, fig. 1.
Another specimen was figured from the Talchir group, which appeared to be a Schizoneura, but which I did not identify specifically, on account of its incompletenbsp;preservation.
In India Schizoneura ranges from the (?) Talchir group to the Tanchet group.
v/
-ocr page 79-65
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Genus : PHYLLOTHECA,' Bgt., 1828.
1828.
1845.
1847.
1849.
185C.
1863.
1846-56.
1876.
1876.
1878.
1879.
Brongniart: Prodrome, pp. 151 and 175.
Morris: in Strzelecki, New South Wales and Vandiemen’s Land, p. 250 etc.
McCoy; Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. 20, Ser. I, pp. 152-157.
Dana: Ü. S. Expl. Exped., p. 710.
Unger: Gen. and spec, plant foss., pp. 62-73. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;,
Bunhury: Quar. Jour., Geol. Soc., London, Vol. XVII, p.'355.
Zigno: Flora formation. Oolithicae, Padova.
Heer : Juraflora Ostsibiriens und des Amurlandes, p. 43.
Feistmantel: Eaniganj flora. Jour. As. Soo., Bengal, Vol. XL V, p. 346.
Heer: Nachtrage zur Juraflora von Irkutsk, p. 4; Flora foss. arctica, vol. V.
Schmalhausen (T.): Beitrage zur Juraflora Russlands, M. de I’Ac. Imp. d. sc. d. St. Petersbourg, 7th Ser., PI. XXVII, pp. 12, 46, 62.
This is another peculiar equisetaceous plant, recalling most closely forms of the living Fquisetum.
The stems and branches (in branched stems) are articulated and the internodes striated or ribbed. The leaflets, which are linear and have a central vein, arenbsp;joined into a sheath in the lower part, the upper part being free. The leaflets (thenbsp;free portion of the sheath) are either erected or in other forms reflexed.
As this genus occurs only rarely in India, I cannot add much to our knowledge of it, and I can only refer to the literature, especially to the recent publications bynbsp;Heer and Schmalhausen.
Pliyllotheca australis, Bgt., Pliyllotlieca ramosa and hoolceri, McCoy, FJiyllotheca itidica, Bunb., Phyllotheca brongniartiana and equisetiformis, Zigno, FJiyIlotJieca ? lateralis, Pbill., sp.,nbsp;Pliyllotheca sibirica. Heer; Phyllotheca deliquescens, socolowshi, stschuroioski, striata,nbsp;paucifolia, stellifera, equisetitoides, Schmalh.
One new species will be described in the present memoir. These known species are distributed as follows :—
a. Australia..— From here the genus was at first described by Brongniart®; bis locality, however, is indistinctly indicated: Hawkesbury river near Port Jackson, New Southnbsp;Wales”—and there is no horizon mentioned from which the fossil came. McCoy, Morris,nbsp;Dana, and myself figured and described other specimens, and we now know that Phyllotheca is known in Australia from four horizons :
Phyllotheca.—Mentioned as genus from the lower coal-measures (below the marine fauna). Palaeozoic.
’ lt;FwXAoi'=leaf, 5);/lt;j}=a sheath (of leaves). ® Prodrome, 1828, p. 151.
-ocr page 80-Phyllotlieca austmlis} Bgt., from the Newcastle beds (upper coal-measures), New South Wales, and from the jurassic beds (upper mesozoic^ at Cape Paterson,, Victoria.
Thyllotlieca ramosa,^ McCoy (this, I think, not differing from Fh. australis), from the Newcastle beds in N. S. Wales.
Fhyllotheca hooheri^ McCoy, from the Wianamatta beds, from the Newcastle beds, and from the locality Avowa (which belongs to a lower horizon, Palseozoie).
h. India.—In India one species was hitherto known from the Raniganj-Kamthi group, Fli. indiQa, Bunb., which will also be described here. A new species will also be described, thenbsp;affinities of which are with a jurassic form in Siberia.
c. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;SiBEKiA.—The knowledge of FhylloiJieca in Siberia is quite recent.
Fhylloilieca sibiricat^ was described and figured in 1876 and 1878 by Professor Heer (7. c. ante from jurassic beds in the Gouvernement Irkutsk (Siberia).
Fhyllotheca deliquescens,^ Göpp., sp., described and illustrated by Professor Sehmalhausen, 1879, (see 1. c. ante) from jurassic beds of the Kusnezk basin in the Altai (Siberia) and fromnbsp;the same formation on the lower Tunguska river. North Siberia.
Fhyllotheca socolowskii,^ Eichw., sp., and Fhyllotheca stschurowshii^ Schmalh., described by the same author from the Kusnezk basin.
Fhyllotheca striata^ Schmalh., described by Professor Sehmalhausen, from the jurassic beds of the Petschora country.
Fhyllotheca pancifolia,^ Schmalh.
Fhyllotheca stelliferaF Schamlh.
Fhyllotheca equisetitoidesF Schmalh., described by the same author, 1879 (7. c.) from jurassic beds on the lower Tunguska river. North Siberia.
d. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Italy.—Prom the jurassic beds in Northern Italy two species oi Fhyllotheca were desci'ibed
by M. Zigno (7. c. ante).
Fhyllotheca hrongniartianaF Zign. (7. c. p. 59).
Fhyllotheca eqaisetiformisF Zign, (7. c. p. 60).
' Australia.
^ Eamus = the branch.
^ From a proper name.
* Siberia.
® Deliquesce, to be dissolved.
® Proper name.
^ Proper name.
® Striatus = striated.
® Pauous = scarce; folium — leaf.
Stella = star; Jero = to hear, to have. ** Like equisetites.
Proper name.
Resembling equisetum.
1'
-ocr page 81-67
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
e. England.—No true PJiyllotheca has hitherto been described from England, and mention of this country is made here only because of the doubtful Eqtiisetum laterale, PhilL, as mentionednbsp;before, which, although referred to iScfeoMewm by Schimper, was lately (1876) correlatednbsp;by Heer with PJiyllotheca. The original specimen is, however, so badly preserved that eithernbsp;of these correlations might be possible.
The range of PhyllotJieca as known at present is therefore from palaeozoic (carboniferous ? in Australia) through the subsequent formations into Jurassic beds,nbsp;where it is most numerous and most widely distributed.
Phtllotheca indica,^ Bunh. PI. XII^, figs. 3—9.
1862. Bunbury: Nagpur plants, Quar. Jour. Geol. Soo. London, Vol. XVII, p. 355, Pis. X, XI.
1876. Peistmantel: Eaniganj plants, Vol. XLV, pp. 346, 347.
This plant was originally described by Sir Charles Bunbury from the Nagpur district {1. c.) and several specimens were figured. I am afraid I cannot add muchnbsp;to the knowledge of this plant, as there are not many specimens in our collections,nbsp;and they seem to he just as incomplete as Sir Bunhury’s specimens were. But Inbsp;shall at least add something regarding the distribution of the plant.
Most of the specimens which I figure (PI. XII^, figs. 3—5, 7—9) are also from the Nagpur district. They are fragments of foliated stems or branches. Thenbsp;partial sheaths are not quite well seen, but all the specimens show the reflex leaflets.
Fig. 6 of the same plate shows another specimen a little more complete, hut from the Baniganj field. That it is a Thyllotheca nobody can doubt, and that it isnbsp;identical with the Nagpur plant must occur to everybody who compares the plants.
In the Baniganj specimen we see better the somewhat funnel-shaped sheaths as described by Sir Oh. Bunbury {1. c., p. 336); they are furrowed, the furrows corresponding with the numbers of leaflets which compose the sheath. According to thisnbsp;the leaves would be numerous, but in none of the whorls are they completely preservednbsp;so as to allow of their number being fixed. The leaves (at least the free portion ofnbsp;them) are setaceous, longer than the sheaths, at first erect, then spreading out andnbsp;at last reflexed.
I did not observe any branched specimens, so that I can form no idea of the mode of ramification, hut in the Australian J^hyllotlieca, as well as in the Italiannbsp;form, and as it appears from Air. Schmalhausen’s figures 1. c. 1879, PI. X ofnbsp;Phyll. deliquescens, also in the Siberian forms, the branches originated above thenbsp;articulation of the stem, and we can therefore assume the same for the Indian form.
Relations and differences.—There are especially two species with which the Indian Rhyllotheca can be compared, i.e., Phyll. australis, Bgt., in the first place,nbsp;and then Rhyllotheca sibirica. Heer; the former from the upper coal-measuresnbsp;(Newcastle beds) in New South Wales, and the upper mesozoic (jurassic) beds of
* Indicus = Indian.
I
-ocr page 82-68
PLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PAN CHET DIVISIONS.
Victoria in Australia; the latter from Jurassic beds in Siberia. The Australian Phyllotlieca, however, has the stem more smooth or only slightly striated, and thenbsp;sheaths more adpressed.
The Phyll. sibirica seems to have the sheaths shorter and the leaves not so refiexed as the Indian form, and it is besides this distinguished by the presencenbsp;of certain small radiately ribbed discs, the nature of which is not quite explained.
Stems.— In the neighbourhood of Nagpur, wherefrom this species was first described, there were also numerous stems having no leaves or sheaths, so that their position must remain somewhat doubtful; but taking their association withnbsp;Phyllotheca and the absence of other equisetaceous leaved plants into consideration, we are, I think, quite Justified in placing these stems with Phyllotheca, Justnbsp;as we did with, other stems associated with Schizoneura, assigning them to thisnbsp;genus. Already Sir Ch. Bunbury noticed these stems, and from the absence of anynbsp;sheaths whatever in their articulations, he conjectm’ed that the sheaths must havenbsp;been deciduous.
These Phyllotheca (?) stems have, however, a great resemblance to those of Schizoneura, at least in one important character, i.e., they are ribbed, and the ribsnbsp;and sulci are not alternating, but in Juxtaposition. Some of the Siberian andnbsp;one of the Australian forms {Phyll. hookeri) show the same relations.
Range and distribution of Phyllotheca indioa, Bunb.
Raniganj—Kamthi group.
RaniganJ, Raniganj coal-field, PI. XII A, fig. 6.
Bliaratwada (PI. XII J, figs. 3-5, 7-9). Bokhara and Chicboli, near Nagpur.
Phyllotheca kobusta,^ n. sp. PI. XIV A bis, figs. 1, 2.
Caulibus ramificatis (?) ramis tenuibus, articulatis, tenuiter striatis, foliis in articulis 10-14, verticillatis, oblonge latiuscuUs, basi attemiatis, apice obtuse-acuminatis, basi decurrentibus inque spatham connatis (?) striatis, nervo medionbsp;mediocri.
This new species is based upon two specimens from the Rdjmahal hills, figured on Plate XIV A bis. It is one of the broad-leaved forms, which, how’ever, are onlynbsp;rare. It appears that our specimens are of a branched plant, the stalks (here perhapsnbsp;branches) are articulated and the internodes are finely striated. The leaves in the articulations number from 10-14, are broadly lanceolate, their midrib is not quite distinct,nbsp;and they are longitudinally striated. They are arranged in whorls in the articulations, their bases are decurrent on the internode, and from several of thenbsp;whorls it appears that the bases of the leaves are Joined to a sheath, but thenbsp;nature of this cannot be more closely stated, as the specimens are too much pressed
* Bohustus, strong.
69
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
and tlie structure is badly preserved. These are the only specimens known from India.
Analogies and differences.—The only form which resembles very closely this new Indian Fhyllotheca is a jurassic form from the Kusnezk basin, on thenbsp;Altai, South-West Siberia, described only recently (1879) by Prof. Schmal-hausen as Fhyll. scMschurowshii (see ante 1. c. p. 16, Plates III, fig. 2amp;; lY, 4Ö,nbsp;VI, 2, 3). It might be quite possible that this Indian and the Siberian formsnbsp;are identical, but Prof. Schmalhausen’s specimens are rather too imperfect tonbsp;justify an identification. As it stands, the two forms seem to differ in thenbsp;number of the leaflets (10—14 in the Indian and 20 in the Siberian) and somewhat in the form of the same, those of our plant being a little more produced atnbsp;the apex; but still Fhyll. robusta has to be considered in closest relation to Fhyll.nbsp;schtschurowslcii.
Locality and horizon.—Raniganj group (?)
Dubrajpur, Gopicandar area, liajmalial hills (our cpllections).
Genus: TRIZYGIA,^ Royle, 1834.
1834-39. Royle : Botany and Nat. Hist., Himalayan Mts., p. 431.
Trizygia speciosa^ Royle. Pis. XI^, XIIA, figs. 1, 2-
1834-35. Hoyle: 1. c. p. 431, PI. II, fig. 8.
1845. Trizygia, Unger : Synopsis plant, fossil., p. 114.
1850. Sphenophyllum speciosum: McClelland’s Geological Report, etc. (1848), p. 54, PI. XIV, fig. 5.
1850. SpJienophyllum trizygia, Unger: Genera et species plant, fossil., p. 71.
1860. Sphenophyllum, T. Oldham: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. II, p. 316.
1865. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Trizygia, W. T. Blanford: Mem. Geol. Snrv. India, Vol. Ill, p. 31.
1876. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Sphenophyllum trizygia, Peistmantel: Reo. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. IX,nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;pt.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;3,nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;p.70.
1876. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Sphenoph. trizygia. Id.: Jour. As. Soo. Bengal, Vol. XLV, p. 342, PL XV,nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;figs.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;1,nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;2.
1877. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Trizygia, Grand’ Bury : Flore Carbonif. d. Dept. d. 1. Loire, p. 404.
1879. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Trizygia, Peistmantel; Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. XII, pp. 163—166.
I do not give a diagnosis of the genus also, because only one species being at present known, the diagnoses of germs and species must be identical.
Caule articulato, tenerrimo, jluctuanPe {?) ; foliis obovato-oblong» cuneiformi-hus, integris ; senis in articulis, verticillum totmn haudformantibus sed unilateraliter in tria paria dispositis; pare summo longissimo, imo brevissimo minimoque ; nervonbsp;medio nullo ; nervalis crebris cequalibus ex duobus primariis regulariter dichotomis.
The chief character of this plant, which seems to have been an aquatic plant as can be judged from the proportion of leaf to stalk, consists in the arrangement of thenbsp;leaves round the articulations; they are not arranged in an entire whorl, but, always
' Speoio.susir=:.handsome.
’Tp£7? = three Zsijyos — ^ pair.
-ocr page 84-70
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
numbering six only, they are plaeed semi-circularly, in three fairs, on one side of the articulation; the pairs are of an unequaOize; the uppermost pair, which is horizontallynbsp;(or suberectly) spread out, is the longest, the lower pair hanging down vertically, isnbsp;the smallest, the middle pair, taking its place between these two, is generallynbsp;sburter than the first pair, sometimes equal to it in size. The leaflets of the whorlsnbsp;differ also in shape, those of the first two (upper) pairs are more oblong-oval, whilenbsp;those of the third (undermost) pair are more egg-shaped. They are entire andnbsp;replete with veins, which originate from two in the cuneiform base, and passnbsp;radiating, constantly bifurcating to the apical margin.
From this number of the leaflets Royle named it Trizygia, a name certainly quite appropriate, as the characters are quite constant and not found again in anynbsp;other of the known fossil equisetaceous plants.
McClelland (1850) and also Unger (1850) have classed it with Sphenophyllum, and I did the same in my first notes on the Damuda plants. But after closenbsp;examination, it appeared to me that it must be considered a peculiar genus, whichnbsp;view I communicated in my recent note “on Sphenophyllum etc.” but still takingnbsp;the Indian Trizygia as belonging to the Sphenophylloidece and, so to speak, asnbsp;representative of the carboniferous Sphenophyllum, which view we also find in Mr,nbsp;Grand ’Eury’s quoted work. The classification would be then as follows:—
Group: Sphenophylloidece.^
a. —Leaf-whorls complete round the joint; number of leaves variable; leaves ofnbsp;the same size and shape (or nearly so) in the same whorl: the true Sphenophyllum^nbsp;of the palaeozoic epoch.
b. —Whorls incomplete on one side of the joints; number of leaves six,nbsp;arranged in three pairs, each of which differs from the other in size and partlynbsp;also in the shape of the leaves. The Trizygia of the Indian coal-beds.
Haniganj and Bar altar form,—This species is one of those which have a pretty wide, vertical and horizontal range. By officers of the Survey it was at first discoverednbsp;in the Talchir coal-field, in beds which, according to the subsequent classificationnbsp;of the Damudas, have to be classed as Barakars ; later it was found numerous in thenbsp;Raniganj field, but in the Raniganj group.^ It was subsequently found alsonbsp;elsewhere. The specimens from the Raniganj and Talchir coal-fields appeared atnbsp;first to indicate a certain difference in size of these two forms, but later discoveriesnbsp;showed that this cannot be taken as a distinguishing character, and we have tonbsp;consider them as indeed identical.
' Eec. Geol. Surv. of India, Vol, XII, p. 3.
’ Belonging to the EqwisetacetB.
¦’ 24iviv = a wedge; (:;)uAXov=a leaf.
Eoyle’s original specimens are described as coming fi'om the shales of Eaniganj, without indicating any horizon, while Mc’Clelland described it amongst his Burdwan fossils, without indicating also any horizon or locality,from whichnbsp;reason I spoke of it in my note in the last number of Eecords (XIII, p. 65) as having been made known at firstnbsp;from the Barakars of the Talchir coal-field.
71
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DI7ISIONS.
Range and distribution of Trizygia speciosa.
a. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Rardkar group:
Bokaro coal-field, near Layeo; Auranga coal-field, west of Mórup.
Talcfiir coal-field, near Gopalprasad (PI. XI A, Rgs. 2,9; PI. XII.4, fig. 2).
b. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Raniganj group :
Raniganj coal-field, Raniganj and Mangalpur (PI. XI A, figs. 1, 3, 4, 5-8; Pi. XII A, fig. I).
Satpura basin, south of Pachmari, upper Denwa valley.
Sikkim (according to Dr. Hooker’s quotation).
Genus : VERTEBRARIA,^ Royle, 1834-39.
1839. Yertehraria, Eoyle : Botany and Nat. Hist. Himal. Mountains, p. xxix,* PL II, flgs. 1-7.
1847. Vertebraria, M’Coy, in Ann. and Malt;;. Nat. Hist., Vol. 20, 1st ser., pp. 145-147, PI. IX, fig, 1.
1849. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Clasteria, Dana: Un. St. Expl. Exped., PI. XIV.
1850. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Splienophyllum, Unger: Gen. et sp. plant. loss., p. 71.
1861. Vertebraria, Sir Ch. Bunbury: Quar. Jour. Geol. Soe., Vol. XVII, p. 338, PI. XI, fig. 3.
1876. Vertebraria, Eeistmantel: Raniganj plants. Jour. As. Soc., Bengal, Vol. XLV, p. 347.
1879. Vertebraria, Eeistmantel: Lower Gondwana foss.. Pal. I. Ser. XII, 1, p. 8, PI. I, figs. 8, 9.
This very peculiar genus, which, is at present known only from India and the upper coal-measures (Newcastle beds) of Australia (N. S. Wales), has been alreadynbsp;sufficiently described as regards its appearance and form, etc., and has been alsonbsp;figured. The true nature of it was, however, not yet made out, and I must confessnbsp;that even now I cannot advance much our knowledge in this direction, althoughnbsp;numerous specimens are at my disposal for examination. There is no instance ofnbsp;Vertebraria being found in connexion with any other plant. So much seems, however, certain, that Vertebraria is the root or rhizome of some other plant. Thisnbsp;already was stated by Sir Ch. Bunbury, at least for one of the forms of his Vertebraria, and in my paper on some Raniganj plants (1876, 1. c.) I tried to show thenbsp;equisetaceous nature from the figured specimens. I cannot add more to-day, andnbsp;shall therefore give the following synopsis referring to the figured specimens.
Vertebraria is in .India a wide-spread fossil, both as regards vertical and horizontal distribution. I think there is only one species of Vertebraria in India, i. e., Vertebraria indica, Eoyle, while Vertebraria radiata is a cross-section ofnbsp;Vertebraria mdica. There are two varieties, so to speak. One which appears anbsp;more tender plant and is more branched, and another variety which represents rathernbsp;the stems; this latter is more generally distributed, while the former appears to benbsp;more common in the Kamthi representative of the Raniganj group, although thenbsp;other form also is not absent.
Analogies.—The Australian form shows the closest analogy to our Indian Vertebraria ; about the identity of the genera there is no doubt, the species are perhaps
' Vertebra= a joint of tbe backbone.
-ocr page 86-72
TLOEA OP THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
different. Dana’s Clasteria {1. c.) is nothing else hut Vertebraria; it represents the longitudinal section of the same plant of which Vertebraria australis (as figurednbsp;by Mc’Coy) formed the transverse section, an analogous case to that in India, wherenbsp;Vertebraria indica was the longitudinal section, and Vertebr. radiaia the transverse section of the same plant.- In Australia it is described from the upper coal-measures only.
Unger placed both the Indian and Australian Vertebraria with Spheno-phyllum ; that this is an error everybody will perceive from the figures.
Lately only a Vertebraria ? petschoremis was described by Mr. Schmal. hausen {1. c., p. 53, tab. YII, figs. 14-18) from Jurassic beds of the Petschora countrynbsp;(Oranetz, on the right bank of the Petschora river). But so far as I can judgenbsp;from the drawings, Mr. Schmalhausen’s specimens do not show much relationnbsp;with either the Indian or the Australian Vertebraria.
In India, as said before, we have only one species—
Vertebraria indica,^ Royle. Pis. XIIA^, figs. 10, 11; XIII^ ; XIV..4, figs. 11-4;
XIV^ bis, fig. 3.
Litterature the same as that of the genus.
I have figured several specimens of the peculiar forms; fig. 11, PL Xlld, fig. 3, PI. XIII.4, and figs. 1,3,4, PL ^lYA, are the most typical forms. Eigs. 5, 6,nbsp;PL XlllA, represent Sir Charles Bunbury’s branched form, to which perhaps alsonbsp;figs. 1, 2 on the same plate may be placed (although they are from a differentnbsp;horizon).
Eig. 8, PL XIIIA, is a specimen exhibiting partly also the transverse section, showing the cuneiform segments, which are still better seen in fig. 3, PL XIV^ bis.
Eig. 11, PL XII A, and fig. 2, PL XIV A, are specimens from which thick branches, with the same Vertebraria structure, branch off.
Mange and distribution of Vertebraria indica.—As far as known at present, Vertebraria is known from all divisions of the Lower Gondwanas and almost fromnbsp;all horizons.
Talcliir division :
(a) Karharbari beds—
Passerabhia, Karharbari coal-field, PI. I, fig. 89. I have recently collected several specimens from the second seam.
Damuda division •
(a) Bardkar group—
Rajmahal coal-field (Mussinia, Burgo) ; Karharbari coal-field (Lumki hill).
Raniganj coal-field (Kumerdbubi. Pis. XIII A, figs. 1, 2, 4, 8; XIV A, figs. 1,4).
' Indian.
-ocr page 87-73
Jliaria coal-field.
Ramkola coal-field (Sendur river, west of Mitgain j Ledho nala, near Karamdihaj between Malian river and Tamor hill; near Majurdaki; Suknai nala, north of Sarsera).
Talchir coal-field (Gopalprasad and Talehir).
Shahpur coal-field (Mardanpur outcrops).
Umret coal-field (Barkoi).
(Ö) Raniganj group (KamtM group)—
Raniganj field (Raniganj, Pis. XII A, figs. 10, 11; XIII A, fig. 3; XIV A, figs. 2, 3 Assensole, etc.).
Jharia coal-field.
Ramkola coal-field (between Mahan river and Tamor hill; nala between Gouri and Ghui; Morne river, north of Parasdiha).
South Rewah (Sohagpur ; Sone river, west of Garara ; Bajbai, 2 miles east of Gopat river ; Mahan river near Tansar).
Raigarh and Hingir coal-field (Garjan hill, Girundla, Kodaloi and on the Bilpahari).
Satpura basin (Bijori horizon, between Rorighat and Harapala).
Nagpur area (Kamthi, Tondakheri, the more branchead form prevailing).
Wardha valley coal-field (Kawarsa).
South-east Godavari basin (Kunlacheru, PI. XIII A, figs. 5, 6; Sadgudiam).
Sikkim-Damudas.
PancJiet division.—From the true Panchet group of Bengal no Fertebraria is known, hut from the Auranga coal-field a collection of fossils was brought hy Mr.nbsp;V. Ball from a locality south-east of Panripura, near Latiahar; they were in a rednbsp;shale, like some shales of the Mahadevas. Mr. Ball designated them as from annbsp;uncertain horizon, but apparently Mahadevas. I for the present would, as statednbsp;before, rather feel inclined to include them in the Panchet division ; amongst thenbsp;fossils are several distinct specimens of Vertebraria indica, and this would he atnbsp;present the highest known horizon in which Vertebraria has been found.
The Equisetaceous plants in the Lower Gondwanas of India are therefore represented by four genera, the affinities of which are rather peculiar—
(a) Schizoneiira, Schimp., may represent a later (more recent) stage of the palaeozoic
Isteropliylhies.
The genus is rather numerous in the Damuda and Panchet divisions.
In Europe it is Triassic and Ehaetic.
The Indian Schizoneura gondtoanensis, Fstm., is most closely related with Schizoneura paradoxa of the lower trias in Europe; another species is probablynbsp;identical with an European form. Including the Indian species, we know at presentnbsp;four species of Schizoneura (not including in this genus the Equisetum laterale,nbsp;Phill., which perhaps better be included with Rhyllotheca).
-ocr page 88-FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS,
{b) VJiyllotJieca, Bgt., may be taken as representative of tbe recent Hquisetnm.
The genus is not very numerous in India; two species are known from approximately the same horizon (Raniganj-Kamthi group).
In extra-Indian countries this genus is known from palaeozoic rocks (in Australia), hut especially from mesozoic rocks (Australia, Siberia, Italy and ? England).
Of the two Indian species, Fliyll. indica, Bunh., most closely resembles to JPJiyll. amtralis in N. S. Wales and Victoria, and to Fhyll. sibirica, Heer, andnbsp;Phyll. deliquescens, Gopp., sp., in Siberia. The other species Phyll. robmta comesnbsp;very close to PJiyllotheca schtschurowski, Schmalh., from the Xusnezk basin of thenbsp;Altai. Together with the Indian species we know sixteen species of Pliyllotheca^nbsp;eleven of which are from Jurassic rocks, while one species (in Australia) passesnbsp;from palaeozoic into Jurassic rocks.
(c) nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Trizygia, Royle, represents the genus Spbenophyllum. It is not rare both in the Barakarnbsp;and Baniganj group of the Damudas.
One species is known.
(d) nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Vertehraria. Boyle, of unknown affinities.
A genus known from India and Australia only, in both countries represented by one species respectively.
In India it is known (as the same species) from the whole Lower Gondwana portion.
In Australia from the upper coal-measures (Newcastle beds) of New South Wales.
Asterophyllites, Bgt. Palaeozoic
DIAGBAM.
Schizonenra, Schimp.
Two species in India (Lower Gondwanas).
ScJiizoneura, Schimp.
Lower and Upper Trias, •)
PbfRti,-. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;1nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;’
Phyllotlieca, Bgt.
Lower coal-measures,
N. S. Wales.
Upper coal-measures (Newcastle beds), N. S. Wales
Phyllotlieca, Bgt. Phyllotheca, Bgt. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Equisetum:
Upper mesozoic, Victoria nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;recent.
Two species in India Jurassic, E. Sibiria.
Baniganj group.
Altai.
Tunguska B. Petscbora C.nbsp;Italy.nbsp;England.
? SpJienophyllum, sp. Paleozoic Vertehraria, Boyle. Upper coal-measures (Newcastle bedsl, N. S. Wales. |
Trizygia, Boyle. One species, India— Damuda Series. Vertehraria, Boyle. One species, India. Lower Gondwanas. |
75
FLORA OF THE DAMUHA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
FILIOES.
The by far most numerous fossils of the Lower Gondwanas are remains of ferns, and we shall find many interesting forms amongst them.
The most numerous, as regards species and specimens and distribution, are forms with single leaves and with net-venation.
In the systematical arrangement, I follow Professor Sohimper’s system in the new Handbook of Palaeontology.^
In the present fasciculus I shall describe only two species of ferns, while all the other fossils will be described in a subseqnent number of the Palaeontologia.
The two species which I have to describe now were formerly joined by me to one species, but further investigations and comparisons have shown that theynbsp;really belong to two forms, one of which represents a jurassic species from the Altai.
The filices will be subdivided as follows :—
a. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Cyatheacem.
b. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Polypodiacea—
a. Group of Alethopteris wJiithyensis.
| ||||||||||||||
Incertse sedis. |
a.— CYA TREA CE^.
Amongst this family I include of our Lower Gondwdna fossils: a Cyathea, a Sphenopteris, and a Dicksonia; the two first will be described here :—
Genus : CYATHEA.
to
Cyathea comp. Tchihatchepei, Schmal. PI. XVI A, figs. 1, 2,4.
1846. Sphenopteris anthriscifolia and Sph. imhricata, Göpp.: TchihatchefE’s voyage dans I’Altai Oriëntale, p. 387, Pis. XXVIII and XXIX.
1871. Geinitz in Cotta, Altai, Tab. II, fig. 4.
1876. Sph. folymorpha, Pstm. (ex parte): Jour. As. Soc., Bengal, Vol. XLV, p. 366.
1879. Cyathea tchihatcheffi, Schmalhausen: Boitrage zur Juraflora Bnsslands. Mem. d. I’Ac. Imp. d. Sc. d. St. Petersbourg, XXVII, No. 4.
When first describing (1876 l.c.) my Sphenopteris polymorpha from Raniganj,
* Handbuch der Palteontologie, Schiinper und Zittel, Vol. II, No. 1.
-ocr page 90-76
PLORA OP THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
I also placed with it some specimens from the Barakar group in the Talehir coal-field.
When examining them later more carefully, I found that the specimens from the Talehir coal-field differ from my Sph. polymorpJia, and they appeared to me to benbsp;Tery closely related with Prof. Göppert’s Sphenopteris anthriscifolia {see Göppert,nbsp;1845, and Geinitz, 1871, l.c.), and I intended to describe them under that name. Butnbsp;as Prof. Schmalhausen in his recent work {1. c.) described this species together withnbsp;Sph. imbricata, Göpp., under one name, as Cyathea tcMIiatcheffi, I must refer ournbsp;form from the Talehir coal-field to Prof. Schmalhausen’s species, not identifyingnbsp;them, however completely for the present, although I cannot find any conspicuous andnbsp;important distinguishing characters. If we compare our drawings (PI. XVI A, figs. 1,nbsp;2, 4), and the quoted drawings of Sphenopteris anthriscifolia, Göj)p., but especially Sph.nbsp;imbricata, Göpp. (in Göpp. l.c., Plate XXIX, figs. 10,11), we shall find a great resemblance between them; we can in fact say that our forms have the characters ofnbsp;both of Göppert’s species, the venation (where preserved) is more that of Sph.nbsp;anthriscifolia, Göpp., while the form of the pinnulse, especially the mode of theirnbsp;connection at the base on the rhachis (forming a winged rhachis) agrees more withnbsp;Sph. imbricata, Göpp.
Geinitz’s drawing of Sph. anthriscifolia, Göpp. (in Cotta’s Altai, 1. c.,) resembles also very much our specimens, but the rhachis does not seem to be much winged.nbsp;The same seems to be also the case with Prof. Schmalhausen’s specimens, although fig. 1, Plate III, is exceedingly like our form from the Talehir coal-field.nbsp;Prof. Schmalhausen’s diagnosis also applies well to our specimens; I thereforenbsp;refer them to Cyathea tchihatcheffi, as closely related.
Eor all other particulars I have to refer to Prof. Göppert’s and especially Schmalhausen’s papers. I would only mention that Prof. Schmalhausen comparednbsp;some of his specimens with Sph. lobifolia (Morris in Strzelecki, 1. c., p.nbsp;246, Tab. XII, fig. 3), the difference being in Cyathea tchihatchefi not havingnbsp;the pinnulse at their base so constricted. I can observe the same as regards ournbsp;specimens, especially fig. 4, PI. XVIM, and Sph. lobifolia, Morr.; the distributionnbsp;of the veins is very similar in both; but in our fern the pinnulse are connected atnbsp;the base, forming a winged rhachis.
Locality of the Indian form.—Barakar group :
Talehir, Talehir eoal-field.
Genus : SPHENOPTERIS, Bgt., 1828.
Sphenopteris poltmorpha, IVtm. Pis. XV^, XVIA, fig. 3, XVIH bis, figs. 1—6.
vquot;
1876. Feistmaiitel; Jour. As. Soc., Bengal, Vol. XLV, pp. 366-358, PI. XVI, figs. 6-7; Pi. XVII.
This species was first described by me from some specimens brought by Mr. Wood-Mason from Raniganj, and several of the figures then given are copied here
- -ho u. ^ C cx. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
-ocr page 91-77
ELOEA OP THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
again. But at present I give also the drawing of one of the large specimens which shows the polymorphous nature of the pinnulse.
As for the diagnosis, I must refer to my original paper. I have nothing to add here to complete it, hu\ some correetions are necessary.
I stated in my original paper that I thought Mc’Clelland’s Pecopteris affinis also belonged to Sph. pglymorpha; but now having had Mc'Clelland’s originalnbsp;specimen drawn again, I :^d that it differs in the chief character from Sph. poly-morplia, i. e., in not having the rhachis of the pinna winged.
I shall therefore quote, Mc’CleUand’s specimen again as Pecopteris affinis (see further on).
I also compared Sph. polymorpha with Pecopteris alata, Bgt., from N. S. Wales (Hawkeshury river), and,I must refer to it again; I have to point out somenbsp;confusion which arose about thi^ species. In his paper on “ Sedimentary formations in New South Wales” published in “Mines and Mineral Statistics,” 1874,nbsp;p. 186, the Revd. Mr. Clarke correlated this Sph. alata with the carboniferous form,nbsp;known at first by the same name, ahd later as Sph. {Eym.) grandmi. The matternbsp;stands, however, as follows :—
The Australian species was at first described as Pecopt. alata, Bgt., and was subsequently placed with Sphenopteris (aèi Sph. alata) by Sternberg, and is at presentnbsp;quoted as such.
The European carboniferous form to' which Mr. Clarke referred was at first described as Sphenopteris alata, Bgt., and was later quoted by Göppert as Hymenophyl-lites grandini, and now by Schimper as Sphenopteris grandmi, Göpp.
Now, both Morris and Mc’Coy, who mention Sphenopteris alata, mention it in Brongniart’s sense of Pecopteris alata, the Australian form, and not in the sensenbsp;of the original Sph. alata, or the present Sph. gtandini of the carboniferous.
This latter (Brongt., hist, végét. foss., PL XLVIII, fig. 4) is totally different from the Australian Sph. alata, Bgt. sp. (Brongniart, hist, végét. foss., PI.nbsp;CXXVII, p. 361), and it was with this latter that I have compared the uppernbsp;portion of our Sph. polymorpha; the lower pinnae appeared to me to resemblenbsp;Sph. athyrioides, Bgt. sp., from the oolite, with the exception, that in this formnbsp;the rhaehids are not winged.
Pange and distribution of Sph. polymorpha—
a. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Bardkar group—'
Although the specimen from Talchir had to he separated from Sph. polymorpha, I yet think, it also occurs in the Barakar group, i. e., on the Lumki hill in thenbsp;Karharhari field,
b. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Maniganj group—
Raniganj (Raniganj field), Pis. XVA, XYIA, fig. 3; PI. NVIJ bis, figs. 1—6.
Note.—So much for the present number. There is on Plate XVI4 lis still one figure (7) which is not comprised amongst the preceding descriptions. I thought it from the first aspect to be an insectnbsp;wing, hut I was assured by a competent authority that it is not an insect wing, but a leaf, and in thisnbsp;case it most probably belongs to some Oyclopteris-like form, and I shall mention it in my second part atnbsp;end of the Neuropt6ride(s. The figure had to be given on this plate, which, however, affords the opportunity of its being examined by other palffiobotanists, who perhaps will be able to form an opinionnbsp;about it of which I may have the benefit when preparing the text for the next number of the Paloeonto-logia.
This separate note does not belong, of course, to this paper, and when the other portion is published, will have to be taken out.
-ocr page 94-Fig. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;1. ScHizoNEURA GONDWANENSis, Fstm., pagcs 59—64. A leaved specimen, sheath-
portions of the longer and narrower kind, resembling those of Sc/iiz. paradoxa. Schimp.
Fig. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;2. The same variety, with shorter, broader oval sheath-portions.
Figs. 3 amp; 4. The same species: sheath-portions again of the narro^ver variety; tig. 3, and the lowest-sheath portion to the left in fig. 4, showing the beginning of a splittingnbsp;at the apex.
Fig. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;5. A specimen of the same species with small sheath-portions.
All specimens from the Kaniganj group, in the Raniganj field.
-ocr page 95-“¦6 0V e;,,
j - fau-rr: of India
lower GONOWANAS,
PI. I. A.
Pig. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;1. SCHIZONEURA GONDWANENSis, Pstm., pages 59—'6i. A robust specimen, with a
thick stalk and two internodes; apparently tlie stem. In the internodes the sheath-portions are seen, but here the splitting of the sheath was not quitenbsp;complete, and we can distinctly see that the sheath-portions originally formednbsp;only one sheath. In the sheath-portion two kinds of lines can be distinctlynbsp;seen—some are considerably thicker, and these are the veins of the leafletsnbsp;composing the sheath-—the others, thinner, between the former, are the commissural lines, along which the leaflets are connected; the stem is i-ibbed.
Pig. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;2. The same species—a leaved specimen with the shorter and broader variety of sheath-
portions. Apparently a branch.
Both specimens are from the Raniganj group, in the Raniganj field.
-ocr page 97-G-eol: Sur V of ïudia
LOWER GONDWA'NAS
j?''
'•'S;
Lï-th» ij-NilkautoDa
Printed at Ged' Survejr Office .
Eiff-
Fig.
1. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ScHizoNEUKA GONDWANENSis, Fstm., pages 59—64. Two specimens preserved in
the same position, as they are figured on the same slab of shale. One of them is probably the end portion of the stem, while the other one may represent anbsp;branch. The leaf portions contain numerous veins, hut do not exhibit the commissural lines; they show well their embracing character in the joints.
2. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;A smaller specimen of the same species with narrower sheath-portions, one of
them showing the beginning of the splitting at the apex.
These two specimens are from the Raniganj group, in the Raniganj field.
3. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ScHizoNEURA GONDWANENSIS, Fstm. A Small specimen with the sheath-portions
almost entirely dissolved into the single leaflets. Stalk pretty broad and ribbed.
This specimen is from the Mohpdni coal-field.
4. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ScHizoNEURA qondwaneNsis, Fstm., from the Bijori horizon (= Raniganj group)
near Baricondam, upper Denwa valley, Satpura basin.
Fig. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;1. ScHizoNEURA GONDWANENSis, Fstm.j pages 59 —64. A considerable specimen with
rather shortish sheath-portions.
Fig. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;2. The same species, the sheath-portions showing distinctly the veins of the leaflets
and the commissural lines of the same.
These two specimens are from the Raniganj group, Raniganj field.
Fig. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;3. ScHizONEURA GONDWANENSis, Fstm. Fragmentary specimen with considerably
broad sheath-portions, showing distinctly veins and commissural lines.
From the Raniganj group of the Jharia coal-field.
-ocr page 101-Fhl'i-A.
LitK^ i)y J o du, ISI atïi Dos.
Printed at Geol: Survey Office.
2.
3.
4.
5.
ScHizoNEURA GONDWANENSis, Fstin., pages 59—64, A leaved specimen, the lower portion of the stalk rather long, which makes me believe that this specimennbsp;represents the plant in the unbranched state.
The same species, with partly dissolved sheath-portions.
A stem with a branch originating from one of the internodes. The ribs of the stem in juxtaposition. The same character is exhibited also in the branch.nbsp;This specimen occurred on the same slab with ScMzonetira, and I have no doubtnbsp;that it is of this genus (page 63).
The same species with a broad sheath-portion and rather broad leaflets.
A sheath-portion, the broadest known to me at present, containing fourteen thick veins of as many leaflets, and showing also distinctly the commissural lines.
All specimens from the Raniganj group, in the Raniganj field.
PI: T^A.
ScHizONEURA GONDWANENSis, Fstm.j pages 59—64. Specimens with oval sheath-portions and exhibiting distinctly veins and commissural lines.
Fig.
The same species—specimen with a dissolved sheath-portion, the leaflets very broad; they are, however, not separated entirely till at the joint, but show that theynbsp;were joined to a common sheath. The stem of the specimen is rather broadnbsp;and ribbed.
All specimens from the Raniganj group of the Raniganj field.
-ocr page 105-Figs. 1 a amp; 5.
ScHizoNEUKA GONDWANENSis, Fstm., page 59. Two specimens, both preserved on the same slab of shale. Fig, ^ is a rather broad stem, showing two joints andnbsp;the internodes distinctly ribbed. In the two joints we see a number of freenbsp;leaflets with a marked midrib; these are certainly the dissolved sheath-portions.nbsp;To the right there is still a fragment of the sheath-portion not dissolved, showing veins and partly the commissural lines also. At the top of the figurenbsp;there are seen still other leaflets crossing those of the second joint; thesenbsp;belong to a next higher joint.
Fig. a is a stem broader than that of fig. b, but of the same nature, and we can safely refer it to the same species.
From the Mohpani coal-field.
Fig.
The same species—a specimen with sheath-portions partly quite dissolved, partly beginning to dissolve. The leaflets broad, the sheath-portion showing well thenbsp;commissural lines.
From the Eaniganj group in the Kaniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 107-Fig.
Fig.
Fier.
1. ScHizoxEURA GONDWANENSiSj Fstm., pages 59—64. Specimens with sheath-portions showing well the veins and commissural lines, and the beginning of a splitting at the tops of the leaflets.
The same species. A broad stem, with one joint, in which there is the sheath dissolved in the upper portion, but still joined below; veins and commissural linesnbsp;distinct.
3. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Same species—broad stem, with fragmentary sheath-portions.
4. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Stem of the (?) same species, resembling also Sc/iizoneura meriani, Schimp.
5. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Branches of ScMz. gondwanensis, Fstm., with dissolved sheath-portions.
All specimens from the Raniganj group of the Raniganj coal-field.
Figs.
1—6. ScHizoNETJEA GONDWANENSis^ Fstm. Stems (pages 63 amp; 64) of various sizes and various lengths of the internodes. From their association with ScUzoneura gond-wanensis, we have to consider them as belonging to that species. Figs. 5 and 6,nbsp;however (of which fig. 5 is the reverse impression to fig 4 on PI. VIII A), remindnbsp;one forcibly of ScMz. meriani. Schimp., but as already mentioned in the text, theirnbsp;association with ScMz. gondmanensis .made me hesitate to separate them.
From the Raniganj group, Raniganj field.
Fig.
7. A stem, with ribs and furrows in juxtaposition, as those of Schizoneura gondwmensis, Fstm., so that I consider it of this species.
From the Mohpani coal-field.
-ocr page 111-LOWER GONDWANAS.
P1.’
H'
Figs. 1—8. ScHizoNBUUA GONDWANENSis, Fstm., page 63. Several leaved specimens, apparently branches exhibiting well the veins of the leaflets composing the sheaths.
These specimens are from the Panchet group of the Raniganj coal-field, and do not differ in anything from the typical form of the Kaniganj group.
-ocr page 113-.rodu Doss.
PrintGci at Gsol: Si-u-v: Office
Fii
Teizygia sPEciosAj Rojle, pages 69—71. Specimens representing the forms both of the Raniganj and Barakar groups. At the first glance a slightnbsp;difference in size would appear to exist between, for instance, fig. 1 (Rani-ganj group) and fig. 2 (Barakar group); hut in fig. 9, which also is of thenbsp;Barakar group, the lower leaf whorls equal well those in the specimensnbsp;of the Raniganj group; and in the specimen from the Barakar group ofnbsp;the Bokaro coal-field (which is not figured here), and also in the specimens from the Barakar group of Auranga coal-field, the leaf whorls are asnbsp;large as in any specimen of the Raniganj group.
Figs. 1,8,4,5,7,8, specimens from the Raniganj group of the Raniganj coal-field; figs. 2, 9, from the Barakar group of the Talchir coal-fieldnbsp;(Gopalprasad). Fig. 6, half of a leaf-whorl enlarged (of fig. 5), to shownbsp;the veins.
-ocr page 115-Geo2: nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;of lïidia,.
PI -XI A
•;. '.w.x \
Printed at Geol. Suirv; Office .
Figs. 1 amp; i. Trizïgia speciosa, Royle, from the Raniganj (fig. 1) and Barakar groups (fig. 2). Figs, la and 2a, enlarged views of leaflets (pages 69—71).
Fiers. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;3—9.
Phyllotheca indica, Bunb., pages 65—68. Fragments of branchlets not very favorably preserved, but showing at least partly the sheaths and the reflexednbsp;leaflets.
From the Raniganj group, Raniganj field (fig. 6), and from the Kamthi group, Nagpur area (figs. 3—5, 7—9).
Figs. 10 amp; 11.
Vebtebrakia indica, Royle, pages 71—73. Fig. 10 appears to exhibit the surface with ribs and articulations (?). Fig. 11 is a more typical form, showing thenbsp;longitudinal section and a ramification.
Both specimens from the Raniganj group, Raniganj field.
-ocr page 117-G-eol'. Surv; of India.
lower GON-OWANAS
Al.
Printed, at the amp;e op. Survey Office
Lith.® iiy PiasitkLallBose.
Fiors.
Fis:.
Figs.
1^ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;4, 8. Vertebuaria indica, Royle, pages 71—73. Specimens from the Barakar group
(Kumerdhubi) in the Raniganj coal-field. Fig. 8 showing partly also the cross section.
3. Vertebkakia indica, Royle, somewhat resembling what Dana described as Claderia australis, which also is a Vertehraria.
From the Raniganj group, Raniganj field.
5 amp; 6. Vektebuaria indica, Royle. That form which was described by Sir Ch. Bun-bury from Nagpur.
From the Kamthi group, South Godavari area (Kunlacheru).
^ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;7. Equisetaceous stem (pages 63, 68). One of those specimens the nature of which
cannot be described with certainty, no leaved forms occurring with it to which it might be assigned; it may be of Sckizoneura or of Phyllotheca.
From the Barakar group, Raniganj coal-field (Kumerdhubi).
Greol'. Suxv'. of iTnaia.
lower gondwanas.
Printed at Greol-, Sui-'vey Ofüoa.
Figs.
1—4. Vektebkaeia INDICA, Royle, pages 71—73; Various conditions. Fig. 2, a branelied specimen showing, as it appears, the surface, with ribs and articulations.
From the Barakar group (figs. 1 and 4, Kumerdhubi), and Raniganj group (figs. 2, 3), Raniganj field.
Fig.
5. ScHizoNETjRA GONDWANENSis, Fstm., pages 59—64. Appears to represent a joint of a large specimen, with dissolved leaflets of the sheath, partly, however, stillnbsp;joined in the lower part.
From the Raniganj group in the Raniganj field.
-ocr page 121-Geo3: Siirv. o£ India .
lower öonüwana-s
Pigs. 1 amp; 2. Phtllothbca eobusta, n. sp., pages 68 and 69. Tlie only two specimens known; not very favourably preserved^ but yet showing the FliyUotheca nature. One of thenbsp;broad-leaved forms, a very closely related form of which is T^liyll. schtscJmrowski,nbsp;Schmalh., from the Siberian Jura.
With the specimen in fig. 3 there is also a leaf of Glossopterh communis, Fstm.
Fi
1 a. Represents two enlarged whorls.
From the Raniganj group (?), Dubrajpur, Gopieandar area, in the Rajmahal hills,
Fig.
3. Veutebeaeia indica, Royle—transverse section (page 72).
From the Sohagpur area, Kamthi (Raniganj) group.
-ocr page 123-Geol: Sutt; of India.
LOWER amp;0NEWANAS
Pl-XrV,A,'bis,
A,.. : \
¥il c antiO Das ,LltM
friTited at amp;eol'. Survey Office
Figs,
1—.9, Sphenopteeis polymoephAj Fstm., pages 76 and 77. Several specimens, showing pinnae from various parts of the frond. All exhibit distinctly the wingednbsp;rhachis.
It was the pinns of the upper part (figs. 2 and 4) which I compared with the similar parts of Sphenopteris alata, Bgt., from Australia (New South Wales).
From the Raniganj group of the Raniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 125-Figs. 1, 2, 4,
Cyathea comp, tschihatcheffi, Sehmalh., pages 75 and 76. These specimens were by me at first considered also as belonging to Sp/i. polymorpha, but after morenbsp;careful comparison they appeared more closely related to what Prof. Göppert des
cribed as
and Sph. imhricata, both of which Prof. Schmal-
Fig
3.
hausen joined under the above name^ under which I therefore also quote our Indian fern.
From the Barakar group of the Talchir coal-field.
Sphenoptekis polymorpha, Fstm., pages 76 and 77. Another specimen from the Baniganj group, Raniganj field.
Geol: S'ar'V'; of Inclia
pi-xn.A.
Fla'S.
1—É
Figs.
7, 7a.
SpHENOPTEBis ÏOLYMORPHA, Fstm., pages 76 and 77. Fig. 1 represents a frond with pinnulse at the top almost entire or only slightly lobed, while the lowernbsp;pinnulse become always more lobed and incised, and at last pinnate. Figs. 3 andnbsp;3 belong to still lower parts of the frond.
Pigs, la, 2a, and 6a enlarged leaflets to show the venation.
Prom the Eaniganj group in the Raniganj field.
An insect-wing-like leaf. See note at end of this paper. Will be described in the next fasciculus.
From the ironstone-shales at Kulti, Raniganj field.
Geol: Surv. of IncLis
LOWER GONDWA-NAS
PI. XYI -LU^.
77
PLORA OP THE T)AMTTT)A AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
again.
Dut at present I give also the drawing of one of the large specimens which shows the polymorphous nature of the pinnulse.
As for the diagnosis, I must refer to my original paper. I have nothing to add here to complete it, but some corrections are necessary.
I stated in my original paper that I thought Mc’Olelland’s JPecopteris affinis Q also belonged to Spli. polymorpha ; hut now having examined Mc’Clelland’s original /Tvnbsp;specimens, I find that one differs^ in the chief character from Spli. polymorpha, i.e.,nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;// z.
in not having the rhachis winged ; it is an Aletliopteris (see PI. XXIII^, fig. 11), nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;gt;
while the other one (McClell., 1. c., fig. llö) resembles somewhat my Sphenopteris polymorpha, though its rather indistinct state of preservation makes it difficult to ^nbsp;say whether it belongs to this species or whether it is distinct {Pecopt. affinis, \
Mc’Clell.) nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;^
I also compared Sph. polymorpha with Pecopteris alata, Bgt., from N. S.
Wales (Hawkeshury river), and I must refer to it again; I have to point out some confusion which arose about this species. In his paper on “ Sedimentary formations in New South Wales” published in “Mines and Mineral Statistics,” 1874,nbsp;p. 186, the Revd. Mr. Clarke correlated this Sph. alata with the carboniferous form,nbsp;known at first by the same name, and later as Sph. {Sym.) grandini. The matternbsp;stands, however, as follows :—
''i ^ -C
The Australian species was at first described as Pecopt. alata, Bgt., and was subsequently placed with Sphenopteris (as Sph. alata) by Sternberg, and is at presentnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;’ ' A
quoted as such.
The European carboniferous form to which Mr. Clarke referred was at first described as Sphenopteris alata, Bgt., and was later quoted by Goppert as Rymenophyl-lites grandini, and now by Schimper as Sphenopteris grandini, Gopp.
Now, both Morris and Mc’Coy, who mention Sphenopteris alata, mention it in Brongniart’s sense of Pecopteris alata, the Australian form, and not in the sensenbsp;of the original Sph. alata, or the present Sph. grandini of the carboniferous.
The latter (Brongt., hist, végét. foss., PI. XLYIII, fig. 4) is totally different from the Australian Sph. alata, Bgt. sp. (Brongniart, hist, végét. foss., PI. CXXVII,nbsp;p. 361), and it was with this latter that I have compared the upper portion of Inbsp;our Sph. polymorpha ; the lower pinnae appeared to me to resemble Sph. athyrioides,
Bgt. sp., from the oolite, with the exception, that in this form the rhachids are not winged.
Pange and distribution of Sph. palymorpha—
a. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Parakar group—
Although the specimen from the Talchir coal-field had to be separated from Sph. polymorpha, I yet think it also occurs in the Barakar group, i.e., on the Lumkinbsp;hill in the Karharbari field.
b, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Paniganj group—
Eaniganj (Raniganj field). Pis. X.YA, XYIA, fig. 3 ; PI. XYIA his, figs. 1—6.
1 Mc’Clelland, l.c., PI. Xtll, fig. 11,
A
-ocr page 132-78
ELOEA OE THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Genus: DICESONIA,' L’Herit.
Several species of this genus were described by Professor Heer,^ from the juras-sics of Eastern Siberia and the Amur countries. One species (the first one) was described by myself from the Eajmahal group in the Eajmahal hills,^ and recently^nbsp;other forms were classed by me with this genus. One species is also known fromnbsp;the lower portion of the Gondwana system.
Dicksonia hughesi,® sp. n. PI. XXIII^, figs. 1—3; 12, 13.
1877. Eeistmantel, Eeo. Geol. Survey of India, Vol. X, pt. 4, page 198; figs. 10-11.
Fronde hipinnata, pinnis suhalternantibus, prcelongis, subjlexuosis, angulo sub-recto ex rJiachide exeuntibus ; rhachide tinea percursa, pinnuUs, suboppositis, mem-branaceis, oblongis, inferiore in parte inciso-lobatis, superioribus lobatis an sublobatis-nervis teneribm, flexuosis, furcatis ramos, in lobos emmittentibus.
The two specimens figured here appear to represent the upper portion of the frond, from the fact that the pinnulse are more deeply lobed in the lower portionnbsp;(see fig. 1), while towards the upper portion the lobes become much shallower, andnbsp;in another specimen, of which only one pinnula is figured (see fig. 3), the pinnulsenbsp;are still less lobed. The rhachis of the frond is traversed by a middle line; thenbsp;pinnee are elongate and subalternately inserted, somewhat fiexuose.
The pinnulse are nearly opposite and membranaceous. The lobation of the pinnulse was already mentioned above. The veins are thin and somewhat fiexuose,nbsp;branched, each of the lobes reeeiving separate hranchlets.
Eigs. la and 2a illustrate the character of the venation.
Eig. 3 is an enlarged leaflet of another specimen with little lobed or almost entire pinnulse, but the venation and the habitus of the plant is identical with thatnbsp;of the others.
The forms to which our plant is related are Dicksonia concinna. Heer, and Dicksonia saportana, Heer, the former of which was described from the jurassics in Eastern Siberia and the Amur countries, the other from the latter locality.
There are two other small figures (12, 13) on Plate XXIII^, which are fragments only, but which from the form of the leaflets and the character of thenbsp;veins apparently belong to the above species also.
' From a proper name.
^ Flora fossilis arctica, Vol. IV.
Gondwana Flora, Vol. I, pp. 76, 77.
‘ Gondwana Flora, Vol. II, preface, p. XIII; Eec. Geol. Survey of India, Vol. XIV, pt. 1, p. 149.
* Mr. Th. Hughes of the Geol. Survey of India.
-ocr page 133-79
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Locality and horizon.—
Raniganj grmp :—Jharia coal-field, PI. XXIII.4, figs. 1—3.
Jtiijori horizon:—Baricoadam, south of Pachmari in the Satpura basin, PI. XXIII.4, figs. 12, 13.
Order: FOLYPODIACE^.
a. Group of ASPLENIUM WHITBYENSE, Heer (Alethopteris whitbyensis,
Professor Heer’ and Professor Schimper’’ have in their recent publications sufficiently explained why a certain group of ferns of the mesozoic period formerly classed with Alethopteris have rather to be placed with Asplenium, Lin. The typenbsp;of this group is Asplenium {Alethopteris) whitbyense which, at first described fromnbsp;Yorkshire, was subsequently also found in Southern Russia, Persia, Siberia, thenbsp;Amur countries, and Japan.
I have described it from the Kach-Jabalpdr group, also from the Sripermatur (Vemaveram) group, and there is hardly any doubt that Alethopteris indica, Oldh.nbsp;and Morr., from the Jabalpur, Sripermatur, and Rajmahal beds belongs to thisnbsp;species. Both Professor Heer and Schimper include Alethopteris indica in Asplenium whitbyense.
The same species is also known from the Damuda series. There is a fossil fern in i^ustralia, which also has to be included here, Alethopteris australis, Morr. Ofnbsp;this it is necessary to state that it has never been found in the New Castle beds (upper coal-measures), but only in the upper beds (jurassic) in the Jerusalem basin ofnbsp;Tasmania, and in the Bellarine beds (upper mesozoic) of Victoria, and also in mesozoic beds on the Clarence river in New South Wales. The best figure of thisnbsp;species is in Mc’Coy’s Prodrome of the Palaeontology of Victoria, Decade II, PI. 14,nbsp;and that form resembles most strikingly Alethopteris indica.
In my short paper on the Flora of Eastern Australia, in the Geological Magazine (1879), I have explained on page 492 why the beds of the Jerusalem basin innbsp;Tasmania have to be considered on about the same horizon as the Bellarine beds,nbsp;Victoria, the mesozoic beds on the Clarence river. New South Wales, and the uppernbsp;beds in Queensland, and I refer the reader to that passage.
Asplenium whitbyense. Heer. Pis. XIX.A, figs. 2, 2a; XL^, figs. 2, 3.
1876. Heer : Juraflora Ost-Sibiriens und des Amurlandes, pp. 36—40. (Flora fossilis arctica, Vol. IV.)
1876. Alethoptciris—Feistmantel, Raniganj flora, Jour. As. Soc. Bengal, Vol. XLV, p. 862, PI. XXI, fig- 6.
{Alethopteris wcficaj^ldh. and Morr., 'd.vA^Jdethopteris australis, Morr., have also to be included here.)nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;____
• Flora fossilis, arctica. Vol. IV. ^
2 Handbuch der Palseontologie, Zittel and Scbimper, IT Bd. 1 Lief. p. 97 et sequ, 1879.
-ocr page 134-80
FLOE A OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
In my Eaniganj flora {1. c.) I have figured a fragment of a pinna of a fern, whieh I could not identify otherwise hut with the above species. I give the samenbsp;figure here again. There are, however, in the present paper two additional figuresnbsp;on PI. XLj[, which, although the venation is obliterated, yet to judge from thenbsp;character of the leaflets, have also to be included in this species; fig. 2 is uncommonly like some specimens of Alethopt, indica, 0. and M., from the Eajmahalnbsp;group of Golapily near Bllore, South Godavari district.
We have as yet no fructificating specimens of this species.
Locality.—Raniganj group, near Eaniganj, in the Eaniganj coal-field (PI. XIX^, figs. 2, 2a), and of the Jharia coal-field (PI. XL^, figs. 2, 3).
, n nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Type: POLYPODIUM, Linn.
AiBTHOPïEais- LiNDLEYANA, Eoyle. Pls. XVIII^, figs. 2, 2a; XIX^I, figs. 3, 4;
XXIII.4, fig. ll^XIX^, figs. 10, 11.
1839. Pecopteris, Royle, 111. Bot., etc., Him. Mts. tab. 2, fig. 4.
1849-6U. McClelland, Rep. Geol. Survey of India, PL XIII, fig. 10, a. b. c.
1849-50. McClelland, ibid, PI. XIII. fig. 11.
1869. Scbimper, Trait, Pal. végét.. Vol. I, p. 568.
1876. Peistmantel; with group of AletJiopteris whitbyemis, Jour. As. Soc. Beng., Vol, XLV, p. 360, PI. X:^ fig. 7.
A diagnosis of this species was given by me in my paper in the Journal Asiatic Society Bengal (see above). When I wrote that paper Professor Heer’s work onnbsp;the Juraflora of Eastern Siberia and the Amur countries was not published, so thatnbsp;I had no information yet about the ^s|?fea^^lt;m-nature of Alethopteris whitbyensis,nbsp;and I therefore included Alethopt, lindleyana also with the “ group of Al. wMt-hyensisy There are two fertile fronds, one of which I have already figured in thenbsp;paper referred to, assigning it to Alethopt. lindleyana. The fructification is, however, as already mentioned there {1. c. p. 361), like that of Lolypodium, while innbsp;Alethopt. whitbyensis it is like that of an Asplenium.
Alethopteris lindleyana, Eoyle, cannot therefore he included with the group of Aleth. whitbyensis, Göpp., and with regard to the fructificating specimens, whichnbsp;I believe belong to it, I include it under Polypodiwm, Lin.
Unfortunately most of the specimens supposed to be Alethopt. lindleyana, Eoyle, are not very well preserved. Mc’CleUand’s figures {1. c.) are of no use whatever, the venation being entirely wrong ; and I only refer to. his report, as he gavenbsp;some kind of a diagnosis of this species. Eoyle’s {1. c.) original figure is muchnbsp;truer to nature, although the venation is also somewhat misdrawn; but there is annbsp;apparent identity between Eoyle’s figure and that given by me on PI. XIX.^4, fig. 4,nbsp;regarding the form of the leaflets.
I give figures of sterile fronds of this species; they remind very much of Asplenium whitbyense and Alethopteris ^Asplenium) indica j but the two fertile
X/
-ocr page 135-81
FLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
specimens, figured on PL XIX^ (fioS. 3, 4), which, must be taken to represent the fructification of our species, show that both Schimper and myself were wrong innbsp;classing Aleth. lindleyana with the group of Aleth. whitbyensis, which is now annbsp;Asplenium. The broad relation of both however still remains, as Asplenium alsonbsp;belongs to the order Folypodiacece.
The venation is shown on PI. XXIIIA!, fig. lla. (This is one of McClelland’s specimens of Pecopt. affinis, 1. c., PI. XIII, fig. 11.) Together with the fructi-ficating frond (fig. 4, PI. XIX ^), there is on the same specimen a sterile pinna,nbsp;showing also pretty well the venation; I gave a figure of it on PI. XVIII^, fig. 2.nbsp;If it would not he more natural to suppose that both belong to the same species,nbsp;I would certainly have to refer this latter to Asplenium whitbyense. Heer. I repeatnbsp;the diagnosis from my paper on some Eaniganj plants {1. c.):—
“ Fronde bipinnata; pinnis patentibus, rhachide crassiuscula ; pinnwlis tota hasi sessilibus, attingentibus, oblonge-ovalibus, margine integris an sinuatis nervonbsp;medio tenero, usque ad apicem excurrente, exquo nervis secundariis sub angulonbsp;subacuto eggredientibus, dicliotomiis; soris nervulis insidentibus—fructificationenbsp;Polypodii.
To show that I was then well aware of the Polypodium-\^Q fructification, I quote the following passage {1. c., p. 361) :—
“ From the manner of fructification and from the shape of the leaflets we could perhaps trace an analogy between our species and some forms of the genus
Polypodium, ......etc.,” enumerating several forms, with the fructification of which
our specimens show some relation.
Locality : Baniganj group.—Eaniganj coal-field, Eaniganj. (PI. XVIII^ 2, XIX^, figs. 3, 4; XXIII^ 11, 11a; XXXIX.4, figs. 10, 11.
Alethoptesis, sp.
Amongst the specimens from the Kamthis of Kunlacheru, in the South Godd-vari district, there is a pinna of apparently an Alethopteroid plant, but the veins are not sufiiciently well preserved, so that I cannot decide whether it is more related tonbsp;Asplenium whitbyense, Heer, or Alethopteris lindleyana, Eoyle.
c. Type: PHEGOPTEEIS, Mett. (Lastraea, Presl.)
Alethoptebis peegopteboides, Feistm. PI. 'EN111A, fig. 1, la, lö.
1876. Baniganj plants. Jour. As. Soc. Bengal, Vol. XLV, pp. 362-364, PI. XVIII.
This fine fern has been already described by me in the above paper; I could then figure only a portion of one frond; at Ipresent I figure the entire specimen.
It represents two fronds, and from the thickness of the rhachis in the larger one (left hand), and from the length of the pinnse at the end where the frond is broken
1/'
-ocr page 136-82
away, we can judge that this frond represents hardly the half of the whole size, and we may safely consider this to have been at least 2^ feet.
From the manner of venation and from the arrangement of the leaflets I have compared our frond with certain species of the living Phegopteris, which also belongsnbsp;to the order Polgpodiacece, family Aspidiece, and I allow this classification tonbsp;remain, although there is no fructification known of this fern.
The closest living relation is Phegopteris deciissata, Mett.; amongst fossil plants Pecopteris {Lepidopteris) stuttgardensis, Bgt., is closest.
The diagnosis given by me was as follows;—
Fronde valida, bipinnata ; rhachide crassa, punctulata}, pinnis sub angulo sub-recto e rhacMde eggredientibus, earumque rhachide crassiuscula; pinnis mediis longissimis basin apicemque versus attenuantibm; pinnulis oblongis incurvatisnbsp;contiguis, oblique insertis, primis solum verticaliter adfixis, pauloque latioribus,nbsp;ommibus ad bases connatis, nervo primario pinnularum distincto ad apicem promote ;nbsp;nervis secundariis singulis sub angulo acuto eggredientibus. Habilu Phegopteridis-fructijicatione adhuc non obvia.
This is the largest species of lower Gondwana plants known.
Locality : Paniganj group.—Eaniganj, Raniganj coal-field. (PI. XVIII^, fig. 1, \a, lb.)
V/
PEOOPTERIDEA] INCEETA) SEDIS.
There are some other species which, although belonging to the division Pecop-teridece, do not show any distinct afidnity to living forms.
Pecopteris conciena, Presl. PI. XVII^, figs. 1—6.
1838. Presl. in Sternberg, PL d. Vorw. II, p. 149, Tab. XLI, fig. .3.
1869. Schimper, Trait, d. Pal. veg., Vol. I, pp. 534-535.
1863. Oldham, in Mem, Geol. Surv. India, Vol. Ill, p. 205.
1876. Peistmantel, Eec. Geol. Surv. India, Vol. IX, p. 66.
Fronde bipinnata, pinnis breviusculis, sub angulo subrecto eggredentibus, rhachide crassiuscula ; pinnulis alternis, ovatis, obtusis, contiguis, integris, tenerrimis ; nervisnbsp;secundariis numerosis, ex nervo primario dichotomis.
The existence of this fern amongst the Indian fossil plants was already correctly recognised by the late Dr. Oldham {1. c.) The figures given at present distinctlynbsp;show their identity with the original figure in Sternberg’s work.
It appears to me, however, that the frond was only hipinnate, and not also tripinnafe, as is said in Schimper’s diagnosis {1. c.) ; my diagnosis is according tonbsp;this character.
* This character was, I regret to say, omitted by the lithographer; it is shown in my first figure (I- c.).
-ocr page 137-83
FLORA OF THE HAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
In Europe this species was at first quoted from the Keuper (Hoefen near Bamberg), but it was subsequently shown that the formation at this locality is Rhaetic.
Locality and horizon.—In India this species is known only at one locality, i.e., in the Panchet rocks, south of Maitdr, in the north-west branch of the Nunianbsp;river, north-west of Assensole, Raniganj coal-field. It appears to be the mostnbsp;numerous species amongst the Panchet-plants of that coal-field. ’
Genus: MERIANOPTERIS, Heer.
1877. Heer, Flora Fossilis Helveti®, p. 88.
Fronde sterili tripinnata, speciosa, pinnis secundariis elongatis, segmentis {vel pinnulis) nervo medio arcuato, nereis secundariis dichotomis, injimis in arcum ana-stomosatis (Heer, 1. c.).
This diagnosis of Professor Heer’s genus is completely applicable to some specimens of ferns figured by me on PL XIKA, figs. 9-11, especially as regards thenbsp;venation. Professor Heer described one species as Merian. angusta, but most probably Pecopt. rütimeyeri. Hr., also belongs to this genus. Our specimens, however^nbsp;indicate a by far larger species, and there are also some other characters which shownbsp;that the Indian form has to be considered as a distinct one.
1/
Both Merian. angusta and Pecopt. rütimeyeri are from the Keuper of Switzerland (near Basel). I propose to describe the Indian species as—
Mbrianopteris major, n. sp. PI. XIX^, figs. 9-11.
Fronde magna, tripinnata, pinnis secundariis elongato-latiusculis, apicevn versus parum angustatis, pinnati-sectis vel pinnati-jidis, pinnulis vel lobis apice rotundatis,nbsp;tenerrimis, nervo medio distincto, incurvato ; nervls secundariis duobus imis ex partenbsp;inferiore nervi mediani eggredientibus, dichotomis, in arcum acutissimum connatis ;nbsp;ceteris superiorem partem pinnules versus ex nervo mediano angulo acutissimo eggredientibus dichotomis jlexuosis.—(Feistmantel.)
\y
From our specimens representing portions of pinnae we can judge of a very large-sized form, hut at the same time of a very thin-leaved one, as can be seennbsp;from the state of preservation. The pinnae are rather broad, decreasing onlynbsp;slightly in breadth towards the apex. They are either pinnate or lobed. Thenbsp;pinnulae (respectively lobes) are obtusely rounded. The middle vein is distinct,nbsp;somewhat curved towards the apex; of the secondary veins, the two lowest pass outnbsp;from the lower portion of the middle vein, are dichotomous and join with the samenbsp;of the adjoining leaflets in a pointed arch, while the others are placed more towardsnbsp;the upper portion of the leaflet, pass out at a very acute angle from the middle veinnbsp;and are also dichotomous, somewhat flexuose.
-ocr page 138-84 FLOEA OF THE HAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Locality.—Eaniganj group, in the Eaniganj field.
The relations have heen pointed to above.
Order: NLUBOLTUBILB^.
Genus: NEUEOPTEEIDIUM, Sehimp.
1879. Zittel and Schimper : Handbucli der Paleontologie; II Bd., pp. 116-117.
Beuropteris fronde simplicUer pinnata.—Single pinnate Neuropteris.
The only species of this genus was already described in my Talchir-Karhar-hari Flora as Neuropt. validum, being from the Karharbari beds of the Karharbari coal-field.
Genus: CYCLOPTEEIS, Bgt.
With this type two fossil plants are placed, which are of a more or less doubtful character, but which at the same time cannot be better placed otherwise.
Cycloptbris pachtrohachis, Göpp., PI. XVII^, fig. 7.
1836. Goppert, Gattunge loss. Pflanzen, Nos. 5, 6, p. 94, pis. 4, 5, figs. 13, 14.
1850. Unger, gen. et species plant fossilium, p. 100.
1869. Neuropteris pachyrhachis, Schimp., Tr. Pal. veg., Vol. I, p. 450.
1874. Pecopteris, Schimper, ibid., Vol. Ill, p. 476.
1876. Peistmantel, R. G. S. I., Vol. IX, p. 66.
Fronde hipinnata, pinnis approximatis aeque distantibus, rhachide crassa, pinnulis cuneatis trapezoideis an abovato-cuneatis, brevissime petiolatis nereisnbsp;numerosis, Jlabellato dichotomis.
From the fact that the veins of the pinnulse do not show a distinct midrib, but radiate into the leaf, the placing of this form with Gyclopteris seems morenbsp;appropriate than with Neuropteris or Pecopteris, as was done by Prof. Schimper.
This species was found in Europe in the same beds from which Pecopteris concinna also was procured. And here we must notice the fact that in India itnbsp;also lies together with Pecopteris concinna in the same rocks.
Locality and horizon.—Panchet group, south of Maitur, north-west branch of Nunia river, Eaniganj coal-field.
Insect-wing-like Leaf. PI. XVO, figs. 7, *la.
I am sorry that I have to introduce a specimen figured on PI. XVI^. (fig. 7) with the above name only. When I first saw the specimen I was struck with itsnbsp;peculiar appearance, and I thought it might be a fragment of a wing of some large
-ocr page 139-85
FLOEA OF THE HAMHDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
insect; in this the transverse thin veins (?) between the thicker ones appeared corroborative. Not venturing to trespass into the Department of Entomologynbsp;independently, I consulted Mr. Wood-Mason,^ who expressed a firm opinion thatnbsp;the said specimen had nothing whatever to do with an insect of any kind ; so I hadnbsp;to assign it a place amongst the fossil plants, and as it is from the Ironshales ofnbsp;the Damuda division, in which fossils are altogether not very numerous, I thoughtnbsp;it worthy of being figured, in spite its very indefinite relations.
Fig. 7 on PI. XVI^ shows the fossil is natural size; fig. 7a is double the size.
It is rather difiicult to ascertain whether the' thin transverse lines are veins also, or only accidentally produced by bursting.
There is no plant known to me with which this fossil might be identified or compared.
Locality.—Ironstone shales, near Kulti, Eaniganj coal-field.
Genus: THINNFELDIA, Ettingh.
1852. Ettingshausen, Abb. d. k. k. Geolog. Eeicbsanstalt, Vol. I.
Thinneeldia, comp, odontopteeoides, Morr. sp. (Fstm.), PI. XXIII^., figs. 7-9.
1846. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Peropteris odontopteroides, Morris, in Strzeleoki Physical Desoript. of N. S. Wales and V. Diemens
Land, p. 429, PI. VI, figs. 2-4.
1847. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Gleicbenites odontopteroides, Mc’Coy, A. and M., Nat. Hist., Vol. XX, 2d. Ser., p. 147.
1860. Idem, Unger, Genera and species plant, fossilum, p. 208.
1869. Cycadopteris (?) odontopteroides, Sebimper, Trait, de Paleont. végétale, Vol. I, p. 488.
1869. Alethopteris (?) odontopteroides, Sebimper, ibid, p. 569.
1872. Pecopteris odontopteroides, Carruthers, Qu. J. G. S., London, Vol. XXVIII, p. 355, Tab. 27, figs.
2. 3.
1875. Odontopteris, Crépin, Bull, de I’Acad. Eoyle de Belgique, 1875, Vol. XXXIX, 2 Serie, pp. 258-
263, figs. 1-5.
1877. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Thinnfeldia morrisi, Peistmantel, N. J. Mineral, etc., 1877, p. 179.
1878. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Pecopteris odontopteroides, Etheridge (E.), Catalogue of Australian fossils, p. 98.
1878-79, Thinnfeldia odontopteroides, Peistmantel, Plora des oestl. Australiens, Palseontographica,
Supplement III. Lief III, pp. 105, 165.
1878. Cycadopteris, M. Zeiller in Guide du Geologue a I’Exposition Universelle (Paris) de 1878, etc.
1880. Thinnfeldia crassinervis. Gein., and Pecopteris odontopteroides, Morr., probably identical A. G.
Nathorst in Ofvers. of Kongl. Vet. Akad. Stolkholm, Pörhandl. 1880. No. 5 (Eeview in botan.
Centralblatt, No. II, page 328,1881).
I think I have identified this peculiar fossil also amongst the Lower Gond-wana plants; the figures are on Plate XXIII^.; some others will be given in a subsequent memoir. Since its establishment this species has undergone numerousnbsp;transmigrations from one genus into another, its proper place not being finallynbsp;settled yet.
‘ Deputy Superinteudent, Indian Museum.
i
-ocr page 140-86
FLOEA OE THE DAMUHA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
It was first found by Count Strzeleckiin Tasmania, on Springshül, in the Jerusalem basin, and was described, 1875, by Prof. Morris by the name of JPecopteris odontopteroides.
The diagnosis was the following :—
“ The frond pinnatifidely bipinnate or flabellate ; pinnse linear, elongate acuminate ; pinnulse opposite, approximate, adnate, ovate, obtuse, entire; veins nearly obliterate.”
Of the systematical position Prof. Morris was not certain.
Subsequently Prof. Me’Coy assigned it to another genus ; the dichotomy of the leaf reminded him of Gleichenia; thus we find it placed with Gleichenites.
Schimper in his Paléontologie végétale quotes this species in the same volume (I) with two difPerent genera, once with Gycadopteris (p. 488), and a second timenbsp;with Alethopteris (p. 669); and what is more remarkable, a difi'erent diagnosis isnbsp;given for each, although with the same reference (to Strzelecki’s work).
Next we find this species described and figured in Mr. Carruthers’ paper on Queensland plants in Mr. Daintree’s “ Geology of Queensland.” He again quotesnbsp;it as Fecopteris; his specimens were smaller than those figured by Prof. Morris,nbsp;yet Mr. Carruthers thought them to be identical. His diagnosis was thenbsp;following:—
“ Erond with a very short and thick stipes, dichotomously divided; the simple portion at the base of the frond as well as each branch pinnatifid ; the segmentsnbsp;more or less opposite, quadrate ovate, with the apex obliquely truncate, connatenbsp;at the base; one vein passing into the centre of the segment and repeatedly dichotomous, several lateral veins, simple or dichotomous, passing direct from the rhachisnbsp;into the upper and under portions of the segment.”
Mr. Carruthers did not think it probable that this fern is a Gleichenites.
A quite different place was assigned to it by Mr. E. Crépin, who received a collection of plants from Tasmania, and amongst them Fecopteris odontopteroides,nbsp;which he places with Odontopteris and compares it with Odontopteris alpina. Gein.,nbsp;no doubt on the assumption that the specimens came from carboniferous rocks.nbsp;But this is easily disproved. On the same specimens of shale, with this Pecopterisnbsp;odontopteroides, there was another fern, the Sphenopteris elongata, Carr.; annbsp;association, of forms, just like that described by Mr. Carruthers from the carbonaceous (jurassic) rocks of Queensland, which only shows that both these rock-groupsnbsp;are of the same age.
When Prof. Geinitz sent me (1876) his paper on the rhsetio plants of the Argentine Eepublic (Cassel, 1876), I was at once struck with the similarity ofnbsp;his Thinnfeldia crassinervis with Fecopteris odontopteroides, and quite recently Inbsp;find the same view expressed by Mr. Nathorst (/.c.), who even thinks that both thesenbsp;plants are identical, after having seen the specimens from Queensland, which werenbsp;described by Mr, Carruthers.
-ocr page 141-87
flora of the damuda and panohet divisions.
I have myself had an opportunity of examining several specimens from various localities in Australia, and although sometimes differing in appearance, yet from allnbsp;the other characters they have, I think, to he considered identical. Consideringnbsp;the differences they present from Odontopteris, Ctenopteris, and Fachypteris, itnbsp;appeared to me best to place this fossil with TMnnfeldia, and I described it asnbsp;Thinnfeldia odontopteroides (l.c.).
The distribution of this fern is in Australia the following (in descending order):—¦
Lpper Mesozoic .
Lower Mesozoic
a. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Carbonaceous beds in Queensland at Ipswich (Tivoli Mines).
b. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Jerusalem basin, Tasmania.
a. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Wianamatta beds, N. S. Wales, at Clark’s hill near Cobbitee.
b. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Hawkesbury beds, Mount Victoria, N. S. Wales.
The diagnosis which I have given in my Austrialian Flora (p. 167) is a very full one, as based upon numerous, partly well preserved, specimens from Australia.
Although the specimens from our Lower Gondwdnas, figured in the present paper (see above), represent pinnse only, yet there is, I think, little doubt thatnbsp;they belong to this species; their character agrees well with that given innbsp;Mr. Carruthers’ diagnosis quoted above, to which I now refer. The leaflets arenbsp;opposite, obtusely obovate, contiguous, the veins show the distribution peculiarnbsp;to the species.
As already mentioned, I shall in a subsequent paper figure other specimens, apparently of the same species, with distinct dichotomy of the frond.
Locality.—The specimens figured at present are from the Ramkola coal-field, from a horizon which stratigraphically appears to represent the Panchet group.nbsp;It occurred at two localities in the Ledho nala and at Karamdiha.^ Associated withnbsp;it were species of Glossopteris; one specimen of these is figured on PI. XXIIInbsp;fig. 10. I take it to represent Gl. indica, Bgt, The other specimens mentioned abovenbsp;are from Parsora, uear Beli, in South Rewah, from rocks which Mr. Th. Hughes hasnbsp;classed as Mahadevas, and I follow his view.
The only European form I can compare with this species is Thinnfeldia rotundata, Nath., from Bjuf in Sweden.®
Order: T.^NIOFTEBIIgt;E^,
The order Tccniopteridece, which is so largely represented in the upper portion of the Gondwana system, especially in the Rajmahal group, has also its good representatives in the Damuda series, and is not absent in the Panchet rocks ; in the for-
1 See Feistmantel, R. G. S. I., Vol. XIII, pp. 68-69; Griesbaoh, M. G. S. I., Vol. XY, pt. 2, p. 44. Also pp. 36 and 38 of this paper.
? Om Floran Skanes kolförande Bildningar I. Flora of Bjuf, 1878, pp. 49-50, Tab. I, figs. 9-12.
1/
-ocr page 142-88
FLORA OF THE HAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
mer it is the very same genus {MacrolcBniopteris) so numerous in the Rajmahal group, which is well represented.
There are, however, three other genera.
Genus: MACROT^NIOPTERIS, Schimper.
1869. Trait, d. Pal. végét., Vol. I., p. 610.
1879. Zittel and Schimper, Handbuch der Palaeontologie, Vol. II., No. 1, p. 133.
Frondibus simplicibus, speciosissimis, ut videtur, membranaceis ; nervis numero-sis, sub angulo acuto ex rhachide eggredientihus, subito subhorizontaliter marginem versus continuantihus, simplicibus an furcatis.
There are two species of this genus in the Damuda series.
Maceot^niopteris DAN.a;oiDES, Royle sp. (Feistm.), PI. 'KX.A., XXI4., figs. 1-2.
1839. GloBSopteris danseoides, Eoyle, Illustr. Bot., etc., Himal. Mts., Tab. 2.
1849-50. Taeniopteris, Mc’Clelland, R. G. S. I., PI. XV, fig. 1.
1876. Taeniopteris, Feistmantel, R. G. S. I., Vol. IX, pt. 3, p. 74.
1876. Macrotseniopteris, ibid., IX., pt. 4, p. 137.
1876. Macrotseniopteris, Feistmantel, J. A. S. B., Vol. XLV, p. 365, Pis. XIX, figs. 1, 2, amp; XXI, fig. 1.
Fronde speciosa, oblonge-ovata, apice obluse-actminata, distincte pedicellata, membranacea an subcoriacea ; rhachide mediocri an crassiuscula ; nervis secundariisnbsp;imprimum sub angulo acuto ex rhachide eggredientihus subito subhorizontalibus,nbsp;numerosissimis dichotomic, usque ad 1*5 mm. distantibus, marginem versus paululonbsp;sursum ineurvatis, crassiusculis.
This species is distinguished from the other, to be mentioned hereafter, by its very distant veins, and this distance of the veins is here indeed greater thannbsp;in any other species I am acquainted with.
Royle {1. c.) at first figured it with the name of Glossopteris ; hut considering the very distinct characters of Tceniopteris and Glossopteris, which were then alreadynbsp;established, I am almost led to think that the above denomination happened bynbsp;mistake. Royle’s figure resembles very much my fig. 3, on Plate XX^., whichnbsp;represents the basal portion.
Of forms related with our species I have to name first the rhsetic Macrotceniop-teris gigantea, Schenk sp.,^ in which the character of the veins mostly approaches that in our species, although in this latter they are stül further distant, and thenbsp;leaves appear somewhat smaller. Next comes Macrotceniopteris lata, Oldh. amp; Morr.,nbsp;from the Rajmahal group, especially that form which was distinguished as T.nbsp;muslt;xfolia?
* Scbenk Flora der Grenzschicbten, 1867, PI. XXVIII, fig. 12.
’ Rajmahal flora, in Gondwana flora, Vol. I, PI. IV, fig. 1.
-ocr page 143-89
FLOKA OF THE DAMTJDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
As a somewhat related form, specially as regards the size, we can also consider the Australian Macrotmniopteris wianamattce, Feistm., which I figured in my Australiannbsp;Flora, hut of which another figure is given by Mr. C. S. Wilkinson in the Annnalnbsp;Report of the Department of Mines, N. S. Wales, for 1879 (1880), PL V (page 215);nbsp;hut in this the veins are already rather close.
Yet another species might be taken into consideration, i.e., Macrotceniopteris major. Schimp. (Lindl. amp; Hutt. sp.). In this the veins are pretty distant, butnbsp;the leaf is much narrower. I do not, however, see any reason why this latternbsp;species should he considered to be the undivided leaves of Anomozamites lindleyanusnbsp;as recently stated by Mr. Nathorst.’^
The distribution of our species is the following:—
a. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Ma,niganj {KdmtJii) group :—
Near Eaniganj, Raniganj coalfield (PL X.XA, figs. 1-3).
In the Jharia coalfield (PL XXI^I, fig. 1).
In the Kamthi horizon near Nagpur.
b. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Bardkar group :—
Near Burgo, in the Bajmahal hills (PL XXI4, fig. 2).
Macrot^niopteris eeddeni, Fstm., PI. XXI.4, fig. 3, amp; PI. XXII.4, figs. 1-4.
1876. Feistmantel, E. G. S. I., Vol. IX, p. 137.
Fronde simplici, speciosissima usque ad .20 cm. lata, elongate-elliptica, apice ohtusa, quandoque emarginata, plerumque lacerata subcoriacea; costa crassiuscula,nbsp;depressa, striata ; nerris secundariis numerosissimis, maxime approximatis ; in partenbsp;inferiore frondis subhorizontalibus, apicem versus suhobloquis, marginem versus sur-sum incurvatis, simplicibus furcatisque altemantihus, furcatione, utvidetur simplici.
This species is dedicated to Mr. Fedden of the Geological Survey, who collected the best specimens (PI. XXI.4, fig. 3; PI. XXII^, figs. 1, 3, 4) near Kamthi.
It is an equally large or even larger form than the previous species. The midrib is proportionally thinner, striated; the secondary veins are the chief characternbsp;of the species; they are very closely set, dichotomous ; almost horizontal in the lowernbsp;portion of the leaves, becoming more oblique towards the apex; but in both casesnbsp;the veins are somewhat turned upwards near the margin.
The figures on PL XXII.4, although portions of different leaves, are so placed as to show the position they probably occupied in the respective entire leaves;nbsp;fig. 2 represents an apical portion, fig. 3 a middle portion, and fig. 4 a basal portion of the leaf. Fig. 3 on PL XXI-4 also represents an apical portion.
* See Botan. Centralblatt, 1881, p. 330.
V
-ocr page 144-90
FLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
During a late visit to the Auranga coalfield (Lohardagga) I collected amongst other interesting fossils a more complete leaf of this species; the portion, as farnbsp;preserved, measures 10-inch, in length and 5|-inch. in breadth; the top can easilynbsp;he restored to a length of 2 inch, more, while the lower portion would have to be stillnbsp;about 3 or 4 inches longer, if complete. I shall figure it in a subsequent paper.
The only form related to our species is Macrotceniopteris abnormis, Gutb.; hut in this species the veins appear to me still closer set and the rhachis much thicker.
Localities and distribution:
a. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Bardkar group.—Auranga coalfield, Lahardagga, Sukri river, west of Gurturnbsp;(east of Eajbar) ; to be drawn hereafter.
b. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Kdmtlii (Raniganj) group.—Kamthi near Nagpur, C. P. (the figured specimens) ; on the Son, west of Guraru, south Eewah hasm (collected by Mr. Hacket).
With regard to these two species and the forms related to them, we can establish the following sequence of species :—
J\1 acrotmniopteris danaordes, Eoyle. With the most distant veins, nearly straight.
Macrot. gigantea, Schenk. Leaves larger.
Macrot. lata and wMsafolia, O. M. From the Rajmahal group, Rajmahal hills.
Macrot. wianamattm, Fstm. From the Wianamatta recks, Australia.
Macrot. feddeni, Feistm. Veins very close, slightly curved up towards the margins.
Macrot. abnormis, Gutb., permian. With the closest veins, straight.
Type: VITTAEIA, Swartz.
Genus: PALfiEOVITTAEIA,' Fstm.
1876. reistiuantel, J. A. S. Bengal, Vol. XLV, p. 368.
1879. Sehiniper, in Handbuch der Palseontologie, by Zittel and Sebimper, Vol. II, pt. 1, p. 133.
With this name I introduced an interesting fern in my paper on some Eaniganj plants (1. c.), and I have to quote it again with the same name, as no other genusnbsp;has come to my notice with which it might be better placed. Prof. Sebimper hasnbsp;also introduced it iuto his Palseobotany, and although remarking that in the fossilnbsp;plant the secondary veins do not form anastomoses with an intramarginal vein,nbsp;which in fructificating specimens bears the sori, he did not suggest any other formnbsp;with which it might he more correctly placed.
Only one species has hitherto been found, which I have dedicated to the late Dr. Kurz (then Curator, Botanical Gardens, Calcutta).
* Palaios (Gr.) = old ; vittarix — a living fern.
x
-ocr page 145-91
FLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Pal^ovittaria kurzi, Ftsm., PI. XLIV^.
1876. Feistmantel 1. c., pp. 368-369, PL XIX, figs. 3-4.
Frondibus aggregatis, simplicibus, oblongato-ovato-spathulatis, margine integris, nonnunquam apice excisis ; nervo medio (costa) inferiore in parte crassiore, dimidiamnbsp;partem versus evanescente ; nervis secimdariis snb angulo acutissimo ex rhaohidenbsp;exeuntibus, in parte apicali radiantibus, simplicibus et furcatis, marginem versusnbsp;incurvaiis, inferiore precedetem ea in parte attingente. Fructificatione non obvia.
Tlie chief character of this species lies in the midrib and the secondary veins. The midrib is distinct in the lower portion of the leaf only, and vanishes towardsnbsp;the apical portion, becoming resolved into the secondary veins. The secondarynbsp;veins pass out at very acute angles, being simple or forked. Towards the marginnbsp;they are somewhat incurved, so that a preceding vein approaches closely the subsequent one. If this were more distinct, it might easily lead to an anastomosis of thenbsp;veins at their marginal ends; and this might then very well represent an anastomosis with an intramarginal vein.
The species with which I compared our fossil is Vittaria intermedia.
There is nothing similar amongst the fossils. The genus Sagenopteris resembles it somewhat in general arrangement of the veins, hut here the secondary veinsnbsp;form anastomoses (a net venation). In the genus JSöggerathiopsis,-whiGh. fit thenbsp;first aspect also resembles somewhat our species, there is no trace of a midrib, allnbsp;veins radiating at once from the base. Flceovittaria is also not to he confoundednbsp;with Bubidgea, Tate,^ this latter showing no indication of a midrib in the lowernbsp;part, and the secondary veins being in their direction much more oblique than innbsp;my genus, and not straight hut curved.
This African species is rather to be compared with the Zamiopteris glossopte-roides, Schmalh., from the jurassics of the Altai.
Locality and formation.—The above interesting species is hitherto only known fi^om the Eaniganj group, Eaniganj coalfield, where it was collected in 1876 by Mr.nbsp;Wood-Mason.
Type: OLEANDEA, Cav. and ANGIOPTEEIS, Mitch.
There are some other, rather fragmentary, specimens of narrow tceniopteroid fossils, the generical position of which can only be determined with some doubt.nbsp;They are, however, sufficieutly distinct from any of the above described species.nbsp;These specimens seem to represent three species, and from their analogies appear tonbsp;represent two genera.
' From the Karoo beds. South Africa.
92
FLOEA OF THE HAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Genus; OLEANDEIDIUM/ Schimp.
1869. Trait, d. Pal. végétale, Vol. I, p. 607.
Frondibus simplicibus, lanceolato elongatis vel linguatis, coriaceis.
Oleandbidium stenoneukon,* Schimp. (Schenk sp.) PI. XIX^, figs. 5-8.
1867. Schenk, Flora der Grenzschichten, p. 103, Tah. XXV, figs. 5, 6 (Tseniopteris).
1869. Schimper, 1. c., p. 609 (Oleandridium).
1876. Peistmantel, Eec. G. S. of India, Vol. IX, p. 67.
I have figured four specimens of a narrow Tceniopteris, whieh from their more coriaceous appearance I place with Oleandridium. Two specimens represent thenbsp;basal portion of the leaf, while the two other represent the apical portion. Fromnbsp;these specimens it would appear that the leaf was only small, the midrib rather thicknbsp;in proportion; the secondary veins at first coming out at an acute angle, and thennbsp;running more straight towards the margin, which is entire. The apex is obtuselynbsp;rounded, and the secondary veins, as far as can be observed, to a greater extentnbsp;single, although some appear to be forked.
After comparing these specimens with other tceniopteroid fossils, I come to the conclusion that it most probably represents Oleandridium stenoneuron, Schenknbsp;sp. It also bears some resemblance to 01. ienuinerve. Schimp. (Brauns sp.), but innbsp;this latter the veins appear to be stronger and somewhat more distant. Even innbsp;this somewhat uncertain position, these specimens are of great interest, as theynbsp;come from the Panchet rocks.
Panchet rocks, south of Maitur, north-west branch of the Nunia river, north-west of Assensole, Eaniganj coalfield.
Genus: ANGIOPTEEIDIUM,’ Schimp.
Some other fragments are, I think, to be better placed with this genus, especially from their thinner veins and the more membranaceous appearance of the leaf. Two species are, I think, represented.
Angiopteeidium, comp, mc’ceellandi,^ (Morr. sp.) Schimp, PI. XXI.^, figs. 4-7.
1862. Oldham and Morris; Stangerites, in Eajmahal Flora, Pal. ind., Ser. II, 1 (or Gondwana Flora, Vol. I), p. 33, PI. XXIII.
1869. TEeniopteris dana^oides (?), Bunbury: Qu. J. G. S., London, Fossil plants from INagpur, p. 332, PI. X, fig. 2.
\J 1869. Angiopteridium, Schimper : Traité de Pal. végét., Vol. I, p. 605.
* Diminutive of Oleandra = a living fern.
^ Stems (Gr.) = narrow, close; neuron (Gr.) — the vein.
^ Diminutive of Angiopteris, a living fern.
' nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;* Proper name.
-ocr page 147-93
FLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
In Ms paper on fossil plants from Nagpur, Sir Cti. Bunbury figured also a leaf of a tcRniopteroid plant, wMcb he referred, though with some doubt, to TcBniopterisnbsp;dancBoides, Mc’Clell. {Macrotceniopteris danceoides). He also compared it withnbsp;Tceniopteris major, L. and H. There are fragments of the same plant from Nagpurnbsp;in our collections, and I have given four figures (see above). If we now comparenbsp;these figures with those of Macrotaeniopteris danceoides, Schimp., on my Plates XX^nbsp;and XXI^, the very marked differences are very obvious: on one side there is anbsp;narrow leaf with closely set veins, and on the, other a large broad leaf with verynbsp;distant veins,—differences which do not want any further comment.
This Indian species under discussion is, however, equally sufficiently distinct from Teen, major, L. and H., which is also a Macrotceniopteris, larger of size and havingnbsp;more distant veins.
Our species presents a narrow, oblong leaf, with a thin midrib; the secondary veins pass out from the midrib at a subacute angle, and then turn straight towardsnbsp;the margin; most of them are forked.
Schimper in his Traité, etc. (Z. c.), classed Sir Ch. Bunbury’s figure with Angiop-teridium mc’clellandi. Schimp. (Oldh. and Morr. sp.); and I quote the specimens figured by myself with the same name. We cannot of course prove whether ournbsp;leaves are of a pinnate frond, but the form of the single leaves, the midrib, and thenbsp;secondary veins are in both very much alike.
As there is no other form with which these leaves could be more correctly compared, and as they do not appear to me sufficient to establish a new speciesnbsp;upon, it appears best to correlate them for the present with Angiopt. mdclellandi.
Locality and formation.—Kamthi (Eaniganj) group at Kamthi Nagpur area. Similar fragments were collected by Mr. Hughes in the South Eewah basin.
Angiopteridium ineakctum,’^ sp. n. PI. XXXIV.4, figs. 4, 5.
Foliis latiusculis, elongato-lineato ohovatis, apice obtusis; nervo mediano {rhachide) tenui, striato; nervis secundariis numerosissimis, maxime approximatis,nbsp;ex nervo mediano obliquis, dicliotomis simplicibusque.
I at first thought that these two specimens figured on Plate XXXIV.d( might be identical wiih those described above from Kamthi, and consequently would alsonbsp;have to be classed with Angiopt. mc’clellandi; but after closer examination I findnbsp;that they are distinct. They are broader, thus indicating a larger leaf, and thenbsp;veins show a different character; they are much more closely set and pass out fromnbsp;the midrib obliquely at about an angle of 30°. I, however, think that the presentnbsp;form belongs to the same genus, representing another species, and I take for thenbsp;specific name the great closeness of the veins.
* Infarctus (Lat.) = closely filled.
-ocr page 148-94
PLORA OR THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Locality and formation.—Barakar group, near Kumerdhubi, west of Barakar, Raniganj coalfield.
Sub-order: DICTYOTAlNIOPTERIDE^.i
This group, altbougb containing one genus of ferns only, is tbe most numerously represented in tbe Lower Gondwana system. It is tbe genus Glossopteris, Bgt.,nbsp;wbicb formerly used to be classed with Lictyopteridecc; recently, however. Prof.nbsp;Scbimper in tbe new band-book of Palseontology established from this genus a suborder of Tceniopterideoe under the above namti. As it hitherto contains only thatnbsp;one genus, tbe characters of the sub-order and genus must be coincident.
Genus: GLOSSOPTERIS,» Bgt.
1828. Brongniart, Histoire des veg. fossiles, p. 222.
Fronde simplici (? an digitata), stipitata vel in petiolwm decurrente, integer-rima, lanceolata, spathulata vel oMongato-obovata. FJiacMde (costa) semper dis-tincta, crassa an subcrassa tisque ad apicem producta, rarissime apicali in portione subevanescente ; nervis secundariis sub angulo variante ex rliachide eggredientibus,nbsp;dichotomiSy anastomosantibm, retia diversa, totam folii superficiem explentia for-mantibus. Fructificatione ut videtur tribus in modis nota.—(Eeistmantel.)
Tbe chief character of this genus lies in tbe presence of a distinct midrib, from which the veins pass out forming nets ; for there is a net venation also in somenbsp;other genera to be described next, but the character of the midrib will appear anbsp;different one.
This genus is the oldest known fossil of the Gondwana system, as already, in 1828, it was established by Al. Brongniart, when three forms were described, twonbsp;from India and one from Australia.
Since then it has been found very numerously both in Australia and India, and it was also met with in Africa.
It has a very wide geological range; for taking its occurrence in the three above-mentioned countries into consideration, its range is through formations from carboniferous to jurassic; and if we may add a doubtful case, this genus would go as far up as the tertiaries.
The distribution is the following:—
a.—Australia.
Here it begins in beds below the fijst marine fauna, or in the lower coal-measures in New South Wales, which have to be considered as of carboniferous
' Taniopteroid plants with a net venation.
: a fem.
’ Glossa (Gr.) = the tongue ; nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;(Gr.) =
-ocr page 149-95
FLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
age. Five species are known, three of them described by myself for the first time. It is in similar beds in Queensland also.
The chief development is, however, in the upper coal-measure in New South Wales, or in the New Castle beds, above the first marine fauna and below thenbsp;boulder bed of the Hawkeshury group. These upper coal-measures were alwaysnbsp;considered by Mr. W. B. Clarke as palseozoic, and are recently placed bynbsp;Mr. C. S. Wilkinson as permian,^ the Wianamatta-Hawkeshury series being placednbsp;as triassie.^
The Hawkeshury boulder bed may then he of either age.
Higher up no Glossopteris was found in Australia.
b. —In Africa.
Here we find Glossopteris in the two uppermost divisions of the Karoo formation, i.e., in the Beaufort and Stormherg beds, both of which also contain numerous remains of Dicynodont reptiles (order Anomodontia). These beds are supposed tonbsp;be of triassic age.
c. —In India.
Here we have, it appears, a much higher range than in the two countries mentioned above. Glossopteris begins, as is ascertained now beyond any doubt, in the Talchir shales,* above the Talchir boulder bed. It is of more frequent occurrencenbsp;in the next bed, the Karharbari beds but the highest development lies in thenbsp;Damuda series, and again in the uppermost group (Eaniganj-Kamthi group).nbsp;We find this genus further in the Panchet rocks,® and it also passes into the uppernbsp;portion of the Gondwana system. One case is undoubtedly certain, i.e., the occurrence of the genus in the Jabalpur group, which I have noticed previously.®
But Glossopteris was also collected by Mr. V. Ball and by myself from another horizon in the Auranga coalfield, which both to Mr. Ball and to me appears tonbsp;belong to the base of the Upper Gondwana system in that coalfield.
This latter occurrence is the more interesting, as here Glossopteris is associated with some other plants of the Lower Gondwana, especially with Vertebraria.
There are also some plant fragments, which were collected by Mr. H. B. Medlicott in the Denwa group (Satpura basin), and which appear to me to be also Glossopteris, but this is not a very clear case.
' Annual Report, Department of Mines, New South Wales, for 1879, p. 216.
2 The late Mr. W. B. Clarke also treated of them under the heading “ Mesozoic or secondary formation.”
® On my recent visit to the Karanpiira coalfield I obtained several specimens of leaves of true G-lossopteris. See my note in Eec. G. S. of India, Vol. XIV, Pt. 3.
¦* Gondwana Flora, Vol. Ill, Pt. I.
‘ Eec. G. S. of India, Vol. X, p. 139.
* See my note in Eec. G. S. of India, Vol. X, p. 140, and Jabalpur Flora (Gondwfina Flora, Vol, II), p. 10.
-ocr page 150-96 FLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
d.—Mussia.
Prof. Trautscliold/ in his paper entitled “ Der Klinische Sandstein,” which is of cretaceous age, describes a fern with, the name “ Glossopteris solitaria.” Thenbsp;form of the leaf is exactly like some of our numerous representatives of this genus,nbsp;also the direction of the veins is the same; but I cannot distinguish whether thenbsp;veins are anastomosing or not. Prof. Trautschold, however, distinctly mentions annbsp;anastomosis of the veins in the lower portion of the leaf, although only faintlynbsp;indicated.
e.—Asia Minor,
From the coalbeds between Eregli and Amasry the genus Glossopteris has been quoted twice hut as no figures or descriptions were given, it is not possible tonbsp;form an opinion as to the correctness of the observation; moreover, in Tchihatcheff’snbsp;great work “ Asie Mineure, 1867,” wherein the plants are described by A. Brongniart,nbsp;who was the founder of the genus Glossopteris, no mention is made of this genus.nbsp;This case must therefore he regarded as doubtful.
f.—Italy.
A Glossopteris is, however, also described from beds of tertiary age, which would he the highest range. In their monograph of the tertiary flora of Novale^nbsp;Messrs. Visiani and Massalongo have described a Glossopteris apocynophyllumnbsp;(p. 206 and fig.1, PI. I). If the figure correctly represents the specimen, its characternbsp;would well coincide with those given in the diagnosis of the genus Glossopteris;nbsp;but without seeing the original a decided opinion cannot be formed as to whethernbsp;it is correctly classed or not.
These are all the districts and localities from which Glossopteris has hitherto been described or mentioned, from some of them only doubtfully.
Thus the range of this famous genus is the following (including also the doubtful cases), in ascending order:—
Carhoniferous: in the lower coal-measures (and Stroud Series ?) in New South Wales.
? Coal formation of Eregli Asia Minor.
Permian; in the New Castle beds (upper coal-measures) in New South Wales [below the Hawhesbury boulder beds).
Above the [permian ?) Talchir boulder beds : a. In the Talchir shales.
2. Tn the Karharbm-i beds.
c. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Damuda Series.
d. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Panchet group.
^ Nouv. Mém. d. la Soc. Imp. d. Naturalists, Moscou, Yol. XIII, p. 221, PI. XIX, fig. 1.
^ Schlehan; Versuch einer geognost. Besohreibung der Gegend zwiscben Amasry and Tyrla-Asy, 1852.
Spratt: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., London, 1877.
* Mem. d’ Acad, di Torino Ild. Ser., Vol. XVII.
-ocr page 151-97
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Jurassic : in India in the lower Mahadevas of the Auranga coalfield,
? Denwa group, Satpura basin.
Jabalpur group, Satpura basin.
Cretaceous (s’) in the “ Klinische Sandstein ” near Moskau (Trautschold).
lertiary (f) near Novale (Vicenza), Italy (Visiani and Massalongo).
I may take up the discussion of tke fmctification of this genus, and of its possible relations with living forms.
As regards the fructification, one kind is with certainty known; and it is most interesting that the same kind of fructification has occurred on leaves which withnbsp;regard to their net venation have to he considered as three distinct species, i.e.nbsp;Gl. communis, Feistm. (with narrow nets throughout), Ql. indica, Schimp, (broadnbsp;nets close to the nidrih, becoming narrow towards the margin), and Gl. browniana,nbsp;Bgt. (polygonal nets throughout the leaf). I refer for the respective specimens tonbsp;Plates XXYI^ (figs. 1—4) and XXVII^ (figs. 1, 2, 5).
The fructification consists of round sori (marked in the fossils by round spots) placed in longitudinal rows between the margin and the midrib, which perhapsnbsp;indicates a relation with Folypodium.
The occurrence of this kind of fructification in Glossopteris browniana, Bgt., also, is of great importance; because in some Australian specimens, which are alsonbsp;described as Glossopteris browniama, Mr. Carruthers^ thinks he can observe a fructification “ in the form of linear sori running along the vein and occupying a positionnbsp;somewhat nearer to the margin of the frond than to the midrib.”
Tills kind of fructification would necessarily indicate a different plant, an An-throphyum ; and thus there is every possibility that the Australian and Indian fossils, quoted as Glossopteris broimiana, are really not only distinct species, but also belongnbsp;to distinct genera.
A third kind of fructification seems to be slightly indicated in another instance. In a few specimens, which I think to be Glossopt. angmtifolia (see further on), andnbsp;which are figured on PI. XXXIX^ (figs. 1, 2), the secondary veins quite close tonbsp;the leaf margin seem to pass into an intramarginal longitudinal vein, leaving thus anbsp;very narrow empty space along the margin, which perhaps shows that in fertilenbsp;fronds the fructification was a marginal one, like the fructification of a Pteris.
These are the only instances in which a fructification is indicated.
As there are, however, many other various forms which have not hitherto shown any fructification whatever, I thought it best to arrange the species (if they can allnbsp;be called so) of Glossopteris in several sections according to size and form of thenbsp;nets, and in this case it wiU not be necessary to add a separate diagnosis for allnbsp;species.
* CajTuilifirs, in Daiutree; Geology of Queensland; Quart Journ. Geol. Soc., Vol. XXVIII, 1872, p. .354.
/
-ocr page 152-98
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIYISION».
c^lcou
Section a; FORMS WITH NARROW NETS.
Famp;liis^plerwmqiie speciosia, retibus. oblongis vaMe angustatis..
Glossoptekis communis,^ Fstm. PI. XXIYA (leaf in left comer); Pis. XlYVA^ fig. 1; XXVI.4, ^figs. 1, 4; XXVII^, fig. 1; XXIX^, figs. 4, 5, 9 ;nbsp;XXXII^, fig. 2; XXXV.^, figs. 1—3; XXXVI^, figs. 1, a ; XXXVIIAnbsp;figs. 3, 4; XXXVIII^, fig. 1; XL^, fig. 4.
1876. Feistmantel: J. A. S. Bengal, Vol. XLV, p. 375. PI. XXI, fig. 5.
Foliis magniè'mrimtihus ; eosta crassa ; apice acuto ; nervis secondariis sub angulo 30°-50° exeuntibus, retia oblonga angustissima formmitibus.
The leaves of this form vary in size, some of them are very large (see Pis. XXY.4, fig. 1; XXXV^,figs. 1—3; XXXVI.4, figs. 1—2; XXXVII^, fig. 3);nbsp;oblongly-ohovate or spatnlate, narrowing into the stalk, the beginning of the well-marked midrib; the apical portion slightly prolonged, and the apex itself is as anbsp;rule pointed.
Tlie midrib Is always well and strongly developed, thick and longitudinally striated in the lower portion, forming the stalk of the leaf, and thinning into the apex.nbsp;In some leaves this midrib shows a peculiar cellular structure (see Pis. XXXVI .4,nbsp;figs. 1, 2 ; XXXYIII.^, fig. 2) which I only observed in this species.
The secondary veins form the chief character. They pass out from the midrib at an angle varying between 30° and 50°, are nearly equally thick throughout, passnbsp;slightly curved to the margin, and form long and narrow anastomoses, only slightlynbsp;broader close to the midrib.
With most of the figures quoted above there are given enlarged portions, which show the secondary veins.
^Cci
Of this species we possess specimens which show a fructification; I refer to the figures 1 and 4 on PI. XXYI..4 and fig. 1, PL XXVII^ ;, the fructification consists in round sori, arranged in longitudinal rows, of which there may he countednbsp;in the mentioned figures two to six.
With reference to living ferns, this kind of fructification would be indicative of a Folypodium.
This species of Glossopteris is one of the commonest in the Lower Gondwanas, and passes also in the upper portion.
Localities and horizamp;m—
Talchir shales: Chano bagia, N. Karanpura eoalfiel'd. Karharbdri beds: Karharbari coalfield, at several shafts-.nbsp;Mohpani coalfield.
‘ Communis (Lat.) = common.
99
FLOEA OF THE DAMÜDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Bardkar group ; Rajmahal area; Lumki hill, Earharbari coalfield; Raniganj coalfield (PI. XXXII^i, fig. 2); Auranga coalfield (Murup) ; Ramkola coalfield; Talchir coalfieldnbsp;(PL XXXVIII.4, fig. 2) ; Shapur coalfield; Umrét coalfield.
Iromtone-shales : Raniganj coalfield (Kulti).
Raniganj {Kamthi) ; Rajmahfl area; Raniganj coalfield (Pis. XXIV.4; XXIX/i, 4; XXXV^, 1-3 ; XXXVU, figs. 1-2); Jharia coalfield (PI. XL.1, 4); Ramkola coalfields ; South Rewah basin (XXIX^, 5, 9) ; Raigarh and Hingir coalfield ; Satpuranbsp;basin (Bijori horizon); Nagpur area (PL XXVI4, figs. 1, 4 (fructific.); XXVII.4,nbsp;1; XXXVIII^, 3); Wardha coalfield (Isapur, XXV1; XXXVIIJ, 4;nbsp;XXXVIIU, 1). South Godavari district.
Panchet group : Raniganj coalfield ; Ramkola coalfield.
Upper Gondwdnag: In the red shales, north face of Latiahar hill, Auranga coalfield, most probably lowest Mahadevas; in shales of the Jabalpur group, on the Sher river, Satpura basin.
Of the Australian species of Glossopteris, it appears that Gl. ampla, Dan., agrees in form of venation with Gl. communis, Fstm., hut the frond appears to havenbsp;been much shorter and broader. Some forms, although belonging to Gl. communis,nbsp;I had to distinguish as a variety.
Glossoptehis communis, var., stenoneuea,^ Pis. XXXII.^, fig. 3; XXXIII^,
fig. 1; XXXVIII^, 5.
The leaf much smaller, spatulate; the midrib less prominent, but also showing the cellular structure of the species. The secondary veins pass out at a very acutenbsp;angle from the midrib,' and continue with a graceful curve towards the margin. Thenbsp;veins are very thin, and the nets they form are very narrow, narrower than in thenbsp;species.
Localities and horizons—
Bardkar group : Raniganj coalfield (Kumerdhubi, Pis. XXXII^, fig. 3 ; XXXIII^, 1), Raniganj group : Raniganj coalfield (PL XXXVIII.4, fig. 5).
Glossopteris intermittens,* n. sp- PI. XXXIIIJ®, figs. 2-4.
This is a rather peculiar form, and one which reminds almost more of Tceniop-teris, at least by the general direction of the veins- Although the veins are apparently well marked, yet I remained somewhat doubtful about their real character. By a careful examination I arrive at the following result. The secondary veinsnbsp;pass out somewhat thickish and with a slight curve from the midrib at an angle ofnbsp;about 45°, then continue more straightly to the margin. Most of the veins are
* Stenos (Gr.) = narrow; neura (Gr.) = a vein.
’ Interiaitiing, disuoutinning-
f-
1/
-ocr page 154-100
dichotomous close to the midrib and form here and there anastomoses, producing elongated narrow nets.
Vi
The figured specimens give on the whole a correct idea of the form, although figs. 2 and 4 show the veins rather too strongly in their beginning; fig. 3 is thenbsp;most correct, l^he enlarged portions (figs. .Sji. and 4a.) do not represent the characternbsp;so satisfactorily as I should haye wished; the above given characteristic is, however,nbsp;correct, and although there is not an anastomosis of veins throughout the leaf, yetnbsp;I think it has to be classed with Glo^sopteris; moreover, this species seems to benbsp;constant in.fiistant areas, for I identified it from the following—
Localities—
Barakar group: Raniganj coalfield (Kumerdhubi, PI. XXXILljfigs. 2-4.)
Karanpura coalfield (brought by myself only recently and collected at Arahura, south of Chepa-Jugra.)
Glossopteeis Steicta,* Bunb., Pis. XXXVIIJ!, figs. 1-2; XXXVIIIH, fig. 3.
1861. Banbury : Fossil plants of Nagpur. Qu. J. G. S., Bond., Vol. XVII, p. 331, PI. IX, 5.
1876. Feistmantel: Eec. G. S. of India, Vol. IX PI- 3, p. 74.
This species was founded by Sir Ch. Bunbury upon some specimens from the Nagpur area. Apparently his specirdens were not quite distinct, as he speaks ofnbsp;them as “ almost ambiguous in characters between Olossopteris and Tceniopteris ; atnbsp;first sight more resembling the latter,” and an anastomosis of veins is mentionednbsp;only as occurring near the midrib.
By these remarks I was at first led to the belief that this species is rather a Tceniopteris than a Glossopteris, considering especially the indistinct figure in Sirnbsp;Ch. Bunbury’s paper. But later I think I have identified specimens referrible tonbsp;this species, and which prove that Glassopt. stricta, Bunb., is a real Glossopteris andnbsp;not a Tceniopteris. The respective specimens are figured on Plates XXXVIIH andnbsp;XXXYIII^.
IVom these figures the following description can be given;—
The leaf appears long and rather narrow in proportion; the midrib very distinct ; the secondary veins are characteristic; they pass out from the midrib at a ])retty acute angle forming distinct polygonal nets quite close to the midrib ; fromnbsp;here they pass with a short arch, and then quite straight to the margin formingnbsp;very narrow and long nets, with parallel sides, thus imitating at first sight thenbsp;appearance of Tceniopteris, but the lens distinctly shows us the anastomosesnbsp;throughout,—see the figures quoted above.
Localities and horizons—^
Kdmthi nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;group: Kamthi,^ Nagpur area (our figs. 1, 2, PI, XXXVIIA),
Isèpur near Chanda, Wardha coalfield (PI, XXXVIII.^, fig. 3).
' Strictus (Lat.) = straight.
» Sjr Ch. Bunbuj-y quotes it from Silewatla apd Kampti (Kamthi), both in the Nagpur area.
-ocr page 155-101
FLORA OF THE DAMÜDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Another somewhat doubtful species, hut which I had not hitherto met with.
IS—
T,
Glossopteeis MUSiEEOLiA,^ Bunh.
1861. Bunbury, lx., pp. 329-330, PI. VIII, 6.
1876. Peistmantel, l.c., p. 74.
Sir Charles Bunbury gives the following description:—“ Frond broadly oblong, rounded, and very obtuse at the apex; side-veins very slender, very much crowded,nbsp;dichotomous, nearly perpendicular to the midrib and the margin, near the base ordynbsp;oblique and anastomosing.”
The figure is not very distinct, and I have not met with any specimen in our collections which could be identified with this species; so I must refer to the above p/nbsp;description only.
Locality and horizon—
Kdmthi group.- Silewada and Kampti (Kamthi), Nagpur area. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;^nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;^
Glossoptbkis indica, Schimp.^,{^. XXIII^, fig. lOJ XXV.4, fig. 3; XXVI.4,
fig. 3; XXYIIA, figs. 3, 5;(XXIX^, fig^yXXXV^, fig. 4; XXXVIII^, 4.
1828. Glossopteris browniana, var. indica, Brongniart, Hist. d. végét, loss., p. 223, Tab. LXII, fio-. 2.
1861. Bunbury, lx., p. 330, PI. IX, figs. 1-4.
1869. Glossopteris indica, Sohimper, Tr. d. Pal. végét., Vol. I, p. 645.
Foliis mediocribus, costa crassa, apice acuto, nervis secundariis retia rhachim versus latiuscula, marginem versus oblonga angmtaque formantibus.
This is one of the first described Indian species, not only of Glossopteris, but of fossil plants altogether. Brongiart in his “ histoire des végétaux fossiles ” described a Glossopteris browniana, and distinguished, from specimens in his possession,nbsp;two distinct varieties, viz., an Indian and an Australian variety. Prof. Schimper innbsp;the work quoted distinguished both as species, calling the Indian variety Glossopteris indica, and leaving the name Glossopteris browniana for the Australian variety.nbsp;I readily adopt this distinction and define Glossopteris indica as follows :—
The leaves, as a rule, somewhat smaller than Glossopteris communis, especially somewhat narrower; the midrib is strong; the secondary veins have about thenbsp;same direction, but begin with short and broad anastomoses close to the midrib,nbsp;whence towards the margin the meshes become longer and narrower.
The apex is prolongate and pointed.
In several specimens a fructification was observed like that of Glossopteris communis, i.e., sori, in longitudinal rows between midrib and margin (see Pis.nbsp;XXVI.4, fig. 3; XXVII.4, fig. 5). Already observed by Brongniart.
* Musa = the plantain tree; folium (Lat.) = leaf, referring to the shape of the leaf.
-ocr page 156-102 FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS. Localities and horizons—
BardJcar group: Eaniganj coalfieldj Ramkola-Tatapani, Talchir coalfield (Gopalpra-sM, Pis. XXIX^, fig. 7; XXXVIlU, fig. 4).
Baniganj (Kamthi) group: Eaniganj coalfield (Pis. XXV 3 ; XXXV4); Nagpur area (Kamthi, Pis. XXVI^, 3; XXVII.4, figs. 3, 5).
Panchet group ; Eamkola-Tatapani coalfield (PI. XXIIU, fig. 10).
Section h: INTERMEDIATE FORMS.
Glossopteris browniana,^ Bgt., Pis. XXYIA, fig. 2; XX.Y11A, fig. 2 ; XXIX^,
figs. 1, 3, 6, 8; XL.^, 5.
1826.
1845.
1869.
1872.
Brongaiart, Hist. d. veg. foss., p. 223, Tab. LXII, p. 1.
Morris in Strzeleoki, N. S. Wales and VanDiemens Land, p. 248, Tab. VII, figs. 1, 2. Scbimper, Tr. d. Pal. veg., Vol. I, pp. 645, 646.
Carruthers, Qu. J. G. S., Vol. XXYIII, p. 364.
, Foliis mediocribus; retibus polygonalibm mediocribus, totam snperjiciem folii oy^Ti^entibus, marginem versus paulo angustioribm.
This is the species originally described by Brongniart from Australia, which hereafter was also quoted from India. I had, however, some difficulties in alwaysnbsp;identifying this species amongst the Indian specimens of Glossopteris, and thenbsp;above figured specimens are placed here only on account of the general resemblancenbsp;of the venation, while the fructification would seem to indieate a distinct fossil.
The leaves are somewhat smaller than Glossopteris communis, Feistm., and Glossopteris indica. Schimp.; the midrib distinct, the veins form ohlongly polygonal anastomoses, becoming somewhat narrower towards the margin, hut here Inbsp;must distinctly point out that the nets occur all over the surface of the leaf, whilenbsp;from Brongniart’s original figure one would get the impression as if there were nonbsp;anastomoses towards the margin.
Two specimens, which from the mode of reticulation have, no doubt, also to he classed with Glossopteris broivniana, Bgt., showed a fructification of the samenbsp;kind as that already described in Glossopteris communis, Feistm., and Glossopterisnbsp;indica, viz., round sort in longitudinal lines, parallel to the margin.
In Ad. Brongniart’s original description of the Australian browniana, there is no mention of any fructification whatever, nor is there in Prof. Morris’ descriptionnbsp;in Count Strzelecki’s work.
Mr. Carruthers, however {l.c.), mentions a specimen of Glossopteris browniana in which there was a fructification along the veins, closer to the margin than to thenbsp;midrib, so that although there exists in India a form of Glossopteris which, withnbsp;regard to the venation, strikingly resembles the Australian browniana, yet from the
* Prom a proper name.
103
FLORA or THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
mode of fructification would have to be considered as different,—a fact which is of great interest.
On the other band, we have, as mentioned before, a similar fructification to that in our browniana in the two most frequent Indian species, Gl. communis and Gl.nbsp;indica ; so that I would be quite justified in placing these in a separate genus altogether, and thus disposing of the difficulty in determining the age of our Damudanbsp;series owing to the correlation of the Indian and Australian species; however,nbsp;everything has its time, and I may quietly leave the matter as it stands for thenbsp;present.
In Australia this species is known from the lower and upper coal-measures in New South Wales. The figures given in Mr. Tate’s paper on South Africannbsp;fossils (Q. J. G. S., Lond., Vol. XXIII, PI. VI, figs. 6, 7) cannot possibly representnbsp;Glossopteris browniana, if compared with the Australian (real) and the Indiannbsp;(pseudo) browniana.
Locality and horizons—
Bardkar group : Talchir coalfield (PI. XXIX.4, figs. 1-2 ;
Eaniganj coalfield; Ramkola coalfield.
Ttaniganj (Kdmtlii) group: Raniganj coalfield (PI. XXIX^, figs. 3, 6, 8); South Rewah basin (Sobdgpur PI. XL^, fig. 5); Raigar and Hingir coalfield; Nagpurnbsp;area (Pis. XXV^, fig. 2 ; XXVII^, fig. 2); Wardha coalfield.
For some specimens with somewhat larger net venation I thought of establishing a distinct name (GZ. intermedia), but I find it would only complicate the matter, and I have here joined them with browniana.
Sections: BEOAD-NETTED FORMS.
Foliis meditcribus, retibus maximis, polygonalibus, tota superficie folii equalibus. In this section belong some of the finest forms.
Glossopteris rbtipera,^ n. sp. PI. XXVIII^, figs. 2, 7,10.; PI. XLII^, fig. 9.
The leaf of this species is small, obovate, with, as it appears, an obtuse apex; the midrib distinct, marked with one or two longitudinal lines; the secondary veinsnbsp;form distinct, broadly polygonal nets, not much longer than broad, and almostnbsp;equal in size throughout the whole leaf.
It is a characteristic species, though not frequent.
Locality and horizon.—Raniganj group: Raniganj coalfield (the above figures); Ramkola coalfield; Satpura basin.
' Rete (Lat.) — a net; fero (Lat.) = to bear, to have.
-ocr page 158-104
PLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Glossoptebis conspicua,^ n. sp. PL XXVIII^, figs. 1, 5, 6, 8, 9.
The leaves larger than in the preceding species, midrib distinctly marked. The secondary Veins form nets of considerable size; they are polygonal, hut oblong, almostnbsp;twice as large as in GL retifera, and almost equal in size throughout the whole leaf.
Locality cmd horizon.—The species was hitherto known only from the Raniganj group, Eaniganj coalfield (the figured specimens).
Recently I have brought the same form from other localities in the Karanpura and Auranga coalfields.
Glossoptems, sp. PI. XXXI^, figs. 4, 5.
«'lt;t«.Ygt;rvCvv t ^V| a*^‘
Ijlv^
4fvW '’'Vutt^C .
There are two fragments of a leaf which, considering the venation, would have to be regarded as Glossopteris, hut of a different type from the others, althoughnbsp;belonging to this section with broad nets.
The character of the nets of the secondary veins in these specimens is quite peculiar; and if we might be allowed to suppose that it is the same throughout thenbsp;whole leaf, it would certainly represent a distinct species, for which I propose thenbsp;name Gl. ingens.^
The veins appear to pass straight from midrib to margin, on the whole parallel, forming long trapezoidal nets.
I shall further on mention another fragmentary form of a somewhat similar character, hut which I think rather belongs to another genus than Glossopteris.
Locality and horizon.—The form under notice is from the Barakar group, Rani-ganj coalfield (Kumerdhuhi).
Glossoptebis diveegens,’ n. sp. PI. XXVIII^, figs. 3, 4.
The positive and negative impressions of a peculiar leaf represent the above species. To judge from the specimens the leaf was ohovate; the midrib appearsnbsp;to have been strong; it is at least of a good thickness in the upper portion of thenbsp;specimens, which I believe to he the apical portion. The secondary veins show anbsp;peculiar arrangement; in the lower portion their direction is downwards ; in thenbsp;middle they are horizontal; and in the upper portion they pass upwards, exhibitingnbsp;thus a diverging arrangement, w'hile in all the other species the veins pass more ornbsp;less obliquely upwards, especially in the basal portion of the leaf.
The veins form anastomoses, the meshes being short close to the midrib, and becoming oblong towards the margin, hut being pretty broad throughout.
' Conspicuus (Lat ) = distinct. “ Ingens (Lat.) = considerable.nbsp;' The diverging Glossopteris.
-ocr page 159-...V
...V
105
TLOEA OE THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Locality and horizon.—EaBiganj group, Eaniganj coalfield (the figured specimens).
Glossoptbris damtjdica,^ n. sp. Pis. XXX^, 1-2; XXXI^, 1-3; XXXII.4, 1;
XL^, fig. 6.
Fronde latisnma, ohovata, apice obtusa an emarginata ; rhacliide crassa, nervis secundariis angulo subrecto ex rhachide eggredientibm, retia rhachidem versusnbsp;breviora, trigonalia an polygonalia, latiuscula, marginem versus oblonge-poly gonalia,nbsp;angusta formantibus.
This is a very common and characteristic species; the leaf is of great size, as can be seen from fig. 1 on PI. XXX^; the apex is obtuse, or in some cases slightlynbsp;emarginated; the rhachis is thick; the secondary veins pass out from it at almostnbsp;a right angle, getting somewhat more oblique in the apical portion.
They form a very distinct net venation, the meshes being broadly and shortly trigonal or polygonal towards the midrib, while they become long and narrower thenbsp;closer they get to the margin.
Erom its frequent occurrence in all the horizons of the Damuda series I applied to it the above name; it begins in the Karharbari beds and appears to pass into thenbsp;Upper Gondwana.
Localities and horizons:—
KarJiarhdri beds.—Karharbari coalfield, shafts 17B and 17C, No. 3 Seam.
Bardkar group.—-Raniganj coalfield (Pis. XXXI^, 1-3; XXXIU, fig. 1); Ramkola-Tata-pani coalfield; Talchir coalfield (Gopalprasad, PI. XXX..^, fig. 2).
Ironstone shales.—Raniganj coalfield (Kulti, PI. XXX.4, fig. 1).
Raniganj {Kdmthi) group.—Ramkola coalfield, South Rewah basin (PI. XL^, fig. 6); Sat-pura basin; Nagpur area; Wardha coalfield.
Upper Gondwdnas [?).—Red shales, of apparently Lower Mahadeva age, on the northern face of the Latiahar hill, Auranga coalfield.
Section d: NAEEOW-LEAVED EOEMS.
Foliis angustis, lineato spathulatis, an linealo acuminatis ; nervo medio distincto, nervis secundariis vario modo anastomosantibus.
Glossopteeis angtjstieolia,* Bgt., PI. XXVIlAl, figs. 6, 8, 9, 11, 12,13; PI. XXXIV.4, fig. 3; PI. XXXIX,4, figs. 1, 2.
1828. Brongniart: Histoire des végét. foss. T, p. 227, PI. LXIII, f. 1. 1876. Feistmantel: J. A. S. Bengal, Vol. XLV, p. 374, PI. XXI, figs. 2-4.
* Augustus (Lat.) = narrow; folium (Lat.) = leaf.
h
/¦
1/
* Belonging to the Damuda series.
106
\/
1/
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHEÏ DIVISIONS.
This is the second of the two species, originally described by Mr. A. Brongniart.
Its leaves are narrow, linear, with a pointed apex; the midrib is strong, the secondary veins pass out at an acute angle from the midrib and form oblong nets,nbsp;larger close to the rhachis, and becoming very narrow towards the margin.
In some of the specimens (PI. XXXIXA[, figs. 1, 2) I have observed that the secondary veins do not go as far as to the margin, but finish intramarginally,nbsp;leaving a very narrow space of the leaf free along the margin. This I consider tonbsp;be an indication of a marginal fructification, in which case this form would benbsp;related to the living genus Pteris.
I have also to mention, with regard to the net venation, that the nets distinctly reach to the margin, while Brongniart represented the veins just like in Gl. brown-iana anastomosing only close to the midrib.
Locality and horizons—
Bardkar group.—Talchir coalfield.
Raniganj group.—Kajmahal hills (Lohundia) ; Eaniganj coalfield (the above figures) ;
Kamkola coalfield; South Rewah basin; Satpura basin; Wardba coalfield.
Glossopteris leptoneura,^ Bunb.
1861. Sir Ch. Bunbury: Q. J. G. S., Loud., Vol. XVII, pp. 330-331, P). IX, figs. 1-4.
This is another narrow species of Glossopteris, which appears to be confined to one area. Sir Ch. Bunbury first described it from the Nagpur area, and it is onlynbsp;from there that I have again identified it.
The leaf is linear, very narrow, and tapering very gradually at the base into the stalk; the apex acuminate; midrib narrow, but still continued to the apex;nbsp;secondary veins very fine, very oblique, arched, forming a complete network, withnbsp;the meshes somewhat more polygonal than in Gl. angustifolia, from which thenbsp;present species is also distinguished by the form of the leaf.
Locality and horizon—
Kdmthi [Raniganj) group.—Nagpur area.
Glossopteris Formosa, n. sp. PI. XXXIKA, figs. 3-7.
Foliis lineato-lanceolatis, nervo medio tenui, nereis secundariis sub angulo acuti-sismo eggredientibus, retia oblonge-polygonalia, conspicua formantibus.
This narrow-leaved form resembles the preceding in the shape of the leaf, but difPers from it by the venation; the midrib is thinner in proportion to the leaf; thenbsp;secondary veins pass at a very acute angle from the midrib, and form oblongly-
* Leptes (Gr.) = fine, delicate; neuron (Gr.) = the vein.
V
-ocr page 161-107
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANOHET DIVISIONS.
polygonal wide meslies, almost equal in size throughout the whole leaf. The apex is obtusely pointed, and the apical portion broader than in the former species.
It is a rare, though characteristic species.
Localities and horizons :—
Raniganj group.—Raniganj coalfield (the figured specimens); Ramkola coalfield; South Eewah basin.
Section e; ROUND-LEAVED FORMS.
As there is at present only one species to be classed under this section, the diagnosis of the section is the same as that of the species.
Glossoptbris orbicularis, n. sp. PI. XLI^, figs, 1, 2.
Foliis orbicularibm subemarginatis; nemo medio crasso inferiore in parte, apicem versus subevanescente; nervis secundariis sub angulo acuto eggredientibus,nbsp;arcuatim marginem versus progredientibus, retia oblonge polygonalia, cmspicuanbsp;formantibus.
This form may perhaps he only a developmental state of some other species; hut as I have identified it from two distinct localities in the same coalfield, Inbsp;thought it right to specify it by a separate name. The leaf is almost circular, therenbsp;being only a slight prolongation in the basal portion. In one specimen the uppernbsp;margin is slightly emarginated; the midrib is thick in the basal portion, while itnbsp;diminishes and gets very thin towards the apex; the secondary veins pass out at anbsp;very acute angle from the midrib, run almost parallel to the outer leaf margin, andnbsp;finish in the margin of the apical portion; they form oblongly polygonal meshes ofnbsp;a good width.
Locality and horizon.—Raniganj group, Raniganj coalfield near Raniganj (the figured specimens) and north-west of Assensole, above the village Khumarpurnbsp;in the north-west branch of the Nunia river.
INCERTAl.
Glossoptbris Decipibns,* Feistm.
1878. Feistmantel, Talchir-Karharbari Flora, Pal. ind„ Ser. XII, 1, or Gondwana Flora, Vol. Ill, pt. 1.
This is a somewhat abnormal, though constant form of Qlossopteris, all the characters being the same as in the genus, excepting that of the midrib, whichnbsp;becomes dissolved in the upper apical portion of the leaf.
i/
It is from the Karharbari beds of the Karharhari coalfield, and it was already described and figured before.
’ Decipio (Lat-) = to deceive.
108
PLOEA OP THE DAMUHA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Order; JDICTYOFTEBIBEJE.
According to the latest results of investigation this order is now rather restricted; the ..dfZe^^o^fem-like plants with a net venation {Lmchopteris, Bgt.)nbsp;have been classed separately as DictyalethopteridecB; the lYeuropteris-Y^e, plantsnbsp;with a net venation {Dictyopteris, Gth.) have been raised to a sub-family Bictyo-neurofteridece, while the Glossopterides have been classed in a separate sub-familynbsp;with the name of Bictyotcsniopteride^.
Most of the fossil plants remaining in the order Bictyopteridem are from the mesozoic epoch in Europe, viz., Camptopteris, PresL, Bictyophyllum, Clathropteris,nbsp;etc.; these are classed under the section Bictyopteride(B with a compound netnbsp;venation; while another division, viz., Bictyopteridece with a simple net venation,nbsp;comprises only two genera, one of which is only known from India, while thenbsp;other one has numerous representatives in India and Australia.
These two genera are Gangamopteris,^ Mc’Ooy, and Belemnoptens,^ Peistm.
Genus: GANGAMOPTEEIS, Mc’Coy.
1875. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Mc’Coy; Frodromus of the Palseontology of Victoria, Decadel I, p. 11.
1876. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Feistniantel: J. As. Soc. Bengal, Vol. XLV, p. 371.
1879. Feistmantel: Talchir-Karharbari Flora, Pal. ind., Gondwana Flora, Vol. Ill, p. 12.
The chief development of this genus is in the Bacchus-Marsh sandstones in Victoria, from wEere it w’as first described by Prof. Mc’Coy {1. c.) and in the Talchirnbsp;shales and Karharbari beds in India, from where I described various forms in mynbsp;Talchir-Karharbari Plora.
It, however, passes into the higher groups of the Lower Gondwanas, as will now be described, and at the same time the review of the whole genus in Indianbsp;can be given.
The diagnosis, which I have given in my above work, runs thus :—
“ Fronde simplici (an impare pinnata ?), forma variabili, nunc ovali, lafiuscula, nunc obovato elongata, basi attenuata, amplexicaule an subauriculata, nunc lanceo-lato spathulata, truncata ; nervo medio {distincto) nullo; omnibus nervis ex basinbsp;radiantibus anaslomosantibus, relia varia formantibus. Fructificatione adhuc nonnbsp;obvia.
Gangamopteris aftthrophtoides,® n. sp. PI. XXXIX^, fig. 8.
Fronde parvula, spathulata ; nervis ex basi attenuata radiatim eggredientibus, teneribus, retia oblonga, angusta formantibus.
* Gangamon (Gr.) = a small round net; pteris — a fern.
’ Belemnon (Gr.) = arrowhead.
^ Like Anthrophyum.
-ocr page 163-109
FLORA OF THE DAMUHA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Only one leaf was found, l)ut I think it is sutficient to characterise the species. It is spatulate of a small size, the thin veins radiate straightly from the attenuatednbsp;base and form long narrow nets. This form differs from Gang. angmUfolia,nbsp;Me’Coy, by a different net venation, and by the much narrower base of the leaf.
From its whole appearance the leaf reminds one much of an AntJirophyum, whence the specific name; and I am not quite sure whether it ought not to henbsp;classed at once with Anthrophyopsis, Nath.; hut in this the veins do not appear tonbsp;he so much radiating as in our form, and the shape of the leaf also seems to differ.nbsp;I shall hereafter mention another specimen, which perhaps more probably is annbsp;AnthropJiy opsis.
I I Locality and horizon.—Raniganj group, near Assensole (north-west branch of Nunia river), E-aniganj coalfield (the figured specimen).
Gangamopteuis whittiana,^ Feistm., Plate XLIII^, figs. 1-2.
1876. Feistmantel: Journ. As. Soc. Bengal, Vol. XLV, p. 371, PI. XX, figs. 3, 4.
Fronde simplici late ovato suhrhomboidali, inequilatera, integerrima, obtuse acuminata ; costa nulla, sulco medio tantum indicata, nervis ceteris omnibus e basinbsp;divergenter marginem versus radiantibus, omnibus anastomosantibus, retia conspicuanbsp;oblonge hexagonalia an polygonalia formantibus.
A description of this fine fern has been already given by me in the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal (Z. c.). Since then no other specimens of thenbsp;same species have been procured; so I have only to repeat my former remarks.
The frond appears to have been obovate suhrhomhoidal, or at least with an acuminate apical portion; there is no midrib, hut the specimens show a slightnbsp;furrow in the middle of the leaf; the secondary veins form the chief character;nbsp;they radiate into the leaf, and form very large polygonal meshes, larger than in anynbsp;of the other known species of this genus.
The relation of this species to Anthrophyum is very conspicuous, and I compared it already with Anthrophyum latifolium from Java and the Khasia hills, Assam.
Locality and horizon.—Raniganj group, Raniganj coalfield (the figured specimens).
Gangamoptekis hughbsi,^ Feistm., Plate XLIII.4, figs. 6-8.
1876. Feistmantel: Rec. Geol. Surv. of India, Vol. IX, pt. 4, p. 138.
Fronde simplici, rotunde ovali, subcoriacea, basi ut videtur subcordata, margine integra mediocriter longa, maximo specimine ad 10 cm. longo, 5 cm.nbsp;lato, rhachide vel nervo medio nullo, nervis omnibus radiatim e basi usque ad
Proper name. * From a proper name.
-ocr page 164-110
FLOEA OF THE Hi MEDA AND FANCHET DIVISIONS.
marginem radiantibm, arcuatis, nonnwllis mediis parte inferiore crassioribus, dehinc omnibus repetito fureatis, anastomosantibus, retia oblonge-latiuscula, iotanbsp;superjicie folii prope mqualia, formantibus.
Altliough this species has been already described by myself, no figure was given of it. At present I figure three specimens, all of which show the charactersnbsp;well. They somewhat remind of Oangamopteris cyclopteroides of the Talchirnbsp;and Karharbari beds, and I think the present species is a direct descendant fromnbsp;this Talchir form, but the frond appears smaller, the meshes of the net venationnbsp;somewhat larger than is the rule in Gang, cyclopteroides, and they are almostnbsp;equal in size throughout the leaf, while in Gang, cyclopteroides the larger meshesnbsp;prevail towards the middle of the leaf, becoming close and narrow towards thenbsp;margin. The character of the radiating disposition of the secondary veins is verynbsp;well exhibited.
Locality and horizon.—Kamthi (Eaniganj) group, near Kamthi in the Nagpur area (the figured specimens).
Gangamopteeis, sp., Plate XXXIX.4, fig. 9.
There is another leafiet of a fern of an oblong shape, the veins distinctly radiating without any midrib whatever, and the veins forming oblong polygonalnbsp;meshes. All these characters are those of Gangamopteris, to which genus I refernbsp;the specimen; but I do not think this one specimen sufficient to establish a speciesnbsp;upon. I only bring it to notice in connection with the others, and as it is also fromnbsp;a higher horizon in the Lower Gondwanas.
\/
Horizon and locality.—Bijori horizon (Eaniganj group), near Baricondam, Satpura basin.
Gangamopteeis ctclopteeoides,^ Eeistm.
1879. Talchir-Karharbiri Flora, Pal. ind. Gondwana Flora, Vol. Ill, p. 12, Pis. VII, IX, etc.
The diagnosis and description of this species, which with its varieties is the most numerous of the Indian forms of this genus (in the Talchir and Karharbarinbsp;beds), is given in extenso in the preceding part of this volume (1. c.). It is sufficient here to repeat the names only. Gangam. cyclopteroides is knowm from thenbsp;following—
Localities and horizons.—Talchir beds: Deoghur field. North Karanpiira coalfield.
Karharbari beds : Karharbari coalfield and Mohpani coalfield.
Barakar group : Near Kotmi, Shahpur coalfield. As the Karharbari character of the coal beds of this coalfield is not quite distinct, I quote them with the Barakar
* Like Cyclofteris.
Ill
FLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
group, so that in this case the range of Gang, cyclopteraides would he somewhat wider than otherwise.
The varieties of Gang, cyclopteraides, already described by me, are—
Gang, cyclopt., var. subaueiculata.^
1879. L. c., p. 13, PI. X, figs. 1, la, 15, etc.
Lacality and harizan.—Talchir shales of the Karanpura coalfield ; Karharbari beds of the Karharbari coalfield.
Gangam. ctclopt., var. aeeolata.^
1879. L. c., p. 14, PL X, fig. 2; PI. XVI, f. 4.
Lacality and harizan.—Talchir shales of the Karanpura coalfield; Karharbari beds, Karharbari coalfield.
Gangamopt. CYCLOP!., var, attenuata.®
1879. L. c., p. 14, PI. XI, fig. 1, etc.
Lacality and harizan.—Talchir shales. North Karanpura coalfield; Karharbari beds, Karharbari and Mohpani coalfield.
I have brought lately a large collection of fossils from the Talchir beds of the Karanpura coalfield, amongst which there are some other varieties of this species,nbsp;as well as some species hitherto not known in India.
Besides the abovenamed species and varieties I have described three other species of Gangamapteris, two from the Karharbari beds (Karharbari coalfield)nbsp;and one from the Talchir shales (Deoghur field) and Karharbari beds (Karharbarinbsp;coalfield), for which I refer to my Talchir-Karharbari flora in the first part of thisnbsp;volume.
In India we have thus for the genus Gangamapteris a range from the Talchir shales up to the Eaniganj-Kamthi group; the greatest development beingnbsp;in the Talchir shales and Karharbari bed.
In Australia this genus appears more limited, being of any importance only in the Bacchus-Marsh beds of Victoria (on about the horizon of our Talchir shales).
Slightly auricled.
Areolated.
Narrowed.
112
v/
FLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Genus: BELEMNOPTEEIS,' Feistm.
1876. Feistmantel: J. A. S. Beng., Vol. XLV, p. 370.
Belemnopteris wood-masoniana,- Feistm., PL XLIIU, figs. 3-4.
1876. Feistmantel: 1. c., p. 371, PI. XX, figs. 1-2.
Fronde simpUci, late sagittafolia, apiee ohtusa, margine integerrima, tota ad 10'B em. longa, inferioribm lobis obtuse acuminatis longiusculis {5'3 cm. longis) ;nbsp;nervis primariis tribus ; uno crassiore in folii superjiciem excurrente duobus ceterisnbsp;tenuioribus in lobos incurrentibus, omnibus tribus apicem versus attenuantibus;nbsp;nervis secundariis sub angulo subacuto eggredientibus, anastomosantibus, retianbsp;plerumque hexagonalia, sed etiam polygonalia formantibus.
No other specimens of this interesting species have heen met with since I descrihed and figured those in the paper quoted. It is of a great interest, being sonbsp;uncommonly like some living ferns.
In the original description I compared this fossil with Semionitis cordata, Eoxburgh, and Fteris sagittcefolia, Eaddi, correlating it more closely with this latternbsp;species. I find, however, in Beddome’s ferns of Southern India (PI. LIII) severalnbsp;figures of Hemionitis cordata which hear a very close resemblance to our fossil; itnbsp;is only by the fructification that it would he possible to decide with which of thenbsp;two living genera our fossil should be more correctly classed.
The fossil has the shape of a broad arrowhead; the lobes directed downwards, large; margin entire; three chief veins, one of which passes into the leaf towardsnbsp;the apex, while of the two others one passes down into each lobe. The secondarynbsp;veins between form a nice net venation of conspicuous polygonal meshes.
Locality and horizon.—Eaniganj group, near Eaniganj, in the Eaniganj coalfield (the figured specimens).
inceeta: sedis.
The leaves hitherto described were, as far as could he decided, single leaves. There are, however, some others which, though exhibiting a net venation, are eithernbsp;actually compound leaves, or have to he considered as such from their shape andnbsp;other characters.
I was at a loss how best to class these leaves; averse to establishing new genera uselessly, and not thinking myself justified in uniting them with Glossop-teris, I placed them provisionally with Sagenopteris, although I know quite wellnbsp;that this genus has somewhat different characters ; the name will, however, do for the
Proper name.
Belemnon (Gr.) = the arrow; pteris = fern.
-ocr page 167-113
present, and should subsequently a new name he required, I should propose the name Dacttlopteris^ gen. now. Erom the material before me it would appear thatnbsp;about five species are represented, one or two of which, however, appear to he truenbsp;Sagenopteris.
iyii-
SAGENOPTEEIS LONGIFOLIA,^ Sp. n. PI. X-JjA, fig. 1.
Fronde digitata, folioUs, ut videtwr six numerantibus, sessilibiis, lanceolatis, longis; nervo medio inferiore in parte indicate, evanescente; nereis secundariisnbsp;sub angulo acuto ascendentibus, retia angusta oblong ague fomiantibus.
There is apparently a common stalk to the leaflets in this species ; the leaflets, about six in number (all that can he counted), passing out of the same, are longnbsp;and lanceolate, sessile, with a midrib in the lower portion, while towards the top itnbsp;appears to dissolve into the secondary veins; these are very thin, and form narrownbsp;and oblong meshes.
The relations of this fern to both living and fossil forms are entirely obscure ; a single leaflet might occasionally pass for a Glossopteris angustifoUa, Bgt., asnbsp;regards general form and the secondary veins, hut the midrib in this latter is quitenbsp;distinct throughout.
Locality and horizon.—Eaniganj group in the Eaniganj coalfield.
Sagenopteris (?) poltphtlla,’ n. sp. PI, XLI^, figs. 3, 4.
Foliis ex caule commune eggredientibus, six ad septem numerantibus, caule distincto, modico, insertis; costa inferiore in paHe solum distincta, apicem versusnbsp;dissoluta; nervis secundariis sub angulo 40°—45° ad marginem progredientibusnbsp;retia latiuscula, polygonalia conspicua formantibus.
Like in the former species, we find in this one the leaves attached to a common stalk, as is distinctly shown in fig. 3; the number of the leaves in both specimens isnbsp;seven; the leaves themselves also possess distinct stalks, from which the midribnbsp;originates; the rhachis is distinct in the lower portion of the leaf, while towards thenbsp;apex it becomes indistinct and dissolved.
The secondary veins are very characteristic; they pass out at an angle of about 40°—45°, and form very conspicuous polygonal meshes of almost the same sizenbsp;throughout the leaf.
It is at least certain that this species and that last described belong to one and the same genus, the principal characters being the same.
Locality and horizon.—Eaniganj group of the Eaniganj coalfield.
^ Daktylos (Gr.) = the finger; pteris — fern.
2 Long-leaved.
^ The many-leaved.
k
114
PLOEA OP THE HAMUHA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Sagbnopteeis, comp ehoipolia/ Presl. PI. XLII4, 2.
1867. Schenk: Flora der Grenzsohichten, PI. XII.
There is one leaflet of a fern with netrenation which, though only single, has, I think, to he considered as being of the genus Sagenopteris ; the shape is inequilateral, the midrib is indicated in the lower portion only, and the secondary veinsnbsp;pass up at an acute angle to the margin forming a net venation.
The most closely related form is Sagenopteris rhoifolia, Presl. But whether or ' not they are identical cannot, I think, he decided with certainty from this singlenbsp;specimen.
Locality and horizon.—Eaniganj group in the Eaniganj coalfield.
There are three other specimens of leaves (PI. XLIIA, fig. 7; PI. XLIIA, figs. 3, 5) which also exhibit to some extent the characters of Sagenopteris, viz., anbsp;midrib in the lower portion only, a net venation, and a somewhat oblique shape ofnbsp;the leaf, which would appear to indicate that they belong to a fingered leaf.
I had already in my Talchir-Karharbari flora described a Glosso2)teris as Gl. decipiens, wherein the midrib vanishes towards the apex, but these leaves have,nbsp;I think, to be considered from their shape as single leaves, and, if anything, morenbsp;in relation to Gajigamopteris, as intermediate forms between it and Glossopteris,nbsp;while the above leaves are on all accounts more related to Sagenopteris.
Locality and hoi’izon.—These three specimens are also from the Eaniganj group, Eaniganj coalfield.
Sagenopteris (?) stoliczkana, Peistm.
1879. Feistmantel: Talchir-Karharbari Flora, Pal. ind., Ser. XII, 1 (or this Vol., p. 18, PI. XIII, fig. 4).
This species has been figured and described before.
Locality and Aori^o».—Karharbari beds of the Karharbari coalfield.
Genus: ACTINOPTEEIS,^ Schenk.
1867. Flora der Grenzsohichten, p. 23.
Certain circular shield-like leaves, furnished with a stalk and v/ith radiating, dichotomous veins, were classed by Prof. Göppert® with Cyclopteris, while Prof.nbsp;Schenk subsequently placed them with Actinopteris {l.c.). The species wasnbsp;Cyclopteris peltata (Göpp., 1. c., Pis. IV, V, figs. 6-9) or Actinopteris peltatanbsp;(Schenk, l.c. PL VI, figs. 3-5).
Prom the many specimens examined by Prof. Schenk it appears that the leaves
^ With leaves like those of Rhus=Sumaoh.
’ The radiated fern.
® Gattungen fossiler Pflanzen Lief. 5, 6, p. 92.
-ocr page 169-I/'
FLORA OF THE DAMUHA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS. 115
are single pinnate, with circular, sessile, and entirely embracing leaflets. The reins pass radiately from the point of insertion to the periphery, are dichotomous, andnbsp;connected by transverse branchlets.
There are certain forms among the Damuda fossils which I think have to he referred to this genus, and I proposed for them the name—
Actinopteris bengalensis,^ Feistm., PI. XIX^, fig. 1.
1876. Eec. Geol. Surv. of India, Vol. IX, 3, p. 76.
Foliis orUcularihus an late-ovalibm, ut videtur peltatis, ex segmentis prqfun-dissime laciniatis compositis, loco insertionis centrali; nereis radiantibus.
The general form of the leaf is exactly as that in Actinopteris peltata, Schenk, circular or broadly oval; the leaf appears to consist of about six segments, verynbsp;deeply incised. In my first description I considered the laciniae as leaflets, but theynbsp;are clearly connected at then’ base, radiating from a central spot, at which there isnbsp;a shallow cavity with what appears to be a slit, and which I believe to be thenbsp;point of insertion.
The two leaves (one a fragmentary one) are figured in position as they lie on the specimen; and this is about the same as in Schenk’s Actinop. peltala. Thenbsp;difference, however, between the two species is obvious.
Some doubt was expressed as to the organic nature of Prof. Schenk’s specimens. This could not apply to our fossil, for there can be no doubt whatever as to its truenbsp;organic nature; and we have only to imagine that the laciniae in Prof. Schenk’snbsp;specimens were narrower, the veins therefore more numerous and somewhat projecting above the surface of the leaf substance, and we have the complete picture ofnbsp;Prof. Schenk’s Actinopt. peltata.
Locality and horizon.—The species occurred only once in the Eaniganj group, Eaniganj coalfield.
Genus: ANTHROPHYOPSIS, Nath.
1878. Nathorst (A. G.), Ploran vid Bjuf, p. 43. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;/ —-XL /
Mr. Nathorst has established this genus upon single oblong leaves, of the same character as the living genus Anthrophyum, to which I have already comparednbsp;some of our forms of Gangamopteris; and my belief is that, in the absence ofnbsp;fructification in Anthrophyopsis, Mr. Nathorst’s specimens should rather have beennbsp;classed with Gangamopteris ; they would have to be classed as a separate section ofnbsp;Gangamopteris with broad nets.
One fragment amongst the Damuda fossils has, I think, to be classed with that section of Gangamopteris, or, as it stands at present, with Anthrophyopsis, Nath. It is
^ Appertainiag to Bengal.
-ocr page 170-116
TLOEA OE THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
figured on PI. LXI^, fig. 6, but not in the correct position, as it ought to have heen placed longitudinally, hut this does not interfere with the features of the fossil.nbsp;The veins show a slightly radiating arrangement, are all equal in thickness, andnbsp;form rhomhoidal or elongately polygonal meshes, of an almost equal size throughout.nbsp;These characters fit well into Mr. Nathorst’s diagnosis of his genus, to whichnbsp;I refer our fossil, without attempting, however, a specific determination.
\/
Locality and horizon.—It is from the Kamthi (Eaniganj) group, near Kunla-cheru. South Godavari district.
Q YMNOSLLRMLE. Class: CYCADEACEA:.
Order: ZAMIE^.
It is now no longer doubtful that true representatives of Cycadeacece do occur in the Lower Gondwanas; and by establishing the fact that Noggerathiopsis is anbsp;Cycadeaceous plant, this class of plants has its beginning already in the Talchirnbsp;division. But there are also other Cycadeacece besides this.
Genus: PTEEOPHYLLUM,' Bgt.
This genus (with the subdivision Anomozamites) is very largely developed in the Upper Gondwanas, and especially in the Bajmahal and Sripermatiir group, whilenbsp;in the higher groups (Jabalpur and Kach plant-group) it can hardly be said to exist.
Erom the Lower Gondwanas a real JBterophyllum has already been described and figured by me ; and only recently I have been so fortunate as to collect in thenbsp;Auranga coalfield good representatives of Anomozamites; so that we have in thenbsp;Lower Gondwanas just the same types of Zamiece as in the lower groups of thenbsp;Upper Gondwanas.
Ptehophtllum buedwanbnsb,^ Eeistm. (Mc’Clell. sp.). PLXLVII.4, fig. 1.
1850. Zamia burdwanensis, Mc’Clelland : Eep. Geol. Surv. of India, p. 53, PI. XIX, 4.
1877. Pterophyllum, Peistmantel; Reo. Geol. Surv, of India, Vol. X, pt. 2, p. 71, PL I, fig. 1.
Fronde mediocri, rhacMde tenui (in figura nostra) pinnulis (foliolis) oblonge linearibus, equalibus, subcoriaceis tota basi insertis, basi paulo dilatatis, contiguis,nbsp;apice obtuse acuminatis ; nervis simplicibus, Jiliformibus, distantibus, 7-8 numeranti~nbsp;bus.
“ The Burdwan Pterophyllum,
Pteron (Gr.) = a feather ; phjllum (Gr.) = leaf.
-ocr page 171-117
FLOEA OF THE HAMUHA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
The leaf was only of moderate size, with a thin rhachis, as can he judged from our fossil; the leaflets are equal, oblong linear, and attached with the entirenbsp;base ; as regards their texture, they appear to he subcoriaceous ; at the base theynbsp;are somewhat widened and connected together ; the veins are single, parallel,nbsp;pretty far apart, and about 7 to 8 in number.
There is but the one specimen of this species. It was at first figured by Mc’Clelland {1. c.) as Zamia burdwanemis. But as subsequently the specimen wasnbsp;not forthcoming, and considering the general badness and incorrectness of allnbsp;Mc’Clelland’s figures, the cycadeaceous nature of this fossil was generally doubted.nbsp;Only after the palaeontological collections of the Asiatic Society had passed intonbsp;the possession of the Indian Museum (in 1876) could I (by discovering the original specimen) re-establish its true cycadeaceous nature, and I classed it then withnbsp;Tterophyllum, to which there is little doubt it belongs.
Our fossil shows a relation to Pteroph. carterianum, Oldh., of the Rajmahal hills.
Locality and horizon.—Raniganj group, in the Eaniganj coalfield.
Up to the beginning of this year this was the only specimen of the Pterophyl-lum family known from the Lower Gondwanas. Recently I have collected from the Barakar group in the Auranga coalfield several well-preserved specimens ofnbsp;Ptero^jhyllum-li^e fossils, of a type which has been classed by Schimper as the subgenus Anomozamites, on account of the unequal breadth of the leaflets. Many ofnbsp;the Rajmahal Pterophylla belong to this sub-genus, and this Barakar Anomozamites,nbsp;of which a figure and a provisional notice was given by me in a late number of thenbsp;Records,’^ and which will be further illustrated and described in a future number ofnbsp;the Palseontologia indica, further establishes the presence of real Zamiece in thenbsp;Lower Gondwanas.
Pteeophyllum sp.
Only for the sake of record do I mention here some fragmentary specimens which were collected by Mr. Th. Hughes in the Kamthi (Raniganj) group at Anur,nbsp;in the Wardha Valley coalfield. As far as can be judged from the fragments, theynbsp;represent linear leaflets, with an obtuse apex, and longitudinal veins, parallel tonbsp;each other. I could not form any idea about their mode of insertion, the basenbsp;being wanting, but they appear to me to be of a Pterophyllum. I do not give anynbsp;figure of them, as they are so uncertain.
Genus: GLOSSOZAMITES,* Schimp.
Glossozamites Stoliczkanus,’ Feistm.
1879. Eeistmantel: Talohir-Karharbari flora, p. 19, PI. XX, figs. 4, 5.
Locality and horizon.—Karharbd,ri beds at Domdhni, Karharbari coalfield.
Volume XIV, pt. 3. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;• Glossa (Gr.) = the tongue; zamia. ’ Proper name (the late Dr. Stoliczka).
I
V
-ocr page 172-118
ELORA OE THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Eamily: NÖGQEBATRIOPOSIDB^,^ Eeistm,
1881. Talchir-Karharbari flora, suppl., this Vol., 55-59.
In describing some supplementary plants from the Karbarbari coalfield at the beginning of this year, I have sufficiently discussed the reasons for establishing thisnbsp;family, including at present two genera, which are, however, very closely allied,nbsp;and which in time may probably be amalgamated. These two genera are Nöggera-thiopsis, Eeistm. (in India and Australia), and BMptozamites, Schmalh. (Siberia).
The classing of these two genera in a special family has its advantage; for it is at present classed with the Zamiece, as the specimens, hitherto known, justify thisnbsp;classification. Should it, however, happen that the discovery of better and morenbsp;complete specimens would make another arrangement necessary, it will be easy tonbsp;transfer the whole family into another class, to which it may appear to belong morenbsp;properly.
Genus: NÖGGERATHIOPSIS, Eeistm.
1879. Talchir-Karnarbari flora, this Vol., p. 23.
1881. Suppl., ibid., p. 55 et sequ.
The distribution of this genus in India and Australia in its relation to the Siberian fossil has been given in my supplement to the Talchir-Karharbari flora.nbsp;The specimens hitherto figured were from the Talchir and Karharbari beds; atnbsp;present others are figured from the higher groups of the Lower Gondwanas, althoughnbsp;they represent the same species.
\/
NÖGGERATHIOPSIS HiSLOPp (Eeistm.), Bunb., sp. Pis. XLV^, figs. 1-11;
XLVI.4, fig. 1.
1879. I.C., p. 23, Pis. XIX, figs. 1-6 ; XX, 1.
1881. I.C., Pis. XXVIII, figs. 1-7; XXIX, 1-4; XXX, 5-9.
As regards the characters of the leaves, their shapes, size, and the distribution of the veins, as well as regards their correlation, I have nothing further to add; theynbsp;all exhibit their close relation to the Siberian BMptozamites. I would only point oncenbsp;more to the circumstance that also in these newer specimens the distance of thenbsp;veins is somewhat variable.
The reasons for the supposition that these leaves are leaflets of a pinnate leaf were also given in my previous memoirs. Amongst the specimens figured at present, there are again some which bear the character of associated leaflets,—see figs.nbsp;3 and 11 on PL XLV.4, and fig. 3 on PI. XLVI.4, and all of those figurednbsp;show more or less the oblique shape of the leaf.
Fossils like Noggerathia.
Proper name (the late Rev. Hislop of Nagpur).
-ocr page 173-119
ELORA OE THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Locality and horizon.—{a) Barakar group, near Barkoi Umrét coalfield, Central Provinces (PI. XLVI^, fig. 3), also in the Bamkola and Shapur coalfields;nbsp;(Ö) Eaniganj group (including Kamtlii group), Raniganj coalfield (PL XLV^, figs.nbsp;10-11), South Bewah coalbasin (PI. A, figs, 1-5), Nagpur area (Bharatwada,nbsp;PI. XLV.4, figs. 6, 8. Silewara, ib., fig. 2; Kamthi, ib., fig. 9).
squama:.
Together with the Lower Gondwana fossils described above there occur certain scale-like leaves, the systematic position of which is uncertain, although they shownbsp;analogies with similar fossils described from elsewhere.
I have given figures of them on PL XLVIIA, figs. 8, 16-18, 21 and 23. They vary in size, but the general outline of the leaves is very similar in all. It isnbsp;ohovate or ohovately triangular with a truncate base, showing in some specimensnbsp;at least a distinct point of insertion. Most of them have a distinct venation; thenbsp;veins pass out radiating from the base, and either continue so up to the margin, ornbsp;in another instance (where the leaf is ohovate) converge towards the top.
Eig. 8, PL XLVIIA, is very similar to some specimens figured by Mr. Schmalhausen,’^ especially to figs. 7, 6 on PL XVI.
Eig. 21 falls in more with some figures given by Nathorst in his flora of Palsjö,® PL XII, figs. 15, 16; and our fig. 16 may probably be also placed here.
Eig. 23 resembles somewhat Nathorst’s fig. 7, PL XVII, in his flora of Bjuf while our figs. 17 and 18 (PL XLVIIA) resemble very much Schmalhausen’s (Lc.)nbsp;fig. 22, PL XVI.
The above authors have introduced these scale-like leaves as “ squamae gymnospermarum ” or “ squamae cycadearum, ” but their place is uncertain. Inbsp;also must leave them with this general title only.
If they are of cyoadeaceom nature, the only plant to which they might belong is Nöggerathiopsis described above.
Locality and horizon—
Bardkar group : Kumerdhubi, Raniganj coalfield (PI. XLVIIi, figs. 17, 18, and 21).
Raniganj group: near Lohundia in the Rajmahal hills,- in the Raniganj coalfield (PI, XLVIUj figs. 8,16); near Guraru on the Sone in the South Rewah basinnbsp;{jh.. fig. 23).
One fossil, which at first I thought had also to be classed with Gycadeacecc, is now, I believe, more correctly classed by me with the coniferae.
1 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Jiiraflora Sibiriens, Mem. de I’Acad Imp. d. So. d. St. Petersbourg, VII Ser., Vol. XXVII, No. 4, 1879, Pis. XVnbsp;and XVI.
2 nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Kongliga Svenska Vetenkaps Akad. Handlingar, Vol. XIV, I, 1875.
® Severiges Geologiska Undersökning, Ser. C., No. 33, Stockholm, 1879.
V
-ocr page 174-120
ELOEA OP THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Class: CONIPERA].
Coniferous plants are not very largely represented in the Lower Gondwanas, although there are some rather interesting forms amongst them, some of whiehnbsp;have only recently been collected by myself.
Order: TAXAGUJE.
Pamily: SALISBUEEAl.
The type of this family in present days is the genus Salisburia or Qingho, now living in Japan and China. In geological times this genus had a much wider distribution, and there were also other types in existence belonging to this family.nbsp;Prom Asia Professor Heer described several species of Qingho^ from the jurassics ofnbsp;Eastern Siberia and the Amur countries ; I have described and figured two speciesnbsp;of Qingho from the Upper Gondwanas.^ (Jabalpur group and Sripermatur group.)
Prom the jurassics of the Altai and of the Petschora country species of Qingho and other Qingho-YXe. fossils were described by Professor Schmalhausen.®
Our Lower Gondwanas also contain some Gingko-lïkQ fossils, one of which appears to be identical with a species from the Petschora country, while two othersnbsp;belong to genera from Petschora, from the Altai and the Tunguska river.
Genus: EUEYPHYLLUM,^ Peistm.
1879. Feistmantel: Talchir-Karharbari flora, this Vol. (Ill), p* 26.
Hitherto only one species is known.
EUEYPHYLLUM WHITTIANUM,« Peistm.
1879. Feistmantel; l.c., pp. 26-27, PI. XXI, fig. 1.
Locality and horizon.—Earharbari beds in the Karharbari coalfield. No. IIA Mine (at Buriadi).
' Flora fossilis arctica, Vol. IV, pp. 67-64, 115-116.
^ Gondwana Flora, Vols. I and II.
® Mem. de la’Aoad. Imp. p. Sc. de St. Petershourg, Vile Ser., Tome XXVII, No. 4.
^ Eurys (Gr.) = broad; the broad-leaved fossil.
* Proper name.
-ocr page 175-FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS. 121
Genus: RHIPIDOPSIS,^ Schmalh.
Folia longe stipitata, coriacea, flabelliformia, palmatisecta; segmenta 6-10, integerrima, lateralia minora, e basi cuneiformia, obovata, media majora, usquenbsp;pedalia, basi substipitata cuneiformia, antice obtusa, nervis numerosis pluriesnbsp;dichotomis.—(Sclimalh.)
When Prof. Schnaalhausen constructed the diagnosis of this genus only one species was known, so that necessarily the diagnosis of the genus and species werenbsp;identical.
There are, however, amongst our Lower Gondwana fossils two specimens which have to he placed with this genus, judging from the majority of characters beingnbsp;identical with those in the above diagnosis, hut they represent a distinct species, sonbsp;that the diagnosis of the genus wül have to receive some slight additions.
RhIPIDOPSIS DENSINEB.VIS,* n. sp. PI. XLVIyl, figs. 1, 2, 2a.
Foliis stipitatis, Jlabelliformibus, coriaceis, segmentis ut videtur six numeran-tibus, oblonge triangularibus, apice emarginato dissectis mediis longiorihus ; nervis radiantibus, densissimis, repetito dichotomis.
The leaves hear a stalk, of the length of which we can form no conjecture, as only a small portion of it is preserved.
The leaf is fan-shaped, with about six segments, which are of oblongly triangular shape; the middle segments longer than the lateral ones, hut not in the same proportion as in Rhipidopsis gingkoides, Schmalh.; the apical margin of the segments innbsp;our species is also not entire as in Schmalhausen’s species, hut emarginate and evennbsp;incised.
The veins also form a distinguishing character; they are very closely set, and thin throughout, while in the Petschora species they are thicker and wider apart innbsp;the lower portion. They are, however, also repeatedly forked in our species.
This fossil was classed hy me at first with the Cyeadeacece, as I thought that it belonged to the genus Macropterygium, Schimp., and I even asserted thisnbsp;confidently; hut closer examination shows now that it is more correct to class itnbsp;with Bhipidopsis, for the leaves have a distinct stalk, and all the segments are separate leaflets constituting the leaf hy being inserted on a common stalk, while innbsp;Macropterygium there is hardly any stalk to the leaves, and the segments are onlynbsp;produced hy incisions in the leaf; and further, the veins in our fossil are repeatedlynbsp;forked, whüe in Macropterygium they appear to be simple.
Locality and horizon.—Kamthi (Raniganj) group, near Kunlacheru, South Godavari district.
Ehipis (Gr.) = a fan ; opsis (Gr,) = appearance. |
* Pensus (Lat.) close ; nervus (Lat.) = a vein. m |
122
PLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANOHET DIVISIONS.
But while these two speelmens from the South Godavari represent a new speeies there are some others, which I have only recently collected, and which I think represent the Russian species, viz., Rhipidopsis gingkoides, Schmalh. Only one leafnbsp;has heen figured’^ as yet, while more figures will he given in a subsequent memoir ;nbsp;but this one specimen sufficiently shows the characters pointed out by Prof. Schmal-hausen : the common stalk to the leaflets composing the leaf; the middle leafletsnbsp;much longer than the lateral ones, and with a truncate apex ; the veins stronger andnbsp;apart in the lower portion and becoming very close by repeated forkings towardsnbsp;the apical portion ; there are 8 to 9 leaflets (segments) in the leaves. I shall havenbsp;occasion to point to this more closely when all the other figures will be given.
I have collected the specimens in the Barakar group (as determined by Mr. Ball), in the Sukri river, near Gurtur in the Auranga coalfield.
Genus: CYCLOPITYS,^ Schmalh.
1879. Schmalhausen, 1. c., p. 39, amp;c.
Another peculiar coniferous plant of another family was described by Prof. Schmalhausen with the above name from the Altai and the Lower Tunguska river.
With the ahovementioned Rhipidopsis gingkoides there occurred in the Barakar group of the Auranga coalfield several specimens of a plant which I cannbsp;only class with Cyclopitys, but it represents a new species, the leaves being dichotomous. I have figured one leaflet in a paper in the last number of Records {1. c.).nbsp;The entire specimens will he figured on a subsequent opportunity.
Oi'Aev: ARIRTACJS(E.
Genus: VOLTZIA,’ Bgt.
VoLTZiA HETEEOPHYLLA^ Bgt-) Bl- XLVII^, figs. 20, 22, 23, and ? 19.
1879. Talchir-Karharbari flora, this Vol. (Ill), p. 28, Pis. XXII—XXIV, fig. 4 ; XXV.
From the Karharbari beds {1. c.) many specimens of this species were figured. At present I have to record the same from another locality, i.e., from South Rewah.nbsp;I identified it long since amongst an old collection from that region, made bynbsp;Mr. J. G. Medlicott in 1861 (see supra, page 12) in the Gopat area; no horizon wasnbsp;indicated, hut I placed them provisionally in the Raniganj group.
Only last year Mr. Hughes collected some fossils near Hardi in the Sohagpur district (South Rewah basin) amongst which there was also Voltzia heteropliylla,
' Rec. G. S. of I., Vol. XIV, pt. 3, PI. II, fig. 2.
‘‘ Kyklos (Gr.) = circle ; pitys (Gr.) = the pinetree.
’ Proper name.
* With two kinds of leaves.
-ocr page 177-123
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
thus confirming my former identification. I have given figures of specimens from both districts. They are of the type of V. Jieterophylla, var hrevifolia.
There is also on PL XLVII^, fig. 19, a specimen which very much resembles certain scales, said to represent fruit scales of the cones of Voltzia. As, however, only one specimen occurs, I do not venture to class the fossil finallynbsp;with Voltzia, but the resemblance is striking.
Locality and horizon.—Raniganj group : South Eewah basin (Gopat area, PL XLVII^, 20, 24; Hardi, ib., fig. 22); Raniganj coalfield {ih., fig. 19).
Genus: ALBERTIA, Schimp.
1879. Talohir-Karharbari flora, this Vol.. p. 29.
Certain specimens of coniferous branchlets were referred by me {1. c.) to this genus. Since then no fresh material has been procured, and thus the identificationnbsp;cannot be made with more certainty now than before. I have, however, compared itnbsp;with Alb. speciosa. Schimp.
Locality and horizon.—Karharbari beds, Karharbari coalfield, Buriadi (No. IIA Mine).
SEEDS.
Seeds are of rather rare occurrence in the Lower Gondwanas. Those which occur more generally are small-winged seeds.
I am afraid I cannot offer much about their systematical position. From their general character and their relation to similar fossils from elsewhere, they havenbsp;most probably to be classed with Coniferce, but unfortunately these fossil seedsnbsp;were found in most cases without any coniferous plants whatever.
Prof. Heer in his Juraflora of Eastern Siberia and the Amur countries figured very similar seeds, classing some with Ephedrites and others with Samaropsis,nbsp;although I could not satisfy myself that he had traced the connection of the seedsnbsp;with their mother-plants.
Prof. Schmalhausen {1. c.) figured also similar forms from the Altai, from the Lower Tunguska, and from the Petschora country, classing some with Samaropsis,nbsp;and others with Bhipidopsis.
Our seeds bear entirely the appearance of those classed by Heer and Schmalhausen with Samaropsis, and I have introduced them as such in my list of Lower Gondwana fossils at the beginning of this Memoir (p. 56).
But there is not the slightest indication with what plant they might he brought in connection. They are known from the Karharbari beds (this YoL, Pis.nbsp;XXIY, fig. 5; XXX, 11-13) in the Karharbari coalfield where there are some coniferous plants as Euryphyllum, Voltzia and Albertia, but there is no reason whatevernbsp;to class them with any of these.
-ocr page 178-124
FLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
In the Ftaniganj group of the Eanigahj coalfield. (PL XLYII.4, 14, 15) and Satpura basin (PL XLVII.4, 9, 10) where these seeds also were met with, theynbsp;are not associated with any coniferous plants, and the same is the case with thosenbsp;from the Panchet group (PL XLVII.4, 11-13) of the Raniganj coalfield; so thatnbsp;their classification with Samar opsis has hardly any other value hut that of reference;nbsp;they are, however, so far of importance, as analogous seeds occur under similarnbsp;uncertain circumstances in the jurassic flora of Eastern Siberia and the Amurnbsp;countries, of the Altai, the Tunguska river, and of the Petschora country.
There are some other indeterminable small seeds known from the Karharhari beds (Karharhari coalfield), and from the Eaniganj group from the South Eewahnbsp;basin and the Nagpur area.
There is also a larger seed from the Karharhari beds at Passerahhia, Karharhari coalfield, which I have described as Carpolithes milleri (after its first discoverer);nbsp;it is very characteristic* in form, hut I could not fix its place with certainty,nbsp;although from its occurrence in association with numerous specimens of Nöggera-thiopsis I thought it might eventually he assigned thereto.
This supposition seems to he corroborated by the circumstance that in a collection of plants recently made by Mr. Hughes in the South Eewah basin,nbsp;which have to he looked on as of Karharhari beds, there are very fine leaves ofnbsp;Noggerathiopsis (predominant), and together with these are about nine specimensnbsp;of this very same fruit.
Stems oe coniferous plants.
Sir Ch. Bunhury in his paper on fossil plants from Nagpur^ figured also a fragment of a stem “ distinctly marked with numerous, small, roundish, dot-likenbsp;leaf-scars,” and he says about its position: —
“ This fragment is perhaps technically referable to Knorria, and may have belonged to a lycopodiaceous plant; but its appearance is so strikingly like that ofnbsp;a small branch of a Spruce-fir stripped of its leaves, that, in the absence of anynbsp;positive evidence to the contrary, I am strongly inclined to believe it to benbsp;coniferous”
There is a small fragment of the same kind of stem in our collections, and from the same locality, viz., Mangli, south of Nagpur; from the disposition of thenbsp;scars it appeared to me to belong to the coniferous, and I even thought myselfnbsp;justified in referring it to Falissya.^
Three other fragments of stems are figured on PL XLVII.^, figs. 5, 7, of my present paper. They are from the Ironstone shales of the Eaniganj coalfield.nbsp;These also I suppose to be coniferous stems, and my supposition is strengthenednbsp;by their analogies.
' See this Volume, ante, p. 59, PI. XXX, fig. 14
• Qr. Jour. Geol. Soc., Vol. XVII, p. 340, PI. XII, fig. 1.
’ Kec. Geol. Surv. of lad., Vol. X, pt. 1, p. 26.
-ocr page 179-FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS. 125
The fragments are not very large, hut they distinctly show on their surface small rhomhoidal or ohovate scars, which are placed in a distinct regular quincunx;nbsp;there is no doubt that they are the scars of fallen-off leaves.
A portion of a quite similar stem was figured hy Prof. Schmalhausen in his paper so often mentioned (PL VIII, fig. 12), and classed hy him with theconifersenbsp;as a stem of RMpidopsis gingkoides.
But in our case there is again the unfortunate circumstance that these stem fragments do not occur with any other plants but Glossopteris, with which these stems cannot he brought into any relation, and from their analogy we have to refer them,nbsp;though still with some uncertainty, to the coniferce.
The remains of animals are rather rare in the Lower Gondwanas—one group only, viz., the Panchet group of the Raniganj group, yielded animal remains in somewhat greater numbers. Most of them have already been described in various papers;nbsp;and as there is nothing new to be added to these descriptions, I shall quote the namesnbsp;only with the necessary references to the literature as to horizon and locality. Theirnbsp;names are introduced here only because they occur together with the Flora.
CRUSTACEA.
Genus: ESTHERIA,’- Straun.
Specimens of Bstheria are locally very numerous, although geographically only limited.
Esthbbia mangalibnsis,^ Jones.
1862. Jones: Monograph of fossil Estherise (Palieontographical Society), 1862, p. 78, PI. II, figs. 16—23.
1876. Prof. Geinitz : Ehatisohe Pflanzen und Thierreste der Argent. Eepublik (Palseontogvaphica Cassel, 1876). PI. I, figs. 1—6, p. 3.
Locality and horizon.—Very numerous in the red shales at Mangli, about 30 miles south of Nagpur.
There occur two kinds of Lstheria at this place, one of a larger size, which wBS described with the above name. The smaller kind was not specifically named,nbsp;but is in so far of interest, as it appears to be the same as the Estherin occurring innbsp;the Panchet rocks of the Raniganj coalfield (near Maitur, north-west of Assensole),nbsp;and in the beds near Kawarsa in the Wardha Valley coalfield.
In a paper on the occurrence of Estheria in the Gondwanas® I tried to establish the view that, from the common occurrence of the smaller kind of Estheria
1 Proper name.
’ Mangali = locality.
^ Eec. Geol. Surv. of India, Tol. X, pt. 1, pp. 26—29.
-ocr page 180-126
ELOEA OE THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
in the Panchet rocks, the Mangli shales, and at Kawarsa (coupled with the rare occurrence of other fossils at all of them), the respective beds might he considerednbsp;as on the same horizon. There seem, however, to he some reasons for consideringnbsp;the beds at the two latter places to he somewhat older than Panchets.
PISCES.
The only remains of fishes in the Lower Gondwana system are scales of ganoid fishes; they are, however, very rare.
They were first mentioned by the late Eev. Mr. Hislop^ in his paper on the Nagpur Sandstone and Coal, when he also mentions “ Jaws of ganoid fishes.”nbsp;One or two specimens of scales are amongst the collections of the Geologicalnbsp;Survey, and they are also referred to by Mr. Lydekker in his paper on fossilnbsp;Eeptüia and Batrachia. They are from Mangli.
BATRACHIA.
LABYRINTHODONTIA.
Gonioglyptus® longirostuis,^ Huxley.
1865. Huxley: Vertebrate fossils of the Panchet rocks, Pal. Ind., Ser. IV (Vol. I), p. 8.
1879. lydekker: ib., Vol. I, pt. 3, p. 17, PI. HI, figs. 14, 15.
Locality and horizon.—Panchet group, near Deoli, south-west of Assensole, cn the Damuda river, Baniganj coalfield.
Pachtgonia® incuevata,® Huxley.
1865. Huxley, 1. c., p. 6.
1879. Lydekker, 1. c., pp. 18,19.
Locality and horizon.—The same as above.
Brachyops'^ laticbps,quot; Owen.
1855. Owen: Qu. Journ. Geol. Soc., Vol. XI, p. 37, PI. II.
Locality and horizon.—Shales at Mangli.
* nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Qa. Journ. Geol. Soc., Vol. XVII (1861), p. 347.
’ Indian pre-tertiary Vertebrata, Pal. Ind. (Ser. IV), Vol. I, pt. 3, 1879, p. 36. “ Gonia (Gr.) = angle; glyptus (Gr.) = sculptured.
* nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;With a long snout.
® Pachys = thick; gonia = angle.
‘ Incurved.
’ Brachys = short; ops (Gr.) = face.
* nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;With a broad head.
-ocr page 181-PLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS. 127
1864. Joiirn. As. Soc., Yol. XXXIII, pp. 336, 412.
1873. Dr. Oldham : Eec. Geol. Surv. of India, Vol. lY, p. 79.
1873. H. B. Medlicott: Mem. Geol- Surv. of India, Yol. X, p. 159.
1875. H. F. Blanford: Qu. J. Geol. Soo., London, Yol. XXXI, p. 523.
1879. Lydekker : Pal. Ind., lY, 3, p. 36.
1879. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Feistmantel: Keo. Geol. Surv. of Ind., Yol. XII, pp. 76, 78.
1880. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Lydekker: J. A. S. B., Yol. XLIX, p. 16.
This interesting fossil, of which there is, however, only a cast in the collection of the Geological Survey, was picked up hy Major Go wan, west of Barikondam,nbsp;below the Pachmari plateau, close to the village Bijori, in beds, which hereafternbsp;were introduced hy Mr. H. B. Medlicott as the Bijori horizon (1. c.). The fossilnbsp;has not been figured or described, nor I think identified with certainty; hut thenbsp;prevalent view is that it belongs to Archegosaurm (see Lydekker, 1. c., 1880).
Locality and horizon.—Bijori horizon ( = Baniganj group), near Bijori and Barikondam, in the Satpura basin.
BEPTILIA.
DINOSAURIA.
1865. Huxley, 1. c., p. 11.
1879. Lydekker, 1. c., p. 17.
Locality and horizon.—Panchet group, near Deoli, south-west of Assensole, in the Damuda river, Baniganj coalfield.
DICYNODONTIA.
Dictnodon^ obientalis,^ Huxley.
1865. Huxley, 1. c., p. 8 et sequ.
1879. Lydekker, 1. c., pp. 1-16, Pis. I, II, HI, figs 1-11.
Locality and horizon.—Same as above.
This reptile is the most frequent animal fossil of the Lower Gondwanas.
Insect icing.—I mention here only for the sake of completeness a fragment of an apparently hymenopterous insect wing, which I disclosed in a piece of Talchirnbsp;shale from the Kuraun (Deoghur) basin. Its fragmentary condition must frustratenbsp;any attempt of identification.
' The ancient saurian. Archegos (Gr.) = the ancestor; sauros (Gr.) = the saurian.
^ Ankistron = a hook; odus = a tooth.
® Dis = twice ; kyon = dog; odus = tooth.
Orientalis = Oriëntale.
-ocr page 182-128
ELOEA OE THE DAMUDA AND PANOHET DIVISIONS.
General Eemarks.
With this memoir the description of the Elora of the Lower Gondwanas, which was begun with the Talchir-Karharhari flora (see first part of this volume), is concluded, so far as based on the collections made up to 1880.
There is other material of Gondwana plants collected in 1880 and 1881 in South Eewah basin (by Mr. Hughes) and in Karanpura and Aurunga coalfields (by myself), but they could not he comprised within the present volume, and will henbsp;published in two subsequent fasciculi.
As most of the general relations of the Gondwana system have been treated of in Volume I of the Manual of the Geology of India, there is no need to repeat themnbsp;here, and I shall restrict my remarks to the palaeontological relations of the Lowernbsp;Gondwanas and their probable correlations.
1. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;'1'he fossils of the Lower Gondwanas consist of animals and plants.
2. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The animals are by far the smallest portion of the fossils, and representnbsp;fresh-water and land animals only.
3. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The land animals are represented by remains ofnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;(Labyrinthodontia)
and Meptilia (Dinosauria and Dieynodontia). The relations of these animals were lately discussed by Mr. Lydekker.^
The most frequent were remains of Dieynodontia in the Panchefc group, by which this group can best be correlated with the Stormberg beds of the Karoonbsp;formation of South Africa.
4. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The fresh-water animals are represented by very rare and fragmentarynbsp;fish remains, and locally numerous remains of bivalved Crustacea, one of which hasnbsp;been identified in Ehatic beds in South America.
6. Plant remains are very numerous, especially as regards specimens. They represent Equisetacece, Filices, Cycadeacece, and Conifercb.
The Equisetacece are represented by four very characteristic genera: Verte-hraria, Schizoneura, Phyllotheca, and Trizygia, the relations of which were discussed at the respective] chapters (see especially ante, pp. 73-74). Vertebraria and Fliyllotlieca are also numerous in the New Castle beds in Australia.
The Filices are very numerous and contain especially representatives of single leaves with net venation. The most interesting of these are Oangamopteris andnbsp;Glossopteris, both of which are common to India and Australia, but in a reversenbsp;proportion—in India, Oangamopteris appears in the bottom beds of the Gondwananbsp;system, and is here at once very numerous, while Glossopteris is subordinate andnbsp;finds its greatest development in the beds above the Talchir and Karharbari beds;nbsp;in Australia, on the other hand, Glossopteris has its greatest development in thenbsp;New Castle beds (upper coal-measures), where Oangamopteris is rare, while thenbsp;latter genus has its greatest development in the Bacchus-Marsh beds in Victoria,
* Sketch of the history of the fossil vertebrata of India, Jour. As. Soc. Bengal, Vol. XLIX, pp. 12.14.
-ocr page 183-129
FLORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
which are held by the Australian Geologists (W. B. Clarke, 0. S. Wilkinson, Mc’Coy, etc.) to he higher than the New Castle beds, and on about the horizon ofnbsp;the Hawkeshury beds in New South Wales (above the New Castle beds). It is,nbsp;however, necessary to state that these two genera are the most frequent of ferns innbsp;the two countries in the respective beds.
Some other ferns (such as Cyathea, DicTcsonia, Asplenium whithyense, Meri-anopteris, Neuropteridium, Macrotceniopteris, Oleandridium, Angiopteridium, Fecopt. concinna, etc.) are related to mesozoic forms in Asia and Europe, andnbsp;have hardly any representatives in the flora of the Australian coal-measures, exceptnbsp;in those belonging to “ secondary formations.”
Again, some other ferns are local types, such as Alethopteris phegopteroides, Belemnopteris, and Falceovittaria, which are especially interesting on account ofnbsp;their relations to living forms.
The CycadeacecB are well enough represented in the Lower Gondwanas by characteristic forms; one genus {Noggerathiopsis) is also known from Australia and here already from carboniferous beds, and passes with a very closely related form {Bhipto-zamites) into the Jurassic flora of the Altai and the Tunguska river in Siberia.
The other three genera^—Pterophyllum, Anomozamites, and Olossozamites— have mesozoic affinities, and excepting the Otozamites, which I have described fromnbsp;the Jurassic beds of Queensland, no Cycadeacece (Zamiese) of this kind are hithertonbsp;known from Australia.
Of the coniferous plants occurring in the Lower Gondwanas none has any representatives in Australia; on the contrary, all of them have relations in mesozicnbsp;formations of Asia and Europe. Thus Bhipidopsis is in the Jurassics of the Petschoranbsp;country ; Cyclopitys is from the Jura of the Altai and Tunguska river (Siberia) ;nbsp;our Foltzia is in the Trias in Europe (though the genus is also known from uppernbsp;permian beds in Hungary).
Some of the seeds, especially those referred to Samaropsls, have their relations in the Jurassics of Siberia and the Amur countries.
6. I would now arrive at the point when mention should be made of the age of the Lower Gondwanas. This question also has been discussed in the Manual ofnbsp;Indian Geology, and I shall add only a few short remarks. I shall not endeavournbsp;to fix the age of the various groups (as I would do it only for my own satisfaction),nbsp;but shall indicate the approximate position of the whole fossiliferous portion of thenbsp;Lower Gondwanas, by fixing with the most possible probability (from the information at present available) the position of the lowest groups, mz., of the Talchir-Karharbari beds.
I would also state that I do not any longer take such a pessimistic view of this point as five years ago when I wrote my papers in the Records on this subject,nbsp;thinking my view the only correct one; and I frankly confess that if at that time I hadnbsp;been acquainted with the relations of the respective Australian deposits as at present.
-ocr page 184-130
PLOHA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
the unpleasant disagreement of opinions of those days would not have appeared. As, however, it did occur, I would explain briefly how the matter stands at present.
When I wrote my first paper in the Hecords^ on the flora and probable age of the Damuda formation, I was entirely averse to any correlation of our Damudanbsp;series which I considered lower mesozic with the lower coal-strata of Australianbsp;which are carboniferous {1. c., p. 68), and I explained the occurrence of Glossopterisnbsp;in both by its having originated in the latter and survived into the former. Whennbsp;I wrote that paper the Karharhari beds were still classed as Barakars.
In a paper in the same number of Becords Mr. W. T. Blanford urged from good reasons the connection of the upper coal-measures in Australia with the lowernbsp;coal-measures (acknowledged of palceozoic age), in which he was, as will be seennbsp;hereafter, entirely correct, although a strict correlation of the Damuda with the uppernbsp;coal-measures (New Castle beds in Australia) cannot apparently be maintained.
In a subsequent paper {1. c., part 4) I again tried to disprove the connection of our Damuda with the lower coal-measures, admitting a comparison with the uppernbsp;portion only; I wrote on page 124 {I, c.) : “ Our Damuda flora (then including thenbsp;Karharhari beds) could at all events only be compared with the upper portion, andnbsp;only through the Glossopteris and Vertebraria,owe flora being much more numerous;”nbsp;and in the tabular list (p. 125) I placed against our division “ Damuda group” allnbsp;those beds in Australia, which I comprised under the heading “ Upper coal-measures,”nbsp;according to the communications of the late Mr. W. B. Clarke. This was, as I shallnbsp;show presently, not quite correct, especially with regard to the Bacchus-Marshnbsp;sandstones and the mesozoic beds (Bellarine beds) in Victoria, New South Wales, andnbsp;Queensland.
Soon afterwards^ I received a communication from Mr. C. S. Wilkinson regarding the position of the Bacchus-Marsh beds with their numerous representatives of Gangamopieris.
At the same time the coal beds of Karharhari® were separated from the Damuda series and classed closer with the Talchir shales within the Talchir division; andnbsp;when writing my Memoir on the Talchir-Karharhari flora (see this volume, No. 1)nbsp;I duly took notice of the communication received about the position of the Bacchus-Marsh beds and the consequent effect of the same upon the correlation of ournbsp;Damuda series.
In this connexion I especially refer to pp. 31 and 32 of the Talchir-Karharbari flora (^this volume, part 1), where I quote a passage from Mr. C. S. Wilkinson’snbsp;above-mentioned letter, and where I show that our Talchir-Karharbari beds can bestnbsp;be correlated with the Bacchus-Marsh beds. I already then pointed to the probability (p. 32) that the Damuda flora is on a higher horizon than the New Castle beds
' Vol. IX, pt. 3, 1876, p.67 et sequ.
“ September 1877.
^ W. T. Blanford: Eec, G. S. of I., Vol. XI, pt. 1, p. 145.
-ocr page 185-131
FliORA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
flora, altliougli I was not at the time aware of the possible correlation of the Bacchus-Marsh beds with the Hawkeshnry beds.
I expressed this view more distinctly in my communications to the late Mr. W. B. Clarke, who embodied them in the fourth edition of his “ Remarks on thenbsp;sedimentary formations in New South Wales, 1878; in the tabular list, pp. 159-162, the sequence of the strata is clearly shown, when the Bacchus-Marsh bedsnbsp;are placed above the New Castle beds, and on page 163 there is in two columns mynbsp;statement about the correlation of the Bacchus-Marsh beds with the Talchirs, innbsp;relation to the New Castle beds and the Damuda series ; it stands thus :
INDIA.
III. Damuda Coal-bearing strata with Glossop-teris, Phyllotheca, etc.
Talchir group with Gangamopteris.
AUSTRALIA.
Bacchus-Marsli beds with Gangamopteris.
II. New Castle beds with Glossopteris, Fhyllo-theca, Vertehraria, etc.
I. Glossopteris, PhyllotJieca, etc., with marine animals, etc., in New South Wales.
The numbers I, II, III indicate the three different stages of the flora with Glossopteris.
I did not directly refer here to the Hawkeshnry beds, hut hy classing the New Castle beds directly below the Bacchus-Marsh beds, I have indirectly correlatednbsp;the latter with the Hawkeshnry beds which overlie the New Castle beds.
In a footnote on p. 165 {1. c.) there is a passage from my letter with regard to the age of the New Castle beds, saying that I do not see “ any objection to considernbsp;these New Castle beds as terminating the Palseozoic epoch in Australia, but afternbsp;which only Glossopteris spread out to India and Africa.”
In a short paper on the Australian flora in the Geological Magazine, 1879, I pointed (p. 188) to the same relations of the Bacchus-Marsh beds and Newnbsp;Castle beds.
Up to this time I had no distinct knowledge about the relations of the Hawkesbury beds and their correlations. In subsequent letters, however, Mr. 0. S.nbsp;Wilkinson communieated to me his observations on a certain boulder bed in thenbsp;Hawkesbury beds, apparently due to ice action, which he compared with a similarnbsp;deposit in the Bacchus-Marsh beds, thus correlating these two deposits from thisnbsp;point of view; as, however, the Bacchus-Marsh beds already were previously correlated by myself from a palaeontological point of view with the Talchir-Rarharbarinbsp;beds, of which the former are underlaid by a boulder bed of similar relations, thenbsp;occurrence of a similar phenomenon in the Bacchus-Marsh beds would furthernbsp;corroborate this correlation, and would also involve a correlation with the Hawkesbury beds. These new additions to our knowledge of the stratigraphical relations
-ocr page 186-132
PLOEA OP THE DAMUHA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
appear to solve the difficult question of the correlation of the Indian and Australian plant beds; and in a short paper in a late number of the Eecords (Vol. XIII,nbsp;pt. 4, 1880) I quoted the several passages from Mr. 0. S. Wilkinson’s letters to menbsp;as well as from his paper on this subject, and drew up a list showing the sequencenbsp;and correlation of the various beds, based upon all this new information.
The flora of the New Castle beds retains, however, entirely its former character, although through the above-mentioned correlation of the Hawkesbury boulder bednbsp;with the Bacchus-Marsh conglomerates it has to be relegated into the Palaeozoicnbsp;epoch, but yet as distinct from the lower coal-measures which are carboniferous.nbsp;This was also only recently illustrated by Mr. 0. S. Wilkinson in the Annual Beport,nbsp;Department of Mines, New South Wales, for 1879, where there is (page 226) a list^nbsp;of the formations in that colony, classing the Wianamatta-Hawkesbury series asnbsp;triassic, the New Castle beds as permian, and the lower coal-measures as carboniferous.
It is only just to mention here that the late Mr. W. B. Clarke in his papers on New South Wales Geology always advocated the palaeozoic age of the New Castlenbsp;beds (upper coal-measures), and that Mr. W. S. Blanford followed his view, whichnbsp;had the necessary consequence that the Indian coal beds (Damnda series), the floranbsp;of which was by the latter and by other authors correlated with that of the Australian coal-strata, would have to be considered as of the same age.
I took the opposite course, considering the Indian coal beds as triassic; and having to correlate them with the Australian upper coal-measures (not then knowing the relations of the Bacchus-Marsh and Hawkesbury beds), I advocated a likenbsp;age for these upper Australian coal-measures, removing them at the same time fromnbsp;the lower coal-measures.
The abovementioned more recent observations remove now these difficulties to a considerable extent, helping to fix with great probability the position of the Lowernbsp;Gondwanas ; for, taking into consideration the correlation of the Talchir-Karharbarinbsp;beds with the Bacchus-Marsh beds, and of these latter with the Hawkesbury beds,nbsp;which overlie the New Castle beds, and considering these latter as permian whilenbsp;the two former are considered as lower mesozoic, then the age of our Lowernbsp;Gondwanas will have to be approximately the same.
To fix the horizons of the various groups of the Lower Gondwanas within the Lower Mesozoic epoch, is, although I tried it once before, of no actual necessitynbsp;here.
' This list refers to the sequence of formations, according to which the palmontologioal specimens from New South Wales were arranged at the Sydney Exhibition.
-ocr page 187-APPENDIX.
1, List ot tossils according to the horizons, with reference to the
FIGURES.
As the plant fossils were described here collectively from the several groups, I think it wül he useful for easier reference to give here lists of the fossils occurringnbsp;in the various groups separately. This has, however, reference only to the secondnbsp;number of this Volume (III), the Damuda-Panchet Elora,^ as in the first number,nbsp;the Talchir-Karharbari Elora, the separation is by itself enough conspicuous.
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Feistm. Lumki Hill, Karharbamp;i coalfield (the specimens figured in No. 1 of this Volume, PI. I, figs. 2, 3); also Auranga coalfield.
Trizygia speciosa, Royle. Talchir coalfield (see Pis. XIA, figs. 2, 9 j Xll^, 2) ; Bokaro coalfield ; Auranga coalfield.
. Verteiraria indioa, Royle. Most of the coalfields ; specimens figured from the Raniganj coalfield (Pis. XI1I4, figs. 1, 2, 4, 8 j XIVvI, figs. 1, 4).
Cyathea, comp. Tchihatcheffi, Schmalh. Talchir coalfield (PI. XVI/I, figs. 1, 2, 3).
Sphenopteris polymorpha, Feistm. Lumki Hill, Karharbari coalfield.
Maerotmwopteris feddeni,^ Feistm. Auranga coalfield (a portion figured in R. G. S. of India, XIV, pt. 8).
Macrotmniopteris danceoides, Royle s. p. Rajmahal area near Burgo (PI. XXI4, fig. 2) ; also Auranga coalfield.
Angiopteridium {?) infarctum n. s.p. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XXXIVi, figs. 4, 5).
Glossopteris communis, Feistm. Widely distributed; specimens figured from Raniganj coalfield (PI. XXXII.4, fig. 2) ; Talchir coalfield (PI. XXXVIIIi, fig. 2).
Glossopteris communis, var. stenoneura, Feistm. Raniganj coalfield (Pis. XXXi, fig. 3; XXXIIIi, fig. 1); also Karanpura coalfield.
Glossopteris intermittens, Yamp;stxa. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XXXIIIi, figs. 2-4).
Glossopteris indica,^Gövayg. Talchir coalfield (Pis. XXIXi, fig. 7 ; XXXVIII i, 4); also in Raniganj, Karanpura, Auranga and Tatapani coalfields.
Glossopteris Irowniana, Bgt. Talchir coalfield (PI. XXlXi, figs. 1-2)^ also Raniganj and Ram-kola-Tatapani coalfields.
Glossopteris damidica, Feistm. Raniganj coalfield (Pis. XXXIi, figs. 1-3 ; XXXIIi, 1) ; Talchir coalfield (PI. XXXi, 2) ; also Auranga coalfield and Ramkola-Tatapani coalfields.
Glossopteris angwstifolia, Bgt. Talchir coalfield (no specimens figured).
’ I shall also take in here those fossils which were received since the first part of this number was written from the South Rewah basin, the Karanpura and Auranga coalfields.
= This has not been figured here from this group, but the figures of the Kamthi specimens can safely be used for comparison.
-ocr page 188-Glossopteris conspicua, Feistm. Auranga coalfield (not figured).
Gangamopteris cyclopteroides, Feistm. Shapur coalfield (horizon not quite certain).
Anomozamites (balli, n. sp.). Auranga coalfield (recently collected by myself and two specimens figured in R. G. S. Ind., Vol. XIV, pt. 3).
Nöggerathiopsis Mslopi, Feistm. Umret coalfield (PI. XLVI^, fig. 3) ¦, also Ramkola-Tatapani coalfield.
Rhipidopds, comp, gingkoides, Schmalb. Auranga coalfield (one leaf figured in R. G. S. Ind., Vol. XIV, pt. 3).
Cyclopitys, Sebmalh. (dichotoma, n. sp.). Auranga coalfield (one leaflet figured in R. G. S. Ind., Vol. XIV, pt. 3).
Hquisetaceows stewis (.Tainagur). South Karanpura coalfield.
MacrotcRniopterii danosoides, Royle, Ibid.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm. (Kulti), Raniganj coalfield and South Karanpura coalfield.
Glossopt. indica, Schimp. South Karanpura coalfield.
Glossopt. retifera, Fstm. Ibid.
Glassopt. damudica, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XXX^, fig. I); South Karanpura coalfield,
Glossopt. conspicua, Fstm. South Karanpura coalfield.
Glossopt. angustifolia, Bgt. Ibid.
Insect-wing-like fossil. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XVU, bis. fig. 7).
nöggerathiopsis lislopi, Fstm. South Karanpura coalfield.
Coniferous stems (Rhipidopsis ?). Raniganj coalfield (PI. XLVII.d, figs. 5-7).
(Comprising Kamthi group and Bijori horizon also) —
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield very numerous (Pis. lA, 11 A, lllA, figs. 1-2; IV^, 1-2; YA, YIA, VII^, 2; VIII^, IXA, stems) ; Jharia coalfield (PI. lYA,nbsp;fig. 3); Bokharo coalfield; Karanpura, Auranga, Ramkola, Tatapani, and Raigarh-Hingir coalfields; South Rewah basin; Satpura basin, near Baricondam (PI. IlIA, fig. 4).
PJiyllotheca indica, Bunh. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XIIA, 6) j Nagpur area (PI. XlIA, 3-5, 7-9).
Phylloth. robusta, Fstm. Rajmahal hills (PI. XIVA, 1-2).
Trizygia speciosa, Royle. Raniganj coalfield (Pis. XIA, 1, 3,4, 5-8; XIIA, fig. 1) ; Satpura basin; Sikkim (Dr. Hooker's quotation).
Vertebraria indica, Royle. In most of the coalfields. Specimens figured from Raniganj coalfield (Pis. XIIA, figs. 10-11; XIIlA, 3; XIVA, 2-3); South Godavari basin (Kunlacheru, PL XIIIA, figs. 5-6).
Sphenopterispolymorpha, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (Pis. XVA, XVIA, 3 ; XVIA, bis figs. 1-6).
Bicksonia hughesi,Pstm. Jharia coalfield (PI. XXIIIA, 1-3); Satpura basin (PI. XXIIlA, 12, 13).
Asplenium whitbyense, Heer. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XIXA, fig. 2); Jharia coalfield (PI. XL A, 2-3).
Alethopteris {Polypodium) lindleyana, Royle. Raniganj coalfield (Pis. XVIIIA, 2 ; XIXA, 3,4; XXIIIA, 11; XXXIXA, 10-11).
' Only a few of the fossils from this group were figured, most of them agreeing with the same figured from the other groups.
-ocr page 189-Alelhopt. phegopteroides, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XVIIIji, 1).
Merianopteris major, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XIXA, 9—11).
Macrotaniopttris danmoides, Royle. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XXA, 1—3); Jharia coalfield (XX1.(/, fig. 1) ; Nagpur area; Aurunga coalfield.
Macrotmniopt. feddeni, Fstm. Nagpur area (Pis. XXlA, 3; XXlIyl, 1—4) ; South Rewah basin.
PalcRovittaria Jcurzi, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XLIV^).
Angiopteridium, comp. mcclellandi, Oldh. and Morr. sp, Nagpur area (PI. XXI^, figs. 4—7) ; also South Rewah basin.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm. Very widely distributed. The figured specimens are from Raniganj eoalfield (Pis. XXIY^; XXIX.4, 4; XXXVA, 1—3 ; XXXVI1—2); Jhari coalfieldnbsp;(PI. XL.il, 4) ; South Rewah basin (Pl.XXlX^, 5, 9); Nagpur area (Pis. XXVI.il, 1, 4 ;nbsp;XXVILl, 1; XXXVIIil, 3); Wardha \alley coalfield (Pis. XXXVII^, 4; XXXVIII^, 1).
Glossopt. communis, var. stenoneura. Raniganj coalfield (XXXVIIlJl, 5).
Glossopt. stricta, Bunh. Nagpur area (PI. XXXVIU, 1, 2); Wardha Valley coalfield (PI. XXXVin.1, 3).
Glossopt. ( ?) muscefolia, Bunh. Nagpur area (Bunh.)
Glossopt. indica. Schimp. Raniganj coalfield (Pis. XXVA, 3; XXXVA, 4); Nagpur area (Pis. XXVIil, 3; XXVII^, 3,5) ; Wardha Valley coalfied (PI. XXVA, 1, 2) ; Karanpuranbsp;coalfield.
Glossopt. hrowniana, Bgt. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XXIX^, 3, 6, 8) ; South Rewah (Soh%pur, PI. XL^, 5); Nagpur area (Pis. XXVIil, 2; XXVIIA, 2); also Raigarh and Hingir coalfield j Wardha coalfield.
Glossopt. retifera, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (Pis. XXVIII.i4, 2, 7, 10; XLI.!4, 9) ; Kfiranpura coalfield; Ramkola coalfield; Satpura basin.
Glossopt. conspicua, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XXVIII.i4, 1, 5, 6, 8, 9); also Karanpüra and Auranga coalfields.
Glossopt. divergens, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XXVIII.i4, figs. 3, 4).
Glossopt. damudica, Psiva. South Rewah basin (PI. XLif, 6); also Ramhola coalfield; Satpura basin; Nagpur area; Wardha coalfield; Karanpura coalfield.
Glossopt. angustifolia, Bgt. Raniganj coalfield; (Pis. XXVIU, 6, 8, 9, 11—13; XXXIV^, fig. 3 ; XXXIX.4, I, 2); also in the Rajmahal hills ; Ramkola coalfield ; South Rewahnbsp;basin ; Satpura basin ; Wardha coalfield ; Karanpdra coalfield ; Auranga coalfield.
Glossopt. leptoneura, Bunb. Nagpur area.
Glossopt. formosa, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XXXIXJ, 3—7); also in Karanpüra coalfield ; Ramkola and Tatapani coalfields.
Glossopt. orbicularis, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XIAA, 1, 2).
Gangamopteris anthrophyaides, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XXXIX.i4, 8).
Gangamopt. whittiana, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XLHU, 1, 2).
Gangamopt. hugkesi, Fstm. Nagpur area (PI. XhlllA, 6—8).
Belepmopteris mod-masoniana, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XLHI.!, 3—4).
Sagenopteris polyphylla, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XLI^l, 3, 4).
Sagenopt. longifolia, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XL^l, 1).
Sagenopt. ( ?) rhoifolia, Presl. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XhllA, 2).
AcHnopteris bengalensis, Fstm. Raniganj coalfield (PI. XIX^l, 1).
Anthrophyopsis ( ?) (sp. ?). South Godévari district (PI. XLI.4, 5).
-ocr page 190-136 FLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Pterophyllum burdwanense, Fstm. Eaniganj coalfield (PI. XLVII^, fig. 1).
Nöggerathiopsis hislopi, Fstm. (Bunb. sp.) Eaniganj coalfield (PI. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;10^ 11); South
Eewab basin (XLV.d, 1—5) ; N%pnr area (PI. XLV.il, 6—9).
Rhipidopsis densinervist, Fstm. South Godavari (Kunlaeberu, PI. XLVI^, 1, 2).
Voltzia heterophylla, Bgt. South Eewab basin (PI. XLVII.il, figs. 20, 22, 23) ; Eaniganj field scale? (PI. XLVIIA, fig. 19).
Samaropsis winged seeds. Eaniganj field (PI. XLVII.il, figs. 14-15); Satpura basin (PI. XLVIld, figs. 9-10).
Coniferous stem. Mangli, Wardha eoalfield.
Estheria mangaliensis, Jones. Mangli, Wardha coalfield.
Estheria, smaller form. Mangli, Kawarsa (Wardha coalfield).
Scales of ganoid fishes. Mangli. •
Brachyops laticeps, Owen. Mangli.
Arcliegosaurus (?) sp. (?) Satpura basin, Bijori.
PANCHET GEOUP.
ScUzoneura gondwanensis, Feistm. Eaniganj coalfield (PI. X^).
Eecopteris concinna, Presl. Eaniganj coalfield (PI. X.V1I^, figs. 1-6).
Cyclopterispachyrhachis, Gopp. Eaniganj coalfield (PI. XVIIil, fig. 7).
Thinnfeldia, comp, odontopteroides, Feistm. (Morr. sp.) Eamkola coalfield. (PI. XXIII.ilgt; figs. 7-9).
Oleandridium, comp, stenoneuron, Schenk. Eaniganj coalfield (PI. XIX.il, figs. 5-8).
Glossopteris communis, Feistm. Eaniganj eoalfield; Eamkola eoalfield.
Glossopt. indiea, Schimp. Eaniganj coalfield; Eamkola coalfield (PI. XXIII.!, fig. 10). Glossopt. angustifolia, Bgt. Eamkola coalfield.
Samaropsis, winged seeds. Eaniganj coalfield (PI. XLVII.4, 11-13).
Estheria (? mangaliensis, small form); Eaniganj coalfield.
Gonioglyptus longrostris, Huxley. Eaniganj coalfield.
Pachygonia incurvata, Huxley. Ibid.
Anhistroion indicus, Huxley. Ibid.
Bicynodon orientalis, Huxley. Ibid.
2. Supplementary list of localities at which Lower Gondwana fossils
WERE FOUND.
Since I have written the list of localities in the first part of the present number (Damuda-Panchet Flora, see this Vol. No. 2, pp. 22-47), Lower Gond-wdna fossils^have been collected at several new localities, which are not containednbsp;in that list. For the sake of completeness they are given now; I arrange thenbsp;localities according to the groups. I also add a few localities which I have overlooked when writing my first list.
a. TALCHIE GEOUP.
Numerous additions were made by myself to our collections of Talchir plants and also a new locality was added.
-ocr page 191-137
PLORA OF THE DAMUHA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Latiahar hill, northern face of, opposite Panripura, Auranga coalfield.—(Feist-mantel, 1881. New locality.)
Eqnisetaceous stalks.
Qangamopteris cyclopteroides, Feistm.
,, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„ var. subanriculaia.
yy
j, var. acuminata.
,, var. attenuata.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„ var. cordiformis.
„ comp, spathulata, Mc'’Coy.
Noggerathiopsis hislopi, Feistm.
Samaropsis, winged seeds.
Hike A, 2 miles, north-north-west of, Ohano-basin, Karanpura coalfield.
This locality was already mentioned before as below the junction of the Tordag and Lurunga streams. I only mention it, because I have brought recentlynbsp;very numerous specimens from here which wiU be figured and described innbsp;a subsequent fasciculus.
Quite lately Mr. Th. Hughes added a new locality from South Rewah:
Antjkptjb,, Sohagpur district. (Th. Hughes, 1881.)
Gangamopteris cyclopteroides, Feistm., and varieties.
h. KARHARBARI BEDS.
Passerabhia, No. 23D shaft, Karharhari coalfield (3rd seam). (Feistmantel, 1881.)
Eqnisetaceous stalks.
Gangamopteris cyclopteroides, Fstm.
Glossopteris comtminis, Fstm.
Noggerathiopsis hislopi, Fstm. (Bunb. sp.)
Dhamni, South Rewah, Sohagpur district, south-east of Pali, about 2 miles southeast of Khaira (Th. Hughes, 1883).
The fossils represent mostly—
Noggerathiopsis hislopi, (Bunb. sp.) Fstm.
Carpolithes milleri, Fstm. This fruit which was already described by me from the Karharhari coalfield, and supposed to belong to Noggerathiopsis, is here verynbsp;numerous, also in company with this latter fossil.
c. BARAKAR GROUP.
Arahura (Joogra), Ghui river near, 1 mile south of Jugra, 11 miles south-west of Hazaribagh. (Feistmantel, 1881.)
Yertehraria indica, Royle.
Glossopteris indica. Schimp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;comm,unis, Fstm.
Q
-ocr page 192-Vertehraria indica, Royle.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Glossopteris sp.
Vertehraria indica, Royle.
Glossopleris communis, Fstm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;comm., var. stenoneura, Fstm.
,, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indica, Schimp.
NoggeratUopsis hislopi, Fstm.
Squamae.
Vertehraria indica, Royle.
Vertehraria indica, Royle.
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm.
Vertehraria indica, Royle.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indica. Schimp.
,, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;conspicua, Fstm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;damudica, Fstm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;angustifolia, Rgt.
Vertehraria indica, Royle.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
„ indica. Schimp.
„ damudica, Fstm.
Macrotaeniopteris feddeni, Fstm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;dancRoides, Royle.
Anomozamites (balli n. sp.)
Rhipidopsis, gingkaides, Schmalh.
Cyclopitys (n. sp. dichotoma).
-ocr page 193-t
d. IRONSTONE SHALES.
Hquisetaceous stems.
Macrotaniopteris danmoides, Royle.
Glossopi. communis, Fstm.
,, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indica, Schimp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;retifera, Fstm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;damudica, Fstm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;conspicua, Fstm.
„ angustifolia, Bgt,
Höggerathiopsis hislopi, Fstm.
Squama.
e. RANIGANJ GROUP.
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
gt;1
!1
damudica, Fstm. retifera, Fstm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;angustifolia, Bgt.
Squamce.
Vertebraria indica, Royle.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
Jdoggerathiopsis hislopi, (Bunb. sp.) Fstm.
Voltzia Jieterophylla, Bgt.
Samaropsis [?) seeds.
Schizoneura gondwanensis, Fstm.
Vertebraria indica, Boyle.
Macrotceniopteris daneeoides, Royle.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
„ conspicua, Fstm.
„ angustifolia, Bgt.
Squamce.
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
-ocr page 194-140
FLOEA OF THE DAMUDA AND PANCHET DIVISIONS.
Shirtjveli, east of the village; South Godavari district (W. T. Blanford, Eec. Geol. Surv. of India, Vol. IV, p. 114; 1871). This and the following were overlooked hy me when writing my first list. Mention is made of—
Glossopteris (sp?)
Pecopteris (f)
Vertebraria.
Calamites (f)
SiNGARAM, rocks near. South Godavari district. (W. T. Blanford, 1. c. (1881), p. 109.)
Glossopteris (sp.)
Tandwa, Gurhee river, 2 miles south-east of Karanpura coalfield. (Feistmantel, 1881.)
ScMzoneura gondwanensis, Fstm.
Vertebraria indica, Eoyle.
Cyathea [.lt;’)
Glossopteris communis, Fstm.
„ indica, Schimp.
„ conspicua, Fstm.
„ formosa, Fstm.
Samaropsis ? winged seeds.
There are a few other fossils from some other localities in the South Rewah basin, which only arrived shortly, and have not been examined yet.
-ocr page 195-Names in italics indicate synonyms or species referred to for comparison.
Abietace® nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.....
Aotinopteris, Schenk ....
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;bengalensis, Keistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;peltata, Schenk
Albertia, Schimp......
Alethopteris sp. .
^ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nvrstralis, Morr., an Asplenium
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indica, an Asplenium
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;lindleyana, Eoyle .
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;phegopteroides, Feistm.
Almond beds, in the Satpura basin Alphabetical list of coal-fields and areas, etc.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;of localities, at which Lower Gondwana fossils have been found
Angiopteridium, Schimp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;infarctum, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;comp. mc’Clellandi, (Morr. sp) Schimp
Animalia nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.....
Ankistrodon indicns, Huxley Aiiomoz. Imdleyanus, Schimp. .
Anomozamites: new species of, in the Barakars, Auranga coal-field Anthrophyopsis, Nath. ....
Anihrophyum latfolium Anukpur: Talchit fossils at. South Eewah basinnbsp;Annr: fossils from ....
Appendix......
Asplenium whitbyense, Gopp. . nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„ Gopp,, group of.
Assensole: fossils of the Raniganj group, near .
Auranga coal-field: fossils from . nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Bajbai, Gopat river area; fossils from
Balumath: Barakar fossils south-east of, Karanpura coal-field Balunagur: Barakar fossils at, Karanpura coal-fieldnbsp;Banki nala, Ramkola coal-fields: fossils on the .
Barakar group : fossils in the, of the Eaniganj field „ fossils of the
„ localities from which fossils of the, known
Paob.
122
114
116
114
123
81
79
80 81nbsp;18
23—28
28—47
92
93 92
125 127nbsp;89nbsp;117nbsp;109, 115nbsp;109nbsp;137nbsp;28nbsp;133
137 127
76
79
29
9
29
133
138 29
5
133
48
142
Barikondam, Satpura basin : fossils at .
Barkoi: fossils at, Satpura basin .
Batrachia nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;....
Beldanga: fossils at, soutb-east Asssensole, Eaniganj field Belemnopteris, Peistm. ....
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;wood-masoniana, Peistm. .
Bbaratwada: fossils at, Nagpur area Bhuwan, near TJmret, Satpura basinnbsp;Bijori, SStpura basin: fossils at .
Bilpahari: fossils at, Kaigarb and Hingir coal-field Birbbum, Deogarb : and Karbarbari regionnbsp;Bisrampur coal-field: fossils of thenbsp;Bokhara: fossils at, Nagpur areanbsp;Bokaro coal-field : fossils of the Damuda series (Barakar and Eaniganjnbsp;Boosjooreea river, Jbaria coal-field, Talchir fossilsnbsp;Braebyops laticeps, Ow. ....
Broad-netted forms of Glossopteris Budatand: nala at, Eamkola coal-field, fossils fromnbsp;Burgaon: Eaniganj fossils at, Karanpura fossilsnbsp;Burgo, locality with Damuda fossils in the Eajmahal billsnbsp;Buriadi, Karbarbari coal-field: fossils at.
Carpolitbes milleri, Peistm.
Chanda coal-field: fossils of the .
Chanda, Wardha coal-field
Cbanduidol, South Eewab coal-field: fossils from Charwat: fossils from .
Cbicholi hill, Nagpur area : fossils from the Chorkberi, Nagpur area
Chumra and Gidbi, between, Eamkola coal-field Chumra, Eamkola coal-fieldnbsp;Chunka, Karbarbari coal-field ; fossils at .
Coal-fields and areas : alphabetical list of Conclusions drawn from the list of Lower Gondwana fossilsnbsp;Conifer® .....
Crustacea
Cryptogam® or Acotyledones Cyatheace® ....
Cyatbea (genus) ....
„ comp, tchihatchetfi, Scbmalb. .
Cycadeace® ....
Cyclopitys, Scbmalb.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;(dicbotoma, sp. n.)
Cyclopteris, Bgt., genus
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;pachyrhacbis, Göpp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;peltata, Göpp.
Dactylopteris (name proposed) . nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Dadka, near Assensole: fossils at
Damuda division subdivided into three groups in the Eaniganj Damuda valley coal-fieldsnbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„ region
Deogarb coal-field : fossils of the Deoli, Eaniganj coal-field: fossils at
PasE.
29
30 126.
30
112
112
30
30
30
30
3- 4nbsp;13
30 9
31 126-103
31 139nbsp;2, 31nbsp;31
124 20-21
31
31 21, 31
32 32nbsp;32nbsp;32nbsp;32
23—28
57—68
120
125 58nbsp;75nbsp;75
75-76
116
122
122
84
84
114
113
32
1
4— 9nbsp;4—10
32
32—33
group)
oal-fieb
Description of fossils
Dhamni, Karharbavi: fossils at, S. Kewah basin Dhonda, west of, Eamkola coal-field: fossils atnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Diagram showing the correlation and distribution of the Equisetace® Dicksonia, L’Hérit .nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;,
Dichsonnia concinna, Heer Dicksonia hughesi, Feistm.
Dichsonnia saportana, Heer Dictyopteride® .
Dictyotaeniopteridefe Dioynodontia
Dicynodon orientalis, Huxley Dinosauria
Dolari, Shapur coal-field: fossils at Doraahni (ghat), Karharbari coal-field: fossils atnbsp;Dubrsjpur; locality with fossils, Eajmahal hillsnbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Eajmahal hills: fossils atnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
Eqnisetacese nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;......
,, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;resume of the, in India
Estheria nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;......
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;mangaliensis, Jones
Euryphyllum, Feistm. • nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;,nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;,nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;,
„ whittianum, Feistm.
Filiees
Fossils : description of .
Galphula river, Bisrampur coal-field: fossils from the Gangamopteris, Mc’Coy .....
., nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;sp.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;anthrophyoides, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;cyclopteroides, Feistm. .
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;var.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;areolata
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;,,nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;attenuatanbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;»nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;subauriculata
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;hughesi, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;whittiana, Feistm.
Garjan hill, Eajgarh and Hingir coal-field: fossils on the General remarks on the paleontological relations of the Lower Gondwana:nbsp;Ghui, Eamkola coal-field: fossils atnbsp;Gingho ....
Girundla, Raigarh and Hingir coal-field : fossils at Glossopteris, Bgt.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Bgt.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ampla, Dan.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;angustifolia, Bgt.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;browniana, Bgt.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;communis, Feistm,
„ Feistm., relation to Gl. ampla in „ var. stenoneuranbsp;conspicua, Feistm. .nbsp;damudica, Feistm. .nbsp;decipiens, Feistm. .nbsp;divergens, Feistm. .
143
Page.
58
137
33
74
78
78
78
78
108
94
127
127
127
33
33
3
33
58—74
73—74
125
125
120
120
75
58
33 108nbsp;110nbsp;108nbsp;110nbsp;111nbsp;111nbsp;11nbsp;109nbsp;109
34 128
34
120
34
94
104 99
105 102
98
99 99
104
105 107nbsp;104
Australia
144
Glossopteris distribution of „ formosa, Eeistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;fructificationnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;of
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;in Africa
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;in Australia
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;in Asia Minor
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;in India
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;in Italy
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;in Russia
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indica, Schimp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;intermittens,nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Feistm,
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;leptoneura, Bunb.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;mussefolia, Bunb.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;orbicularis, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;range of
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;retifera, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;stricta, Bunb.
Glossozamites, Schimp. .
„ stoliozkanns, Feistm.
Godavari region
Gonioglyptus longirostris, Huxley Gopalprasad, Talchir coal-field: fossils atnbsp;Gopat coal-field : fossils of the .
Gopicandar area, Hura coal-field .
Gouri and Ghni, Eamkola coal-fields Gymnospermse .
Harapala, Satpura basin : fossils at Hardi: fossils near, S. Eewah basinnbsp;Semionitis cor data, Roxburgh .
Hurdeeamo, Bokaro coal-field : fossils at Incert® sedis (Filices)
Insect-wing-like fossil
Ironshales fossils in the, of the Raniganj coal-field Ironstone shales, fossils of the
„ localities with fossils in the Isapur and Anur, fossils from
„ south of Chanda, Wardha coal-field Jainagur: Ironstone shale fossils at, S. Karanpura coal-fieldnbsp;Jainti coal-field ,
Jharia coal-field: fossils of the
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;fossils of the Damuda Series (Barakar and Raniganj group)
Jogitand, Karharbari coal-field ; fossils at Juguldugga, Barakar fossils at, Auranga coal-fieldnbsp;„ Raniganj fossils at, Auranga coal-fieldnbsp;Kachodhar, Raniganj fossils at, S. Eewah basinnbsp;Kamthi, Nagpur area: fossils fromnbsp;Karamdiha, Eamkola coal-fields : fossils atnbsp;Karanpura coal-field: fossils in thenbsp;Karaunfield: the
„ . fossils of the Karharhari coal-field: thenbsp;Kawarsa, Wardha coal-field; fossils at
Page.
94 106
97
95
94
96
95
96 96
101
99
106
101
107
96
103
190
117
117
18-22
126
34
12
24
34
116
34 139nbsp;112
35 112
84
5
134
48
21
35
139
35
35
8—9
35
138
139 139
36 36nbsp;36
4
36 4
37
Khumar, in the Karaun coal-field ; fossils at Kbumarpur, N.-W. Assensole, Eaniganj coal-fieldnbsp;Kodaloi, Raigurhand Hingir coal-field : fossils atnbsp;Komaljore hill, Karharbari coal-fieldnbsp;Kotmi, Shapur coal-field : fossils at .
Kiilti, Raniganj coal-field : fossils at Kumerdhubi, Raniganj coal-field : fossils atnbsp;Kunlacheru, S. Godavari: fossils at .nbsp;labyrintbodontia
Laiijit, near, Ramkola coal-field: fossils at Latiabar hill, Auranga coal-field ; fossils on thenbsp;„ Talchir fossils on thenbsp;Layo, Bokaro coal-field: fossils atnbsp;Ledho nala, Ramkola coal-fields : fossils on thenbsp;List of fossils of the Lower Gondwanas according to horizonsnbsp;List, tabular, of the fossils of the Lower Gondwanasnbsp;List of equivalent groups
List, supplementary, of localities, with Lower Gondwana fossils Localities, the various, arranged alphabetically within the groups
„ alphabetical list of, where Lower Gondwana fossils were fou Lohundia, Eajmahal hills : fossils at
„ locality with Damuda fossils, Rajmahal hills Lower Gondwanas : list of fossilsnbsp;Lumki hill, Karharbari coal-field: fossils fromnbsp;Lurunga and Tordag streams: below the junction of, Karanpiira coal-fieldnbsp;Macropterygiumnbsp;Macrotmniopteris, Schimp.
Macrot. ahnormis, Gutb.
Macrotseniopteris danmoides, Royle sp. (Feistm. feddeni, Feistm.nbsp;gigantea, Schenknbsp;lata, Oldh. and Morr. .nbsp;major, Schimp,nbsp;sequence of the species ofnbsp;wianamattfB, Reistm. .
Mahan river, Ramkola coal-field : fossils from „ S. Eewah ; fossils on the .
Maitur, Raniganj coal-field: fossils near Majurdaki, Ramkola coal-fields : fossils atnbsp;Mangalpur, Raniganj coal-field .
Mangli, C. P., Wardha coal-field : fossils at Mardanpur, Shapur coal-field : fossils atnbsp;Mathadi, Karharbari coal-field ; fossils atnbsp;Meguli, north of, Ramkola coal-fieldnbsp;Merianopteris, Heer, Genus
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;angusta. Heer. .
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;major, Feistm. .
Minarra, near. South Eewah : fossils at
„ and Gajar, between. South Eewah : fossils from Mitgain, west of, Ramkola coal-field ; fossils fromnbsp;Mohpani coal-field: fossils from .
Morne river, Ramkola coal-field: fossils from
145
Page.
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
38 126
38
38
137
38
38 133nbsp;-56
23 136nbsp;-50nbsp;29
39 2
oO——56 39nbsp;39nbsp;120nbsp;88nbsp;90nbsp;88nbsp;89nbsp;88nbsp;88
89
90 89nbsp;39nbsp;39
39
40 40nbsp;40nbsp;40
40
41 83nbsp;83nbsp;83nbsp;41nbsp;41nbsp;41
41
42
50
47
Motur horizon, in the Satpura hasin Mump, west of, Aurunga coal-field : fossils fromnbsp;Musinia, locality with Damuda fossils, Rajinahal hillsnbsp;,nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„ Eajnaahal hills : fossils from
Nagpur, neighbourhood of: fossils from Narola, Ramkola coal-fields : fossils fromnbsp;Narrow-leaved forms of Glossopterisnbsp;Neighbourhood of Nagpur : fossils from thenbsp;Neuropteridese
Neuropteridium, Schimp., Genus „nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;validum, Feistm.
Nirsha, Eaniganj coalfield: fossils at Nöggerathiopsidese, Feistm.
Noggerathiopsis, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;hislopi, Feistm.
Nowadih, Ramkola coal-field: fossils at Oleandra Cav. and Angiopteris, Mitch.
Oleandridium, Schimp. .
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;stenoneuron.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Schimp.
Oleandridium tenuinerve, Braund.
Pach3’^^gonia inourvata, Huxley .
Pachypteridem Palamaun: coal-field of .
Palffiovittaria, Feistm., Genus .
„ kurzi, Feistm.
Falissya nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;...
Panchet group: fossils of the
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;fossils in the, of the Eaniganj coal-field
,, nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;localities with fossils of the
Pankabari: fossils of the Damuda Series at Panripura : fossils on the hill south of .
Parasi and Kunjwar, South-Eewah coal-field Passerabhia: fossils from No. 23D shaft at Karharbarinbsp;„ Karharbari coal-field: fossils fromnbsp;Pecopterides incertse sedisnbsp;Fecopteris affinis, McClell,
„ concinna, Presl.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;rütimeyeri, Heer
„ stuttgardensis, Bgt Bench valleynbsp;Phanerogamsenbsp;Phegopteris, Mett.: type ofnbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;decussata, Mett.
Phyllotheoa, Bgt.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;in Australia
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;in England
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;in India
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;in Italy .
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;in Siberia .
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indica, Bunb.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indica, Bunb.: range and distribution of
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Bunb.; relations and differences
coal-field
Page.
17
42,138 2nbsp;42
18—20 ¦nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;42
105
18-20
84
84
84 42
118
118
118
42
91
92 92nbsp;92
126
85 9—10
90
91 124nbsp;133
7-8
50
43 43nbsp;43
137
43
82
81
82
83
82
25
116
81
82
65—69
65
67
66 66nbsp;66
Pliyllotheca known species and distribution „ robusta, Feistm.
Pisces ....
Polypodiace® (order)
Polypodium, Lin.
Porsa, Wardha coal.field: fossils from Pteridophyta
Pteris sagittafolia, Eaddi Pterophyllum, Bgt.
» nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;sp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;hm-dwaaense, McClell (Feistm.)
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;carterianumgt; Oldh.
Eaigarb and Hingir coal-field : fossils of the Eajmahai region: Damuda series in the
„ hills; localities with Danmda fossils Eamgarh, Brahmani coal-field, Eajmahal hillsnbsp;Eamkola and Tatapani coal-fields; fossils in thenbsp;Eaniganj, Eaniganj coal-field; fossils fromnbsp;„ field : fossils of the
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;groupnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;:nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;fossils in the, of the Eaniganjnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;coal-field
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;localities with fossils of the
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;fossils of the
Eemarks on the probable age of the Lower Gondwanas Eeonti, Eamkola coal-field: fossils fromnbsp;Eeptilia
Eesume of the Eqnisetace» in India Ehipidopsis, Schmalh.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;densinervis, Feistm. .
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;gingkoides, Schmalh.
Wiiftozamites, Schmalh.
Eikba: Talchir fossils at, Karanpura coal-field Eound-leaved forms of Glossopterisnbsp;Ruhidgea Tate
Sadgudiam, S. Godavari: fossils from Sagenopteris, comp, rhoifolia, Presl.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;(?)nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;longifolia, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;(?)nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;polyphylla, Feistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;(?)nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;stoliczkana, Feistm.
Sahajori coal-field, Deogarh area ,
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„ fossils from .
Salisburece nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;,
Samaropsis
Satpura basin, Bijori horizon; fossils of the „nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Damuda division : fossils of the
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;fossils of the Barakar group in the
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Karharbari beds at Mohpani
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;localities .
„ region ....
Seeds .....
Shapur coal-field ....
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„ localities.
Shiruveli, Kamthi (Eaniganj) fossils at, South Godavari district
147
Page.
65
68—69
126
79
80 21, 41
58
11
116
117
116
117 13, 44
2—3
2- 3nbsp;44
10—11
44
4— 8
5— 7nbsp;48-60
134
129
44
127
73—74
121
121
122
118 137nbsp;107
91
44 114nbsp;113
113
114
3— 4nbsp;44—45
120
123
17-18
16—18
16—17
15
46
15—18
123
27
45 140
Schizoneura, Schimp. ....
„ known species and range out of India „nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;relations and differences
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;gondwanensis, Teistm.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;range and localities
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;relations
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„ stems
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;comp, meriani, Schimp.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;sp.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;...
Sikkim Damudas : fossils from the .
Silewada, Nagpur area: fossils from Singaram, Kamthi (Kaniganj) fossils at, S. Godavari districtnbsp;Sitarampur, Ilaniganj coal-field: fossils fromnbsp;Sitai'iva river, Mohpani coal-fieldnbsp;Sohagpur coal-field : fossils from the
„ South Eewah basin : fossils from Son, Mahanadi, and Brahmani regionnbsp;Son river, west of Guraru : fossils from .
Southern Godavari: fossils from the South Eewah and Sohagpur
„ fossils from nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;,
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Gopat coal-fields: fossils from
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;basin, localities
Sphenopteris, Bgt.
„ polymorpha, Feistm.
Squanue nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;....
Stems of coniferous plant.s Suidud nala, Ramkola coal-fields : fossils atnbsp;Suki, Shapur coal-field : fossils atnbsp;Suknai nala, Ramkola coal-fields : fossils on thenbsp;Sukree river, east of Eajbar and west of Gurturnbsp;Tseniopteridese ....
T(Entlt;ypteris musafolia, Oldh, and Morr.
Talchir coal-field : fossils of the
„ in the Talchir coal-field ; fossils at „ group : additional fossil localities in thenbsp;„ Karharbari beds: localities at which they occurnbsp;Tamor hill, Ramkola coal-field .
Tandwa,; Eaniganj fossils at, Karanpura coal-field Tansar, near, on Mahan river, Ramkola coal-fieldnbsp;Taxace®nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.....
The zainti or Karaun field
The various localities arranged alphabetically within the Thinnfeldia, Ettingsh. ....
„ crassinervis, Geinitz nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
„ odontopteroides, Morr. sp. (Feistm.)
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;: various classification of
Tondakheri, Nagpur area; fossils at Tordag and Lurunga : fossils below the junction of thenbsp;Trizygia, Royle .....
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;its position amongst the Sphenophylloides
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;speoiosa, Royle
Barakar fossils in, Auranga coal-field
groups
Page.
59— 64nbsp;59
60— 61nbsp;61—64nbsp;63—64
lt;53
63
64
65
22—23, 45 45nbsp;1-10nbsp;45nbsp;45
13
45
10- 15
46 22
11— 13nbsp;12nbsp;46nbsp;46
76—77 76-77
119 124
46 46nbsp;46nbsp;138
87
88
14
46 136
47 47
140 47
120 4
47—50
85
86
85
86 47nbsp;47
69—71 70nbsp;69—71
149
Trizygia speciosa range and distribution ,
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;„ tbe Eaniganj and Barakar form
Umrét coal-field, in tbe Pencb valley Vertebraria, Royle
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;indica, Rojdenbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;.
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;analogies ,
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;range of
„ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;in tbe Mabadevas
Viiiaria, Sw.
„ intermsdia Voltzia, Bgt.
,, heteropbylla, Bgt.
Wardba—Pranhita—Godavari basin Zamia hurdwanensis, Mc’Clell. .
Zamiose
Zamiopteris glossopteroides, Schmalh,
Page.
71
70
47
71— 73
72- 73nbsp;73
72-73
73
90
91 122nbsp;122
20-22
117
116
91
' â– /.
r
\
â– v'-v
%â– nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;^r--.*.v
.., , ,'^■•■!- '.;r
1
m
r':i
i
G-eol Surv of India ¦
PL W. A,
LiA^iyKilLan'A Dg s
Printed by W, Newman 8c Co.. Calcutta..
Figs.
1—6. Pecopteris cokcinna, Presl., page 82. Various fronds of this peculiar fern, resembling so closely its European representative. The specimens show I thinknbsp;clearly that the frond was only bipinnate.
Fis
7. Cyclopteris pachyrhachis, Göpp., page 84. The specimen is only fragmentary, but still I think sufficient for the above identification ; the rhachis of the pinnaenbsp;is proportionally thick, the leaflets and the distribution of veins eyclopteroid.
All these specimens are from Maitur, north-west branch of the Nunia river, northwest of Assensole, Raniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 207-lower GOND\|^^NAS
P7XVUA-
J. 3 clia-ainliurg' LxtH?-
Prmted S-t Creol-. Sm'vey Office.
RANIGANJ GEOUP.
Pig.
Figs. la. amp; IS. Fig.nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;2.
%a.
Alethoptekis phegopteeoidbSj Feistm., page 81. Two fronds of this large and nice fern, the relation of which to the living Phegopteris is very conspicuous.nbsp;The rhaehis of the frond is traversed by a middle line, or better said, a thinnbsp;longitudinal rib, although the draughtsman did it somewhat too regular. Inbsp;believe them to bipinnate fronds; but even in this ease they must have beennbsp;of considerable size, as the preserved portions appear to be only about one-third ofnbsp;the entire length of the frond.
Are enlarged portions of a pinna showing the venation of the pinnulse,
Alethopteris (Polypodium) lindleyana Royle, page 8. A portion of a sterile pinna. It lies with the specimen figured on PI. XIX.iI., fig. 4i, on the samenbsp;piece of shale.
Enlarged pinnula showing the venation.
These specimens are from the Raniganj coal -field.
Geoi; SiiTT'. of ïniia
lAXVlllA.
1.
-ocr page 210-Figs.
Fis
Fig.
Fig.
Fig'S.
Figs.
PLATE XIXa
PANCHET GROUP.
5—8. Oleandridium, comp, stenoneüron, Schenk, page 92. Basal (figs. 5, 6) and apical (figs. 7, 8) portions o£ a taeniopteroid plant referable to the above species.
From near Maitur, north-west branch of the Nunia river, north-west of Assensole, Raniganj coal-field.
RANIGANJ GROUP.
Actiuoeteris (?) BENGALENSIS, Feistm., pages 114-115. One of the peltate leaves is almost entire, and there is a fragment of another one. The first one exhibitsnbsp;in the centre, what appeal's to be the point of attachment.
Shows a portion of the leaf enlarged,
. Cf o-(R ¦
Asplenium: whitbyense^ Heer, page 79. Two pinnute. One enlarged in fig. 2a.
Alethopteeis (Polypodium) lindleyana, Royle, page go fertile pinnffi showing polypodiaeeous fructification.
Mbeianopteris major, Fstm.j page 84. Apical portions of pinnae of the frond exhibiting distinctly the thin nature of the leaf substance and the characternbsp;of the veins.
Two fragments
of
All these are from the Raniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 211-Geol' Surv' of India.
RANIGANJ GROUP.
Figs. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;1—3. MACROT.ENIOPTERIS DAN.®oiDEs, Royle, page 88. Portions (apical, middle, and basal)
of the leaf, from which a good idea about its size and shape may be formed. The veins, single and forked alternating, are very widely distant, more than in. anynbsp;other species of this genus.
Figs, la, 3a. Enlarged portions showing the venation.
From near Raniganj, Raniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 213-Greol' S'iirv. of India,
L0V\/Ï1R GO ND WA NAS
PLAX.A
Printed at Geol. Survey Office .
RANIGANJ (Kamthi) GROUP.
/
Fig. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;1. Mackomniopteris dan^oides, Royle, page 88.
The apical portion of the leaf; veins almost horizontal.
From the Jharia coal-field.
Ihg.
Fio-
Figs.
Fig.
Fig.
3; Macuot.®niopteris feddbni, Feistm., page 89. Apical portion of another broad-leaved form with very closely set veins, single and forked.
3fl. A portion enlarged.
From Kamthi, Nagpur area. (Collected by Mr. F. Fedden, Geological Survey.)
4—7. Angiopterimum, comp, mc’cleleandi, Oldh. sp., page 92. Fragments of pinnae.
da. A portion of the leaf enlarged.
From Kdmthi, Nagpur area.
barAkar group.
2. MACEOTiENioPTERis nAN.®oinES, Royle, page 88. The basal portion of a very large frond, with very far apart veins.
From Burgo, in the Rajmahal hills, on a piece of shale together with Glossopteris,
Gt, ol: Surv -. of ladia .
LOWER amp;0NDWANAS.
Fl- xxr.A.
Lit}!'.^ Taj Hil c au.to Das. Prmted at Cxeol: Survey Office.
-ocr page 216-KAMTHI (Raniganj) GROUP.
Figs.
1—4. MACKOT.a:JiioPTEEis PEDDENi, Feistm., page 89. Various portions of the frond;
Fig
fig. 2 apical, fig. 3 middle, fig. 4 lower; veins very closely set, almost horizontal, except in the apical portion, where they are oblique and somewhat curved up.nbsp;The apical portion, fig. 2, resembles very much the same part in some specimens ofnbsp;Macrotmniopferis lata, Oldh. and Morr.,'from the Rajmahal group, Rajmahal hills.nbsp;2. Shows the venation.
From Kamthi, Nagpur area. (Collected by Mr. F. Fedden.)
-ocr page 217-amp;8oL Sutt; of Iniia.
Li til ^ lyLTilkuntoLas.
ïrintei at Oreol: Survey Office.
PANCHET GROUP.
Figs.
Fig.
Figs.
Figs.
7—9. Thijsnpisldia, comp, odontopteboides, Morr., sp., p. 85.
10, Glossopteris filBiQ^Schimp., p. 101. Fragment of a leaf in association with the former species.
From the Ramkola coal-field.
RANIGANJ GROUP (Bijori horizon).
1—2. Dicksonia hughesIj Feistm., p. 78. Two apical portions of the frond.
\a, 2a. Enlarged leaflets. Fig. 3.—One leaflet of another specimen, with more entire pinnulm.
From the Jharia coal-field.
Figs.
11 amp; 11a. Alethopteris (Asplesium) whitbyensis, Göpp. (Heer), p. 79. This specimen, if compared with Aletk. lindleyana on PI. XXXIX4, 10—11, appears considerably distinct, and I therefore place it with Aspl. wliitbyeme. Heer : it reminds very much of specimens figured in my Jabalpur Flora.
From the Raniganj coal-field.
Figs. 12, 13, amp; 12a. Dicksonia (?) hughesi, Feistm., p. 78. Small fragments of a pinna.
From the Satpura basin, near Baricondam.
RANIGANJ AND BARAKAR GROUP.
Figs.
‘L.
4—-6, 14. In the above group peculiar leaflets occur, four figures of which are given.
They all exhibit very nearly the same shape, are covered with small tubercles within and with larger ones along the margin. When examined with the lens, a very fine net venation can be observed in some of them. Theynbsp;appear to be fertile leaflets of some fern, which, however, is impossible tonbsp;identify. But they are in so far of interest as they occur in the Raniganjnbsp;and Barakar group equally.
From the Raniganj coal-field (Raniganj group) and Talchir coal-field (Barakar group).
-ocr page 219-Geol'. SiiTquot;V-. of ludia.
GONDWABTAS.
Pl-.AXIIIuf.
J. Sdiaumliur^ Lal2ii
Printed at Geol- Survej Office.
RANIGANJ GROUP.
This specimen is figured to show how crowded the fossils are in the shale at certain localities. This is especially the case in the shales of the Raniganj group, wherever it occurs. But it is also sonbsp;in the Karharbari beds of the Karharbari coal-field.
This specimen is from the Raniganj group of the Raniganj coal-field.
There are represented :—
ScHizoNEUEA GONDWANENSis, Feistm.: leaved branches and stems.
Glossopteris cÖMii^Nisj Fcistm.: the leaf in the left corner.
Glossopteris iWBiCA, Schimp.: the other leaves,
-ocr page 221-^cliaTrmbTar^, LitliS- .
Printed at G-eol'. Survey Office .
Figs.
RANIGANJ (Kamthi) GEOUP.
1, 2. Glossoptekis indica^ Schimp., page 101. From Isapur, south of Chauda, Wardha Valley coal-field.
3. Glossopteeis indica, Schimp., page 101. A basal portion of a frond, showing larger meshes close to the midrib, which become oblong and narrow towards the
Tio*
j. igj.
From the Eaniganj coal-field.
barAkar group.
Glossopteeis bamudica, Feistm., page 105, oblique veins.
From the Talchir coal-field.
A variety with somewhat more
KAMTHI (Raniganj) GROUP.
Figs.
Fig.
1—4. Glossopteeis communiSj Feistm., page 98. A narrow net venation throughout. 3. Glossopteris indica, Schimp., page 101. Larger meshes towards the midrib,nbsp;becoming long and narrow towards the margin.
Fig.
2. Glossopteris browniana, Bgt., page 102. Polygonal meshes throughout the leaf. (See also PI. XXVII A., fig. 2.)
All these leaves show also a fructification, and it is the same in all of them.
All the specimens are from the Nagpur area,—viz., figs. 1 and 4 from Silewada } figs. 2 and 3 from Kamthi.
-ocr page 225-G-eol: SurT'. of Julia
LOWER GrO¥DWANAS
PI: XXVIA.
. ScfaumiOT^lith.i
Printed at Geol'. Survey Office.
Fig.
Fig.
Figs.
Fig.
Figs. 6, 8, 9, 11—13.
Figs.
KAMTHI (Eaniganj) GROUP.
1. Glossopteris communis, Feistm., page 98. Fruetifieating.
3. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Glossopteris browniana, Bgt., page 103. Fruetifieating. (See also
3—5. Glossopteris indica, Schimp., page 101. Fig. 5, fruetifieating; fig. 3, showing well the pointed apex. Both showing well the larger meshesnbsp;towards the midrib.
From the Nagpur area : figs. 1, 3, 5 from Silewada; fig. 3 from Kamthi.
4. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Glossopteris browniana, Bgt., page 103.
From the Eaniganj coal-field.
Glossopteris angustifolia, Bgt., page 105. Various, mostly youn»-fronds of this narrow-leaved form, one of those originally described by Brongniart.
From the Eaniganj coal-field.
7, 10. Basal portions of leaves without a distinct midrib, this being replaced by several distinct veins which are forked and form anastomoses, especiallynbsp;towards the margins. These are characters which necessarily refernbsp;these specimens to Gangamopteris, although no idea can be formed aboutnbsp;the shape or size of the leaf, though they remind very much of somenbsp;of the long-leaved forms of the Talchir-Karharbari beds.
From the Eaniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 227-.G-eol: SurT: of iadia.
Figs. Ij 8, 9. Glossoeteuis cOkseictja, Feistm., page 104. One of the nicest and most typical forms, with large regularly shaped and sized nets.
Figs. 2, 7, 10. Glossoptekis eetifera, Feistm., page 108. Nets somewhat smaller than in the former, though equally regular,
Figs. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;3, 4. Glossopteeis diveegens, Feistm., page 104. An oval leaf, with veins diverging
(downwards and upwards).
From the Raniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 229-G-eoI. Surv: of Iniia.
RANIGANJ GROUP.
Fii^s. 3,6, 8. Glossopteris browniana, Bgt., page 102. Nets somewhat larger than In the ordinary form, but hardly justifying a separation.
Fig. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;4. Glossopteris communis, Feistm., page 98. Apical portion.
These specimens ai’e from the Raniganj coal-field.
Figs.
5, 9. Glossopteris communis, Feistm., page 98. Varieties with a somewhat more straight venation.
O
From South Rewah (J. G. Medlieott).
BARAKAR GROUP.
Figs. 1, 2. Glossopteris browniana, Bgt., page 102. Like figs. 3, 6, 8.
V
Fig. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;7. Glossopteris iSimca, Schimp., page 101.
These specimens are from the ferruginous shales of the Talchir coal-field,
-ocr page 231-Greol: SurV of Iticlia.
li 0 VEB O OND WANA S
Pr. XXK.A,
lEONSTONE SHALES.
Fis’.
1. Glossopteeis damudica» Feistm., page 105. The upper portiouj with the apex ot a very large frondj of this typical form.
From Kulti, Raniganj coal-field.
Figs.
2a, Glossopteeis damudica, Feistm,, page 105.
From the Talchir coal-field.
-ocr page 233-G-eol: SurT. of India .
PLATE IXXlA. bauAkau group.
Figs. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;1—3.
Glossopteeis damudicAj Feistm., page 105. In the apical portion, fig, 3, the veins run out to the margins very obliquely, but the character o£ the nets is the samenbsp;as in the others.
It appears also that the Barak ar forms of this species have somewhat narrower leaves than those in the higher groups, while, however, all other characters remainnbsp;the same.
From Kumerdhubi in the Raniganj coal-field.
Figs. 4,5, Glossopteeis, sp., page 104. Fragments of a leaf, showing a peculiar net venation, which, if the leaf were known in a greater portion, would probably show it to benbsp;a distinct species, for which I would then propose the name Gl. ingens.
From Kumerdhubi, Eaniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 235-LOWER amp;0RD WA NAS
El-.XXXI, A.
Printed a.t G-eop. Survey Oftiec.
Kg.
Fig,
Fig.
BARAKAR GROUP.
1. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Glossopteris DAMüDicA, Feistm., page 105. Specimen showing tlie basal portion.
2. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Glossopteeis communiSj Feistm., page 98. Typical form.
3. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The variety of GL communis, Feistm., which I distinguished as sie^ionewa. See
page 99.
All from Kumerdhubi, near Barakai-j Raniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 237-G-eol Surv'. of ladia.
I OWER GONDWANAS
PLXXXII.A.
J. S cTiauini u,r|, Ltthp!' ¦
FrratecL at Geol-, S-urv63r Offioe .
Figs.
Figs.
BARAKAR GROUP.
Ij la. Glossopteris communis, var. stenoneura, Feistm., page 99. la. Showing the venation.
2, 3, 4. Glossopteris intermittens, Feistm., page 99. Another peculiar form, in which ^^ot all veins form nets, some being only forked. Pig. 3 represents this species
Fig.
best, while in the two others the veins are too strongly shown at the point of passing out from the rib.
Figs. 3a and 4a were given to illustrate the venation, but I am sorry to say that they are misdrawn—an evil which is not always under the control of the author.nbsp;Glossopteris browniana, Bgt. The original specimen at least represents thisnbsp;species, while the drawing is made useless by bad printing.
From Kumerdhubi (1, 5) and Nirsha (2—4), Raniganj coal-field.
amp;eol' Surv, of India
LOWER G-ORDWANAS
PI.iCXXIir,A.
V-*-0f
J. S cliaumbiir^jLilii^,
Printed at G-eol: Survey Office .
Figs.
Fig.
Fiers.
1, la. Glossopteris, probably browniana, Bgt., page 102. A narrow-leaved variety.
3. Glossopteris angustifolia, Bgt., page 105. (See Plate XXVIIi^., the same form.)
2, 2a. Glossopteris, probably angxjstifoeia, Bgt. I have not finally identified this form, as it combines with the size and shape of the leaves of Glossopt. angustifolia, anbsp;venation somewhat abnormal and differing from that of the latter species.
These are from the Raniganj coal-field.
barakar group.
Figs. 4, 5, 5a. Angiopteridium infarctijm, Feistm., page 93. A tmniopteroid plant characterised by the great number and closeness of the veins. It appears to belong to thenbsp;genus Angiopteridium.
From Kumerdhubij Raniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 241-amp;eol-. Surv; of India,
LOWER amp;0ND WA NAS.
PLXXXIYA.
J. 3 cLaumlur^, Lifh ^
Printed at Geol: Survey Office .
EANIGANJ GROUP.
Figs. 1, la. Glossoptekis communis, Feistm., and Gl. iiidica, Schimp., pages 98, 101. One leaf lies on top of the other. The larger leaf, with the pointed apex and withnbsp;the narrower net venation throughout, is GL communis, Feistm.
The other one, which is below, shows a larger net venation towards the midrib.
Figs. 2, '6, 8a Fiff.
Glossopteris communis, Feistm., page 98. Very typical leaves; fig. 2 showing well the pointed apex.
4.
Glossoptbris indica, Schimp., page 101, The veins unfortunately somewhat indistinct in consequence of bad printing.
All from the Raniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 243- -ocr page 244-RANIGANJ GEOUP.
Figs. 1,3. Glossopteeis COMMUNIS, Feistm., page 98. Two very fine fronds; fig. 2 almost quite complete. It shows distinctly the characters of the midrib, broad in thenbsp;basal portion and tapering towards the apex. The midrib in both specimensnbsp;shows that peculiar celled appearance which I have mentioned in the text, andnbsp;which I have hitherto only observed in this species.
Both from the Eaniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 245-Geol; S-arv'. of Ijidia
LOWER GONDWANAS.
PI', XXXVI, A.
KAMTHI (Raniganj) GROUP.
Pigs. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;1—4. Glossopteuis stricta, Bunb., page 100. I believe these two specimens to repre
sent Sir Bunbury’s species; la show the veins.
Figs. 3, 3a. Glossopteris communis, Feistm., page 98. A portion of a very large specimen, with a thick midrib, longitudinally furrowed below.
These are from Kamthi, Nagpur area.
Fig. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;4. Glossopteris communis, Feistm., page 98. The upper portion of a leaf, with the
apex. Veins exceedingly fine.
From Isapur, south of Chanda, Wardha Valley coal-field.
-ocr page 247-Geol; S\irV'. of IiiJia.
L 0 WE R
G 0 N D Vv' ANAS.
PI XXX VII. A,
/ quot;¦
''0.
Mi
JNT
V.
-ocr page 248-Fig.
Tig-
Fig.
Fig-
Fig.
KAMTHI (Kaniganj) GROUP.
1. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Glossopteris communis, Feistm., page 98. The apex somewhat more obtuse than
usually.
3. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Glossopteris stricta, Bunh., page 100. The apical portion.
Both from Isapur, south of Chanda, Wardha Valley coal-field.
5. Glossopteris communis, var. stenoneura, Feistm., page 99.
From the Raniganj coal-field.
BARlKAR GROUP.
2. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Glossopteris communis, Feistm., page 98. A middle portion of a frond; the
midrib exhibiting again the cellular appearance.
4. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Glossopteris indica. Schimp., page 101. A complete but only small leaf, though
exhibiting well the characteristic venation.
From Gopalprasad, Takhir coal-field.
-ocr page 249-amp;eol: Surv. of In dia .
Pl-XXXYIIIA.
J. ScliaumLur^,Litb^.
Printed at Geol-, Snrv ey OPfic e.
RANIGANJ GROUP (Bijori horizon).
Pigs. 1, 2, la. Glossopteeis angustieolia, Bgt., page 105, These leaves I believe to be the typical forms of the species. It was on these that I observed the narrow longitudinal space along the margin, which is perhaps indicative of the fructification.
Figs. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;3—7. Glossopteeis foemosa, Feistm., page 106. A narrow-leaved form, with conspicuous
nets; it represents here the Glossopteris conspieua amongst the broad-leaved forms.
Figs,
Figs.
8—8a. Gangamopteeis antheophyoides, Feistm., page 108. One leaf only occurred ; shows great relation to some species of the living Anthrophyum.
10—11, Alethopteeis (Polypodium) lindleyana, Royle, page 80. Fig. 10 I believe to be the top portion of the same species of which fig. 11 is the lower portion.nbsp;Both show also a distinct appearance from Asplen. whitiyense, and if we takenbsp;the fertile fronds on PI. XlX/f., figs. 3 and 4, into consideration, then I thinknbsp;to be justified in referring this species closer to Polypodium than to Asplenium.
All these specimens are from the Raniganj coal-field.
Figs. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;9—9a. Gangakoptbeis, sp., page 110. A small, roundish leaflet, without a midrib, but
with a radiary net venation.
From the Satpura basin, near Baricondam.
-ocr page 251-Geol'. Surv. of India.
amp; 0 ¥11 WANA S.
PI, XXXIX . A.
Fk
Fis
Figs.
RANIGANJ GROUP.
1. Sagenopteris (?) LONGIROLIA, Feistm., page 113. A fingered leaf, the systematical place of which is not quite certain ; the leaflets have a narrow net venation and anbsp;midrib vanishing towards the apex.
la. Was intended to show the net venation, hut the meshes are far too broad for that scale.
From the Raniganj coal-field.
2, 3. Alethofteris (Asplenium) whitbvensis, Göpp. (Heer), page 79. Small pinn»; the venation indistinct.
4i Glossopteius coMMums, Feistm., page 98.
Aa. An enlarged portion, showing the character of the net venation.
These three latter from the Jharia coal-field;
5. GtossoFTERis browniana, Bgt., page H)2. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;5a. An enlarged; portion.
6j Glossopteius dauudica, Feistm., page 105.
These two are from Sohagpur (J. G. Medlicott) in the South Rewah basin.
Pl-.XL, A,
RANIGANJ GROUP.
Figs.
Figs.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
1, 2. Glossopteeis orbictjlariSj Feistm.^ p. 107.
3, 4. Sagenopteris polyphylla, Feistm., page 113. Another fingered leaf, with a conspicuous net venation in the single leaflets, the midrib distinct in the lower portion, though vanishing towards the apex. From this latter character and from the circumstance that it is a composite leaf, I class it for the present with Sagenopteris ; it is, however, very possible that this species, together with that figurednbsp;on PI. XL A (fig. 1), form a distinct genus, for which, as said in the text, Inbsp;would propose the name Bactylopteris.
7. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Is possibly a leaf of a Sagenopteris, page 114.
8. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Giossopteris sp., top portion of either a Glossopt. conspicua or perhaps Gl.
dainudica.
9. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Glossopteris retifera, Feistm., page 103.
All these specimens are from the Raniganj coal-field.
5. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Anthrophyopsis sp., page 115. Is wrongly placed, should have been placed
vertically.
6. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Sagenopteris? (or? perhaps a small specimen of Gangamopteris angustifolia,
Mc^Coy).
These two latter fi’om the South Godavari district, near Kunlacheru,
J, SoTiauiialnirl'.LlA?: Printed at GeoP. SuTvej Offic e
-ocr page 256-EANIGANJ (Kamthi) GROUP.
This plate contains specimens of a more or less uncertain position^ whichj however, I yet thought interesting enough to be figured, if it only was for the sake of reference.
Figs. 1, \a. Sagbnopteris sp. A lateral (?) leaflet. Fig. la, the leaflet three times enlarged. From the South Godavari district, near Kunlacheru.
Fig.
2. Sagenopteris, comp, ehoifolia, Presh, page 114. About this identification I think there is hut little doubt.
Fi
2a. The apical portion enlarged, showing no midrib.
Fig.
Figs.
25. A part of the lower portion enlarged, wherein the midrib is still seen.
3 amp; 5, Sagbnopteris sp., page 114. Of the same character as that leaf on PI. XLIA.,
Figs. 3a amp; 5a. Are enlarged portions of the respective leaflets.
All these from the Raniganj coal-field.
.Fig.
This leaflet might possibly be in some relation with those peculiar apparently fertile leaflets, figured on PI. XXIII4., figs. 4—6, 14. I have, however, no clue fornbsp;their determination.
From Guraru, on the Sone river. South Rewah basin (Mr. Ch. A. Hacket).
amp;eol: Surv'. of Iniia,
LO'WEIl GOND WA TT A S .
P1-. XllI.A,
Figs. |
1, 2. |
Figs. |
3, 4. |
Fig. |
5. |
Figs. |
6—8. |
RANIGANJ (Kamthi) GROUP.
Gangamoptekis whittiana, Feistm., page 109. Interesting Anthrophyum.
Belemnopteeis wood-masoniana, Feistm., page 112. Conspi( with a living fern, mz., Hemionitis cordata, Roxh.
Glossoptekis sp., or Sagenopteris polyphylla, Feistm.
All specimens from the Raniganj coal-field.
Gangamopteris hughesi, Feistm., page 109. A characteristi lieve descending directly from Gang, egelopteraides, Feistm.
From the Nagpur area, Kamthi.
-ocr page 259-Geol'. Siirv of India .
LOWER GONDWANAS
PI - XLIIL A.
J. ScKaumlDur^j Litln.^
PriïitecL at Greol; Survey OTfice.
*
RANIGANJ GROUP.
Figs.
1—8. Paljeovittaria kurzi, Feistm., page 91. An interesting fern, with a venation in general after the manner of a Sagenopteris (midrib in the lower portion only), butnbsp;the secondary veins are txniopteroid, i.e,, they form no nets, but are simplynbsp;forked.
The late Dr. Kurz suggested its belonging to the type Vittaria,
Figs.
3 amp; 4. Show enlarged pieces of the apical and basal portions.
From the Raniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 261-Geol: Surv. of In die
LOWER G0N.BWANA S
Pl-.XLrV, yl.
Frinted at Geol'. Survey Office,
RANIGANJ (Kamthi) GROUP.
Figs. 1—11. NÖ6GERATH10PSIS HiSLop I, Bunb. sp. (Feistm.), page 118. Various leaves of this interesting cyeadeaceous plant, some of which (see figs. 3 and 11) are such as tonbsp;suggest a pinnate leaf.
From the Raniganj coal-field (figs. 10—11); South Rewah (J. G. Medlicott, figs. 1—5); Nagpur area at Bharatwada (figs. 6, 8); Silewada (fig. 7), andnbsp;Kamthi (fig. 9).
-ocr page 263-Greol: Surv' of India,
lOWER GONDVARAS.
PI: XL VA.
J. Sdiaumb-ur^Iiitiii Printed al Geol-, Survey Office ,
5 .
-ocr page 264-KAMTHI (Raniganj) GROUP.
Figs.
Rhipidopsis densineevis, Feistm., page 121. Two leaves of this intereating coniferous plant of the family Salisburea; fig. 2 shows the specimen in which a portion of the stalk is preserved. Fig. 2a is a portion of one leaflet enlarged.
From the South Godavari district, near Kunlacheru.
BARAKAR GROUP.
Fic
Nogoerathiopsis hislopi, Bunb. (Feistm.), page 118. Another of those specimens which show two leaves in such a portion, in which they probably were originallynbsp;attached as pinnulse to a common stalk.
From Barkoi in the Umret coalfield, Central Provinces.
-ocr page 265-LOWER amp;ONDWALLAS,
PLXLVI.A,
J. SchaTOïvbuT^.Lithi
Printed at GeoL. Survey Office
-ocr page 266-Figs.
Fig.
Figs.
Figs.
Figs.
Pigs.
Fig.
Figs,
Fig.
Figs.
Figs,
PANCHET GROUP.
11—13. Samaeopsis ? sp., pages 123-1X4. Small-winged seeds.
From near Maitur, nort-west branch of the Nunia river, north-west from Assensole, Raniganj coal-field.
RANIGANJ (Kamthi) GROUP.
1. Pteeophyllum BUEDWANENsB, Pcistm. (Mc’Clell. sp.)j page 116. Very impoi-tant specimen, being a true Zamieae.
From the Raniganj coal-field.
2—4. NÖGGEUATHIOPSIS HisLOPi, Fcistm., page 118. Fragmentary specimens.
From Kamthi, Nagpur area.
8 amp; 16. SquAMiB GYMNosPERMAEUM (Cycadearum), page 119.
From the Raniganj coal-field.
9, 10. SaM4Ropsis sp., pages 123-124. Winged seeds.
From the Satpura basin.
14, 15. Samaeopsis sp., page 124. Winged seeds.
From the Raniganj coal-field.
19. VoLTZiA? scale, page 123.
From the Raniganj coal-field.
20, 22, 24. VoETZiA heterophylla, Bgt., page 122. Leaved branches.
South Rewah basin; figs. 20, 22 from the Gopat river (J. G. Medlicott) ; fig. 24 from Hardi (Th. Hughes).
23. Squama, page 119.
From Guraru, on the Sone, South Rewah (Th. Hughes).
IRONSTONE SHALES.
5—7. Coniferous stems of? Rhipidopsis, page 124.
From Kulti, Raniganj coal-field.
BARAKAR GROUP.
17, Ï.8, 21. Squam*? page 119.
From Kumerdhubi, near Barahar, Raniganj coal-field.
-ocr page 267-Ge al. Surv. of India.
8.
10
11
12.
13.
«
14..
frt.'iu
) '//
/¦
22 .
y/
\! nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;24.
J. Sc}iaiiinl)iiA,Lith4.
Printed al Geol. Survey Office.
¦ :. ¦; s;:::;;::;:::::: :::::::’:::;:;:i:.:v;.::::::;:;:-v
:.y:y;:s;i:ÖKx;v;ox;w-gt;s::;sSx-x*lt;rtx^;KÏS:Slt;Sci»Si¥xtóïgt;-;;jNJ^o^^^
Xv.\‘yA%vi;-;vgt;. ¦•;-
/t.